As someone who reports on publicly available court documents and comments on matters of public concern, I take my privacy and my family’s safety very seriously. I’ve become aware of certain things happening behind the scenes that I believe may put my safety and my family’s safety at risk. Simply because I choose to use my voice. Simply because I speak on what I believe are injustices. Simply because people disagree with my opinions. I’ve documented everything and have been doing so for months. I’ve preserved the relevant evidence and taken the appropriate steps to report my concerns. I have never harassed anyone, nor have I ever encouraged others to do so. I don’t tag certain people. I don’t go on their pages. I don’t use their content. I report on publicly available information and express my opinions. Despite that, I believe there have been efforts to intimidate me. I won’t speculate publicly about anyone’s motives, and I won’t be intimidated into stopping my reporting or expressing my opinions. I’ll continue to let the facts speak for themselves. But I just wanted to publicly document my concerns as well.

littt 😭🔥 #NotOnatorTour #ToryLanez

Tory Lanez just sold out his first tour show from jail. Congrats @torylanez 🔥🔥🔥 Catch me there tonight at HK Hall 😎

RT @diddydocket: In the matter of Carter v. Buzbee, Buzbee: "Carter and his attorneys are now advancing testimony that they either (1) kno…

Witness Intimidation during court filings 4am visits to house with grass marks next morning; car shot at 35 rounds; while I was in the car; six bullets hit car; police report filed. @50cent @RepLuna @RepNancyMace @RepJamesComer @TheLightJoker24 @TonyBuzbee2 @KaraBrazey20

Two Jay-Z/Buzbee Docket Updates: First, Roberta Kaplan has responded to the Buzbee Parties' claims Carter pulled a "bait and switch" in his request for consent to exceed the 25-page limit for opposition briefs. Second, Jessica Meyers, on behalf of the Buzbee Parties, is requesting the Court "strike the [Doe] Declaration pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) as immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous." #JayZ #Buzbee

🚨 Tony Buzbee’s side is now asking Judge Dale Ho to STRIKE Jane Doe’s new declaration from the record, and this filing gets very pointed. They argue Jay Z was not required to attach Jane Doe’s declaration to the voluntary dismissal and say the declaration appears to serve no purpose other than to attack and “impugn” the remaining defendants. They go even further and characterize it as Jane Doe’s “bought and paid for Declaration.” Their position is that if the court is going to consider this new declaration at all, then the court also needs to consider Jane Doe’s prior sworn statements, because those statements directly contradict what she is saying now. Buzbee’s lawyers attached those prior declarations. In February 2025, Jane Doe swore under penalty of perjury that she stood by her claims against Jay Z, believed she had a meritorious claim, and had authorized Buzbee and his firm to pursue the case. Then in March 2025, after Jay Z’s investigators claimed she had told them he did not assault her, Jane Doe filed another sworn declaration saying that was false. She specifically denied ever telling the investigators that Jay Z did not sexually assault her and said she refused their request to sign an affidavit saying her claims were false. Now, in September 2026, she is saying something completely different. Buzbee’s side is also pointing out what they see as a major contradiction in Jay Z’s own position. Jay Z’s pleadings have repeatedly described Jane Doe as an unreliable witness with credibility problems. But now his side is relying on her newest declaration because it supports their claims against Buzbee. So Buzbee’s lawyers are essentially telling the court: If Jane Doe was unreliable before, why should her newest declaration suddenly be treated as reliable now? And if the court is going to consider what she is saying now, then it should also consider everything she previously swore to under penalty of perjury. They are asking the judge to either strike the new declaration entirely, or review it alongside the full history of Jane Doe’s prior sworn statements and the obvious contradictions between them. This is no longer just about whether Jane Doe changed her story. Now the court is being asked to decide what weight, if any, her newest version should be given at all. Previous declaration exhibit 1 drive.google.com/file/d/19VR… Previous declaration exhibit 2 drive.google.com/file/d/1Ba_… Previous declaration exhibit 3 drive.google.com/file/d/1uXu…

This Jay Z and Buzbee case is going crazy. Buzbee’s lawyer just filed something. This time Camille Vasquez filed. She DID NOT mince words 😩 Reminder: She represented Johnny Depp against Amber Heard. BRB

🙌🏾‼️‼️

Tory Lanez Sold Out The First Show Of His ‘Not On Tor’ Tour. It Begins Tonight At HK Hall In New York City.

I hope everyone has the most amazing time tonight for @torylanez’s first date on the “Not On Tor” Tour In NY ❤️☔️☔️☔️ Times like these I really hate being all the way over here in the UK 😒 #FREETORYLANEZ

Top Hollywood Publicist Alleged to Have Hid Evidence About Role In Celebrity Smear Sites In new court filings, Melissa Nathan is accused of committing perjury about her link to websites that have lodged anonymous complaints against prominent individuals and companies. Nathan has denied involvement. - via @thr hollywoodreporter.com/busine…

🚨 UPDATE: Jay Z’s attorney (Roberta Kaplan) has responded to Tony Buzbee’s lawyers after they accused Jay Z’s side of obtaining consent for a larger brief “by fraud” and pulling a “bait and switch.” Jay Z’s lawyers say there was no false statement. Their position is that when they asked for permission to file a 40 page consolidated opposition on September 24, Jane Doe was still a defendant, her motion to dismiss was still pending, and she had not yet signed the declaration that was filed later that night. They argue Buzbee’s fraud theory depends on treating Jane Doe’s later dismissal as if it had already happened when consent was requested. They also accuse Buzbee’s side of trying to distract from Jane Doe’s new allegations against her former lawyers. And because Jane Doe is now out of the case, Jay Z’s side has reduced its request from 40 pages to 33 pages, saying that is the same number of pages the remaining defendants collectively used in their opening briefs. So now the fight is over whether the original request was misleading, and whether Jay Z should still get an expanded opposition brief at all.

BREAKING: New Jersey Lt. Gov. Dale Caldwell has resigned after an independent investigation into his misconduct and sexual harassment. Gov. Mikie Sherrill says the investigation found "serious, repeated violations of state policy," including ethical lapses and a substantiated finding of sexual harassment. "I gave the lieutenant governor until today to resign. He submitted his resignation to me this afternoon, which I accepted."

TRENTON, N.J. (AP) — New Jersey’s Democratic lieutenant governor resigns after a report accused him of sexual harassment and ethics lapses.

A lot of filings on the Hadley/Perez docket. Will go through when I can