Father | @RentalsNEPA Owner | B.S. Finance, Bloomsburg University | Agent Home Smart Realty – Live Free Team | 8+ yrs in STRs | Building community in NEPA

Collegeville, PA
Pinned Tweet
My call: $GME reverses. If buyers take back control, this could go from a quiet Friday to a session people talk about for years. A prediction, not a promise. But if it turns, it could be epic. Hold on tight. 🎮🔥
22
11
207
10,986
If GameStop deploys its authorized share repurchase program into this dip and starts buying back stock at these levels… That would be absolutely epic. Buy low. Reduce the float. Increase ownership per remaining share. Now THAT would send a message. $GME
Made with AI
11
15
179
5,477
My gut says @ryancohen makes his move at market close today. The bell rings. The weekend gets interesting. Bookmark this. You heard it here first. $GME
7
10
220
4,656
We talk about @GameStop every day. My question for @larryvc’s livestream is: do those conversations ever make it into the room with him and @ryancohen? Have any of our ideas made it onto Ryan Cohen’s vision board? Has something we’ve shared made them stop and think? I want to know how far our voices carry. If you’ve wondered the same, give my question a like to help Larry see it. Thanks, everyone. ❤️ $GME
Replying to @larryvc
Larry, how much of what this community shares actually makes it into conversations between you and Ryan? Do you ever send each other a shareholder’s post or discuss a suggestion someone made? I ask because from this side, it’s hard to know. I appreciate these livestreams, but beyond them, the interaction feels limited and after years of showing up for GameStop, that distance can be discouraging. Have you ever read something from the community and thought, “They have a point we should consider that”? I’d love to hear about it. You may hear from us far more often than we hear from you. That’s why even a small acknowledgment carries so much weight. It tells someone who put thought and heart into supporting this company that their voice reached the people they believed in.
1
28
2,032
If you were @TheRoaringKitty, would wealth be enough or would you feel a responsibility to the community that believed alongside you?
11
1
75
7,801
This is why I think Ryan Cohen put up $46 million dollars into $GME over the past few weeks along with other large insider buys. Pokemon card sales reached an all time high in August. Then in September it was Pokemon's 30th anniversary. It was the biggest coordinated event for Pokemon cards in history. Stores were sold out. Lines all over. GameStop probably made a killing. And this anniversary will continue until the end of the year with more sets dropping in Q4, which is the best quarter. GameStop is going to smoke the $650 million of EBITDA for 2026. I have it closer to $885 million. The core business is on fire. Get more info here: deepfuckingvalue.com
20
20
271
20,715
I came to @GameStop hoping to change my future. Somewhere along the way, I started rooting for thousands of strangers to change theirs, too. Behind every “still holding” is a person with a reason. I want to see the day this timeline celebrates together. $GME
41
64
1,005
12,157
$8 away from $32 $GME #IBelieve
$10 away from $32 $GME #IBelieve
4
13
380
8,024
To the @GameStop community: I’ve been praying hard for us. 🙏🏻 For everyone who’s held through the doubt, the ridicule, the red days, and the quiet moments when this felt heavy. There are real people behind these accounts. Real families. Real hopes for a better life. I’m praying there’s light ahead. That we get to see those days of green. That we get to watch @GameStop build something extraordinary and see its stock follow a path we once watched @Amazon, @Nvidia, and @Tesla take. Nobody knows how this ends. But I hope one day there are books written about this community. About what we endured together. About how ordinary people helped break a chain by believing in something so many others doubted. I’m still here. Still holding. Still praying that the next chapter gives us something to smile about. $GME
19
23
295
4,824
No one was listening 🧩
Consider this your green light. Pre-order the XBOX 25th Anniversary Console tomorrow at GameStop. While supplies last.
1
5
94
5,399
THE $GME APES ARE AWAKE 🦍 Stocktwits sentiment has surged 100% as GameStop climbs 30% over the past month.
23
47
484
38,905
🚨 MORE BREAKING NEWS! GameStop director Alain Attal just bought 17,500 more shares! Paid a weighted avg of $22.969, spending roughly $401,958 of his own money. @GameStop $GME 🧵
🚨 BREAKING - @ryancohen just bought 1,150,680 more @GameStop shares — $26.4M at a weighted average of $22.9375. His second open-market buy this month. $GME 🧵
26
181
1,167
43,667
🚨 What could these two images mean for @GameStop? My theory: “It was always @GameStop and the audience is part of the story.” Here’s the deeper connection. The astronaut image uses the familiar “Always has been” setup. One astronaut discovers something. The other already knows. But the dialogue is missing. We supply it: “Wait, it’s still about @GameStop?”
“Always has been.” The bullish interpretation is continuity of conviction through the silence, distractions, and competing theories. The story never changed. Then there’s the TIME cover. The original 2006 cover named “YOU” Person of the Year, recognizing ordinary internet users shaping information and culture. Applied to @GameStop, that’s a powerful idea: the people watching the story are also helping write it. Investors publish research. Customers buy products. Collectors build communities. Millions of people can direct attention toward a company the traditional financial world has already dismissed. Both images leave something for the viewer to fill in: the astronauts’ missing dialogue and the blank screen. Now look at the timer: 01:09 / 04:20. 1:09 is 69 seconds. 4:20 is familiar internet humor. But as a metaphor, the video is still in progress. The story hasn’t finished. That supports “there’s more to come.” It doesn’t give us a reliable date. Here’s where the theory gets economically interesting. Attention brings people in. Some become shareholders. Some become customers. If that customer interest becomes repeat purchases and profitable business, management has something durable to build on. Better results could then attract investors who originally dismissed @GameStop. The community helps create conditions that management must convert into earnings. That’s the feedback loop worth watching. Its weakness? Attention can also produce a temporary stock spike without creating lasting business value. Execution still matters. The most aggressive interpretation of these images together: “The thesis hasn’t changed. The story is unfinished. Pay attention.” A livestream? A public investment update? Renewed commentary? Those are possibilities not things these images establish. For context, the TIME image is from @TheRoaringKitty’s December 2024 post. I haven’t verified the astronaut image’s source or whether they were intentionally paired. This is an interpretation, not confirmation of a new message. But read together, the strongest theory is simple: It was always @GameStop.
You’re still part of the story.
It isn’t over. $GME
9
9
129
7,603
I’m going to just leave this here for you. $GME 🚀 🌖
5
15
166
2,379
How many people have to say the system is broken before something actually changes? @SteaknShake @gamestop @ryancohen @AMCTheatres @CEOAdam @RobinhoodApp @vladtenev here’s what I want to know: Can these public arguments about how markets should work become something shareholders can actually trust? Because I’m glad the conversation is happening. But I’m tired of watching frustration turn into engagement instead of results. People put years of their lives into this market. Every paycheck invested represents hours worked, time away from family, a retirement they hope to enjoy, or something they want to leave their kids. That money deserves more than a vote nobody can explain and an apology nobody is accountable for. When someone inside corporate America says the process is failing shareholders, we should pay attention. We should also ask them to get specific. What needs to change? Who has the power to change it? What are you personally willing to do? How will we know you followed through? We don’t need every CEO to agree. We don’t need every shareholder to own the same stock. We need enough people to agree that transparency and accountability shouldn’t depend on whether your side is winning. That includes holding our favorite executives to the same standards we demand from everyone else. I’m not going to pretend these posts prove there’s some coordinated movement behind closed doors. But there’s an opportunity to build something out in the open. Stop making people piece together tweets and guess what comes next. Give them a proposal they can understand, challenge, and get behind. AI might make the process faster. It won’t make the people running it more honest. So am I reading this wrong? Are we watching the beginning of meaningful change or have we reached the point where even calling out the bullshit is just another way to profit from it? You have our attention. What happens next?
The Hollow Men American capitalism is rotting from the head down. We have replaced the "Owner-Operator"—the risk-taker-with a new, parasitic class of corporate bureaucrat: The Risk-Free Insider. By "Insider," I am not referring to a specific title. I am referring to the entire administrative state that has captured the modern corporation. This includes the Directors who exist solely to collect fees, the Executives who exist solely to collect bonuses, and the Managers who exist solely to hire consultants. These are the hollow men of the boardroom. They are masters of PowerPoint. They wear the right suits. They say the right buzzwords about "governance" and "ESG." But they are mercenaries fighting a war with someone else’s ammunition. In a functioning economy, authority is tied to liability. If you make a bad decision, you lose your own money. That fear of loss is the only thing that keeps a business honest. It forces you to cut waste, obsess over the customer, and stay late to fix what is broken. Today, we have severed that link. We have rigged the game so that heads, the Insider wins; tails, the shareholder loses. If the stock goes up, the Insider collects a massive performance bonus. If the stock crashes due to their own incompetence, they are fired with a "Golden Parachute" worth tens of millions. They are gambling with the house’s money, and they never leave the table poorer than they arrived. This looting starts in the boardroom. We have normalized a "Country Club" culture where directors are selected based on social profiling rather than their ability to build a business. The modern board member is often a professional tourist—paid an average of $350,000 a year. Let’s be brutally honest about what that number represents. The average director is paid nearly five times the GDP per capita of the United States. They earn more for attending four quarterly lunches than the vast majority of Americans earn in five years of hard labor. And for what? Most of these directors are "over-boarded," sitting on three or four boards simultaneously. They treat directorships as a gig economy for the elite. They fly in, rubber-stamp a compensation package they didn't read, and fly out. They collect checks from companies they do not understand, do not use, and certainly do not love. They are not there to ask hard questions. They are there to be collegial. They are there to protect the other Insiders. And what happens when these boards hire executives who also have no personal capital at risk? We get the Delegation Economy. When a Risk-Free Insider faces a crisis—bloated expenses, a broken supply chain, or a stale product—they do not roll up their sleeves. They hire a consultant. They pay a strategy firm millions of shareholder dollars to produce a 100-page deck telling them what they already know. This is not management. It is intellectual money laundering. They use shareholder capital to buy an insurance policy for their own careers. If the plan fails, they can blame the consultants. They delegate the work because they are terrified of the responsibility. They would rather preside over a slow, comfortable decline than risk a bold mistake. While American Insiders are busy optimizing their severance packages, our global competitors are optimizing their products. They are not slowed down by bureaucracy. They are not waiting for a slide deck. They are outworking us. If we continue to fill our C-suites with administrators instead of operators, we will lose our edge. We will see iconic American franchises hollowed out by fees, managed for the benefit of the Insiders, while the true owners—the shareholders—are left holding the bag. The time for polite governance is over. If we want to save the American economy from mediocrity, we must demand a return to the "Owner’s Mentality." We need leaders who treat shareholder capital with the same reverence they treat their own savings. The era of the Risk-Free Insider must end.
1
11
1,076
Everyone’s joking about working at @Wendys. What if @GameStop becomes the landlord of that joke? A @Wendys franchisee operating 314 restaurants just filed Chapter 11. Not the Wendy’s parent company. That distinction matters. Here’s the speculative play: @GameStop acquires the distressed restaurant business through a subsidiary, keeps experienced operators running it, and uses the holding-company structure to own businesses beyond gaming. The connection wouldn’t be burgers and video games. It would be buying future cash flow at the right price. Bankruptcy creates an opening. Whether it creates a bargain depends on the debt, leases, turnaround costs, and purchase price. My call: @GameStop takes a bite out of Wendy’s through its distressed franchise network. You heard it here first. Pure speculation. No deal announced. But “Sir, this is a GameStop” would age beautifully. $GME
34
22
239
13,271
🚨 @GameStop keeps forcing Wall Street to update the narrative. Profits are back. The turnaround is becoming harder to dismiss. Now even @jimcramer is changing his tone on $GME: “I’m willing to say that stock is a buy.”
6
6
87
2,894