What the f*ck!
"Aramco [...], is responsible for more of the carbon emissions driving the escalating climate crisis than any other company in history"
Thank you @dpcarrington, @EoghanGilmartin, @SilviaLazzaris, Rita Cruz, @simonguichard, @Simon__Guichard and David Haas!
Apparently aerosols were deliberately left out, because "INDIA called for deleting it"?!
And adding the invaluable figure WG1 SPM.2 was "opposed by SAUDI ARABIA and INDIA" in a f*cking huddle?!
What's next? Removing gravity from physics education?
Sep 21, 2026 路 7:13 PM UTC
7
113
319
8,404
I can't say I'm very surprised..
COP30 President:
"We want to ensure transparency, inclusivity, predictability and legitimacy.
Does everyone agree with this approach?"
Saudi Arabia:
"Hell no, we need you to confirm that our backroom huddle meetings remain, so we can halt progress without anyone noticing"
1
2
9
1,067
Conflicts of interest and censorship are an inherent part of the IPCC process.
And the summary for policymakers (where few read beyond) are much worse even than the full reports.
Censorship is an inherent part of the IPCC process.
"INDIA called for deleting it"
And adding the invaluable figure WG1 SPM.2 was "opposed by SAUDI ARABIA and INDIA"
I recommend reading the actual minutes yourself
2
2
6
844
