This is Cara Galloway, the @City_of_Ottumwa council member who attempted to PREVENT a Christian man from REVERSING an evil Satanic prayer that was issued at the beginning of the city meeting. You can contact her here: gallowayc@ottumwa.us

WOW 🚨 There is a taxpayer funded charter school for Muslims in Columbus, Ohio. On camera they are teaching students that non-Muslims go to hell and their purpose is to spread Islam in America You’re not going to believe this, taxpayers are paying $10,435,836 PER YEAR for this school to operate The school is called Focus Learning Academy of Northern Columbus in Columbus, it’s a public K–8 charter Funding reported from the school’s Ohio Auditor of State report: - Total revenue: $9,972,915 - State foundation basic aid: $7,654,007 - Federal and state grants: $2,268,249 - Other operating revenue: about $50,659 - Total expenses: $10,435,836 That is roughly $16,000 per student Get this, The academic page lists full-time Arabic language instruction for grades K–8 An estimated 98% of the students are Muslims. The students are described as ‘overwhelmingly Somali’ WE ARE PAYING FOR THIS

🚨BREAKING🚨 New analysis of nearly 22,000 U.S. kids finds a clear pattern parents deserve to see. COVID-vaccinated children had higher odds of autism, ADHD, anxiety, special-education use, and mental-health treatment than children who never got a COVID shot — and the signal got stronger with more doses. Using the CDC’s own National Health Interview Survey (2022–2024), researchers compared vaccinated and unvaccinated children: • Current autism: 32% higher odds • ADHD: 33% higher odds • Any neurodevelopmental diagnosis: 23% higher odds • Mental-health medication: 57% higher odds • Therapy: 60% higher odds Three or more doses vs none pushed current autism odds to 1.40. In the youngest group (ages 5–7), three or more doses were linked to more than double the odds (aOR 2.54). The link held after adjusting for measured factors, after propensity-score balancing that wiped out measured group differences, and after limiting the sample to physically healthy kids. Influenza vaccination did not show the same pattern in direct comparison. The authors say the findings meet several markers used in causal reasoning — strength, dose response, consistency across checks — but stress this is cross-sectional survey data, so it cannot prove the shot came before the diagnosis. If this holds up in a birth-cohort study that tracks timing, it changes the risk-benefit conversation for healthy children. Would you want this looked at with linked medical records, or left as is? Full paper: Hulscher, Mead, Taccetta, Catanzaro, Honea, McCullough — Zenodo, Oct 5, 2026 (link in comments) 👇🏻

Doxycycline treats PLAGUE with a 97% SURVIVAL RATE. 29 of 30 survived in a randomized clinical trial. This is not the Middle Ages.

Even if vaccine clinical trials were properly controlled and reviewed safety for long enough, most trials for routine childhood vaccines on the CDC’s schedule are fatally flawed in assessing safety for yet another reason. They have too few children in the trial. Meaning, they do not have sufficient “power” to identify adverse events caused by the vaccine.

Everyone rushes to protect children from harm… until the harm is linked to something we were told NEVER to question. Parents who report regression, seizures, or sudden loss of skills after vaccination are still treated like the threat. The child is real. The injury is real. The silence around it is the part that keeps repeating. We don’t need more slogans. We need honest tracking, real informed consent, and an end to the idea that some childhood injuries are politically inconvenient. If this graphic made you pause, that’s the point. Research and learn the truth that the only safe vaccine is the one that is NEVER given.

An acquaintance of mine who's an ER doc told me two decades ago that they were taught (brainwashed) to ask about vaccine status in the ER ahead of all visits. They're taught it's a prime way to get people vaccinated and find people who have been missed. Of course vaccinating an ill person can increase their risk of side effects. But they don't seem to notice or care. And these docs weirdly don't seem to question how these illogical and sometimes harmful protocols happen to pump up pharmaceutical industry products, or that the pharmaceutical industry influences and designs their medical school and post-school educations. This relative told me that after reading up on vaccine side effects, it contradicted what he'd long been taught in med school and afterwards and said "he could no longer in good conscience" automatically try to vaccinate every ER patient. I'm still hung up on a very basic fact: Never ever has a medical person administering a vaccine to me or my child discussed with me the risk of side effects or even the stats on effectivenesss. These omissions should be considered unethical if not illegal. It's certainly not allowing for "informed consent," which is a supposed tenet of western medicine. Our system has allowed doctors to get away without having these verbal conversations by providing a written summary statement instead that doesn't give the full picture of risks. And even so, I also haven't always been provided the written info. Have you? "Informed consent is both an ethical principle in medicine and a legal requirement (rooted in common law and statutes) that patients receive material information about risks, benefits, and alternatives before agreeing to treatment. Doctors are generally required to obtain it for procedures and medications, though the depth varies by risk and jurisdiction, and exceptions exist for emergencies, incapacity, or waived consent. "For routine vaccines in the U.S., federal law (the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act) requires providers to give the patient or parent the current CDC Vaccine Information Statement before each covered dose; that sheet summarizes benefits, risks, and contraindications, and many states add a consent or documentation step. "Failure to furnish the VIS can violate the Act and related state rules. "The same baseline duty applies to other medicines: clinicians must provide information a reasonable patient would find material, with narrower requirements for low-risk treatments and exceptions mainly for emergencies or incapacity."

I am reading through Brian Cole Jr.’s “confession”. I thought it was going to be bad for the FBI. It’s beyond bad. It’s literally your wildest nightmares. Straight out of House of Cards-level abuse. The worst scene you can imagine of FBI corruption on steroids. A caricature of the Hollywood villainizing of FBI/federal abuse. I can’t even reduce the number of highlights to show how disgusting this is. This is the worst thing I’ve ever seen in my life. And this is what the FBI is relying on for the so “confession”.

Right near the end of @SenRonJohnson ’s hearing, Gail Seiler said she personally knew cases where pregnant women were induced early so the mothers could be given Remdesivir. Then people in the audience stood up to confirm it. I have never heard a story like this in my life. I thought the protocol story was ventilators and “died from COVID.”, but this minute says it reached the delivery ward.

I don't know who needs to hear this, but Islam is not a religion of peace.

Global religion motivated terror attacks committed by the top 5 religions in the world… Last 50 years: 1. Christianity: ~30 2. Islam: ~67,000 3. Hinduism: ~10 4. Buddhism: ~5 5. Judaism: ~80 What jumps out at you? Not compatible.

RFK JR: “None of the vaccines that are given during the first six months of life have ever been tested.” Secretary Kennedy pushes back on claims that the link between vaccines and autism has been definitively disproven. He points to a DTP study that DID find a link, but it was thrown out because it relied on VAERS —the CDC’s own vaccine injury surveillance system — which was deemed inadequate by the CDC?! And Kennedy asks the obvious question: If the system is so unreliable that its data can’t be trusted, why has the CDC allowed it to remain that way? “We’re going to make sure they do have a functional surveillance system.”

COVID-19 Hospital Hearings: Wife Peggy Hokett says her husband’s last words to her while he was given Remdesivir— “NEED HELP” He was placed on a ventilator without consent, and despite not being an organ donor, they went after his organs the moment he died. “Your husband is going to die. He wasn’t vaccinated. What did you expect?” What they did to our elderly community is truly unfathomable… they suffered in ways no one should suffer. rumble.com/v7g43g6-covid-19-…

This spine tingling moment just happened at the Sen. Johnson Hospital Protocols Hearing. I can understand exactly why the room erupted. Here’s an attorney with 50 years experience. At the start of covid, he gets flooded with requests to make Hospitals give early treatment protocols. But the result of his work is the part really blew my mind. 95.8% of the cases he won ,to force the Hospital to administer Ivermectin. Survived. But then I heard the contrast of what happened when he lost his cases... the patients who had to go with standard of care hospital protocols which included Remdesivir. Ralph Lorigo Esq. - “Where I lost.... Every. Single. Person. Died” I’m left speechless.

So the US military put Ebola into airborne particles so animals could be infected by inhaling air. Vaxxed animals got hurt by inhalable Ebola worse than unvaxxed ones. Tony Fauci blows up, saying it all should have been classified to not undermine vaccine confidence.

My heart is so broken listening to these stories. This is very hard to listen to. People were forced to take medical advice from a monster that needed a pardon for the medical advice that he gave. ARREST DR FAUCI NOW

Hide your kids. Per Moderna, @FDA is on board with mRNA flu shot trials on children.

Confirmation we cannot trust the @FDA, and we cannot trust any vaccine.

Aaron Siri: "Babies have to remain alive for organs to be harvested in Vaccine development experiments." "You can't grow viruses using dead organ tissue, they have to be born alive." "Dr. Stanley Plotkin admits it under oath... unborn babies are alive at tissue extraction." Famous vaccinologist, coined 'the godfather of vaccines' during 9 hours of deposition under oath, reveals horrifying acts of violence & experimentation on babies aborted for the sole purpose of research experimentation studies. 1,000s of babies are used for experimentation... whose mothers sign up to 'donate' their unwanted unborn child to be used experimentally for vaccine development. Dr. Plotkin gladly admits, without remorse, to Lawyer Aaron Siri, that he accepts human sacrifice as a normal 'acceptable consequence' in order to 'further science' as he is 1st & foremost a scientist & practicing Atheist. Former Vaccine Researcher & Biologist Pamela Acker has stated, "The babies are alive when the researchers start extracting the tissue. Their hearts are still beating & they're not given any anesthetic because that would contaminate the organs being harvested that need to be alive, pure & free of toxins." According to expert Dr. Theresa Deisher, PhD, "Babies are born alive from five to six months old, with beating hearts cut out without anesthesia for research purposes. Researchers also cut through live babies' faces to collect brain tissue." The vaccine industry is built on the use of babies organs to produce many vaccines. They also have to replace these lines with current organs, the most recent being WALVAX-2, using the lung from 1 of 10 babies in 2015 for vaccine development. HEK-293: Human Kidney, female; used in development of Ebola & Covid. 293rd experiment. MRC-5: Human Lung, male; used in Polio, Rabies, Chickenpox, MMR, Hep A & Shingles. 5th cell line. WI-38: Human Lung, female; used in Polio, Rabies, Chickenpox, MMR, Hep A & Shingles. From fetus #38. RA 27-3: Human Kidney, used in the Rubella & MMR. 27th fetus & 3rd organ. PER-C6: Human Retina, used in the development of Ebola & Covid. Clone #6. IMR-90: Human Lung; to replace the WI-38 line. WALVAX-2: Human Lung; to replace the WI-38 and MRC-5 line. 2nd lung of 10 babies.

Secretary Kennedy asked for comment on how to revise the CDC vaccine schedule. Here is what we submitted on behalf of @ICANdecide on that score: I. Every Vaccination Recommendation and Decision Should be Based on Shared Clinical Decision-Making (SCDM) The central principle is straightforward: vaccines should be treated like every other medical intervention administered to an individual patient. The appropriate approach, therefore, is SCDM, where there is no “default” decision to vaccinate, but where “the decision about whether or not to vaccinate may be informed by the best available evidence of who may benefit from vaccination; the individual’s characteristics, values, and preferences; the health care provider’s clinical discretion; and the characteristics of the vaccine being considered” with no “prescribed set of considerations or decision points in the decision-making process.”[1] This process should apply to every vaccine—period. HHS should therefore not treat SCDM as a special category reserved for a subset of vaccines or classes of vaccines; it is the appropriate clinical process for every vaccine decision. We urge HHS to adopt and implement this principle across the entire federal vaccine recommendation framework. A. Ethics and Informed Consent Demand SCDM The RFI states that personal autonomy, informed consent, and the values and preferences of patients and parents “apply across all vaccine recommendations, including routine ones.” However, with the current categories, most of which are “default” decisions to vaccinate, that statement has no practical effect. A federal recommendation should not predetermine the medical decision of any particular patient. This principle is consistent with ordinary clinical practice and ethics. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (“AHRQ”) describes SCDM as a collaborative process in which patients and clinicians make healthcare decisions informed by evidence, clinical expertise, and the patient’s values, goals, and circumstances.[2] The American Medical Association likewise recognizes informed consent as fundamental to medical ethics.[3] The fact that a vaccine is recommended by public health authorities does not eliminate the need for individualized clinical assessment or informed consent. Each patient’s medical history, risk factors, prior reactions, values, and preferences may affect the appropriate decision in ways a population-level recommendation cannot capture.[4] The current federal framework classifies a majority of vaccine recommendations as a “default” decision to vaccinate. Other medical frameworks reject this approach: Clinical Practice Guidelines, for example, are designed to inform clinician-patient decision-making by presenting the evidence and the likely benefits and harms of available options, without dictating a one-size-fits-all course of care.[5] There should not be any “routine” or “risk-based” recommendations. Population-level criteria cannot capture every clinically relevant characteristic of each patient, and applying them directly to individual decisions risks creating the false impression that harm-benefit tradeoffs are uniform across everyone who meets a given classification. In reality, individuals within the same risk group often differ substantially in their risk for the relevant outcome and in the balance of benefits and harms of treatment. Population-level classifications should never substitute for the individualized evaluation of all relevant patient attributes that determines whether an intervention offers a true net benefit to a specific patient.[6] A clinician should never administer a vaccine based on a government recommendation but rather should only administer every vaccine based on SCDM which allows for informed consent and an evaluation of each individual’s medical history, competing risks, and personal values. B. Many Childhood Vaccines Do Not Prevent Infection or Transmission and/or Have Limited or Uncertain Community-level Impact While all vaccines should be administered based on SCDM, without any exception, CDC’s existing guidelines already provide that most vaccines should be SCDM because they do not meaningfully prevent transmission. As CDC’s guidance provides: “ACIP makes shared clinical decision-making recommendations when individuals may benefit from vaccination, but broad vaccination of people in that group is unlikely to have population-level impacts.” For example, DTaP, Tdap, IPV, and MenACWY do not meaningfully prevent transmission, as detailed in the following link with supporting citations: sirillp.com/wp-content/uploa…. Also see an FDA Briefing Document, dated September 20, 2024, titled Use of Controlled Human Infection Models to Support Licensure of Pertussis Vaccines which explains that “aP [acellular pertussis] containing vaccines induce helper T cells (TH2) memory and neutralizing antibody responses that effectively prevent symptomatic disease but fail to prevent colonization and carriage.”[7] In a similar vein, HPV is almost exclusively transmitted through sexual contact, and, in most cases, an 11-year-old is not sexually active and may not face any meaningful near-term exposure risk. The decision to vaccinate at age 11 versus later should therefore be based on individualized considerations—anticipated timing of exposure, medical history, and parental values—rather than a uniform community-wide transmission concern. Hence, even putting the significant risks of this product aside, HPV vaccines should be recommended pursuant to SCDM so that clinicians and parents can evaluate risks, benefits, and timing for the individualized child, rather than applying a one-size-fits-all approach. As a final example, studies reflect that influenza vaccine has not been shown to meaningfully prevent transmission among children[8] and influenza vaccination during pregnancy involves widely varying clinical circumstances and risk profiles, and patients differ in their medical history, prior vaccine reactions, trimester-specific considerations, and personal values. A meaningful recommendation therefore requires an individualized discussion of expected risks and benefits, available alternatives, and the patient’s preferences—not a reflexive “routine” assumption. This approach is consistent with an evidence-based framework that prioritizes informed consent and individualized care, especially where community transmission benefits are not the driving rationale for giving this vaccine during pregnancy. The bottom line is that every vaccine should forthwith be moved to the SCDM category so that they will be administered through counseling based on the individual’s circumstances. HHS should eliminate all categories except for SCDM and treat all vaccines like every other drug or medical procedure. Sources: [1] cdc.gov/acip/vaccine-recomme… [2] About Shared Decision Making, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (last visited Aug. 25, 2026), ahrq.gov/sdm/about/index.htm…. [3] Opinion 2.1.1 Informed Consent, American Medical Association Code of Medical Ethics (last visited Sept. 3, 2026), code-medical-ethics.ama-assn…. [4] Anil Makam and Oanh Nguyen, An Evidence-Based Medicine Approach to Antihyperglycemic Therapy in Diabetes Mellitus to Overcome Overtreatment, Circulation (Jan. 10, 2017), ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/…. [5] Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust, National Academies (2011), nationalacademies.org/read/1…. [6] David Kent, et al., The Predictive Approaches to Treatment effect Heterogeneity (PATH) Statement, Annals of Internal Medicine (Nov. 12, 2019), acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/…. [7] VRBPAC, FDA Briefing, September 20, 2024, fda.gov/media/181937/downloa…. [8] See, e.g., cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi…; pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article….