Nanotyrannus lethaeus! One of two definite nanotyrannids, and seemingly the larger of the two. Jane may have had a rocky history, but it's good to she her finally somewhat taxonomically settled
Lukewarm take: I think much of the amateur paleontological community would benefit from touching grass. Literally going outside and feeling dirt crunch under their feet. Running after a bug or perhaps a small lizard. Watching a bird in a tree—maybe even catching a fish or two!
So I looked at Tromerosaurus’ skeleton and I was like eh, looks like every other tyrannosaur… so I was like lets make it distinctive with some speculative soft tissue and it ended up being a living duckbill lure #aggressivemimicry :B
So now we have Gorgosaurus, Albertosaurus (Gorgosaurus 2), and Tromerosaurus (Gorgosaurus 3), and then there's Daspletosaurus—which is basically Gorgosaurus 4, but on steroids.
NEW TYRANNOSAUR!
and the next in our journey lol. Tromerosaurus is a peculiar albertosaurine showing traits of both Gorgosaurus and Daspletosaurus, but being more closely related to the former
Very excited to see this paper finally come out! Tromerosaurus solumons gen. et sp. nov. Beautiful paleoart of a beautiful specimen by @Paleoartologist
Perfect timing for #FossilFriday! A new albertosaurine tyrannosaur! Dubbed Tromerosaurus solumons, it highlights features shared between both albertosaurines and tyrannosaurines. It also coexisted with Daspletosaurus wilsoni. Paper linked below…
I have other broad conceptual issues with the study that wade into grey areas, but a lack of clear explanation as to why such a major part of the data analysis (and arguably the most methodologically sound part) doesn't support the conclusion is a sticking point I can't get over.
The PCA not supporting the conclusion of a beak (with the sauropods plotting closer to lizards), but being only vaguely and briefly dismissed, is one of a few major barriers to me being able to agree with the conclusions here.
The PCA not supporting the conclusion of a beak (with the sauropods plotting closer to lizards), but being only vaguely and briefly dismissed, is one of a few major barriers to me being able to agree with the conclusions here.
If you use or generate AI art in fields like #paleoart / #palaeoart, it should be clear what the rest of us think about you: that you're a corner-cutting hack with no interest or investment in education, or in portraying things at an acceptable standard... gizmodo.com/paleontologists-…
Our recent paper on Mosasaurus lemonnieri has a flashy taxonomic conclusion, which can overshadow some of the cool anatomical findings that make up 95% of the paper. I'm going to do a few #FossilFriday threads on these, starting today with IRSNB R 32: a mosasaur with hearing loss
The new mosasaur, Thoraxion tahlequahae enjoys itself a yummy lemon.
The paper also does allot with Mosasaurus lemonnieri variation and is open access, so do give it a read!
Sorry for the break, getting back into the university rhythm, here's the next Tyrannosaur!
Tyrannosaurus mcraeensis, an often debated species of Tyrannosaurus from New Mexico. regardless of the remains taxonomic status, they certainly came from a fearsome predator
Just as a reminder that a line on a plaque in a prep lab doesn’t equal peer reviewed material. There’s a lot of details we don’t know and will only get with the release of the paper(the quality of which is also, as it stands, to be determined).
An article was just released outlining details of a subadult T.rex currently being prepped at Dr. Paul Sereno’s lab. He’s being rather coy about certain details until publication but he’s indicating some intriguing possibilities regarding integument. Link below, time will tell