“Inequality.”
💬 This term is invoked so frequently, and so loosely, that its opposite—equality—can start to sound less like a real goal and more like a decorative phrase in policy speeches and academic debate.
Part of what makes inequality so challenging to tackle is that we struggle to agree on what it even is.
Countries define it differently, measure it differently, and respond to it differently. Yet whatever the approach, as
@amitabhbehar, Executive Director of
@Oxfam International, has argued, “ending inequality is a political choice.”
Some hold that a degree of inequality is inherent to any society and lies beyond the reach of political will, but on one point there is little disagreement: reducing it, or at least trying to, is a choice
⏩ Our newest analysis authored by Jeronimo Pareja-Cardona,
@SDG16Plus Program Officer, follows that “choice” through three moments. Before anyone can reduce inequality, someone has to define it, decide how to measure it, and choose how to respond; and none of those steps are neutral.
Download “ No Neutral Number: The Politics of Defining and Measuring Inequality” today 🔻
cic.nyu.edu/resources/no-neu…
#Inequality #PublicPolicy #MeasuringInequality
ALT Text: "No Neutral Number: The Politics of Defining and Measuring Inequality + Read Now!"