27. ā˜”ļø.šŸ¦„šŸŽ€. āœŠšŸ½ Add second pages for legal news @noir_lex . Everything is now allegedly. In case I get packed up @LocdBarbieHQ

šŸ‡§šŸ‡§šŸ—½
They trying to get pages packed up so in case my page is no longer available. I can be found here. 🄓 SMH.
2
7
67
12,848
RirišŸ«¶šŸ½ retweeted
A Baltimore pastor tore up 1,500 square feet of church lawn to grow vegetables, and it turned into a produce supply chain running through Sunday service. Heber Brown started the garden at Pleasant Hope Baptist in 2010 because too many people in his pews were getting sick from what they ate. In 2015 he asked Black farmers from the countryside to start driving food into the city. Find the farm stands selling near you with Localize. Sources: Baltimore Magazine
5
137
375
3,181
This is one of my favorite speeches by him. Honestly this is one of the reasons why I don’t spread vitriol when black people decide to vote for whoever they choose to vote for. For the most part people want to get to same goal just differently. I personally have allegiance to none. I am for the people first.
Malcolm X would’ve loved Nicki Minaj! Malcolm X literally warned Black people against blindly aligning themselves with a political party that doesn’t deliver for them. Nicki Minaj stepped back, looked at what she believes Democrats promised versus what they delivered, and decided she didn’t owe that party automatic loyalty.
6
15
439
RirišŸ«¶šŸ½ retweeted
I WENT DEEP digging into the New York casino deal and look what I found buried in the paperwork involving @RocNation CEO Desiree Perez. The agreement lays out proposed PRE-LICENSE FULTON HOUSES OBLIGATIONS including $20 MILLION over 10 years. But keep reading. The agreement also talks about PUBLIC SUPPORT. POSITIVE PRESS. PUBLIC MESSAGING. And then comes the part that really caught my attention: CONFIDENTIALITY. The document was supposed to stay confidential. And on the signature page? DESIREE PEREZ CEO ROC NATION So here’s my question: When millions of dollars are being committed before a casino license is awarded, while an agreement also addresses public support, positive messaging and confidentiality, shouldn’t somebody with subpoena power find out EXACTLY who agreed to what, who knew about it, where the money was supposed to go and why this was supposed to stay confidential? Could any of this cross into bribery, fraud, theft or another violation of New York law? I’m not saying it did. I’m saying INVESTIGATE IT. @NewYorkStateAG and the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office should investigate the documents and FOLLOW THE MONEY. @RocNation @LiveNation
12
58
194
6,429
In November 2022, Cardi B made a major career move by signing with Full Stop Management, a powerful firm founded by Irving Azoff and his son Jeffrey. To understand why her touring numbers could be manipulated, you have to understand Irving Azoff's history and his unprecedented grip on the live music industry. Azoff is the former CEO of Ticketmaster and played a massive role in the $2.5 billion merger between Ticketmaster and Live Nation, eventually becoming Live Nation's Chairman alongside CEO Michael Rapino. Though he left his official role at Live Nation in 2012, he went on to found the venue-management powerhouse Oak View Group (OVG). The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is currently investigating this ecosystem and explicitly outlined their collusion in a formal complaint. To illustrate just how deeply connected Azoff is to Live Nation's monopoly, the DOJ filings state: ā€œ[...] Live Nation has neutralized threats from potential competitors, including Oak View Group ('OVG'). OVG was founded by a former Live Nation executive [Irving Azoff] and several of its initial senior employees were former Live Nation employees. [...] Live Nation and OVG have a deep, symbiotic relationship. [...] Live Nation and OVG reached a verbal agreement that OVG would not compete with Live Nation in the promotion business and Live Nation would not compete with OVG in its core venue consulting and sponsorship businesses.ā€ Because this cartel illegally divides the market, they also control the platforms that report touring data to the public. In 2017, OVG acquired Pollstar, widely considered the "bible of live entertainment" and the primary source of industry box office metrics. After OVG took over, Pollstar shifted its methodology to prioritize raw box office revenue over actual ticket volume or show quality. This creates a system of "Information Fraud". Because Live Nation controls ticketing, they use "Dynamic Pricing" and hidden fees to artificially inflate ticket prices to exorbitant levels. The total box office gross for their tours is, therefore, artificially massive. Instead of reporting honest, organic success based on how many fans attended, the final numbers reflect a gross inflated by price manipulation. For an artist managed by Azoff’s firm like Cardi B this means a $69.5 million tour gross could easily be padded to $70 million or higher. The Azoff network controls the artist (Full Stop Management), the ticketing (Ticketmaster), the venues (OVG), and the platform reporting the success (Pollstar). They have the power to completely legitimize their own padded numbers and use that "record-breaking" data to justify even higher prices on the next tour. Industry manipulation is not a conspiracy; in 2018, Nicki Minaj accused Irving Azoff who co-managed her chart rival Travis Scott of orchestrating a smear campaign. She alleged that Azoff used his influence to spread false reports of "low ticket sales" to sabotage her tour. This incident highlights that if Azoff's network can weaponize media to fabricate failure for rivals, they can equally inflate data to elevate clients like Cardi B. @TXAG Complaint: justice.gov/atr/media/135310…
2
4
25
1,458
Gorgeous šŸ’•
Sports analyst Taylor Rooks goes viral. ✨
1
10
485
ā€œAmicably parted waysā€ some articles say šŸ˜‚ I think that person really got dropped. The math is mathing. She can bring in millions and still bring in significantly less than the other people on the roster. Management gets 15-20% of gross income standard. ~$70M tour Ɨ 15–20% = $10.5M–$14M ~$617M tour Ɨ 15–20% = $92.6M–$123.4M (Harry Styles last tour and he’s on tour right now) Now subtract salaries, staff, travel, strategy, administrative overhead and time. Then she goes back into a recording cycle with no touring revenue etc. Why wouldn’t management make that business call?
6
47
827
RirišŸ«¶šŸ½ retweeted
In 1963 Wendell Scott became the first black driver to win a race at Nascar's top level, while getting death threats at tracks. 63 years later… 8 year old Eli Price from D.C is the first black driver in Nascar's youth series!
15
822
6,456
85,727
🚨 UPDATE: Curis Law has now ALSO rescinded its consent to Jay Z’s request for an enlarged 40 page opposition brief. Curis says it originally agreed because Jay Z’s side represented that the extra pages were needed to respond to all three pending motions to dismiss, including Jane Doe’s. But later that same evening, after obtaining the defendants’ consent, Jay Z voluntarily dismissed Jane Doe and filed her new declaration. Curis is now joining Buzbee’s opposition and says it ā€œappears fairly obviousā€ Jay Z’s side already knew they planned to discontinue the claims against Jane Doe when they sought the extra pages. Their position is that with Jane Doe’s motion now out of the picture, the remaining arguments are largely overlapping and the additional pages are no longer warranted. So now BOTH Buzbee’s side and Curis Law have withdrawn their consent to the 40 page request.
1
2
12
686
Realistically, Jay-Z is NOT wrong for defending himself. Everyone has that right. It’s how he went about it that bothers me. Investigators showing up at someone’s home, questions surrounding the recording, and judges raising concerns along the way. Now we’re asking a court to essentially say a lawyer was wrong for taking a client’s claim because her story changed? Ask anyone who works with abuse victims how often details change or how often they change their minds about going forward. Challenge the evidence. But lawyers still have to be allowed to do their jobs. The world does not bow down to you.
5
9
64
1,504
My money has always been on Buzbee. Law school damn near hazes you. Three years, the bar, additional exams, six figures of debt, just to risk your license for what? This was always going to turn into lawyer vs. corporation. They’re not just coming for his case. They’re coming for his livelihood, license, and character. He’s going to swing. That I know.
4
17
174
3,012
When I see logic, my heart swells.
11
323
I have PTSD because I swear this is the same line of thinking I had with Sean Kelly. This is literally the twilight zone 🤣 Vasquez ate that up. No crumbs.
🚨 Tony Buzbee’s side is now asking Judge Dale Ho to STRIKE Jane Doe’s new declaration from the record, and this filing gets very pointed. They argue Jay Z was not required to attach Jane Doe’s declaration to the voluntary dismissal and say the declaration appears to serve no purpose other than to attack and ā€œimpugnā€ the remaining defendants. They go even further and characterize it as Jane Doe’s ā€œbought and paid for Declaration.ā€ Their position is that if the court is going to consider this new declaration at all, then the court also needs to consider Jane Doe’s prior sworn statements, because those statements directly contradict what she is saying now. Buzbee’s lawyers attached those prior declarations. In February 2025, Jane Doe swore under penalty of perjury that she stood by her claims against Jay Z, believed she had a meritorious claim, and had authorized Buzbee and his firm to pursue the case. Then in March 2025, after Jay Z’s investigators claimed she had told them he did not assault her, Jane Doe filed another sworn declaration saying that was false. She specifically denied ever telling the investigators that Jay Z did not sexually assault her and said she refused their request to sign an affidavit saying her claims were false. Now, in September 2026, she is saying something completely different. Buzbee’s side is also pointing out what they see as a major contradiction in Jay Z’s own position. Jay Z’s pleadings have repeatedly described Jane Doe as an unreliable witness with credibility problems. But now his side is relying on her newest declaration because it supports their claims against Buzbee. So Buzbee’s lawyers are essentially telling the court: If Jane Doe was unreliable before, why should her newest declaration suddenly be treated as reliable now? And if the court is going to consider what she is saying now, then it should also consider everything she previously swore to under penalty of perjury. They are asking the judge to either strike the new declaration entirely, or review it alongside the full history of Jane Doe’s prior sworn statements and the obvious contradictions between them. This is no longer just about whether Jane Doe changed her story. Now the court is being asked to decide what weight, if any, her newest version should be given at all. Previous declaration exhibit 1 drive.google.com/file/d/19VR… Previous declaration exhibit 2 drive.google.com/file/d/1Ba_… Previous declaration exhibit 3 drive.google.com/file/d/1uXu…
2
6
60
2,203
šŸ‘šŸ½šŸ‘šŸ½šŸ‘šŸ½šŸ‘šŸ½šŸ‘šŸ½šŸ‘šŸ½
Tory Lanez Sold Out The First Show Of His ā€˜Not On Tor’ Tour. It Begins Tonight At HK Hall In New York City.
6
32
640
Again where is federal enforcement? The average person would be in cuffs by now 🫩 every time I see anything about that company it’s nothing good.
1
3
33
820
RirišŸ«¶šŸ½ retweeted
🚨 UPDATE: Jay Z’s attorney (Roberta Kaplan) has responded to Tony Buzbee’s lawyers after they accused Jay Z’s side of obtaining consent for a larger brief ā€œby fraudā€ and pulling a ā€œbait and switch.ā€ Jay Z’s lawyers say there was no false statement. Their position is that when they asked for permission to file a 40 page consolidated opposition on September 24, Jane Doe was still a defendant, her motion to dismiss was still pending, and she had not yet signed the declaration that was filed later that night. They argue Buzbee’s fraud theory depends on treating Jane Doe’s later dismissal as if it had already happened when consent was requested. They also accuse Buzbee’s side of trying to distract from Jane Doe’s new allegations against her former lawyers. And because Jane Doe is now out of the case, Jay Z’s side has reduced its request from 40 pages to 33 pages, saying that is the same number of pages the remaining defendants collectively used in their opening briefs. So now the fight is over whether the original request was misleading, and whether Jay Z should still get an expanded opposition brief at all.
🚨 In an interesting turn of events, Jay Z’s lawyers are now being accused by Tony Buzbee’s side of a ā€œbait and switchā€ and of procuring consent to a court request ā€œby fraud.ā€ Here’s what happened. On September 24, Jay Z’s lawyers asked Judge Dale Ho for permission to file one combined 40 page opposition to the three pending motions to dismiss filed by Jane Doe, the Curis defendants, and the Buzbee defendants. The request said the parties had met and conferred and that the defendants consented. But Buzbee’s lawyers now say they only agreed because they understood Jay Z was responding to ALL THREE motions. According to their filing, hours after Jay Z’s lawyers made that request, Jay Z voluntarily dismissed all claims against Jane Doe. Buzbee’s lawyers say that changed the entire premise of what they had agreed to and that Jane Doe’s dismissal was already ā€œin the worksā€ before Jay Z sought permission for the larger brief. They accuse Jay Z’s side of deceiving the defendants and the court, calling it a ā€œbait and switch,ā€ and they have now withdrawn their consent. They are asking the judge to DENY Jay Z’s request for the 40 page omnibus brief, arguing he no longer needs the extra pages because Jane Doe’s motion is now moot. This case just got even messier.
4
10
54
4,083
🫠
Add this to the list of things you can’t make up. 🄓 Y’all remember the viral story out of Detroit with the funeral home and the wig? Well, Joseph Hutchison Jr., the vice president of operations at Hutchison Funeral Home, was reportedly found dead Thursday night at an apartment complex. His death comes just days after Kimberlly Moore’s family accused the funeral home of mistakenly cremating her before her scheduled viewing, then presenting another woman’s body dressed in Moore’s clothes and wig. A cause of death has not been publicly confirmed, and there is currently no verified connection between his death and the controversy surrounding the funeral home. This whole story is WILD.
6
538
RirišŸ«¶šŸ½ retweeted
Remy’s feelings are hurt behind Pap but she’s not willing to acknowledge she fucked up. He just chose up & she cannot stomach it. Her behavior is so telling.
207
632
4,532
144,723
This is exactly why activism within the black community can become so difficult to sustain. ā€œWhoever told you to get on your knee should make a league for you, and that’s where you should be playing.ā€ That rhetoric is a perfect example of the factionalism people should actually research. Someone takes a stand, becomes controversial, and then people within the same community leave them high and dry. You don’t have to agree with every decision Kaepernick has made to recognize the problem with that. I was in agreement up until that point. That comment was a no for me.
Cam’ron and Ma$e GO OFF on Colin Kaepernick, saying if he chose to TAKE A STAND by kneeling he had to stand on the CONSEQUENCES, and that he fumbled his NFL comeback by changing the workout to a HIGH SCHOOL on his OWN TERMS with his own receivers šŸ˜®šŸ‘€ ā€œWhoever told you to get on your knee should make a league for you, and that’s where you should be playing.ā€šŸ¤£šŸ¤£
26
29
137
8,868
Working on two papers right now. One on antitrust, trademark bullying, and how major fashion houses can potentially push independent Black fashion designers out of the market, using Dapper Dan and newer designers as case studies. The other explores how slavery and racial capitalism connect to modern hip-hop and R&B contracts and their impact on Black creators. The more I research entertainment law, copyright, and ownership, the more what I see on the timeline starts making sense. Might turn both into educational pieces when I’m done this semester.
1
4
24
549