आकृति चौधरी को जेल में रखने के लिए नोएडा की ज़िलाधिकारी ने बिना आधार के NSA लगा दिया।

Criminal racket is the only word. Perhaps the biggest political scandal in post-independence India - of messing with citizens, the destruction of rightful franchise - to feed an outdated, discredited political fantasy of a One Kind of Nation.

Bengal SIR has to be cancelled. The Supreme Court has allowed the ECI to carry on the biggest disenfranchisement exercise in the world by removing millions of genuine voters against law, against all constitutional values on political citizenship.

Under Modi's Govt Conduct SIR ⬇️ Delete voters’ names ⬇️ Vote Chori ⬇️ Conduct elections ⬇️ Introduce a new form to add back the deleted names What about canceling and reconducting elections?

Surjit S. Bhalla argues that most SIR deletions are legitimate, dismissing claims of mass voter disenfranchisement. But his claim that 51 million deletions were justified rests on demographic estimates, not an individual-level audit. Jean Drèze and Yogendra Yadav expose the flaw in Bhalla's argument - comparing projected adult populations with final electoral rolls reveals a shortfall of 7 crore voters across nine states. Bhalla’s statistical assumptions cannot establish that these voters were ineligible. The absence of proof of wrongful deletion is not proof that disenfranchisement did not occur.

Government: Your land is illegal. Vacate it immediately! MP: Switches to the ruling party. Government: Sorry, sir! Your land is now completely legal. 😂 Moral: In India, change your party, and even your land gets a clean chit! @iamyusufpathan #YusufPathan

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗘𝗠 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘁: 𝗔 𝗖𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗥𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗰 𝗠𝗮𝗱𝗲 𝗣𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗲𝗻𝘁 Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka. 1 ACP. 1978. A quiet constitutional violation unfolds daily in offices few citizens even know exist. The recent news of CJP leaders Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka having their judicial custody extended brings into focus the machinery of the Special Executive Magistrate (SEM) courts. An Assistant Commissioner of Police - an officer whose primary function is investigation and law enforcement - dons the robe of a magistrate, hears cases, and determines whether citizens should remain in custody or walk free. This is not a scene from a dystopian novel. It is the routine operation of Delhi's SEM courts, a system whose roots stretch back to the East India Company and which was cemented into law during the political panic of 1978. This arrangement is not merely problematic. It is fundamentally absurd. It is a relic that mocks the constitutional promise of separation of powers while trapping thousands of vulnerable citizens in its procedural maze. 🧵👇

Imagine ruling India since 2014 and still campaigning in 2026 saying "Bangladeshi ghuspaithiye are entering India." Then who exactly is supposed to stop them? Rahul Gandhi? Mamata Banerjee? Twitter users? Home Ministry is literally controlled by your Govt. Stop advertising your own failure as nationalism.

🚨MASSIVE BREAKING : Delhi's SIR numbers brutally EXPOSED Traitor Gyanesh & dictator Modi 🔥 (MUST Read & Share) Either Delhi's 2025 election was a fraud, or this SIR is a fraud. Gyanesh Kumar can't have it both ways. → Delhi had about 1.56 crore voters in the January 2025 list. → Before SIR even started, 11 lakh names were deleted. → In SIR's first round, 47 lakh more were put on the "absent, dead or shifted" list. → On top of that, 33 lakh people got notices: show your documents or your name goes. → Total at risk: 91 lakh out of 1.56 crore. → That's nearly 60% of Delhi's voters. Now connect the dots. → In February 2025, Delhi voted using that same January 2025 list. → BJP won. Rekha Gupta became CM. → Now ECI says nearly 60% of that list may be wrong. → So which one is the lie? → If the list was wrong, BJP's Delhi win stands on a fake list. → If the list was right, then SIR is wiping out real, living voters. And it's not just Delhi. Across the country, around 13 crore names are alleged to have been deleted through SIR, and it could touch 15 crore. Bro, imagine. You voted in February 2025. Your finger had ink. A year later, the same ECI says you are "dead or shifted". Your vote counted when they needed to win. Your name is gone when they don't. That's not a voter list cleanup. That's a voter list wipeout. Gyanesh, was your list right in 2025 or is it right now? Pick one. Modi, if 60% of the list was fake, will your Delhi government resign? 🔥🔥🔥 x.com/Gabbar0099/status/2112…

Knowledge cures extremism. Thats why fascists hate books.

These goons got the bail within 24 hrs. While Ashutosh and Saurav are still in jail. Mother of democracy!!

Here tumbles out another skeleton from our ECI’s cupboard. Now, it is a regular, daily fare. Disband this ECI.

Welcome to 🇮🇳 Average time to establish someone's guilt - 1 FIR - 20 minutes Average time to prove someone's innocence in court - 6 Yrs 3 Months Average costs to prove ones innocence in court - ₹4 Lakh -₹10 Lakh Average compensation for false case, false arrest and years of judicial custody - ₹ 1 Lakh 😔😔😔😔😔😔😔😔😔😔

दिल्ली पुलिस अब नेहा बोरा के पीछे पड़ गई है। उसने उन्हें नोटिस जारी करके 19 अक्टूबर को अदालत में पेश होने और पीस बांड साइन करने को कहा है। नेहा बोरा की कानूनी टीम इस नोटिस के ख़िलाफ़ हाईकोर्ट जा रही है। नेहा का कहना है कि ये उनके संवैधानिक अधिकारों का हनन है। साथ ही उन्होंने ये भी कहा है कि दिल्ली पुलिस सादे कपड़ों में उनका पीछा कर रही है।

Neha Bora has challenged the Special Executive Magistrate’s notice in the Delhi High Court. The notice directs her to furnish a ₹10000 personal bond along with one surety by 2 PM, promising to keep the peace during the inquiry. Now approached the High Court to challenge this order. Why is a student leader facing such restrictions for raising her voice?

Oh he has a sense of humour too 🤷‍♀️

If his rent is 80k and he doesn’t have any savings it seems like he either is poor at financial planning or he is not able to cope with the rising costs of living. Given the state of our economy, a lot of middle income brackets are feeling this pressure and he should join the protest.

Dr Bhalla, thank you for doing what the Election Commission should have done: counting. I agree with more of your piece than you might expect. The rolls needed cleaning, the dead and the duplicates had to go, and the 130 million in the headlines was never a count of the disenfranchised. Your Assam comparison is valuable. So is your finding that about five million eligible citizens were removed in West Bengal. But let me put the citizen back where the Constitution puts him, at the centre. Article 326 sets three conditions, and only three: a citizen of India, eighteen years of age, ordinarily resident. A person who meets them “shall be entitled to be registered”. Everything else is fluff. So the question is not how many names a “clean roll” should hold. It is this: how could anyone who met all three conditions fail to get onto the roll? Ask the people who were left out what they had to do to get back in. They were “mapped” against a roll of 2003 and served notices for a “logical discrepancy” in a parent’s spelling. Some were told to find their grandparents’ entries. Many were made afraid that their citizenship itself was in question, which no Electoral Registration Officer has the power to decide. In Punjab, 39 of every 40 people served notice turned out to be entitled all along. In West Bengal, 93 per cent of the appeals decided so far restored the voter. And the Commission itself has since had to relax that process and retreat from it, with hearings waived and BLOs sent back to doors with Form 6. That retreat is its own verdict. Rights don’t net out. A surplus name in Bihar doesn’t restore a deleted voter in Kolkata. And seven million is not “almost nothing”. It is Uttarakhand’s entire electorate. Dr Bhalla, please don’t defend the indefensible. KBS Sidhu

This story will sound like a joke but it is not. -A teacher in MP was disappointed by bad condition of village school. -He used his own money to paint it, put some furniture in dining space, cleaned it. -brought a smart board. Gave some stationary to students. -brought 2 retired people to teach students for free. -also brought 2 other teachers & paid them from his pocket. -school enrolment increased, kids left private schools to study here. -kids from nearby villages also came. -Education Department transferred the teacher. -angry villagers protested on highway against his transfer. -he had to leave. Kids cried, everyone sad. -retired teachers were also removed. -kids started leaving school. -villagers protested again at collectorate to bring back that teacher. -Edu Dept gave show cause notice to the teacher asking him if he really used his own money? Who gave him permission. -Also asked him how he hired other teachers w/o permission. -asked if he has given stationary to kids, where did he get the funds? -warned him to reply to the notice to avoid the disciplinary action.

लोकतंत्र के हत्यारे 🔥 दोषी सिर्फ ज्ञानेश कुमार नहीं है,पहले वाले राजीव कुमार ने भी यही काम किया था,तर्क ये दिया था कि “CCTV” फुटेज हम नहीं दे सकते इससे वोटर की निजता का हनन होता है और same to same ज्ञानेश कुमार ने कही थी, और सबसे महत्वपूर्ण बात कि 10.50 लाख बूथों में से किसी एक का भी 12 घंटे के फुटेज देते हैं तो इतने लाख देखने में 3600 साल लगेंगे और मशीन से analysis करने पर निजता का हनन होगा। ये सारी बातें हज़म होने वाली नहीं हैं और इसीलिए राहुल गांधी @RahulGandhi जी पिछले 2 सालों से बता रहे हैं कि “वोट चोरी” हो रही है। जितनी ज़िम्मेदार ये सरकार है उतनी ही ज़िम्मेदारी गोदी मीडिया की बनती है।