A few thoughts on where the US/Iran confrontation now stands:
1. Trump had a long-term plan, which was to asphyxiate Iran economically while increasing non-Iranian oil traffic through the strait.
The problem is that a long-term plan has to survive the short term, and the odds were zero that Iran was going to sit still and accept this new normal. Its escalation was predictable, designed to make the US pay a heavy price for its economic warfare.
So too was the Houthis’, driven both by local ambitions in Yemen and a desire to help the Islamic Republic tighten the squeeze on the oil market.
2. Trump has, in this sense, run into his own version of a catastrophic success: the more the blockade & sanctions strangled Iran’s economy, the greater Tehran’s incentive to escalate and the less it had to lose.
3. Trump essentially has three options:
- To try to manage the conflict through calibrated retaliation and hope to establish a sustainable equilibrium that both hurts and deters Iran and avoids an uncontrolled military escalation. But Iran is unlikely to cooperate, and in any event, it would do little to bring down the price of oil.
- To escalate -- against nuclear sites, civilian infrastructure or leadership targets -- in hopes of forcing Iran to back down. But this would further strain US military resources, be more likely to trigger greater counter-escalation, and thus send oil prices higher still.
- Or to seek a negotiated solution, by far the better option. But for Iran to agree, any deal would probably have to resemble the earlier MOU, only with greater clarity about its control over the Strait of Hormuz. That may be the price to pay to end this unlawful, misbegotten war. Yet there is no indication Trump is prepared to go down that road, at least prior to the midterms…