High-throughput omics are powerful, but they don’t substitute for thinking.
Discovering new biology often starts with intellectual input: frame sharp questions first, then choose the methods that can answer them, not the one that’s most convenient or currently fashionable.
1/
Agree. But this is not a specific issue with omics. Comes down to a lack of serious consideration of expt. designs that can enable answering well defined questions. Vague problem definitions/formulations, arbitrary designs, scaling modalities just cuz u can. Huge waste.