what have I done to help? garbage plate native. šŸ‘©šŸ»šŸ‘§šŸ¼šŸ‘¦šŸ»šŸ¶. partner at rallyday (lmm pe). tweets my own.

Denver, CO
Some good stuff in here re: How to do a networking call if you’re a young one… I’ll add: - do your research! No excuse today to not properly prep. If you ask obvious questions you will look unprepared - set the context. ā€œI’m super green and trying to learn what an investment banker doesā€ is very different than ā€œI’m dead set on investment bankingā€. This preps the person on the line and can give you grace if you’re super early - your story / pitch should be perfect. Practice practice practice. If you’re super green you can even ask the person to help you with the pitch. - be incredibly easy to schedule. Send your resume beforehand. Don’t dress like a slob. - ā€œwhat do you think got you to position xyzā€ is a great question, imo. Lots to learn from success stories. - ā€œgiven my resume, pitch, and goals, what advice do you have for me?ā€ This should unlock some gems I got my job in PE out of business school doing this stuff. It works. Good luck!
On this note, I wanted to highlight some of the things you should be doing if you want the call to go well: 1) When the call starts and the person you're talking to asks you something along the lines of "How's your day going," do not just reply with good. Say what you've been up to so far or have planned for the day, lie if you have to. If you just rolled out of bed at noon tell him you went to the gym when you woke up and just got back from class. 2) Keep the small talk going for a bit, but once that runs its course, find a way to transition and take charge of the call. It's weird to go from small talk to firing straight into questions about the job. I'd recommend a transition that thanks them again for taking the time and lays out a framework for the rest of the call. 3) It's always good to have questions prepared to fall back on, but its important that you ask good follow ups that show you pay attention and have some understanding of the industry. If you just go down your list of prepared questions that don't flow together well, it's going to come off as unnatural. 4) Check on time at the 30 minute mark. Say something like "I see we're getting pretty close to (whatever time it's about to be 30 minutes after the start), do you have a hard stop or do you mind if I ask a couple more questions? Only do this if the call is going well. If it's going poorly, you should just kill it there by acknowledging that you're coming up on 30 minutes and thanking them for the time. At the end of the day, it just comes down to reps. Your first couple are going to be bad. Once in a while, someone is going to be having a bad day and be a dick to you on the call. Never forget that its a numbers game.
11
1,532
one of the things we hear about ai usage is how "scattered" all the tools & documents & folders are - drives disorganization and adoption issues we built most of our use cases in an app, which stitches a lot of the tools and plumbing together in one place. highly recommend.
6
25
3,185
banker event at our office in denver tomorrow with some hands-on ai work, dinner, drinks, etc. shoot me a note if you fit the description and want to come by - 3pm start 🤘
we are hosting a banker event with nimble gravity at our place on 10/1 around "ai in investment banking". dinner, drinks, hands-on use-case / demo stuff - we'll have a big team from NG, including CEO, engineers, etc. if you're a lmm / mm banker and want to attend, we have a few slots left. shoot me a dm.
11
2,779
The majority of our associate candidates over the last few years have had a tough time with the model test (score less than 5 out of 10). It’s a 3 hour test. Claude scored a 10/10 in 4 minutes today. 😳
10
2
126
30,300
we are about 9 months into our ai project - probably ~4 more to go. we have a fully dedicated engineering team from nimble gravity + a consultant from NG. azure > databricks > anthropic is the bulk of our stuff. biggest thing for me: will this help us do more great deals? fwiw, I'm a believer that the two biggest areas of differentiation for any firm are sourcing and building. I'm also generally a tech skeptic. some observations / thoughts: 1. if your data is poorly organized / if your firm doesn't already have decent people / process / tools infrastructure around managing data, start here (this is a heavy lift imo and is more cultural than technical) 2. be great about the tedious discovery and process mapping to start (this took 10 weeks for us) 3. be great about building a proper change mgmt program (set up a show & tell cadence, set up the slack channel, etc. do we measure usage? is it part of performance reviews?). be thoughful about measuring ROI 4. I'm pretty blown away by what's possible. this job will change a good bit in the next 12-24 months. if your firm is not building you are behind. for more senior folks, if you are great at process but can't draw a straight line to returns and / or fundraising, you need to figure it out = get on the road and shake more hands (which all this work should enable) Our original use-case mapping is here (has changed a bit as we've gone through the process): docsend.com/view/4furdqmifm7… Detailed use-case stuff here: padraicmcconville.com/writin…
I'm polling hundreds of finance professionals on how they use AI at work It's a no bullshit survey on what vendors bankers and investors actually like and use, and I'm extremely excited to share the results in a couple weeks Survey form is below but curious to hear from you
12
2
70
23,542
Got this today.
Unfortunately, I think that we are at a point where AI has gotten good enough that new graduates add very little value to most jobs in finance This was always the case, but the rationale for hiring young talent before AI was two-fold 1. They soak up grunt work around the office, including tedious number entry into Excel, logo aligning, calendar invites, and administrative tasks on a deal 2. Train up the next generation of talent who can go on to become senior leaders in the future The first one has been pretty much already solved by AI to a large degree. Even if not fully replaceable today, the state of progress tells me that almost all finance grunt work will be handled by AI in the next 5-10 years. Probably even sooner The second one still creates incentive for companies to hire young graduates, but at a much slower pace than before. > AI leads to higher productivity across senior management and mid-level employees, freeing up their time to focus on bigger picture > Need fewer senior management and mid-level employees in the future due to this productivity boost, which pushes down the need for young graduates even further > Even if you dont completely shut down the analyst program, the number of analysts you need on the job certainly shrinks down by 20-30% at least, likely in the next 3-5 years > New analysts coming in are lower quality due to being reliant on AI during their college years and requiring AI to do any sort of critical thinking. This in turn hurts their ability to get promoted down the line All of these factors combined likely lead to a very difficult hiring environment for students studying finance in college today. The best piece of advice I can really give is to embrace the tools as fast as you can and try to keep your critical thinking and imagination skills intact while doing so. This is going to be much tougher than it sounds, especially as AI progresses in the next 5 years
10
1
97
39,182
re: what it means to get to the top of a firm. I see lots of folks get really good at process along the way and forget that this is what ultimately matters...
Replying to @PadraicMcC
Generally either an ability to drive great returns or raise money.....
5
27
8,694
fwiw for folks in tough spots at underperforming shops: ā€˜09-ā€˜12 portended a big washout and a good # of those firms are still around today w/ good aum Need to figure out if you have the resilience & confidence in the team to get to the other side
1
6
1,511
(now a) simple ai uc: built a site selection tool with an interactive map for a prospect🤯- this used to take weeks & a good chunk of $$, and now it's likely a pricey sub to a buxton-type product. part of the challenge with this stuff is properly rethinking what's possible...
2
4
1,118
Interesting bit in tech services right now: IP or ā€œacceleratorsā€ were always viewed as positive differentiators; now, in can be interpreted that your sdlc is ancient. great dd question.
1
3
1,111
people in our industry love to say stuff like "I / we don't want to waste anyone's time..." remove it from your vocabulary and learn how to tell people what needs to be true to move forward. quality of convos and conversion will go up, meaningfully.
3
2
29
2,315
my pal and colleague Samantha is hosting a Power & Motherhood event as part of Colorado Startup Week at 930am on Friday - highly recommend if you're in the area: linkedin.com/events/75057071…
548
jeez my goodness please relax šŸ˜‚ (this is great)
Have you kicked off annual planning yet? Before you model a $, pull these five things: 1. your current headcount roster, 2. your open headcount roster, 3. the September P&L, 4. historical sales rep attainment, and 5. the last twelve months of costs. Everything downstream is built on these, so it's worth getting them rock solid before you start. Here’s a detailed guide you can lean on this annual planning season, taking you from start to finish: mostlymetrics.com/p/don-t-st…
2
5
6,201
Padraic McConville retweeted
this was a fun one to work on - our partner company, Insero Advisors, acquired Cause & Effect, a data & AI consultancy. grateful to the Insero and Cause & Effect leadership teams! inseroadvisors.com/blog/inse…
1
1
267
this use case is pretty close to an actual product and is probably my biggest Wow around what’s happening to the sdl. I’ve been in this industry 20+ years and portfolio reporting has always been a hassle. There are a number of pretty bad products out there that you can try (I don’t know if I’ve ever met a happy customer). Where this has landed: - takes some config on the front end for each portco; and, the user can do it! Statements / dashboard are configurable by the user and the tool remembers and ingests future statements in that format - semantic analytical chat on top - will roll into lp reporting (šŸ™ŒšŸ»)
1
1
7
3,554
when your good pal works at crocs (go bills)
3
7
926
we’re in a part of the cycle where the frankenstein rollups (zero integration) are mostly not selling. sometimes these things do great. Best to put a sizable team together to drive integration (people / process / tools) at this point, imo.
3
1
14
2,005
bruce is 10 🄳 these guys are the best
7
28
1,182
We invested in Insero Advisors in January 2025 when it was doing about $24m in revenue (reminder that most accounting firm rev numbers are easy to find). We’ve done three add-ons and one aqui-hire. Some thoughts and whatnot (we talked to a good number of firms before getting this deal done): - not all firms care about growth and that’s OK!; don’t take PE if you’re most interested in running a lifestyle biz (perfectly great choice) - governance: lots of partnership structures with slow decision-making processes and misaligned incentives across sr vs jr partners (insero already had a ceo-led structure in place); need to understand how decisions get made - ā€œthe scrapeā€: equity partners ā€œgive backā€ distributions to essentially create EBITDA. This is an important part of the process and has impact on up and comer comp expectations; easier to do when this is concentrated vs a much larger group; important to create meaningful equity plans and upside for up and comers and illustrate how economics can be more lucrative via traditional accounting ā€œretire and payoutā€ construct - fwiw not sure I’ve ever seen such a large and old sector go through so much change so quickly; personally believe we are in the early days of some big transformation - like most services businesses: take care of your employees and they will take care of their clients (always easier said than done) Jason - really appreciate your content šŸ™šŸ»
6 ways to sell your accounting firm Including the PE, VC and AI roll-up paths: 1// Platform Investment Buyer: Private equity Target Firm: $75M–$400M/yr revenue These are the headline-makers. Juicy multiples, the 7-11x EBITDA. At this size you're the anchor firm a PE fund builds around, and bolts other firms onto you. You're the backbone, and have the most say in how your deal (and future firm deals) come together. 2// Add-On (Tuck-In) Acquisition Buyer: Private equity Target firm: $2M–$50M revenue You're selling into an existing platform someone else already built. As a result the deal is turnkey, giving you little room to negotiate. What you lose: your brand, your back office, your say in software. What you keep: your client relationships, and for a time, your team. 3// AI Roll-Up Buyer: Venture capital Target firm: 10–100 people, sub-$10M revenue. This one's venture capital, not PE. The (correct) thesis is a 12-person firm will change how it works, a 200-person firm won't. It's still early for these, and the AI-as-a-source-of-leverage thesis still hasn't proven out. It's perhaps the most lucrative option on the table for small firms today, but still tbd if the math ends up mathing. 4// Minority Recapitalization Buyer: Private equity Target firm: $50M+ revenue, top 50–100. The field is thin here. The Armanino deal is the most-cited example because there are so few examples of this. You sell under 50%, give away some equity but keep control. It's rare because buyers' models depend on control, so they price minority deals worse or won't do them at all. Worth knowing this deal type exists if someone tells you the only option is to hand over control. 5// External Sale or Merger Buyer: Another firm Target firm: $150k-$5M Another firm or individual buyer comes in, generally taking full control. Either seller financed or SBA-financed through a lender like Live Oak Bank. Priced at roughly 0.9x–1.3x annual revenue. Can't be compared directly to a 9x EBITDA PE number, as it's a manufactured number that involves carving out a huge amount of partner compensation. 6// Internal Succession and ESOP Buyer: Your team Target firm: Internal succession can happen at any size. ESOPs need roughly $1M+ EBITDA and 20+ staff The holy grail exit and most positive outcome for staff and clients. Notoriously hard to put together because you're effectively paying your team to pay you out. šŸ¤” How Would I Sell My Firm? The biggest change I've seen over the last 3-5 years is private-party sales between very similar firms. You know the person. They run their firm the same way you do. It de-risks the entire transaction and justifies a greater multiple. It all begins with your network, and I see them happening on a near-monthly basis inside my private network of 1,000 accounting firms (Realize). The best fit + best multiple will always be found in a like-minded firm.
6
33
7,306
we are hosting a banker event with nimble gravity at our place on 10/1 around "ai in investment banking". dinner, drinks, hands-on use-case / demo stuff - we'll have a big team from NG, including CEO, engineers, etc. if you're a lmm / mm banker and want to attend, we have a few slots left. shoot me a dm.
2
9
5,531