Pearl says she doesn’t believe in child support because women have access to abortion and Plan B. This is a crazy take that will only lead to more degeneracy and more abortion. Children shouldn’t be casualties in the war between the sexes. The solution to things being unfair for men isn’t to give them the same right to abandon their parental responsibility that women have; you would never argue men should have the ability to kill their preborn kids just because women in America have that right, and yet that would be what’s actually equal and “fair.” The solution is no abortion—not because that’s what’s fair to men who can’t abandon their parental obligation or kill their kids, but because that’s what’s fair to the most vulnerable among us, the children and especially the preborn.

Sep 28, 2026 · 4:10 AM UTC

79
11
163
12,285
It’s crazy because elsewhere in the debate Pearl cited abortion as proof women aren’t nurturing, and she seems to admit abortion is at least not a good thing. So…why support policies (like abolishing child support) that would lead to more abortion? Everyone—men and women both—need to be way more careful about who they’re intimate with and in what circumstances they’re intimate. Children shouldn’t have to suffer for adults’ recklessness.
4
6
1,100
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @NJBeisner
I caught a glimpse at this debate over the weekend, I couldn’t get beyond this part.
2
2
270
Haha naturally!
3
264
Replying to @NJBeisner
I have listened to her a lot. I truly feel like she just doesn’t like women at all. Her views are alway postulated around how it affects men.
4
9
296
Agreed. She dismisses everyone who disagrees with her as a feminist who hates men, but I’m generally very friendly to her overall concern—men’s wellbeing, rights, and mental health. But she doesn’t care about women at all. And she’s willing to sacrifice more children in order to make things “fair” for men, which makes me sick. The answer isn’t less men’s accountability to match women’s supposed lack of accountability; it’s more women’s accountability to match men’s perceived accountability. That’s what’s best for CHILDREN.
3
4
265
more replies
Replying to @NJBeisner
You don’t understand the game Pearl is playing. She believes the only way to defeat feminism is by amplifying and accelerating feminism — taking it to its logical end point She is doing an internal critique and arguing that if women get to opt out of parenthood via abortion then men can opt out of parenthood via not paying child support. She’s granting their worldview and then showing them where it logically leads.
1
5
196
Replying to @NJBeisner
Pearl is making her opponent seem reasonable, and we know that's wild.
1
5
160
Replying to @NJBeisner
Pearl is dumb. It blows my mind anyone listens to her
5
132
Replying to @NJBeisner
A man is responsible for any progeny resulting from his actions - just like any woman is. Pearl is not going to be the ultimate decision-maker in this scenario.
2
4
154
Replying to @NJBeisner
In a situation where a woman gets pregnant out of wedlock, primary custody is always going to go to the woman and the man gets "visitation" and bill. This is unjust. I agree that infants need their mothers more than fathers for obvious reasons, but men are routinely denied access when the parents aren't "together" and this is highly unfavorable to men. Judges often treat custody laws as a suggestion and it's very expensive for men to get anything changed, so the often do not.
2
2
207
Replying to @NJBeisner
You’re right, abortion should be illegal
2
21
Replying to @NJBeisner
If women have a choice then so should men. It's an internal critique, not an advocacy of more abortions.
3
70
Replying to @NJBeisner
It’s not merely a matter of fairness. Removing the obligation of child support from men until - at minimum - the father’s right to equal say in protection of his child from murder in the womb, would foster more support for pro life policies. Even if only for self serving reasons.
1
101
Replying to @NJBeisner
There is no solution, but strong families with rare divorces for extreme cases. And women going back to abstinence before marriage. That is how it worked well. We broke it, we have endless social mores that can never be patched back. The causalties are endless.
2
60
Replying to @NJBeisner
I don't think women should be able to abort their children between the ages of 18 to 25, if men are required to apply for the draft between those ages.
2
186
Replying to @NJBeisner
In Australia we have lots of support for parents I don’t why America is so different
1
19
Replying to @NJBeisner
and actually yes if women have the right to end pregnancies men should have the right to walk away at least. until women are criminally punished for it men should be free to abandon their kids. this christian misandrist nonsense of men alone having to care for society is bs
60
Replying to @NJBeisner
IMO, if both don't want it, it should be adopted. ✋️If one or the other doesn't want to be involved, go to court, let a judge or mediator decide. I just don't think you fight over him or her paying support or not. By this time they probably hate each other and will set iut to do maximum damage to the other. I put the ✋️to remind me to tell about being a triggered AB Clinic protestor at 14! I remember yelling at people for calling a baby "it". I would scream and clutch pearls. I was genuinely horrified. They were so beneath me. I was close to God Almighty and could do no wrong! Amazing how stupid I was. Haven't thought about that in 30 years. Answering this post just popped up on my mind.🤣🤣🤣
48
Replying to @NJBeisner
You are disgraceful
1
1
50
Replying to @NJBeisner
naw, pearl's bluff here is sound the only thing thing they care about more than their ability to murder their child is the power to extract resources after divorce when they're ready to keep it and since it appeals to their claimed desire for equality, they can't dispute it
1
70
Replying to @NJBeisner
If you don't want children abstain from sex or use protection why is this so difficult?
1
100
Replying to @NJBeisner
She’s just a one trick pony that realized she could make a lot of money being the “ cool girl “ in the manosphere … So she might have started out with legit complaints but now she’s just grifting off it all
29
Replying to @NJBeisner
Thanks for continuing to destroy the next generation of kids...the globalists love you.
20
Replying to @NJBeisner
I appreciate ur take. Correct, we should not be competing for the bottom of the barrel. Fathers of living children do not deserve “equality” to fathers of dead children. Equality is such an abused, BS term these days. My husband tried to coerce me to abort our first child by saying he’d leave if I kept the baby. We need LESS abortion coercion, not more.
1
79
Replying to @NJBeisner
Why are the dumbest people podcasters? Pearl being pro choice makes sense because she’s just right wing flavored woke anyway
13
Replying to @NJBeisner
Agreed, however, custody ahould be granted to the parent most capable of providing for the child, not the mother every damned time. I’ve seen far to many children’s lives destroyed in divorce
1
2
39
Replying to @NJBeisner
The solution shouldn’t be just taking men’s money from to spend Willie Nilly at mom’s discretion. All that does is turn men into ATMs under the guise of “Support” if she can pay for cigarettes, tattoos, alcohol other expenditures, she doesn’t need his money
8
Replying to @NJBeisner
Women LOVE having access to other people's money. This is one of the reasons effeminate socialism is so popular with women and young adults.
1
111
Replying to @NJBeisner
who even entertains this fucking degenerate naima after her stunt on 9/9/2026 mocking Charlies death???
60
Replying to @NJBeisner
When No Abortion is not something that's going to happen and is something solely decided by the woman, than it is absolutely fair for a man to be able to opt-out of child support as his "rights" don't matter. Women shouldn't get to decide something on their own that affects both
13
Replying to @NJBeisner
She’s probably afraid no man is willing to put himself on the birth certificate w her, so it feels easier to say she doesn’t want a man to have a family with.
124
Replying to @NJBeisner
Isn't that convenient? So the solution is advocating for something that you know will never happen and just letting men continue to be fucked over. Great The solution is to give men the power of not signing a birth certificate. Women will do the rest. Abortion would be gone.
14
Replying to @NJBeisner
I mean sure no abortion would be nice but it’s never gonna happen, at least fairness prevents some societal suffering in the long run. If men could leave it would force women to be more careful about which guys they choose their one night stands with, which would protect more kids.
1
50
Replying to @NJBeisner
Sad that that's the only perspective you see this from when there Is an obvious alternative perspective that only affects the women because the men already dont have those rights......
49
Replying to @NJBeisner
No abortion just makes things worse. Abortion is a net positive and causes less issues. On the flip side its only fair that a man can choose to not be a parent if a woman can choose to not be a parent. The real solution is for women to pick better and make sure the man they have
2
90
Load more