I firmly believe the Quantum Financial System represents a transformational shift in global finance. To me, it signals the end of corruption, hidden manipulation, and centralized control — and the beginning of transparency, asset-backed value, and financial sovereignty for everyday people. I see digital assets like XRP and XLM as foundational technologies in that evolution. tools designed for fast, secure, borderless transactions that align with a more efficient and accountable financial system. NESARA/GESARA and QFS, in my view, are not just theories but part of a broader awakening about how money, governance, and power should function. fairly, transparently, and for the benefit of the people. I choose to stay informed, prepared, and open-minded about the changes I believe are unfolding. #XLM #xrp #nesara

Hey, to those who say Trump's the Deep State because of what you're seeing him do, it's called a STING OPERATION. Why in the World would he outright show them his cards? He wouldn't. Just like you wouldn't. TRUST THE PLAN.

🚨 $XRP ISN’T “UNDERVALUED”… IT’S BEING SIZED FOR THE SYSTEM. 👀If XRP becomes part of a larger financial infrastructure for payments, liquidity, and tokenized assets, the conversation changes completely. It’s not just about today’s price. It’s about how much value the network could potentially handle tomorrow. 🌎💰 The question is: Are we looking at XRP as an investment… or as infrastructure? 🔥

The government is telling you that you're going to eat foreign ground beef and you're gonna like it and it's gonna lower beef prices. That's about as America LAST as we can get when the president is undercutting our own ranchers. This is outrageous. 🚨

👁GOT THE MESSAGE YET??? On August 24, 2026, the global financial system crosses a threshold from which it cannot return. This is the date when the ISO 20022 standard completes its migration across all major banking rails. ISO 20022 is not a currency, not a blockchain, and not a digital asset. ISO 20022 is a messaging standard — a universal language that defines how banks transmit payment information. On 24.08.26 the following systems will complete their transition: 🌐SWIFT, 🌐the Federal Reserve, 🌐the European Central Bank, 🌐the Bank of England, 🌐BRICS settlement networks, 🌐the IMF, and 🌐all high-value cross-border payment systems. For the first time in history, all major financial institutions will speak the same transactional language. 🔴This has direct consequences: a) Real-time transparency: ✅Every payment instruction, every field, every metadata tag is standardized. b) Nowhere to hide: ✅Technical excuses disappear. Outdated formatting disappears. ✅Opaque message structures disappear. ✅The entire monetary system becomes visible — and visibility is the biggest weakness from the world’s point of view, of the fiat system. After the switch is completed on 24.08.26: ✅A debt-based monetary system has nowhere to hide. ✅Every insolvency becomes transparent. ✅Every derivatives mismatch becomes obvious. ✅Fractional-reserve systems can no longer hide liquidity holes. ✅Banks cannot create endless synthetic credit ( fake Monopoly money ) behind opaque SWIFT messages. The legacy system becomes fully open and fully traceable. ✅From a strategic standpoint, ISO 20022 is the final step needed before major sovereign systems transition to asset-backed settlements. ✅XRP may serve as collateral for digital assets! On August 24, 2026, the old system becomes transparent… and.. ..because it is built entirely on debt, leverage, and the illusion of fractionalization… transparency guarantees its collapse. [FOLLOW THE SIGNAL] Christian B. Wallace Tier 4B

.@POTUS is right. We need to pass the CLARITY Act. The choice is simple: either America leads the world in digital assets or we watch the innovation, investment, and jobs go elsewhere. The choice is ours and we must choose American leadership.

Some community banks are suggesting stablecoins are driving deposit flight. The data says otherwise: BofA shows household deposits rising across income groups this year, and the FDIC reports domestic deposits grew for a seventh straight quarter. Community banks actually outperformed the industry, posting 5% deposit growth. If the worry is the Clarity Act compromise itself, that’s backwards. Section 404 bars stablecoin issuers from paying anything that functions like interest, even disguised as rewards or points, and bans marketing stablecoins as deposits or FDIC-insured. It’s actually tougher than current law, not looser. The real story behind closing community banks isn’t stablecoins. It’s consolidation: 2,000 community banks lost in a decade, only 62 new ones formed, and the buyers are super regional banks, not crypto companies. The Banking Committee already built a nine-provision community bank package into the housing bill to help with deposit retention, on top of tightening stablecoin yield rules under Clarity. Killing the Clarity Act won’t help community banks. It just protects the status quo they say is broken.

The Quantum Financial System is not coming. It is already here, quietly unfolding as the old financial system begins to crack. QFS represents a new vision of transparency, sovereignty, security, and financial freedom, designed to return greater control to the people. After few days of transition period, citizens will reportedly receive a call to schedule an appointment, verify their identity, and activate their Quantum Money account. The process is expected to happen in stages, with dedicated support for the elderly, disabled, and vulnerable. This is presented as more than a financial transformation. It is a movement toward independence, transparency, and the restoration of what belongs to the people. The door is opening. The question is: Are you ready to walk through it?

The redemption process has begun. Not publicly. Not through mainstream channels. Through secure portals. Through verified appointments. Through the system they built PARALLEL to the one they’re destroying. Tier 1: Governments and sovereign funds ✅ COMPLETE Tier 2: Institutional investors ✅ COMPLETE Tier 3: Large private groups ✅ ACTIVE Tier 4A: Internet groups ✅ ACTIVE Tier 4B: General public 🟢 OPENING THE EMERGENCY BROADCAST SYSTEM When the switch happens, there will be a blackout. Not permanent. Not dangerous. PROTECTIVE. 10 days of media silence. Military in control of communications. Emergency broadcasts revealing EVERYTHING. The crimes. The networks. The names. Played on loop for the world to see. This is not punishment. This is DISCLOSURE. When the lights come back on, the world will be different. The cabal will be gone. The system will be new. And YOU will be free. THE STORM IS NOT COMING. THE STORM IS HERE. TRUST THE PLAN. HOLD THE LINE. THE BEST IS YET TO COME.

Here's what Q told you about Hollywood. What is also here, is proof Hollywood is not juat a society of wealthy, quircky, excentric artists, writers, singers, entertainers; it's a "Background Machinery" of a failing Regime, The Old Guard, call it a Deep State if you will. If you read the Q drop carefuly, you will notice a line - "Who was adopted?". If you watched Curb Your Enthusiasm, you might remember a sketch from Mr. David, where he made fun of this exact question from Q. In the show he imagined he heard his Father, who is in a bad condition on a hospital bed, saying that he is adopted. Larry than goes all excited, asking loudly: " I was adopted?", then he maniacally rushes out of hospital room, jumping people with lines like: "I could be adopted", "I'm adopted!", " Can i be adopted?", " It's possibe i'm adopted!". He does it in his specific way and it's one of his most famous sketches. People who are into modern hollywood comedy find this very funny, and it's done in a masterful way, but knowing what we know now, we can understand what and how they do it. We also know why they do it. Arm of the Deep State. • THEY THOUGHT THE SHEEP WILL FOLLOW THE STARS. In the Graphic You can see Larry David with Obama, with Alex Vindman, and you can see an article which says Larry David was raising money for Vindman's Senate Race.

Global Currency Reset: (GCR) IT’S OFFICIAL: Redemption Centers will start processing live appointments in accordance with full GESARA protocol during the first week of September, 2026. The schedule is already being filled with authorized [Tier 4B] participants, according to sources within two U.S. …Nesara Gesara Connected on Telegram NESARA GESARA: THE DEBT JUBILEE The National Economic Security and Reformation Act was never repealed. It was BURIED. Hidden behind classification. Suppressed by every administration that served the cabal. Waiting for the one president brave enough to execute it. What NESARA activates: • Cancellation of all credit card and mortgage debt • Abolition of the IRS and income tax • Creation of a flat national sales tax • Return to Constitutional Law • Release of suppressed technologies • Gold-backed US Treasury currency What GESARA extends globally: • Debt forgiveness for every nation • End of central bank control • Asset-backed currencies worldwide • Release of humanitarian funds • Prosperity packages for every citizen The time has come patriots. Prepare yourself 🐸🇺🇸

🚨 THIS IS THE SHIFT $XRP HOLDERS HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR 🇺🇸🚨 SEC Chair Paul Atkins says the agency is moving to modernize securities rules for crypto. From regulation by enforcement to actual rules. America is finally building the framework.

BE READY FOR WHAT IS ABOUT TO HAPPEN. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED. YOUR MEDIA WILL NEVER REVEAL THIS BECAUSE THEY'RE COMPROMISED. HOW PREPARED ARE YOU??? EBS READY TO GO LIVE. MILITARY ON STANDBY.

The new QFS vision represents a clean break from the past not the transfer of the old system into a new one, but a fundamental transformation toward transparency, accountability, and a system designed to serve humanity rather than exploit it. The old structures cannot simply be repackaged and called “new.” If a new era is truly coming, then the corruption and practices of the old system must be exposed, dismantled, and replaced with something fundamentally different. The truth will ultimately separate what is genuine from what is built on deception.

.@POTUS and Congress delivered the GENIUS Act, establishing a landmark framework and clear rules of the road for payment stablecoins, and Treasury is moving quickly to implement that framework. @USTreasury welcomes input from stakeholders as we work to provide the regulatory certainty businesses need to innovate and grow in America, cement the role of the U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency, and keep America the crypto capital of the world.

Wolverine RV update: Bond holders are getting paid Tier 4b coming soon!!! Lets pray it in 🙏🕉

They still haven't connected Covid to election fraud That's how flippin' slow and behind they are Our GOP are feckless spineless money-grubbing RINOs

🚨 JUST NOW: While on the tarmac at Joint Base Andrews, President Trump walked up to the press with a printed article showing the sharpest prescription drop in 60 YEARS He also had a print-out bragging about 15 MONTHS STRAIGHT of ZERO releases at the border "Are you impressed?! Is anybody impressed?! You are!" 🤣

Finally some long overdue clarity. Great to see XRP and others officially recognized as digital commodities. This is a big step forward for the industry hoping this paves the way for meaningful progress.

SEC and CFTC Issue Landmark Joint Guidance on Classification of Crypto Assets Under Federal Securities Laws On March 17, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) jointly released interpretive guidance (the “Release”) clarifying when transactions in crypto assets are subject to regulation under federal securities laws. The Release sets forth the Commission’s and the CFTC’s views on many topics relevant to market participants operating in the digital asset space. This Alert offers key takeaways for crypto asset market participants and summarizes the provisions of the Release. Overview and Background The Release follows the establishment of the SEC’s Crypto Task Force in January 2025 and the launch of “Project Crypto,” which became a joint SEC-CFTC initiative in January 2026 to harmonize federal oversight of crypto asset markets. The Release expressly supersedes prior staff statements, including the SEC’s 2019 Framework for “Investment Contract” Analysis of Digital Assets, and provides an authoritative Commission-level interpretation of how the SEC staff will apply the Howey test to crypto assets and related transactions. The Release classifies crypto assets into five categories based on their characteristics, uses, and functions, discusses when transactions in crypto assets that are not themselves securities might still involve an “investment contract” that subjects the transaction to regulation under the federal securities laws, and goes on to evaluate the treatment of mining and staking, wrapping and airdrops under the federal securities law. Key Takeaways for Market Participants Although the Release has been presented as a “watershed moment” for the crypto industry, market participants should consider the following practical implications: No Formal Rulemaking. The Release is not a formal rulemaking. Unlike a rule adopted by the Commission following the statutorily mandated rulemaking process, the Release does not have the force of law. Although the Release undoubtedly provides valuable insight into the position of the Commission on the sale and use of digital assets, it may be updated, modified or abandoned in the future without formal rulemaking or the associated notice-and-comment process. In fact, the Commission has indicated that it may refine, revise, or expand upon this guidance based on feedback received in response to its request for public comment. Not Binding on Courts. The Release is not binding on courts, who will independently determine whether a particular crypto asset is a security and whether a sale or offering of a crypto asset is a securities offering. U.S. federal securities laws, as well as state securities laws, contain a variety of private rights of action. The disputes will be largely unaffected by the Release and sales of crypto assets deemed commodities by the Commission may not necessarily be interpreted the same way by courts or arbitrators. Subject to Market Infrastructure Legislation. Congress continues its work on legislation to establish a framework for the regulation of crypto assets, including establishing explicit grants of authority to the SEC, the CFTC and U.S. banking regulators. While there remain competing bills in the Senate and the House, we expect that legislation will reinforce and codify the interpretations and guidance provided by the SEC in the Release. Market Opportunity for Crypto Exchanges and Operating Companies. U.S. crypto exchanges and operating companies that are interested in maintaining crypto reserves may be the biggest beneficiaries of the Release. The Release indicates that secondary-market transactions generally will not be securities transactions where purchasers would not reasonably expect the issuer’s initial representations or promises to remain connected to the crypto asset (and, presumably, where the issuer has not made any further representations or promises that an investor would reasonably rely on in making an investment in the crypto asset). This should reduce the risk that trading in mature non-security crypto assets on an exchange will be characterized as involving securities transactions. In addition, crypto reserves can be maintained with a reduced risk of the operating company inadvertently becoming an “investment company” due to the company holding more than 40% of its total assets (excluding cash and government securities) in “investment securities.” Issuer Communication Considerations. Issuers planning token offerings should carefully consider whether their marketing materials and promotional activities could create reasonable expectations of profit from essential managerial efforts, triggering investment contract status. This will include statements made in the crypto asset’s white paper, on any promotional website, on public or private forums (e.g., Discord, Telegram, Reddit), at conferences or other events, and in interviews with the media. Failure to Address Identity of Issuers. The Release’s application of the Howey “investment contract” analysis depends in part on the actions or inaction of the relevant crypto asset’s “issuer.” Due to the nature of crypto assets, the identity of a crypto asset’s issuer is often unclear. The Commission’s failure to acknowledge that foundations, DAOs and other similar entities often provide a decentralized governance model for crypto assets projects leaves questions as to how developers or others may take steps to comply with the guidance, including communications that would seek to eliminate any residual representations or undertakings that could be seen as an investment contract, without inadvertently acknowledging that they are “issuers.” We expect that this aspect of the guidance will elicit comments and requests for clarification. Identification of Other Digital Commodities. The Commission explicitly identified a non-exhaustive list of crypto assets that are not digital commodities. However, the criteria used by the SEC to select the specific names noted in this non-exhaustive list is unclear and the relevance of omitted names is similarly unclear. For example, many crypto assets with relatively large market caps appear to have similar attributes to listed crypto assets but were not included in the list of digital commodities. They expect that this may be an area where comments seek additional clarity from the Commission in terms of determining what attributes were identified and relied upon in developing the list included in the Release. Potential for Onshore Offerings/Activities. One goal of the Release was likely to bring more crypto asset business back onshore. For instance, over the past five years, new crypto asset offerings have largely been restricted to non-U.S. persons and new crypto projects have often been launched using offshore foundations and DAOs. Whether the additional clarity provided by the Release will provide adequate comfort to resume initial coin offerings and other crypto asset activities in the United States remains to be seen. Classification Framework: Five Categories of Crypto Assets The SEC identifies four categories of crypto assets that are not securities: digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools and stablecoins. Each of those categories has certain features in common which are important to the SEC’s analysis. The Release states that digital commodities, digital collectibles and digital tools do “not have intrinsic economic properties or rights, such as generating a passive yield or conveying rights to future income, profits, or assets of a business enterprise or other entity, promisor, or obligor.” With respect to stablecoins, pending effectiveness of the GENIUS Act, the SEC adopts the guidance previously published by its staff, which similarly only covered stablecoins that do not “pay or guarantee to pay interest or otherwise convey any rights to payments or assets except upon redemption for USD on a one-for-one basis.” In each case, the SEC’s analysis is also premised in large part on the assertion that the value of the asset depends on something other than the “essential managerial efforts” of others. The fifth category of crypto assets identified in the Release are securities. Digital Commodities Digital commodities are crypto assets intrinsically linked to and deriving their value from the programmatic operation of a “functional” crypto system, as well as supply-and-demand dynamics, rather than from the expectation of profits from the essential managerial efforts of others. The Commission explicitly identifies the following as digital commodities: Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH), Solana (SOL), Cardano (ADA), XRP (XRP), Dogecoin (DOGE), Polkadot (DOT), Avalanche (AVAX), Chainlink (LINK), Litecoin (LTC), and several others. Digital commodities are not securities because they do not have the economic characteristics of a security, and their value is derived from the functional utility of the associated crypto system rather than the efforts of any central party. The SEC noted that digital commodities can include governance tokens, allowing holders to vote on certain technical and governance matters, and include “gas” fees on transactions that are used to compensate validators, implying that neither feature would result in a digital commodity being treated as a security so long as there is no central party. Digital Collectibles Digital collectibles, including NFTs and meme coins, are crypto assets designed to be collected and may represent artwork, music, videos, trading cards, in-game items, or cultural references. Digital collectibles are not securities. These assets derive their value from artistic, entertainment, social, or cultural significance and supply-and-demand dynamics, not from any essential managerial efforts of their creators. The Commission identifies CryptoPunks, Chromie Squiggles, Fan Tokens, and VCOIN as examples of digital collectibles. Notably, fractionalized digital collectibles may constitute securities where purchasers reasonably expect profits from the essential managerial efforts of others. The Commission’s inclusion of Dogecoin as a digital commodity suggests that a token may transition from one category to another over time. Under the outlined framework, Dogecoin would likely initially have been a digital collectible meme coin. Individual crypto assets may also be hybrids of more than one category or might not fit into any of the five identified categories. Digital Tools Digital tools are crypto assets that perform practical functions, such as memberships, tickets, credentials, title instruments, or identity badges. Digital tools are not securities. These assets derive their value from functional utility rather than any expectation of profits from managerial efforts of others. The SEC notes that the fact that a central party issues digital tools will not in and of itself result in the digital tool being treated as a security, stating that “[w]hile the value of a digital tool may be impacted directly or indirectly by the activities of the developer, the creator of a digital tool typically does not make representations or promises to undertake any essential managerial efforts from which a purchaser would reasonably expect to derive profits.” The SEC further notes that while digital tools are “often non-transferable,” the ability to resell a digital tool will not result in its being treated as a security, because such assets derive their value from functional utility rather than any expectation of profits from the essential managerial efforts of others. The Commission cites Ethereum Name Service domain names and CoinDesk’s Microcosms NFT Consensus Ticket as examples. Stablecoins The Commission confirms that “payment stablecoins” issued by "permitted payment stablecoin issuers" under the GENIUS Act will be categorically excluded from the definition of “security” after the effective date of that legislation. Corporation Finance has previously confirmed that prior to the GENIUS Act’s effective date, “Covered Stablecoins” (e.g., stablecoins that are fully backed by USD or low-risk assets and may be redeemed for their pegged value) are not securities under the Howey test. Stablecoins falling outside these categories may still constitute securities depending on the facts and circumstances. Digital Securities Digital securities, commonly known as “tokenized” securities, are financial instruments enumerated in the definition of “security” that are formatted as or represented by a crypto asset, with ownership maintained on one or more crypto networks. These are securities regardless of their format. Non-Security Crypto Assets May Be Subject to Investment Contracts The Commission clarified that a non-security crypto asset may be sold subject to an investment contract when the issuer promises to undertake essential managerial efforts from which a purchaser would reasonably expect to profit. Critically, the crypto asset itself does not become a security as a result; rather, it becomes subject to an investment contract, which is a security. Historically, there has been ambiguity around the existence and identity of the issuers of crypto assets. Despite the application of the Release depending on action or inaction of the issuer of a crypto asset, the Release does not clarify how to identify the issuer of a particular crypto asset. However, non-security crypto assets do not necessarily remain subject to investment contracts in perpetuity. A crypto asset separates from an investment contract when purchasers can no longer reasonably expect the issuer’s representations or promises to engage in essential managerial efforts to remain connected to the asset. This separation may occur through either: (i) fulfillment of the issuer’s representations or promises regarding essential managerial efforts; or (ii) the issuer’s failure to perform, including abandonment of development. When, or if, these events have occurred will be a facts and circumstances determination and may depend on whether certain statements (e.g., posts on X, Discord or Telegram) are “public.” Issuers remain potentially liable under securities laws for failures to register offerings or for material misstatements that occurred while the crypto asset was subject to an investment contract, even after separation occurs. Mining and Staking The Commission confirmed that mining activities on proof-of-work networks do not involve the offer and sale of securities. This includes both solo mining and participation in mining pools, as these activities are administrative or ministerial in nature and do not involve reasonable expectations of profits from the essential managerial efforts of others. Similarly, staking activities on proof-of-stake networks are not securities transactions. This interpretation covers self (or solo) staking, self-custodial staking with a third party, custodial arrangements, and liquid staking. Staking Receipt Tokens issued as receipts for non-security crypto assets that are not subject to investment contracts are also not securities. Ancillary services such as slashing coverage, early unbonding, and alternate rewards payment schedules do not change this analysis. Wrapping The Commission confirmed that “Redeemable Wrapped Tokens” do not involve securities transactions. In a general sense, “Redeemable Wrapped Tokens” are depository receipts. A user may deposit Bitcoin (or any other crypto asset) in a designated wallet in exchange for a new “wrapped BTC” token that is recorded and trades on a different (e.g., non-BTC) blockchain. The Commission characterizes the wrapping process as an administrative or ministerial function to facilitate interoperability between crypto networks, provided the wrapped token is backed and redeemable one-for-one and the deposited asset is effectively locked and not otherwise used. As such, no essential managerial efforts are involved, and the economic value of the wrapped token derives solely from the underlying deposited crypto asset. By contrast, a wrapped token representing a digital security, or a non-security crypto asset that remains subject to an investment contract, would remain a security. Airdrops The Commission provided guidance that airdrops of non-security crypto assets generally do not involve securities transactions because they fail the first prong of the Howey test, i.e., there is no “investment of money.” Airdrops where recipients perform services or provide other consideration in exchange for the tokens are not covered by this interpretation. - Ropes & Gray

Mastercard is NOT needed with the QFS, or on the XRP-XRPL [Private_Ledger]. "The QⁿDebit Card doesn't need banks to process transactions. Every transaction is handled "on the ledger" not thru a bank." @DavidXRPLion