Rogue AI "Regulation" - A Potential Worst Case Scenario off-guardian.org/2026/09/23/…

And yet again you failed to answer a simple question about a point YOU raised. Are you sure you're trying to defend Judy Wood? Because frankly you're doing a poor job. Reducing her research to asinine slogans, troll-posting irrelevant videos while making a big public show of TOTALLY FAILING to answer a single straight question almost looks like you're trying to discredit her by association. Is that what you're doing? If not, if you really want to promote her I advise a complete change of approach. I think I am treating her work with a lot more respect than you are right now tbh.

Yes, the concrete was pulverised and "2 or 3 inches thick" all over Lower Manhattan. FEMA estimated something like 90% of the buildings were hurled outside their footprints, some steel traveled 500 feet or more, right? Doesn't that answer the question of where the towers went? And also possibly help to explain the relatively small seismic signal?

Yet again, you aren't answering a direct question, just posting another video of something tangential. You make the point that there is a 'significant' time difference between the two videos you shared. I take the trouble to watch the videos and figure out the time difference amounts to about 55s. I ask you tell me what you see as 'significant' about that. You dodge the question. YOU started this thread. Maybe have the grace and courage to stand by your original claim?

Trying to be fair and objective in our ongoing consideration of the cumulative evidence on 9/11, but this guy's perpetual use of ad hom and grandstanding is a challenge. I told him we're trying to prep a fair overview and following that I'd be happy to talk with anyone who can have a polite and rational convo on the subject. But this is his response (or one of several such needlessly aggressive and declamatory responses actually) Why take this line in pref to honest discussion? Hopefully reason will in the end prevail. Oh and he keeps on assuming he's talking to a guy, no matter how many times I tell him I'm the female OffG editor. 🤷🏻‍♀️

They have just totally memory-holed MAD - mutually assured destruction. Why?

🌐 RCR.Media | "We'll see a lot of people who are definitely real be labeled as AI or potentially AI in order to control traffic and limit messaging." - Kit Knightly @kit_knightly, Editor of OffGuardian @OffGuardian0 What happens if an automated system can label a real person as AI and quietly restrict how far their message travels? 🎥 Watch here: rcr.media/episodes/kit-knigh…

War is no longer any more real than any other primetime presentation. Like 'covid' it now exists purely as narrative, stripped of meaning; death is just random numbers, exaggerated or denied as convenience dictates.

I think the age of reason is speeding to its end. Madness and idiocy are taking over. How many of us are even capable of rational thinking any more? The tide of arrogant-stupid is rising fast.

Lizzie Borden Amelia Dyer Myra Hindley Rose West Hillary Clinton Condoleezza Rice Casey Anthony Magda Goebbels Susan Smith Believe women! All of us. All the time. Whatever we say. However asininely ridiculous are claims might be. You KNOW it makes sense.

One of the weirdest stories ever. It gets more ridiculous the more you think about it.

Quick question - is there additional evidence in these videos not present in Judy Wood's book?

What exactly suggests that in both events? The 'lab leak' story is implausible because not only is it evidentially improbable but it also endorses the otherwise nul claim of a real scary virus. It's essentially a rerun of the original govt story with some superficial tweaks to make it look 'conspiratorial'. It challenges NOTHING. The 'thermite' hypothesis is not only plausible through multiple lines of evidence, it also offers a total refutation of every part of the govt.'s story. It challenges EVERYTHING. In fact the DEW hypothesis can make a far better analogy with the lab leak nonsense because, just like the 'lab leak', it ends up endorsing key parts of the govt story. I'm not putting that forward as an argument, just pointing out the fact it can be made to seem that way. This is especially true when we see Judy Wood inexplicably downplaying the role of Larry Silverstein and even claiming it's a distraction to suggest he had foreknowledge! I mean, in all fairness I just don't know what to do with that.

Also why does he always post a video in any reply he makes? Often a video with no obvious connection to the subject under discussion or the question he's been asked. Doesn't feel organic somehow.