In recent months, there's been some really great research on Iran's nuclear sites. Hat tip to OSINT experts
@DAVIDHALBRIGHT1,
@StrickerNonpro,
@NicoleGrajewski,
@dex_eve, and
@sam_lair, and strong analysis from next-gen experts including
@baileyschiff.
There's been some discussion about overlap in recent Pickaxe Mountain analysis. Happy to speak to what our work contributed to a growing body of research by several organizations and media outlets, including
@TheGoodISIS,
@CNN, and
@JamesMartinCNS:
-We used 6 years of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) to identify more activity at Pickaxe Mountain this year than ever before, not just optical imagery to show a change in activity.
-We offered an original policy analysis comparing the difficulty of striking Fordow versus Pickaxe Mountain, including with GBU-57s: Pickaxe is much harder to hit because it is buried deeper in a granite mountain.
-We found evidence of external reinforcement of the portal tunnel entrances at Pickaxe Mountain in August of 2026.
My hope is that this contributes to the ongoing community-wide effort to address the challenges of Iran’s nuclear program. Iran's nuclear activity has been one of the biggest challenges to the nuclear regime for decades, and tracking it while offering concrete policy solutions will take a diverse field of experts working on the problem. As ever, I’m proud of PONI’s work and look forward to further discussions on Iran’s nuclear program across our multi-generational and ambitious network.