Tec Diver, SE Oklahoma Redneck Citizen Lobbyist. Co-Host of AxXiom for Liberty Radio -- GET INVOLVED! Less Governemnt = MORE Freedom The USSR still breathes...

Hugo, Okla. America
Dear @elonmusk; We've been trying to contact you about your car's Warranty. Our records indicate your @Tesla may be eligible for our exclusive Extended Warranty Program.
1
140
Heading to Cathay Pacific Check-In via @AmericanAir section of Terminal D, DFW. If AA was the last airline on earth, it would be Trains, Automobiles, & Boats.
1
144
"I was being a little sarcastic" (37 times).
He knows that everything he says is bullsh*t but he also knows MAGA eats his sh*t up.
1
1
91
U.S. Vice-President JD Vance said this today when attempting to bolster Pres. Trumps position on the russian invasion of Ukraine -- double check this, PLEASE: “If you go back to World War II, if you go back to World War I. If you go back to every major conflict in human history, they all end with some kind of negotiation.” 1: Is this just another overt lie from this Administration? 2: Does VP Vance really believe this? 3: Will VP Vance claim he was misunderstood? My bet is on #3 These misinformation bits are getting WAY out of hand.
5
3
123
howard houchen 🇺🇲 🇺🇦 retweeted
Customer feedback on American Airlines in 2025 is mixed. Positive reviews highlight friendly crews, on-time flights, and comfortable seating (e.g., Yelp, Skytrax). However, many report frustrations with delays, cancellations, lost bags, and poor service (e.g., Trustpilot, BBB, Reddit, X posts). JD Power's study shows industry satisfaction up, but AA ranks mid-to-low. For specifics, check recent surveys.
1
135
howard houchen 🇺🇲 🇺🇦 retweeted
I just had the worst airport experience of my life. How the hell are you just going to cancel my flight, then keep my bag with all my clothes hostage for days? @AmericanAir And then on top of that, you have some of the most rude unhelpful agents on planet Earth.
18
30
516
15,614
Two neighbors in my neighborhood have been in a "battle". Neighbor #1 is a well known bully/law breaker. He has lied to everyone in the neighborhood for decades and often physically attacks and sometimes even steals from them. A few years ago neighbor #1 walked across the street and brutally attacked neighbor #2 killing his pets & a family member and stole $1000 dollars from him. There were witnesses to this attack, murder, and theft and there has been a brutal legal battle for almost 11 yrs now. A judge from 1/2 way around the world now says this ugly battle can stop ONLY if neighbor #2 gives neighbor #1 another $2000 and access to much of neighbor #1's property & says neighbor #1's attack was justified. Do you think the judge is correct? Is impartial? @ZelenskyyUa @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @marcorubio
56
American Airlines is running a "Guess Where?" Campaign. Supposedly asking people to fly AA. Here is my response to AA: "EXACTLY! GUESS WHERE? Because that is what could happen when flying AA. A recent trip that was supposed to be a few hours...1st Class on AA: TUL-DCA then DCA-PWM... TOOK 3 DAYS! Left Friday afternoon, was supposed to land Friday night. Left Friday afternoon, arrived Sunday afternoon and we ended up in places we were GUESSING WHERE! STAY AWAY FROM AA. Also, their "Customer Relations" (not Customer Service, CUSTOMER RELATIONS) is worse than the flight service and snotty attitude. STILL trying to get something done about this AA induced debacle that cost me in excess of 2K EXTRA. Cancelled flights due to maintenance issues, baggage issues, 1st to Economy issues, nasty cabin issues...an absolute nightmare. @AmericanAir
26
35
175
521,598
Hey @Grok; what are people saying about their experiences with American Airlines Customer Relations @AmericanAir
4
557
Does ANYONE have a direct line of communication with @AmericanAir "Customer Relations"? This is beyond insane trying to get in direct touch with someone. You easily communicate with "Customer Service" but Customer Relations is completely separate entity within AA who seems be unreachable in any meaningful or direct way.
2
1
117
LOADS of TRUTH in this...jus sayin'.
From a letter in the Saturday edition of the Wall Street Journal:
124
Question: Current NATO countries share about 1615 miles of border with russia. Ukraine shares about 1420 miles of border with russia. Keep in mind 826 miles of that NATO shared border with russia did not exist until AFTER russia invaded Ukraine - then Finland joined NATO. So, are we really to believe "NATO Expansion" was the legitimate (legal) reasoning for the russian invasion of Ukraine? Why didn't russia invade Finland as well???? Things that make ya go, hmmmmm......
89
What am I missing? Did President Trump negotiate and sign a Bad Trade Deal in the USMCA?? Via GROK xI "Donald Trump approved the USMCA. As President of the United States, he played a key role in its negotiation and signing. The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) was signed by Trump, along with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto, on November 30, 2018, during the G20 Summit in Buenos Aires. However, "approval" in this context has layers: Negotiation and Signing: Trump initiated the renegotiation of NAFTA, which he frequently criticized as a bad deal for the U.S., shortly after taking office in 2017. His administration drove the talks, and he personally signed the USMCA in 2018, signaling his approval of the agreement’s terms. Congressional Approval: In the U.S. system, trade agreements require Congressional ratification. After some revisions (notably pushed by Democrats in Congress in 2019 to strengthen labor and environmental provisions), the USMCA was passed by the House of Representatives on December 19, 2019 (385-41), and by the Senate on January 16, 2020 (89-10). Trump signed the implementing legislation into law on January 29, 2020, finalizing U.S. approval. So, Trump both approved it as the executive who negotiated and signed it, and he signed the bill into law after Congress ratified it. The agreement entered into force on July 1, 2020, during his presidency, fulfilling one of his major campaign promises to replace NAFTA with a deal he deemed more favorable to American interests, including specific wins like the dairy access to Canada we discussed earlier."
3
99
It appears those 270%+ Tariffs are only on goods that are in EXCESS OF THE ALREADY AGREED UPON Quotas?
45
Canada imposes tariffs on U.S. dairy products under a supply management system that uses tariff-rate quotas (TRQs). Within these quotas, dairy imports from the U.S. face low or no tariffs, as negotiated under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). However, once the quota is exceeded, over-quota tariffs apply, and these can be significantly higher. Specific over-quota tariff rates vary by product but are often cited as follows: Milk: Approximately 241% to 270% Cheese: Around 245% Butter: Up to 298% These figures reflect Canada’s protectionist approach to its dairy industry, designed to limit imports and stabilize domestic supply and prices. The exact rate depends on the specific dairy product and the terms of trade agreements like the USMCA, which has granted the U.S. some increased access to the Canadian market (about 3.5% of it), though high tariffs remain a barrier for amounts exceeding the quota. For the most current and precise rates, you’d need to check Canada’s official tariff schedule, as these can shift with policy updates or trade disputes. As of now, March 5, 2025, these are the commonly referenced ranges based on historical and ongoing trade discussions
65
The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which replaced NAFTA and entered into force on July 1, 2020, outlines specific tariff-rate quotas (TRQs) for U.S. dairy exports to Canada. Under the USMCA, Canada agreed to provide increased market access for U.S. dairy products through TRQs, allowing a set volume of imports at lower or no tariffs before the high over-quota tariffs (like the 200%+ rates I mentioned earlier) kick in. Here’s the breakdown based on the agreement: Key Dairy TRQs for U.S. Exports to Canada in the USMCA: Milk: Starting at 8,333 metric tons (MT) in the first year, increasing incrementally to 50,000 MT by year 6, then growing by 1% annually for the next 13 years. About 85% of this quota is reserved for further processing (e.g., into cheese or yogurt). Cheese: Starts at 2,083 MT in year 1, rising to 12,500 MT by year 6, with an additional 1% annual increase for the following 13 years. Split between industrial-use cheese (e.g., processed) and retail cheese. Butter and Cream: Begins at 750 MT in year 1, reaching 4,500 MT by year 6, then a 1% annual increase for 13 years. At least 85% of this is allocated specifically for butter. Skim Milk Powder: Starts at 1,667 MT in year 1, climbing to 10,000 MT by year 6, followed by 1% annual growth for 13 years. Cream: Begins at 1,750 MT in year 1, increasing to 10,500 MT by year 6, with a 1% annual increase thereafter. Other Dairy Products: Additional TRQs apply to products like yogurt, ice cream, and whey products, with specific volumes phased in over time. For example: Yogurt and Buttermilk: Starts at 166 MT, rising to 1,000 MT by year 6. Ice Cream: Starts at 115 MT, reaching 690 MT by year 6. Implementation Details: The TRQs are phased in over 6 years, starting from 2020, with the full amounts (e.g., 50,000 MT for milk) reached by 2025 or 2026, depending on the product. After year 6, the quotas grow by 1% annually for another 13 years (until roughly 2039), reflecting a compound growth mechanism. Within-quota imports face tariffs of 0% or very low rates, while anything exceeding these volumes triggers the over-quota tariffs (e.g., 270% for milk, 298% for butter). Context as of March 5, 2025: Since we’re now in year 5 of the USMCA (2025), the TRQs are likely close to or at their maximum pre-1% growth levels for many products. For instance, milk should be nearing 41,665 MT (5/6 of the way to 50,000 MT), and butter approaching 3,750 MT. The exact allocation for 2025 would depend on how Canada has administered the quotas annually, which can involve some variability due to domestic policy and trade disputes (e.g., U.S. complaints about Canada not fully honoring TRQ access). These volumes represent about 3.5% of Canada’s dairy market, a modest but significant increase from NAFTA, though still tightly controlled to protect Canadian producers. For the most precise current-year figures, you’d need Canada’s 2025 TRQ administration data, but the USMCA text lays out the framework as described.
65
Canada won....Trump has lost his bet. No Tariff Imposition for at least another year. #Hockey
95
An amazing Grok 3 Analysis of @elonmusk as a leading disseminator of falsehoods regarding Ukraine: "Let’s narrow the focus to Elon Musk’s recent misinformation specifically related to Ukraine. Since late 2024 and into early 2025, Musk’s posts have increasingly centered on the Russia-Ukraine war, often aligning with Kremlin narratives or amplifying unverified claims. Here’s a detailed look at key examples from this period, emphasizing Ukraine-specific disinformation. USAID Fake News (Early February 2025) Musk reposted a fabricated story claiming the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) funded celebrity visits to Ukraine for Volodymyr Zelensky’s PR. Ukraine’s Center for Countering Disinformation (CPD) identified this as Russian-origin propaganda, with posts on X from EuromaidanPress and Maks_NAFO_FELLA (February 6, 2025) noting its 13 million+ views before Musk deleted it. The claim lacked evidence—no such story existed on E! News, the attributed source—and echoed Russian efforts to discredit U.S. aid, a pattern Musk has repeated. This misstep fueled perceptions of him as a disinformation vector, especially as it coincided with Trump administration moves to cut USAID funding. Zelensky’s Approval and “Dictator” Claims (February 2025) Musk recently backed Donald Trump’s assertion that Zelensky has a 4% approval rating in Ukraine, citing vague “U.S. intelligence” in posts reported by outlets like The Independent (February 20, 2025). He also echoed Trump’s “dictator” label, claiming Zelensky is “despised” and refuses elections—implying illegitimacy. This contradicts a Kyiv International Institute of Sociology poll (February 2025) showing 57% trust in Zelensky, consistent with wartime support levels. Ukraine’s martial law, enacted due to Russia’s invasion, legally suspends elections, a context Musk omits. X posts (e.g., @RichardAngwin , February 20) and experts like Olga Onuch (University of Manchester) flagged this as Kremlin-aligned misinformation, undermining Ukraine’s democratic legitimacy while ignoring its war-driven constraints. U.S. Media Control Fabrication (February 2025) On February 10, 2025, United24media reported Musk spreading a false claim that the U.S. controls 90% of Ukrainian media. Originating from a distorted interview, this was amplified by pro-Kremlin sources before Musk boosted it. No evidence supports this; Ukraine’s media landscape, while strained by war, remains diverse and independent, per analyses from groups like Freedom House. This fits Musk’s broader narrative of U.S. overreach, but it’s baseless and aligns with Russian propaganda aiming to portray Ukraine as a Western puppet. Community Notes Controversy (February 2025) On February 20, 2025, Musk vowed to “fix” X’s Community Notes, claiming it was “gamed” by governments and media over Zelensky critiques, per France24 and The Independent. This followed his amplification of false Zelensky narratives (e.g., dictator claims) that Notes failed to consistently flag. X sentiment (e.g., unwokegod) accused him of dodging accountability, suggesting his “fix” might weaken fact-checking to protect his Ukraine-related posts. This ties into earlier 2024 incidents—like USAID fakes—where Notes lagged, letting his misinformation spread unchecked to millions. Pattern and Impact These Ukraine-specific cases reveal Musk’s 2025 trend: amplifying unverified or Kremlin-friendly claims (USAID, Zelensky’s legitimacy, U.S. media control) while leveraging his 208 million+ followers and X’s algorithm to maximize reach. His posts often garner 10-20 million views, dwarfing corrections (e.g., CCDH’s 2024 finding of 200:1 spread ratio). Since aligning with Trump’s administration and DOGE role in late 2024, his Ukraine disinformation has spiked, potentially influencing U.S. policy—like aid cuts—amid Trump’s Russia negotiations. Critics on X and in reports (e.g., Euromaidan Press) argue this isn’t mere skepticism but a deliberate echo of Moscow’s talking points."
1
2
456