Pollster @EchelonInsights, married an Iowa girl, here for the Realignment, author of Party of the People — “the book that predicted the 2024 election.”

Virginia
Coming November 4: The paperback edition of Party of the People, with a new epilogue on the 2024 election.
13
8
57
154,030
Took the @rpyers Big Board and visualized it. Insiders are mostly not buying a wave beyond Trump +10 seats but there start to be some ripe targets right at that level. patrickruffini.com/p/whats-r…
Ohio's US Senate race passes $100 million between the IEs and coordinated expenditures from the NRSC/DSCC
4
11
68
25,736
Generic polling is now at a point where if it goes further, the D gains start to rack up.
17
24
238
102,152
Patrick Ruffini retweeted
Unbelievably disappointing rhetoric from Dan Osborn. No wonder rich kids like Morris Katz have backed him
13
11
122
10,685
Patrick Ruffini retweeted
Why are Democrats so consistently more uncomfortable with machines doing things? This goes back 200 years now. Why are they like this? I find this more fascinating than religion, culture, woke, etc in politics. They genuinely do not like machines as much as Whigs/Republicans.
3
3
35
1,863
Cue Demxiety
This morning, the Polling Index showed Dems in the Senate at a cycle-high D+11.1 swing from 2024. With the addition of today's NYT/Siena and other polls, that's now D+9.8. Senate & House lines have converged. More info on this project: patrickruffini.com/p/the-int…
2
1
14
11,712
Cue savvy knowing Dem strategists in Politico and Axios decrying "bedwetting"
1
12
1,528
Patrick Ruffini retweeted
Adjusted for the seats being polled, it's a D+8.4 swing in the Senate and D+7.7 points in the House. That's consistent with a good but not spectacular D+6 to 7 environment. Not enough in Texas and Ohio without candidate quality doing A LOT of the legwork.
5
5
24
16,160
This morning, the Polling Index showed Dems in the Senate at a cycle-high D+11.1 swing from 2024. With the addition of today's NYT/Siena and other polls, that's now D+9.8. Senate & House lines have converged. More info on this project: patrickruffini.com/p/the-int…
3
4
17
15,170
Adjusted for the seats being polled, it's a D+8.4 swing in the Senate and D+7.7 points in the House. That's consistent with a good but not spectacular D+6 to 7 environment. Not enough in Texas and Ohio without candidate quality doing A LOT of the legwork.
5
5
24
16,160
Polls over the past week or two (mostly GREAT for Democrats, but Collins still ahead in Maine?!?) tell an internally consistent but slightly weird story: D gains are overwhelmingly concentrated in red states.
22
130
1,045
99,390
oof
90
81
677
189,926
Using screens will be lower-class coded in 10 years
Just went for a long walk while using ChatGPT Voice with plugins on my phone, and I think it's a more consequential update than it might seem at first glance. On my walk, I talked through my calendar, email, and to-do list. I had ChatGPT read through my emails and triage them. Then, we added items to my to-do list. Then, we reviewed my calendar. By the end of the walk, I'd finished getting organized, and never had to look at a screen once. I've been waiting for this a long time. Yes, you can kind of do this in the ChatGPT desktop app. And I think in Codex remote on the mobile app. But I've never gotten either to work very smoothly or reliably. And I often want to do this when I'm not near my laptop, like when I'm out for a walk, and the ChatGPT desktop app for whatever reason won't connect. This feels like the future. It feels like a true assistant. You have a natural conversation, and it does stuff for you. It disappears into the background. You're not walking down the street with a screen in your face. You're not contorting your thumbs to type sentences and scroll menus. You're just talking, conversationally, and stuff's getting done. My sense is: • Screens are going away for many uses other than visual content consumption. They won't disappear entirely. But they also won't dominate the way they do now, and definitely not for things that can be done verbally. • Apps that aren't agent-native and plugin-optimized will die. I use Google Workspace and Todoist primarily because they're so well-integrated with ChatGPT. I stopped using apps, such as many of Apple's, because with few exceptions they're poorly agent-integrated. (X is a big exception, but I've hacked some integration via IFTTT.) • Those apps, however, will become more valued for what they let agents do than for their in-app experiences. Not all will become essentially databases, but many will. It also seems inevitable to me that at some point OpenAI and other AI app providers roll out native calendar, email, and to-do functionality that's maximally agent-optimized. • We'll have our audio agents on all the time. We may have them on mute sometimes (I discovered you can do this with ChatGPT Voice by clicking an AirPod), but at great cost, because you'll want be able to just say something like "summarize that conversation I just had and then draft the presentation." It will be like having an assistant following you around when you want them to. • We need new hardware. For example, I want a camera in my AirPods not to take pictures, but to have the context of what's around me. Like, "What kind of tree is that?" Or, "That's a cool shirt. Find out where they bought it." (I have this in my Meta Ray-Bans, but people are now very sensitive to those devices because they do take pictures.) I also want ChatGPT able to be always listening or awoken with "hey, Chat." • The individual thread model starts to break down when you're treating ChatGPT like an always-on assistant. We need to have the infinite continuous thread from which ChatGPT can delegate work to subthreads, the central assistant model that Muse is built around. This makes even more sense when you start treating your AI apps like assistants. They should be juggling all those individual threads on your behalf. More to come I'm sure as I continue to experiment.
10
6
135
44,469
Thanks I hate it.
3
22
2,398
Who the heck are we, Alpine?
1
4
1,353
So, the airline really doesn't want me to log in with Muse
3
2,401
Just a reminder that all of this is known about Marist. They and other pollsters who do not weight to any measure of partisanship tend to get worse and more D-leaning results cycle after cycle.
Clear divide between pollsters weighting on party/education variables & those that don't No weight on education or party/2020 vote Research Co.: H+2 PV Selzer: H+3 IA Marist: H+4 PV Weight on educ. + party or 2020 vote Emerson: Tie PV NBC: Tie PV NYT/Siena
2
5
32
7,066
Patrick Ruffini retweeted
Hinojosa up 49-46 and the GCB the same too. Combined with a R+6 party ID this poll is, as we say in South Texas, un pedacito de m*erda.
Marist poll | 9/17-2/20 RV US Senate Texas 2026 🟦James Talarico 50% 🟥Ken Paxton 44% Link to poll: maristpoll.marist.edu/wp-con…
14
6
112
24,699
Patrick Ruffini retweeted
GOLETA: Today, $3.00 gas is on me! Want it EVERY day? Vote for it.
BREAKING: $3 gas in Goleta, California.
140
851
4,875
354,350
Patrick Ruffini retweeted
.@benthompson gives his recommendation on how Meta should market Muse: "The way to frame this is to say: 'We're not helping you be more productive, we're helping you get rid of annoying crap in your life.'" "It needs to be framed more as a pain relief as opposed to this aspirational, 'I'm gonna be so productive and get things done.'" "People don't care about being productive. Employers care about their employees being productive. But once you're off the job, you just want to go home and watch TikTok." "The way I think this is going to land is through Instagram Reels or TikTok with people actually showing stuff they do and people say, 'That's amazing. That would make my life so much easier.'" "It really is a show-not-tell sort of technology."
13
25
371
203,715
The hero we need not the one we deserve
Tomorrow on the show: @JensenHuang, the CEO of NVIDIA, who thinks A.I. fear is getting way out of hand.
1
7
58
9,003