𝐇𝐢, 𝐈’𝐦 𝐀𝐙𝐔𝐁𝐔𝐈𝐊𝐄. I turn 𝐚𝐦𝐛𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐬 into 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐬 people 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝, 𝐮𝐬𝐞, and 𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐰 with. From strategy and documentation to user experience, community, and execution — I help bridge the gap between vision and reality. 𝐒𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐬 𝐬𝐨 𝐟𝐚𝐫: ❏ Onboarded 𝟏𝟓𝟎𝟎+ community members across multiple product launches before launch. ❏ Produced 𝟏𝟎+ educational documents that supported user onboarding and adoption across 𝟕 product launches. ❏ Organized campaigns that engaged 𝟐𝟎𝟎+ participants, contributing to 𝟕 successful marketing campaigns between 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟓-𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔. ❏ Helped onboard contributors, partners, community leaders, and core team members for growing ecosystems. Whether you’re building in Web3, AI, or tech, I help make complex things feel simple. I don’t just turn ideas into products — I turn products into experiences people understand, trust, and advocate for. 𝐌𝐲 𝐃𝐌𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 🫱🏾‍🫲🏻

Great for Crypto, and great for us!

After going through Fusi from the launch mechanism to the fee model, MultiFuse, $FUSE and everything sitting around it, I think I finally understand what caught my attention in the first place. It isn’t just that Fusi makes launching a token easier. We’ve already seen how easy token creation is And the protocol itself has a mechanism connecting activity back to $FUSE. That makes Fusi feel less like another place to press “launch” and more like an attempt to build the infrastructure around the entire market. The product is still relatively young. For me, that’s usually where the interesting projects begin. Not when everyone already knows the outcome. But when there’s still something to watch unfold. For more context, check out @Fusi_ng Website: fusi.ng

And because I really wanted to understand what I was writing about, I decided not to stop at Fusi’s docs. I followed an actual Fusi launch onchain. I wanted to see what really happens between: Token creation → Pool creation → Liquidity → First swap → Fee flow And the interesting part is that you can actually see the pieces come together. Take $CLARITY, for example. Fusi records its launch transaction, the token contract, its Uniswap market, the liquidity position and the trading activity directly on the launch page. The launch created a 1B supply, paired it with ETH and brought the market live through Uniswap v4. Then came the first trade: 328.5K $CLARITY for 0.0005 ETH. That transaction is recorded against the launch. And the fee wasn’t some abstract number sitting in a document either. The launch shows a 1.1% pool fee, with the V2 split sending 0.44% to the protocol and 0.66% to the creator side. So I could follow the entire path: Create token ↓ Create market ↓ Initialize liquidity ↓ First swap ↓ Fee gets routed

I had to separate two things when researching Fusi: Fusi is the protocol. $FUSE is the token. The token has a 1B maximum supply, but Fusi has built a mechanism where protocol activity can permanently reduce that supply. Here’s the loop. Fusi takes its share of trading fees. ➠ 80% of the protocol’s quote-asset share is directed toward $FUSE buybacks and burns. ➠ The other 20% goes toward operations. So when activity happens on Fusi, part of the value generated by that activity can make its way back into the $FUSE economy. And this isn’t just something sitting in a roadmap. ➠ Fusi’s dashboard currently records 37M+ $FUSE already burned, representing roughly 3.7% of the maximum supply at the snapshot I found. That gives the token a very specific relationship with the protocol: More trading activity → more protocol fees → buyback & burn → less $FUSE remaining Then there’s governance. $FUSE is also the governance token for the ecosystem, giving holders a role in how the protocol develops.

Launching the token is only the beginning. Once people start trading it, there’s another layer most people don’t think about: the money moving through the market. Fusi built an economic system around that activity. Every swap currently carries a 1.1% base fee, and that fee is split between the creator and Fusi depending on the version being used. ➠ With V1, creators receive 70% of the base fee. ➠ With V2, that becomes 60%, with the remaining 40% going to the protocol. ➠ With V3: Fusi is taking the model further, with a focus on expanding into tokenized-stock and broader onchain market infrastructure. A creator can structure the economics around: ➠ Buybacks & burns Trading activity can feed back into the token by purchasing and removing tokens from circulation. ➠ Liquidity Part of the generated value can be directed back toward the market, creating another layer around liquidity. ➠ Holder rewards The economics can also be designed to send rewards toward the people holding the token. ➠ Creator revenue And of course, there is a direct creator-side fee mechanism. So instead of fees simply disappearing into some backend revenue account, Fusi gives creators different ways to build an economic loop around their market.

➠ The MULTIFUSE This is where Fusi’s Uniswap v4 architecture starts becoming more useful. Normally, if I launch a token and want it traded against different assets, I’m dealing with separate pools and separate setup processes. MultiFuse changes that. Say I launch $XYZ and I don’t want its entire market to depend on one quote asset. I could create: $XYZ / ETH $XYZ / USDC $XYZ / WBTC and up to six different Uniswap v4 pools in a single transaction. But Fusi isn’t simply creating six random pools. The starting prices are aligned around the same ETH-denominated value. So if $XYZ starts at an equivalent value of 0.001 ETH, the different pools are initialized around that same valuation. That creates a common reference point between the markets. Now imagine one pool moves away from that price because of trading activity. The difference creates an arbitrage opportunity. Traders can move between the pools, buying where $XYZ is cheaper and selling where it’s more expensive, pushing the markets back toward alignment. So the mechanism becomes: One token → multiple quote assets → multiple Uniswap v4 pools → shared starting valuation → arbitrage keeps prices connected And because all of those pools can be created in one transaction, the creator isn’t manually deploying each market one after another. That’s what makes MultiFuse more than just a “multiple pools” feature. It’s a way of launching one token with several connected markets from the beginning.

So what actually happens when you launch a token on Fusi? Let’s break the mechanism down step by step. ➠ Step 1 : Create the token You start with a fixed-supply token. Set the name, ticker, supply and other launch parameters, then create the token directly through Fusi. ➠ Step 2 : Choose the market Next, you choose what the token will trade against. ETH or another supported quote asset with an existing Uniswap market can be used as the pair. ➠ Step 3 : Set the starting price Fusi uses your chosen token supply, quote asset and launch parameters to establish the starting market. There’s no bonding curve sitting between the token and its market. ➠ Step 4 : Create the Uniswap v4 pool This is where Fusi gets different. The token and its liquidity are placed into a Uniswap v4 market as part of the launch process. So the market isn’t something you graduate into later. It exists from the beginning. ➠ Step 5 : Lock the liquidity position The liquidity position is locked, preventing the creator from simply pulling the launch liquidity out. The market is now there for trading. ➠ Step 6 : Trading begins Once the launch is live, people can buy and sell the token through its Uniswap market. Every swap passes through Fusi’s fee mechanism, with the creator and protocol receiving their respective shares. ➠ Step 7 : The market keeps working And this is the part I find most interesting. The launch doesn’t end when the token is created. The market is already there. Creators can earn from trading activity, holders can participate in rewards where applicable, and Fusi can build additional functionality around the same market. So the entire flow becomes: Create → Choose → Price → Pool → Lock → Trade

But the more I looked into Fusi, the more I realized the launch was only the surface. Because Fusi isn’t just one feature dressed up as a platform. There are a few things happening underneath it that make the whole model interesting. ➠ Your token gets a market from the start Fusi uses fixed-supply tokens with a locked Uniswap v4 liquidity position, so the token can be traded from the first block. No bonding curve graduation. No waiting to migrate liquidity later. The market is part of the launch. ➠ You can launch against different assets ETH isn’t the only option. Fusi lets creators choose a quote asset with an existing Uniswap market, meaning the token can be paired against assets people already trade. And with MultiFuse, multiple Uniswap v4 markets can be created in a single transaction. ➠ Creators can earn from trading activity Every swap carries a 1.1% base fee. Depending on the launch version, a share goes back to the creator while the protocol takes its own share. So the creator isn’t only launching a token and walking away. There is an actual fee mechanism attached to the market. ➠ Rewards aren’t limited to creators Fusi also has a rewards system where eligible rewards can be claimed directly from the platform. And then there’s the feature I found particularly interesting: ╰┈➤ Community takeover. If a creator completely disappears, the community can apply to have the creator-fee recipient changed. It doesn’t rewrite the token or alter its supply or liquidity. It simply gives the people who kept the project alive a way to potentially control where future creator fees go, subject to Fusi’s review and a public timelock. And these are just the features sitting on the surface. Because Fusi has also been building ways to make launching a token feel less like a technical operation… and more like something you can trigger from where you already spend your time.

Fusi is an Ethereum-based market creation platform built on Uniswap v4. But forget the fancy wording for a second. The simple version is this: you can create a token and its market at the same time. No waiting for a bonding curve to hit some magic number. No graduating first, then figuring out liquidity afterwards. You create your token, choose what you want it traded against, and Fusi puts the market live on Uniswap from the start. And for something that only launched in September, the early traction was hard to ignore. $500K+ in volume in 24 hours. $1M+ in less than 48 hours. Then it crossed $5M+ in platform volume with 160+ tokens launched, according to Fusi’s own dashboard. And once I looked deeper, I realized that was only the beginning… Fusi had a lot more planned for that market.

But the Pons numbers tell only half the story. The other half is what happens to the thousands of tokens created every day. Bitquery tracked 207,893 tokens launched through Pons between August 3 and September 3. Only 1.55% of them actually graduated to Uniswap. That means the overwhelming majority never made it far enough to develop a deeper market. And this is the bigger problem with token launches today. Creating the token is easy. Getting it into a market with meaningful liquidity, sustained trading and a reason for people to keep participating is the hard part. You can have a great idea, launch in seconds and still end up with a token that nobody trades. That’s the gap I kept coming back to. If launching a token is becoming this easy, why does creating the market around that token still have to be such a separate, complicated process? That question is basically where @fusi_ng begins.

A lot of people have been donating these past weeks, all in the name of launching a token I am one of them 🥲 But , On july 14, Ogle put $4,997 into PONS. By September 3, that bag was worth roughly $5.69M. That’s almost 1,140× in less than two months. And Ogle wasn’t the only reason people started paying attention to Pons. In just 32 days, Pons had helped create 207,893 tokens, with about $736M traded on their launch curves and another $2.14B traded after graduation. So naturally, I started asking myself: What if creating the next token people discover wasn’t something you had to watch from the sidelines? What if you could create yours too? Hear me out @fusi_ng ▼

100 human to see this and we call it a day🔥 Let get it done ✅

Majority of people study billionaires backwards. They look at the money and miss what came before it. I studied how 7 of them built their fortunes. The pattern was surprisingly simple: Habit → Skill → System → Wealth. Thread 👇

New UI. Live now. And Spice Flow is live inside it! Log in with an email. Load up your account with whatever you already hold on @ethereum, @base, @arbitrum , @Polygon , @BNBCHAIN or @monad. No bridge, no wallet switching, no gas token. One signature and it lands in your PARE account. From there, in one screen: • Buy the S&P 500, Nasdaq 100, Apple or Pfizer at a discount to the share, rate fixed to Dec 2027. 6.6% on Pfizer today. • Cash out the next 15 months of dividends today and keep the shares. • Post S&P 500 as backing and borrow dollars against it. Or loop it up to 2.28x in one signature. • Add to the pPFE/USDG pool. $100 a day in rewards spread over the pool on top of trade fees. New front page too. Less to read, more to see: what PARE is in one line, the live fixed rates, the four contracts, and the app behind it. Spice Flow x PARE campaign coming: trade on PARE, earn Spice Points. Details from @spicenetio soon

Ground rules for our replies: Come to talk, and I'll talk. Humbly, patiently, every time. Think something's broken? Tell me. I'll listen, and we'll ship the fix. Come in swinging with no reason? Then sorry, all the rage I've been bottling up during these late-night dev sessions finally has somewhere to go.

Programmability is the feature Ink is the chain 💜

hood access loading soon

Inkyswap is now live on Robinhood Chain. same launch engine. wider trenches.