"Gender affirming care" @seattlechildren. Here. In. Washington State.

Protections menstruelles 🩸 Pour lutter contre la précarité menstruelle, certaines cups et culottes menstruelles sont remboursées par l'Assurance maladie à partir du 1er octobre. 👉 Cette prise en charge concerne les personnes assurées menstruées de moins de 26 ans et les bénéficiaires de la Complémentaire santé solidaire (C2S). ℹ️ Elle est limitée à deux produits éligibles par an, délivrés en pharmacie.

Colorado wanting to legalize the bodily inspection of all school aged girls in sports to ensure they’re not trans is the same as men checking women for witch marks in the 1600s. FFS, when will we stop allowing women and children to be harmed by pedophiles and perverts?

"Bigots are on the ballot, folks" #copolitics

The @RutgersU Women's Rugby Team just changed their name to the "Womxn's Rugby Team" in order to be more "inclusive" Your tax dollars are funding this university and its woke agenda to erase women

Some natural genders in human biology: XX (Female) XY (Male) XXY (Klinefelter syndrome) XYY (Jacob's syndrome) XO (Turner syndrome) [🚫YO] XXX (Triple X syndrome) XX/XY Chimerism XO/XY Mosaicism Ovotesticular DSD: 46,XX; 46,XY; 46,XX/46,XY; & more, nature is incredibly diverse!

Sen. Dick Durbin was the only Democrat to speak at today's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on women's sports, declaring he would "refuse to treat this hearing like a responsible exercise of this committee," and "not ask questions." He left the hearing soonafter, leaving no Democrats at the hearing at all.

Join us on Wednesday LIVE at 5 PM ET Featuring: @JenniferSey, @jonjakubowski, @WassonWatch

NOW: Trans activists and community members inject HRT outside NYU hospital in Defiance "We're taking our HRT here at the doors of the people who have given up to demystify, normalize, and celebrate our trans bodies in the face of NYU's cowardice." NYU Langone Health stopped providing puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and other gender-transition treatments to patients under 19 after President Trump’s January 2025 executive order threatened federal funding for hospitals that offered the care.

The Trade: real, sensitive genitals for fake, insensate genitals sex for "stereotypes associated with sex" living for "passing" authenticity for "stealth" self acceptance for self curation honest relationships for 'walking on eggshells'

EX-PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA AND HIS PIVOTAL ROLE IN ENFORCING GENDER IDEOLOGY IN THE USA Gender identity entered 🇺🇸 law as a contested sexological concept, moved into local ordinances and state statutes over several decades, and received its broadest federal institutionalization between 2009 and 2017. President Barack Obama directed his administration to reinterpret statutes originally written around biological sex, attach federal funding and contracting power to the new interpretation, and require institutions to treat self-identified gender identity as operative across schools, workplaces, the military, healthcare, housing, and criminal law. These steps occurred largely without new legislation from Congress defining “sex” as gender identity. Obama personally signed key measures, appointed officials who advanced them, and oversaw the multi-agency campaign that converted a minority state-law concept into federal operational policy. Here's how it happened. CONCEPTUAL ORIGINS AND EARLY MEDICAL-LEGAL RECOGNITION In the 1950s and 1960s, psychologist John Money at Johns Hopkins University @JohnsHopkins advanced the concepts of “gender role” and “gender identity.” He argued these could be shaped primarily by social and environmental factors and could be surgically reassigned independently of biological sex. Money’s Gender Identity Clinic, opened in 1966, performed early "sex-reassignment" surgeries and influenced clinical protocols. His theories later faced severe criticism after the David Reimer case, in which a male infant was raised as a girl after a circumcision injury; Reimer rejected the assigned identity, experienced lasting trauma, and died by suicide in 2004. Nevertheless, Money’s framework supplied the intellectual basis for treating identity as detachable from sex. Beginning in 1955, individual states permitted amendments to sex markers on birth certificates and other documents for persons diagnosed as "transsexual", usually after genital surgery. By the late twentieth century, most states had some version of this process. LOCAL AND STATE STATUTORY ADOPTION Local nondiscrimination ordinances covering sexual orientation began in 1972 with East Lansing, Michigan, followed the same year by San Francisco and Ann Arbor. "Gender identity" provisions were added in later in many municipalities. Statewide protection started with Minnesota’s Human Rights Act amendments in 1993 - the first state law to prohibit discrimination on the basis of both sexual orientation and gender identity in employment, housing, and public accommodations. Rhode Island added gender-identity protections in stages (employment 1995; broader coverage by 2001). California included gender identity in 2003. New Mexico followed in 2003. Illinois and Maine acted in 2005. The District of Columbia expanded protections in 2005. Hawaii completed staged additions by 2011. New Jersey acted in 2006. Washington, Iowa, Oregon, Vermont, and Colorado enacted protections between 2006 and 2007. Connecticut and Nevada expanded coverage in 2011. By the early 2010s approximately fifteen states plus the District of Columbia explicitly enumerated gender identity, requiring private and public entities to accommodate self-identification in employment, housing, and facilities. It still remained a limited idea mostly hidden from public view or scrutiny. FEDERAL ENTRY AND EXPANSION UNDER OBAMA: A TIMELINE 2009 On October 28, 2009, President Obama signed the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act (Pub. L. 111-84). The Act expanded federal hate crime law to cover offenses motivated by the actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender, "gender identity", or disability of the victim. It also broadened federal jurisdiction and investigative authority. Matthew Shepard, a 21-year-old University of Wyoming student, was beaten, tied to a fence, and left to die outside Laramie, Wyoming, on the night of October 6–7, 1998. He died on October 12. Prosecutors presented evidence of anti-gay bias; two men were convicted of murder. James Byrd Jr., a 49-year-old Black man, was abducted, beaten, chained to a pickup truck, and dragged to death in Jasper, Texas, on June 7, 1998. Three white supremacists were convicted; two received the death penalty. Importantly, neither crime involved "gender identity". Shepard was targeted because of his sexual orientation; Byrd was targeted because of his race. The 2009 Act was nonetheless named for both men and used the political momentum and moral authority of those two high-profile murders to insert “gender identity” into federal criminal law for the first time. Legislative advocates had long sought an expansion of federal hate crime statutes that would include both sexual orientation and gender identity as a single package. The bill’s sponsors and supporting organizations treated the two categories as parallel bias grounds even though the titular cases supplied no factual predicate for the gender-identity provision. The result was that a statute framed around the memory of an anti-gay murder and a racist murder became the vehicle for establishing gender identity as a federally protected bias category, extending enhanced penalties and federal investigative resources to crimes motivated by that newly listed characteristic. Obama’s signature made the insertion permanent federal law. 2010 Under Obama’s direction the Office of Personnel Management added gender identity to federal Equal Employment Opportunity protections for the civilian workforce: the first explicit federal employment recognition. In June 2010 the State Department, operating under Obama administration policy, revised passport rules: a physician’s certification of “appropriate clinical treatment for gender transition” became sufficient to change the sex marker; surgery was no longer required. Limited-validity passports were available during transition. The Social Security Administration simultaneously lowered the evidentiary threshold for changing gender markers on federal records, no longer requiring proof of surgery in most cases. 2011–2012 Early Department of Education Title IX guidance under Obama addressed harassment based on sex stereotypes, including "gender nonconformity". On February 3, 2012, HUD, directed by the Obama administration, published the Equal Access Rule, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity in all HUD-assisted housing programs and limiting inquiries into those characteristics for eligibility determinations. 2014 In June 2014 the Office of Personnel Management, under Obama, directed Federal Employee Health Benefits plans to end categorical exclusions of transition-related care, effective with the 2015 plan year. On July 21, 2014, Obama personally signed Executive Order 13672. It added “gender identity” as a protected class for the entire federal civilian workforce and required federal contractors and subcontractors, covering a substantial portion of the private workforce, to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. On December 18, 2014, Attorney General Eric Holder, serving under Obama, issued a memorandum directing the Department of Justice to treat discrimination based on gender identity as sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in all litigation. The Department of Education under Obama issued additional Title IX guidance stating that single-sex classes and facilities should accommodate gender identity, essentially nullifying its protections for women and girls. 2015 On August 18, 2015, Obama appointed Raffi Freedman-Gurspan as Outreach and Recruitment Director in the White House Presidential Personnel Office: the first trans-identifying White House staffer, who later served as the administration’s primary "LGBT liaison". OSHA, under Obama, published guidance on restroom access for "transgender workers" according to gender identity. The Justice Department under Obama filed its first civil lawsuit on behalf of a trans-idenitfying individual. The case was United States v. Southeastern Oklahoma State University and the Regional University System of Oklahoma, filed in March 2015 under Attorney General Eric Holder. It was brought on behalf of Dr. Rachel Tudor, an assistant professor of English. ​Dr. Tudor began working at Southeastern Oklahoma State University in 2004 and became trans-identifying in 2007. Despite positive recommendations from the university’s Promotion and Tenure Committee, university administrators denied tenure application and subsequently terminated employment in 2011. ​After Dr. Tudor filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the EEOC found reasonable cause to believe discrimination had occurred and referred the case to the Department of Justice. The DOJ sued under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, alleging sex discrimination, harassment, and retaliation based on gender identity and nonconformance with traditional gender stereotypes. An act meant to protect women twisted yet again. Although the DOJ withdrew from the suit in 2017 after a shift in federal administration policy, Dr. Tudor continued the case with private legal counsel. A federal jury ultimately ruled in his favor in November 2017, finding the university liable for unlawful sex discrimination. The court awarded Dr. Tudor over $1.1 million in damages alongside employment reinstatement. In the same year HHS, the Department of Labor, and the Treasury, directed by the Obama administration, issued joint guidance requiring preventive services for transgender individuals without cost-sharing, regardless of sex recorded at birth. The Department of Justice under Obama issued guidance addressing "gender bias" in law-enforcement responses to sexual assault and domestic violence. 2016 On May 13, 2016, the Departments of Justice and Education, operating under Obama’s direction, issued the infamous joint Dear Colleague letter on Title IX. It stated that the prohibition on discrimination “on the basis of sex” encompasses gender identity and transgender status. Schools receiving federal funds were required to: - treat a student’s "gender identity" as the student’s sex upon notification by the student or parent/guardian; - require no medical diagnosis or treatment as a prerequisite; - use the student’s preferred name and pronouns (staff and contractors); - provide access to restrooms, locker rooms, and housing consistent with gender identity; - allow participation in sex-segregated activities and athletics consistent with gender identity (subject only to limited fairness or safety standards); - protect the privacy of the student’s birth sex and prior records under both Title IX and FERPA. An accompanying 25-page document supplied examples of policies and practices. Schools faced investigation and possible loss of federal funding for noncompliance. A federal district court in Texas issued a nationwide preliminary injunction on August 21, 2016; the guidance was formally withdrawn on February 22, 2017. On May 18, 2016, HHS under Obama published the final rule implementing Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act (81 Fed. Reg. 31,375). It defined discrimination on the basis of sex to include gender identity and sex stereotyping. Covered entities (most hospitals, insurers in federal programs, and related providers) were prohibited from denying or limiting health services, coverage, or facilities on the basis of gender identity. Categorical exclusions of transition-related care were treated as potentially discriminatory. Most provisions became effective approximately 60 days later. On June 30, 2016, Defense Secretary Ash Carter, under Obama’s authority, announced that "transgender individuals" could serve openly. Service members could transition while serving; Department of Defense resources were authorized for transition-related medical care, including hormones and surgery. Accession standards were phased in. This simply means that taxpayer money meant for defense funding and service members health was being siphoned to help men impersonate women better and vice versa. Think of being a woman in the army in a military zone forced to share intimate spaces with men impersonating women. This is what Obama ushered in without any concern for female service members. On September 21, 2016, HUD under Obama published a final rule requiring equal access in accordance with an individual’s gender identity in Community Planning and Development programs, including homeless shelters with shared sleeping quarters or bathrooms. Providers were prohibited from making intrusive inquiries about anatomy. Additional actions directed by the Obama administration updated federal prison placement guidance, hospital visitation and medical-decision rights for LGBT patients (including "transgender individuals"), and various agency record systems to prioritize gender identity. Barack Obama and his trans industry activists were very thorough in their decimation of the rights of women and girls. CONSEQUENCES All these measures, directed and signed by Obama, converted a contested academic theory into enforceable federal policy without a statute redefining “sex.” Funding conditions and contracting requirements supplied the enforcement mechanism that Congress had not enacted. The 2016 Dear Colleague letter’s pronoun and name requirements placed institutional pressure on school staff. Refusal risked investigation as contributing to a hostile environment under Title IX, creating compelled-speech dynamics in federally funded settings. By directing institutions to treat gender identity as the operative sex for facilities, athletics, and records, the policies subordinated biological criteria like chromosomes, gametes, reproductive anatomy, and post-pubertal physical differences, to self-identification. Males obtained access to female-designated restrooms, locker rooms, and sports categories, producing documented conflicts over female privacy, safety, and competitive fairness grounded in measurable sex differences. Schools were authorized to act on a student’s asserted identity while protecting that status from disclosure. In subsequent practice some districts limited parental notification of social transitions occurring at school, generating later disputes under FERPA and parental-rights claims. Removal of coverage exclusions in FEHB, clarification of Medicare coverage for sex-reassignment surgery (2014 HHS Departmental Appeals Board decision), and the Section 1557 nondiscrimination rule expanded payment pathways for hormones and surgery. These changes coincided with the onset of the sharp rise in adolescent gender-dysphoria diagnoses and clinic referrals that accelerated in the mid-to-late 2010s. Trans industry activists described the record as civil rights progress against discrimination but Obama’s administration used administrative power to impose one side of a contested scientific and definitional dispute, bypassed the legislative process, and attached federal resources to the outcome. Later European systematic evidence reviews and multiple U.S. policy reversals confirmed that the medical and definitional assumptions underlying the 2014–2016 measures were substantially more contested than the contemporaneous guidance acknowledged. SUBSEQUENT ACTIONS BY THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION, Lawsuits, and Current Status of Reversals The policies advanced under Obama faced immediate and sustained legal challenge and were substantially reversed by subsequent administrations, though some elements persist through statute, court precedent, or incomplete rollback. TITLE IX GUIDANCE (2016 Dear Colleague letter) Multiple states (led by Texas and others) sued in 2016. In *Texas v. United States, the Northern District of Texas issued a nationwide preliminary injunction on August 21, 2016, holding that the guidance exceeded Title IX’s statutory text, lacked required rulemaking, and improperly redefined “sex.” On February 22, 2017, the Trump Departments of Justice and Education formally rescinded the guidance. The Biden administration later issued new interpretations and a 2024 Title IX rule that again included gender identity; those were met with further lawsuits and injunctions. As of 2025–2026, under the second Trump administration, the Department of Education returned enforcement to the 2020 Title IX rule (which does not treat gender identity as sex discrimination) and issued directives aligning with biological-sex definitions. The original Obama guidance remains rescinded and is not currently enforced. Though this is theory only in many blue states, being fought over in many school districts. SECTION 1557 RULE(2016) Religious providers and states challenged the rule in Franciscan Alliance v. Burwell (later Azar). A federal district court vacated the gender identity and pregnancy-termination provisions, finding violations of the Administrative Procedure Act and Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The Trump administration’s 2020 final rule removed gender identity from the definition of sex discrimination. The Biden administration’s 2024 rule restored and expanded it; multiple federal courts issued preliminary injunctions or stays blocking enforcement of the gender-identity provisions in various states or nationwide in part. As of 2026 the status remains fragmented by ongoing litigation, with significant portions of the identity-based interpretation enjoined or not enforced in many jurisdictions. MILITARY POLICY(2016) On August 25, 2017, President Trump issued a presidential memorandum directing a return to the pre-2016 policy, effectively reinstating restrictions on open transgender service and accession and limiting transition-related care. The Biden administration later restored open service. In January 2025 President Trump issued Executive Order 14183 (“Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness”), again prohibiting transgender individuals from serving and directing cessation of gender-transition medical procedures for service members. Implementation memoranda followed in 2025. The 2016 open-service policy has been reversed multiple times and is not currently in effect. HUD EQUAL ACCESS RULE and related housing guidance The Trump administration proposed revisions to restore greater sex-based discretion for shelters and limit identity-based mandates. Full repeal did not occur in the first term; subsequent proposals and 2025–2026 actions under the second Trump administration have further narrowed or suspended identity-based requirements. Litigation continues, and the original Obama-era identity mandates are substantially weakened or not uniformly enforced. OTHER ELEMENTS Executive Order 13672 (federal contractors) and the 2009 Hate Crimes Act’s gender identity provision remain statutory or executive-law text, though enforcement priorities have shifted and related guidance has been withdrawn. Passport, Social Security, and FEHB policies have been revised multiple times. As of 2026 federal document and benefits practices have largely returned to biological-sex markers and restricted coverage of transition-related interventions in line with 2025 executive orders defining sex as binary and biological. In sum, the core Obama-era administrative reinterpretations of Title IX, Section 1557, military policy, and housing rules have been rescinded, enjoined, or replaced. Statutory insertions such as the 2009 hate-crime provision and the text of EO 13672 persist, but their practical effect has been sharply limited by later guidance, enforcement discretion, and court orders. The pattern of repeated reversal and litigation underscores that the 2009–2017 measures rested on executive policy rather than durable statutory or constitutional mandate. One thing really stands out in all of this. It is that Barack Obama, a fierce transactivist, clearly does not think about the privacy, safety or dignity of the women and girls of America. In fact, he and his administration actively sought to overturn protections for women and girls, including misinterpreting the Civil Rights Act to benefit trans-identifying men. They used the murder of a gay man and a black man to introduce gender identity into criminal law despite the cases having nothing to do with it. There is no way Barack Obama did not know putting male criminals into prison cells with women in women's prisons was harmful and dangerous to female prisoners. There is no way Barack Obama, father of two daughters, did not know it is morally wrong to allow boys into girls sports to steal their metals and podium finishes. There is no way this man did not know teenage girls do not feel comfortable sharing locker rooms and restrooms with boys, or that it is inappropriate and unsafe for them to do so, which is why we have those seperations in the first place. When you really think about it, Barack Obama put the lives of so many women and girls, all except the very isolated rich and privileged ones, at risk on behalf of the very powerful trans industry. His executive and other actions also resulted in so much downstream harm to autistic kids and confused young men with porn addictions, leaving many with maimed bodies dependent on synthetic hormones, medicalized for life in the futile quest of sex change or the pretense of it. He and his administration literally tried to federally enforce trans industry language like "preferred pronouns" by curbing the free speech of Americans, and weaken defenses of sex-based reality. It does beg the question doesn't it, whether this very powerful man, Barack Obama, is at very least, the biggest predator of women and girls in the history of America, and a vile enjoyer of gay and lesbian erasure, or simply an innocent and kind-hearted enabler who did not fully understand the long-reaching and international destructive consequences of his trans industry activism. REFERENCES AND SOURCES Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, Pub. L. No. 111-84, 123 Stat. 2835 (Oct. 28, 2009). Executive Order No. 13672, 79 Fed. Reg. 42,971 (July 23, 2014). U.S. Dep’t of Justice & U.S. Dep’t of Educ., Dear Colleague Letter on Transgender Students (May 13, 2016), and accompanying Examples of Policies and Emerging Practices document. Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities, 81 Fed. Reg. 31,375 (May 18, 2016). Equal Access to Housing in HUD Programs Regardless of Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity, 77 Fed. Reg. 5,662 (Feb. 3, 2012); Equal Access in Accordance with an Individual’s Gender Identity in Community Planning and Development Programs, 81 Fed. Reg. 64,763 (Sept. 21, 2016). U.S. Dep’t of Def., Statement by Secretary of Defense Ash Carter on DOD Transgender Policy (June 30, 2016). U.S. Office of Pers. Mgmt., Federal Employee Health Benefits Program carrier guidance and EEO policy updates (2010 and 2014). Memorandum from Att’y Gen. Eric Holder on Treatment of Transgender Employment Discrimination Claims Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Dec. 18, 2014). U.S. Dep’t of State, New Policy on Gender Change in Passports and Consular Reports of Birth Abroad (June 9, 2010). Social Security Administration gender-marker policy revisions (circa 2010–2013). White House, Fact Sheet: Obama Administration’s Record and the LGBT Community (June 9, 2016). Texas v. United States, No. 7:16-cv-00108 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 21, 2016) (preliminary injunction); U.S. Dep’ts of Justice and Educ., Dear Colleague Letter withdrawing prior guidance (Feb. 22, 2017). Presidential Memorandum on Military Service by Transgender Individuals (Aug. 25, 2017). Nondiscrimination in Health and Health Education Programs or Activities, 85 Fed. Reg. 37,160 (June 19, 2020) (Trump Section 1557 rule). Franciscan Alliance v. Burwell / Azar litigation records and subsequent related cases. Executive Order 14183, Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness (Jan. 27, 2025); related 2025 Department of Defense implementation memoranda. U.S. Dep’t of Educ. Dear Colleague Letter on Title IX enforcement (Feb. 4, 2025) and related 2025 directives returning to 2020 Title IX rule. Minnesota Human Rights Act amendments (1993) and subsequent state gender-identity nondiscrimination statutes (Rhode Island, California, New Mexico, Illinois, Maine, Hawaii, New Jersey, Washington, Iowa, Oregon, Vermont, Colorado, Connecticut, Nevada). John Money clinical publications; documentation of the David Reimer case. Contemporaneous guidance from OSHA, DOJ, HHS, SSA, State Department, and HUD; insurance-claims and clinical data on gender-dysphoria diagnoses and procedures, 2009–2017. Court records and contemporaneous reporting on the 1998 murders of Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. #BarackObama #Obama #unitedstates #USA #politics #Sexbasedrights #sexnnotgender #donoharm #medicalethics

"Bigots are on the ballot, folks" #copolitics

🚨 Don't miss this new piece from @Mike_Burke_UK as he explores the moral inheritance beneath liberal democracy—and what it takes to keep liberty alive. Check it out through the link below!

According to the ruling, some of these providers who are refusing to provide these procedures at CHC have apparently just moved to providing it in a different clinic, so they’re still harming kids…

📢The American Society of Plastic Surgeons decided to put evidence above politics in the care of gender-dysphoric youth. We're thrilled to announce that the past president of @ASPS_News will speak at SEGM's upcoming conference in DC Nov 5-7. Register for in-person & online⬇️

Not a meaningful substantive decision in the Colorado Childrens case, but this was the only sensible outcome on this specific question. Courts can't force individual doctors to perform procedures they choose to not perform. (Courts can't force any person to perform any labor the choose to not perform because slavery is against the law.) I wish there was an argument a parent could make to have standing to intervene to oppose the injunction. It would be an angle to prevent the trial court's stupid holding that there is a constitutional right to rejecting procedures in Colorado from becoming law. Right now, I don't see one. Anyone got any ideas?