A British TV host just SNAPPED on air on the U.K. Government for ignoring clear links between mass immigration and terrorism. “Let me teach you a thing or two in case you don’t get it yet. I would imagine that whatever has gone down near that base, the people who done it, probably came into the country from somewhere else and came there specifically to do whatever it is they were planning to do” Look at the men who were caught trying to bomb RAF Fairford air base. Do they look “British” to you? It doesn’t take a genius to see that they are third worlders. Everyone is sick of being betrayed by their own leaders with suicidal immigration policies. Enough.

If I was a self-aware lefty (contradiction in terms, I know) I'd be feeling like a bit of a twat right now. Everything they've ever supported has been totally self-defeating. They supported the climate scam and now they can't afford electricity. They supported laws punishing landlords and now they can't find a place to rent. They supported high taxes and now there aren't any jobs. They supported open borders and now there's no casual work for them or their kids. They supported welfare increases so now there's no money to maintain basic amenities. They supported "refugees" and now rapey Afghans being moved into their street. They supported trans rights and now their daughters have to share changing rooms with total perverts. And worse still, because they've built their entire personality around their ideology, and believe themselves to be morally and intellectually superior, they have to suck it up and pretend they like the way they've soiled their own nest. They now have to pretend that the overcrowded urban slums they have to live in are "vibrant" and "enriched by diversity" even though he next door neighbour on one side is an Albanian heroin dealer, and the other side is a family of Roma benefit monkeys who keep breaking off your car wing mirrors. This is why lefties live in a bubble of delusion because if they actually had to face up to the fact that the deteriorating world around them is exactly what they keep voting for, their tiny little brains would capsize.

SO WHICH IS IT? YOU CAN’T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS. I’m being told that Danny Tommo can be charged with criminal damage because the French authorities had custody and control of the boat. Right. So let me get this straight. If, in the eyes of the law, taking custody and control of that boat is enough to say it now belongs to the French authorities, then in my eyes you have opened up a much bigger question. Because those same authorities are the ones dealing with these boats and the people on them. And section 25 of the Immigration Act covers assisting unlawful immigration into the UK, with a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. So if we are now saying that custody and control gives you legal responsibility for the boat, then where does that responsibility end? Because if Danny Tommo is being accused of a crime involving a boat that nobody apparently owns, but suddenly that boat is considered to belong to the French authorities because they took custody and control of it… then why aren’t the people who took custody and control of it being arrested and detained for people smuggling if they have assisted people in getting into the UK? That is the question I’m asking. You can’t tell me the boat is theirs when it helps establish criminal damage… and then suddenly that responsibility disappears when we start talking about people being smuggled across the Channel. If Danny is going to be held responsible for that boat, then why aren’t the people who supposedly have custody and control of it being held responsible for the people on it? You can’t have it both ways. So tell me… When will we be arresting the French authorities WHO ACTUALLY OWNS THE RESPONSIBILITY HERE?

MŁODZI TO PATOLOGIA. 1. Wyprodukowaliśmy pokolenie ludzi, którzy mają dostęp do całej wiedzy ludzkości w kieszeni, a jednocześnie nie wiedzą absolutnie nic. Nie znają historii, geografii, ekonomii ani własnego kraju, ale posiadają opinię na KAŻDY temat. Dawniej, żeby być ignorantem, trzeba było przynajmniej nie mieć dostępu do książek. Dzisiaj ignorancja wymaga aktywnego wysiłku. 2. Nie panują nad własnymi emocjami. Wszystko jest „toksyczne”, „traumatyczne”, „problematyczne” albo „triggerujące”. Krytyka staje się atakiem. Dyskomfort staje się cierpieniem. Niepowodzenie staje się traumą. Zamiast nauczyć człowieka radzić sobie z rzeczywistością, nauczono go tworzyć coraz bardziej wyrafinowane słownictwo do opisywania tego, dlaczego rzeczywistość powinna dostosować się do niego. 3. Nie potrafią też docenić tego, co mają. Żyją w jednym z najbezpieczniejszych i najbogatszych okresów historii, otoczeni technologią, o której ich pradziadkowie nie potrafiliby nawet fantazjować, a zachowują się tak, jakby zostali zesłani do kopalni soli w XIV wieku. Ciepłe mieszkanie, pełna lodówka, smartfon, wakacje, streaming, dostawa jedzenia pod drzwi — i permanentne poczucie krzywdy. 4. Są źle wychowani. Nie dlatego, że nie znają właściwego widelca do ryby. Gorzej: nie rozumieją, że przestrzeń publiczna należy również do innych ludzi. Głośnik w autobusie, hulajnoga między pieszymi, telefon przy stole, darcie mordy w miejscu publicznym. Świat jest sceną, oni są głównymi bohaterami, a reszta społeczeństwa ma zejść z kadru. 5. Nie potrafią czekać. Nie potrafią się nudzić. Nie potrafią przez pięć minut siedzieć bez bodźca. Telefon musi być sprawdzony podczas jedzenia, rozmowy, spaceru, pracy i kiedyś prawdopodobnie własnego pogrzebu. Pokolenie z największym dostępem do informacji w historii wytrenowało sobie zdolność koncentracji złotej rybki na amfetaminie. 6. Nie potrafią niczego naprawić. Nie potrafią niczego zbudować. Część nie potrafi ugotować pięciu normalnych obiadów, przyszyć guzika, odetkać odpływu ani zorganizować własnego dnia bez aplikacji. Za to doskonale wiedzą, jak powinno zostać zreorganizowane całe społeczeństwo. 7. Nie mają cierpliwości do kompetencji. Chcą rezultatów bez praktyki, pozycji bez hierarchii, pieniędzy bez doświadczenia i autorytetu bez osiągnięć. Jeśli ktoś robił coś przez dwadzieścia lat, to nie jest ekspertem. Jest „gatekeeperem”. 8. Nie rozumieją pieniędzy. Subskrypcja tu, dostawa tam, kawa za 25 zł, telefon na raty, pięć aplikacji pobierających co miesiąc pieniądze z konta — a potem wielkie odkrycie ekonomiczne: NIE DA SIĘ OSZCZĘDZAĆ. 9. Nie mają stosunku do przeszłości, bo przeszłość zaczyna się dla nich mniej więcej w 2016 roku. Wszystko, co było wcześniej, jest albo niezrozumiałe, albo podejrzane moralnie. Człowiek bez pamięci historycznej patrzy więc na instytucje istniejące od stuleci i po piętnastu sekundach namysłu stwierdza, że właśnie odkrył, jak je naprawić. 10. Nie żyją nawet w tej samej rzeczywistości. Algorytm daje każdemu prywatny wszechświat, prywatne fakty, prywatne autorytety, prywatne oburzenie i prywatną epidemię problemu, o którym normalny człowiek nawet nie słyszał. Potem wychodzą z internetu i są zdziwieni, że społeczeństwo nie przeczytało tego samego feedu. Najbardziej imponujące jest jednak połączenie wszystkich tych cech. Nigdy wcześniej człowiek nie mógł wiedzieć tak mało, umieć tak niewiele, kontrolować się tak słabo i jednocześnie posiadać tak niewzruszonego przekonania, że to właśnie ON powinien pouczyć wszystkich poprzednich ludzi, jak należało urządzić świat.

Refusing to drill for our own North Sea oil but then buying the exact same North Sea oil from Norway makes Britain the virtual-signalling, eco-nut capital of the world

The preening virtue-signalling Rachel from Piddington is the definitive English mega-Karen: wealthy, privileged, snobby, hypocritical, stupid, and knows fuck all about nine-tenths of anything. It's beautiful to behold because she is the distilled version of EVERYTHING the contemporary left is: Undiluted, galactic ignorance imbued with a sense of absolute moral superiority. Combine this with the psychopathy and zealotry of Islamism, and you've pretty much encapsulated everything the Palestine flag actually means when you see it on the streets of Britain. As a cultural point of reference, Rachel from Piddington is now an immortalised meme that will never be surpassed.

The residents of Piddington and places like it need to understand that this is just the beginning. The illegal invasion is not going to stop without a radical, and I do mean radical, change of government. If you voted for any branch of the uniparty - Conservative, Labour, Liberal Democrat or Green - you voted for this. There’s no point in being shocked. This was always coming your way. You invited it with your moral posturing and your refugees welcome platitudes. You could have said no like the rest of us, but you said yes because it made you feel virtuous in your little bubble of complacency, and now here it is. The evil you summoned has arrived at your door. And this is just the beginning. The globalist uniparty has no intention of stopping the invasion. They’re going to keep flooding the country with dangerous foreign men until there is widespread violence and social unrest, giving them an excuse for a national security emergency and the suspension of everyone’s civil rights, postponing the next election indefinitely. This will be followed by the arming and mobilisation of their imported army of militarily trained savages to quell any attempt at a popular uprising by the native British people. Sounds implausible, doesn’t it? The current situation would have sounded implausible ten years ago, yet here we are. Enjoy what you voted for.

What we've lost isn't coming back. Busy pubs packed at a weekend. Crowded High Streets on a Saturday morning. Jobs for life. Respectable neighbourhoods. Clean towns and cities... These are some of the things that have been eradicated over time. These are the things that we had, we appreciated and we thought would last forever. All of these things are from Yesterday's Britain, A Better Britain. Today's Britain is now a loony-left controlled cesspit of diversification, multiculturalism and green idiots banging on about carbon footprints. For those of you who, like me, were around in the past, just be grateful that you saw the best of Britain. And if they can tear our country apart, they can't wipe out our memories. Enjoy your Sunday, wherever you are.

WHO SILENCED DR DAVID KELLY Most people scrolling past this have never heard the name Dr David Kelly. They should. He was one of the world's leading weapons inspectors, a quiet Ministry of Defence scientist who spent years checking Iraq's chemical and biological arsenal for the United Nations. Nobody understood that file better than he did. In 2003 Tony Blair's (@InstituteGC) government published a dossier claiming Saddam Hussein could deploy chemical weapons within 45 minutes. That one line helped justify sending Britain to war, a war that ended up killing hundreds of thousands of people. Kelly knew the intelligence behind that claim had been stretched. He said so privately, off the record, to BBC (@BBCNews) journalist Andrew Gilligan (@mragilligan). Nothing more than a conversation. Somebody in government made sure his name reached the press anyway. Within days a respected scientist with decades of service was dragged in front of 2 parliamentary committees and questioned like a suspect on live television. His wife later said he came home a broken man. On 17 July 2003 he left his house in Oxfordshire for a walk. He was 59. He never came home. His body was found the next morning in nearby woodland, a knife beside him and a shallow cut to his wrist. Now here is where the story stops making sense. Instead of letting the standard coroner's inquest run its course, Tony Blair's government suspended it before it properly began and replaced it with a private inquiry led by a judge the government appointed, Lord Hutton. It was never resumed. To this day Dr David Kelly is the only person in England and Wales in living memory to die in unexplained circumstances without a full coroner's inquest ever taking place. Hutton concluded suicide within months. Officially, that was that. Unofficially, a group of senior doctors reviewed the medical evidence and said the conclusion was unsafe. In letters to The Times (@thetimes) and The Guardian (@guardian) they explained that the artery involved is so small that cutting it rarely causes fatal blood loss in a healthy person, that the painkiller level found in his body was well under a lethal dose, and that the amount of blood at the scene was too small to account for the death recorded. In 2011 those doctors formally asked the government to finally allow a proper inquest. Attorney General Dominic Grieve (@dominicgrieve_) reviewed it and refused. Hutton's inquiry was declared sufficient. The matter was closed, again, by the people who opened it. Think about what actually happened here. A civil servant quietly raised concerns about the most consequential political deception in modern British history. He was exposed, humiliated and found dead days later, and the same government that needed answers made sure a proper, independent investigation never happened. Tony Blair went on to become a Middle East peace envoy. He was later knighted. Dr David Kelly got a rushed private inquiry, a sealed post mortem report kept from public view for years, and a grave that campaigners are still fighting over more than 2 decades on. Nobody has ever been held accountable. Not for the dossier, not for the leak, not for what happened next. This story deserves to be told every single year, not forgotten. If you think that too, share it. Sources @BBCNews @guardian @thetimes @PrivateEyeNews

One moment to leave my box then I'll get back in it. If you're uneducated enough to have an issue with the British government rightly making this statement, lemme put it very simply: -49,000 slave owners, approx 0.19% of the population at the time, were given money to buy them out of owning slaves. British taxpayers paid to free the slaves. -For decades during the 19th century, Britain dedicated 1/6th of it's entire Navy specifically to seek and capture other nations' slave ships to free the slaves on board. The economic cost was bore by the taxpayer. 2,000 British sailors lost their lives. -During the US Civil War, Pres Lincoln blockaded Cotton exports from the USA. This put more than half a million working Britons out of already very poorly paid work. After months, the mill owners worked a deal with the US govt to reopen trading. More than half a million working class Britons voted AGAINST the deal citing that they didn't ever want to work with goods produced from slavery again. About half as many (24,000 ish) Brits died from malnourishment, disease etc in the affected cotton factory communities as a direct result of that action as ever owned slaves. -Britain paid £400,000 to Spain to convince it to stop its slave trade. It also placed diplomatic pressure on France to stop them too. Of every empire that ever took part in slavery, Britain is the ONLY ONE that grew a conscience, stopped its own, and then set out to stop everybody else without any outside encouragement. And it is also the only one that has maintained a successful and genuinely beneficial diplomatic network to lift up and empower its former territories- the Commonwealth- which has helped ex-colonies outperform their peer nations in almost every way ever since. Not to mention endless and unwavering humanitarian relief when a hurricane rips through their islands every season, or when an earthquake buries their brothers and sisters under their own houses. The British taxpayer has bore the cost of all of that. Britons voted in favour of that responsibility in the 19th century, decades before anybody else grew a conscience of their own- even African Kingdoms such as the Asanti Empire who only stopped slaving when Britain took over Ghana and made it illegal. You reparationsit types don't harass modern-day Turks over the 6-8 million slaves that passed through the Ottoman Slave trade, or modern-day Ghanaians for the millions that the Ghana and Asanti empires captured, abused, and traded in the Trans-Sharan and Transatlantic trades. You don't even get on at the Arab and African countries who still enable slavery today. Why? There is no other demographic/nation/country for which people feel so empowered to blame the crimes of the most miniscule proportion of its ancestry, which were undone and atoned for by exponentially more of its ancestry, on an entire diaspora that has lived for generations with no direct culpability in said crimes. Every population in the world has been a victim to another population at a given time. The following paragraph should be the one that sticks from this whole rant: The working class, poor, destitute British man and woman who rotted in workhouses for centuries had more in common with their African slave counterparts than they ever did their compatriot masters. That's exactly why they bloody well did something about it. British people en masse stood WITH the slaves. Not with their feet on their necks. Reparationism towards the British nation is just politics of division, meant to absolve commonwealth governments of their own failures towards their people at the expense of a population who have never committed the crime they are demanding reparations for, and whose ancestors paid the human and economic price for for the last 2 centuries. This is the last post I'll make on the matter.

‘Bringing back hope’ is such vacuous bullshit when you’re importing hundreds and hundreds of young foreign men who treat women like dirt and generally hate everything about us. They are scumbags. You’re the prime minister. Get off social media and actually DO SOMETHING.

🚨 GLOBALISM JUST DIED IN DAVOS Howard Lutnick just walked into the lion’s den — and told the World Economic Forum exactly what they didn’t want to hear. “Globalism has failed.” Not whispered. Not softened. Declared — on their own stage. He dismantled the entire WEF doctrine in minutes: • Offshoring hollowed out the West • Cheap labor destroyed innovation • Net Zero made Europe dependent on China • Sovereignty begins with borders • Nations must control their industry, energy, and medicine Then came the line that shook the room: “Why would Europe agree to Net Zero when they don’t even make a battery?” That’s the truth globalists can’t answer. Green agendas without industry. Climate pledges without sovereignty. Moral posturing while outsourcing power to Beijing. America First isn’t isolation. It’s independence. And Lutnick made it crystal clear: The old model is finished. The globalist experiment has failed. And the future belongs to nations that put their people first. Davos just heard the obituary — live.

When will people learn, fraud is not a victimless crime. Jason Arday was on board with witch hunts, persecution, bullying and victimisation of students who raised the alarm. If things were different we could have been reading about falsely accused students taking their lives as their academic careers were destroyed and them smeared as racist. Arday would have likely said a few nice words and in private celebrated getting away with it whilst perpetuating his fraud. Arday is not a victim. His family in grief, are his victims. His students condemned as racist, are his victims. Cambridge University reputation as a place of care and support for students, are his victims. The reputation of every hard work and honest and sincere academic of colour, are his victims. Reflect on the collateral damage to decent honest people Jason Arday has left behind himself over the course of his life.

I find it extremely bizarre that the supposedly ‘integrated’ Pakistani community in Britain chose to celebrate Pakistan’s independence, whilst living in the country they gained independence from. If you’re proud of your country, why don’t you fuck off back there?

It’s probably worth saying at this point something I’ve said before, lest it gets lost in the sands of time and political rhetoric about immigration and illegal entry, and how we got to this point. I was an immigration officer in the 1970s and 1980s. The power to grant or refuse leave to enter was vested to me in law under the authority of a Chief Immigration Officer. Anyone arriving without a valid passport (and a visa if required) was refused entry at the border, detained, and removed on the next available ship or aircraft whence they came. This was under the Immigration Act 1971 (still In force although amended massively by successive governments ever since). It was some 20 - 30 years after the 1951 ECHR and the 1951 Refugee Convention was signed. Nobody claimed asylum. Nobody claimed human rights. No country refused to take people back. Those who had destroyed their passports were removed on a letter, signed by me. Fast forward 50 years and now anyone who arrives at the border without a passport or a visa automatically claims asylum or human rights. Immigration Officers of today (or Border Force Officers) are thereby disempowered to send them back before their asylum claims or human rights claims are considered. And their appeals are dismissed. They cannot be detained in the meantime because under the Hardial Singh principles immigration detention is only lawful if there is a realistic prospect of removal within a reasonable period of time. Which there isn’t of course. So the only option available to the officer is to grant temporary permission whilst these applications are considered. And if the applicant claims to be destitute they must be given support and accommodation at public expense. Because failure to do so would put the government in breach of A3 of the ECHR (inhuman and degrading treatment). And even if the applicant is eventually refused protection - and loses their appeal - we need to get a passport to remove them on. And they often refuse to comply with the documentation process. Even if they do many countries still refuse to issue them with a passport and refuse to take them back. And even after all this they can abscond and if ever caught start the whole process again. This is where we are and so far no government has been able to break the Gordian knot that ties the hands of our officers. In order to do that they would have to reverse decades of laws and judgements - and demur from long held well intentioned international conventions. And probably look at the British Constitution itself to curtail the opportunity of political opponents to use the courts to thwart the will of Parliament. This is not to criticise or favour any political party or policy. It is simply a matter of record to inform the next generation of politicians and the civil servants charged with the duty of implementing any new laws or policies they may introduce. And to ask why - if we did it back in my day - why can’t we do it now? I even wrote a book about it. I hope someone keeps a copy for posterity - or even history - when thinking about how to fix this seemingly intractable problem. amzn.eu/d/06wM4s2h

The UK – our HOME, the country we love – is in a slow-motion car-crash, & everything good about this country is being deliberately, systematically & gleefully trashed by mentally unhinged Marxists/Globalists. I find that immensely depressing & frustrating. Don’t you?