We got 99 problems but house arrest ain’t one… The first time I spoke to Chris on the phone, January 13, 2022, he showed himself to be a man who cared about his country, his industry, and his fellow Canadians. He was level headed, had a great sense of humour, and knew, like the rest of us, that something was inherently wrong with Canada and he decided to do something about it. Neither of us could have ever imagined that almost 5 years later we would still be fighting for our lives and our freedom. We’ve made some friends, found a family, and lost some dead weight along the way. We’ve hit many milestones together and today marks another. Our 24/7 house arrest has come to a close and we have moved into the curfew portion of our sentences. Mine will be complete January 21, 2027 and Chris’s will wrap up in April. I couldn’t be more proud to call this man my friend, my co-accused, and my Saskatchewan brother from another mother. I couldn’t be more proud to stand along side him throughout this incredible journey we’ve found ourselves on. He’s had my back since day one and is one of a handful left whom I can count on, who I know will never stab me in the back. Here’s to another milestone @ChrisBarber1975! Still standing and I’m still so proud of you and all you have accomplished and have had to sacrifice as a result. Absolutely no regrets!

“The right of the people to discuss and debate ideas forms the very foundation of democracy.” Those are not my words. They are words written by judges of the Supreme Court of Canada in Harper v. Canada. Yet something deeply unhealthy is happening in our public discourse. The right to question power is not a threat to democracy. It is the very thing that keeps democracy alive. So go ahead—be a bit of a rebel-rouser. Get educated. Get involved. Ask tough questions. Make those in power uncomfortable. History remembers those who stood up and helped move society forward. Holding government accountable is not radical. It is not disloyal. It is not merely our right. It is our duty. The question is no longer whether you are allowed to stand up. The question is: will you?

House Arrest Countdown - 2 days left of being locked down 24/7 for peacefully protesting lockdowns. We’ll miss feigning shock and horror watching non-Canadians, violent criminals, sexual assaulters, drug dealers, human traffickers, and repeat offenders serving less (or no) time than a couple of western Canadians have for “mischief”. @ChrisBarber1975 @18houseHouse

A Call for Canada to Support the Vaccine Injured and Move Together Toward Closure from a Pandemic We All Want to Forget ~ by Nelly Shin "The lack of government interest and will to help post pandemic patients, whether vaccine injured or those struggling with other COVID related illnesses is grossly negligent. The government opted to handle the pandemic with a heavy hand and enforced drastic lockdowns and mandates that collapsed businesses, and tested the mental health and freedom of Canadians—all in the name of saving lives. How, then, can the government and Canada’s health authorities now be so quick to turn a blind eye to those who need support in the aftermath?" "There’s a chill around anything COVID-related that makes physicians reluctant to engage in potentially controversial conversations that might cost them their practice. Patients with pandemic related illnesses feel abandoned. They have no choice but to forage the internet for self-help or look to secret lists of doctors willing to treat them. But when they do find alternatives, their medical choices are discredited... So what on earth are the injured supposed to do? Go hide in the corner and just wilt? Where is the dignity of the medical profession? Does freedom of conscience still exist?" These are excerpts from a Substack article by former Member of Parliament Nelly Shin. Read the full article here: nellyshin.substack.com/p/a-c…

Even U.S. Senators have taken up the cause against Canada's draconian, anti-Charter Bill C-9. Is Canada becoming an international embarrassment? @fordnation @PoliceOnGuard @SCC_eng @liberal_party @CPC_HQ @peoplespca junonews.com/p/us-senator-so…

Canada’s invocation of the Emergencies Act was found to be illegal. Alberta’s public health orders were found to be illegal. Governments demanded compliance of the vax “for the public good.” Then they abandoned the injured. Where are the consequences for those in power? Where is the recognition of the harm done to the people? How do those involved have the audacity to lecture citizens about responsibility when they have yet to answer for their own decisions? And how are we supposed to trust leaders who demand accountability from everyone but themselves? You cannot convince me they are working for the people while they fight so hard to avoid accountability and refuse to acknowledge those harmed. Public office is not a shield from consequences. Those who refuse to answer for their mistakes or the harm they caused have no business holding power or lecturing the rest of us about right and wrong.

The Emergencies Act case has gone to conference at the Supreme Court. Typically, it takes one month for the conference to decide if they will grant the case leave. So we expect the Supreme Court will announce the decision on whether they will hear the case in mid-October. Sign up to be the first to know when we have a decision: theccf.ca/emergenciesactupda…

Can’t wait to read your book @CarrieSak Thank you to you and @echipiuk for standing your ground.

In this column, John Carpay warns that airport biometric screening could make Canadians surrender their faces or fingerprints to fly within their own country. He argues that a system introduced as voluntary could expand into a tool for mass surveillance. junonews.com/p/carpay-the-pu…

Pardon?!?!

Heritage Minister Marc Miller says Ottawa must draw a “fine line” between “legitimate and illegitimate discussion” online. That should alarm every Canadian. The government does not get to decide which opinions are legitimate. Bill C-34 threatens free expression and privacy under the banner of online safety. junonews.com/p/liberals-wres… Take action today: send a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney and the Attorney general opposing Bill C34: jccf.ca/provincial-campaign-…

PRESS RELEASE - Statement on the Sakamoto Class Action Decision We are deeply disappointed by the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta’s decision to dismiss the application to certifySakamoto v Attorney General of Canada, a proposed class action against the Government of Canada and the Province of Alberta. Carrie Sakamoto suffered life-altering injuries after receiving COVID vaccines. The decision records the position she advanced in seeking accountability: “Ms. Sakamoto submits that in this context, the Defendants assumed a duty of care to an identifiable group by holding themselves out as authoritative, by enforcing coercive public health orders and by compelling participation in a de facto mandated vaccine program. She submits that the effect of the Defendants’ fear-based messaging and public restrictions amounted to compulsion to get vaccinated; she submits that the Defendants eliminated the conditions needed for informed choice and exceeded their statutory authority.” The Court concluded that the claims as pleaded do not disclose viable causes of action and dismissed the application to proceed as a class action. This means the class action will not provide an open examination of the decisions public officials and agencies made, the representations they gave the public, and the pressure they placed on people to follow their directives. Class actions give people a way to seek answers together and, where wrongdoing is established, change harmful behaviour. Public trust suffers when people cannot meaningfully examine the conduct of their governments or hold public officials and agencies to account. Carrie and other vaccine-injured people, along with the public, still deserve a transparent investigation and answers. “To say I am devastated is an understatement. We poured our hearts, our health, and our truth into this effort, not just for ourselves, but for every single person who felt unheard, unsupported, and left behind. Hearing that our case won't proceed feels like a massive setback, and it hurts deeply, said Ms. Sakamoto. "While this legal door may have closed, it does not erase our stories, our pain, or the reality of what we’ve experienced. Standing up for truth and advocacy is never easy, but doing it alongside this incredible community has been a powerful reminder that none of us are truly alone. “Thank you to everyone who supported us, shared their stories, stood by our side, and kept believing in this effort,” Ms. Sakamoto added. “I will forever be an advocate for the vaccine injured like me, and I will continue to work with Canrise19 and their efforts to help the injured.” “People who took the vaccine for the public good should not be abandoned by the governments that demanded their compliance,” said Eva Chipiuk, counsel for Ms. Sakamoto. “Carrie and others who suffered serious injuries deserve compassionate care, timely support, and answers about the decisions that affected their lives.” “Class actions can give people a way to seek answers together and change harmful behaviour where wrongdoing is established,” Chipiuk added. “Public trust suffers when people cannot meaningfully examine government conduct or hold public officials and agencies to account. We are disappointed that Carrie and other vaccine-injured people will not have that opportunity through this class action.” The federal vaccine injury support program has been an abject failure for people like Carrie, and its replacement has yet to deliver the timely, compassionate support they need. Carrie described her experience with the federal program in her evidence as “dehumanizing and at times abusive.” We urge the Government of Alberta to establish its own vaccine injury support program. Quebec has administered a provincial vaccine injury compensation program since 1985. Alberta should take responsibility for supporting vaccine-injured Albertans and provide timely care, practical assistance, and fair compensation to those in need.

Peaceful Saskatchewan trucker Chris Barber is appealing his Freedom Convoy conviction and 18-month conditional sentence. The Crown wants a harsher sentence and is challenging his acquittal on an intimidation charge. Lawyers funded by the Justice Centre will file his written arguments by September 30. sasktoday.ca/swift-current-t…

94% SUPPORT ALLISON INQUIRY TOWN HALLS We asked Canadians whether the conversation started by the Allison Inquiry should continue through a series of town halls. The response was overwhelming: 94% believe Allison Inquiry Town Halls would be a good idea. As we consider the next steps, one thing remains clear: the conversation must continue. Keep sharing the testimonies and helping these stories reach more Canadians. The experiences of those injured following Covid-19 vaccination must remain part of the public conversation. Continued attention is essential to keeping their concerns visible and bringing recognition and meaningful assistance to those affected.

Thank you so much Dr. McCullough for attending on Parliament Hill. We are starting to get requests for Allison Inquiry Town Halls across Canada. @DeanAllisonMP @AllisonInquiry Courage is Contagious

55 Specialists Later and Still Being Asked to Prove It Patient: “Are you not interested in learning what's been happening to us?” Doctor: “No, that's not what we do here.” Kelly Shorkey worked as a nurse for 15 years. After receiving two Pfizer doses and a subsequent booster, she developed Bell's palsy, cranial nerve damage, and vision problems. Her injuries have been confirmed by British Columbia's medical health officer, WorkSafeBC, the Canada Pension Plan, and her insurer—but not by the Vaccine Injury Support Program. Even more troubling, Kelly says 55 different specialists have declined to discuss the possibility of a connection to vaccination. How can we understand what is happening to these Canadians if the medical community is unwilling to have the conversation? Watch Kelly Shorkey's full testimony at the Allison Inquiry: covidtestimony.com/hearings/… @DeanAllisonMP @Shawnbuckleylaw

Should a flyer or Facebook comment trigger a human rights investigation? Human rights laws should protect people from discrimination in jobs, housing, and services. They should not put political debate on trial. We’re urging British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba to repeal the clauses that let human rights bodies police public expression. truenorthcanada.com/western-… If you live in one of these provinces, you can send a letter to your provincial leaders in just a few moments using our online tool. jccf.ca/provincial-campaign-…

Allison Inquiry: The Anatomy of a Silent Coup (Jason Digger) It was not a failure of the system; it was the system working as designed. Every element—media, policy, and enforcement—moved in perfect lockstep to protect the crime. In September 2026, a quiet but extraordinary event unfolded in the Wellington Building on Parliament Hill. For four days, Conservative MP Dean Allison, acting without official government sanction, held an independent inquiry to listen to the stories of Canadians who were injured by COVID-19 vaccines. This was not a formal commission with the power to compel testimony or subpoena documents. It was, in Allison’s words, an attempt “to begin a conversation that should’ve begun years ago.” While the personal stories of the 50 witnesses who came forward were heartbreaking, the true alarm of the Allison Inquiry was sounded not by their suffering, but by the chilling testimony of a handful of experts and the stark, corroborating pattern of institutional failure that surrounded them. When viewed together, a series of what officials would dismiss as coincidences begins to look less like chance and more like design—a perfect storm of data manipulation, altered policy, and alleged corruption that targeted the very foundations of Canadian society. Read the full article here: wiretapmedia.ca/allison-inqu…

“A MASS ABROGATION OF CRITICAL THINKING” Patricia Leidl, former Director of Communications with the World Health Organization, testified at the Allison Inquiry about the profound social divisions she witnessed during the Covid-19 era. She had just completed a 26-kilometre hike and was very fit. She says she was skeptical of the COVID narrative but needed vaccination to take a job in Europe. The first Pfizer dose was uneventful, and about a week after the second she says she collapsed getting out of bed, with a racing heart, swelling, nerve pain, a migraine and hearing loss in her right ear. She says emergency doctors diagnosed POTS, told her she had long COVID although she had not had COVID, and at one point suggested a mental health episode. In this excerpt, Patricia reflects on how people she had known for decades suddenly began defining and dismissing others based on their views—particularly those who spoke openly about vaccine injury. She describes the experience as deeply isolating and speaks about the way fear came to influence how people understood reality. She also reflects on the toll this division took on families, relationships, and even her own faith. Her testimony offers a deeply personal perspective on the social consequences of the past five years—and the importance of restoring critical thinking, dialogue, and the ability to disagree without dehumanizing one another. The full video testimonial, along with testimony from all witnesses at The Allison Inquiry, is available here: covidtestimony.com/hearings/

The Canadian Air Transport Security Authority is considering biometric screening at airports. Justice Centre President John Carpay warns that requiring facial scans or fingerprints for domestic flights could raise serious privacy concerns under the Charter. Canadians should retain the option to travel without surrendering their biometric information. junonews.com/p/justice-centr…