Democracy, representation, national security, foreign policy, and sidewalks.

Shany Mor שני מור شني مور retweeted
Replying to @v_j_freeman
Britain has faced much less than Israel and done much worse to counter it. And it kept the peace for decades afterward by threatening far worse than that even. The general denialism and moral posturing is distasteful to say the least.
2
9
81
3,551
Shany Mor שני מור شني مور retweeted
Replying to @v_j_freeman
The important thing to add here is that it is not an enemy that just disappears after the attack, but one that is theologically committed to continuing such attacks as long as it can, says it will do so, and whose immediate victory galvanizes its broad basis of support elsewhere.
2
3
64
1,382
Shany Mor שני מור شني مور retweeted
Replying to @ProfDBernstein
It was the Chekhovian gun in Act 1. To be shocked that a global justice-oriented institution might be hijacked by Israel obsessives is plausible in say, 1958. But if you didn't see that in 1998, you were willfully blind.
1
3
25
1,122
Shany Mor שני מור شني مور retweeted
Replying to @TristinHopper
It's worse. Even the condemnations subtly reinforce the central libels animating the violence. They wink at the baying mob, while excusing the elites that have indulged it and given it years of moral backing.
2
5
85
1,525
Four questions about all these late martyrdom notices: 1) Why are they only being printed up now, so long after these men's deaths? 2) Does the fact that a terror organization prints a martyr notice actually (dis)prove anything? Does it change someone's legal status in LOAC?
7
22
125
8,808
3) At this point the numbers of notices for people previously hailed as journalists or doctors is rather large, so why has this received no attention from anywhere in the mainstream discussion of the Gaza War? (obviously, if the answer to (2) is no, then this is less shocking)
3
14
97
4,259
4) If this is such a boon to pro-Israel advocacy, why are the organizations involved still printing and distributing these? I get slipping up a bit once or twice, but at this point it's obviously being used against them, so what's the point? Why are new ones still coming out?
14
5
58
3,784
מזכיר כי בפרשת בילד/קטאר יש חשד לדליפת חומר מסווג כדי להפיץ מידע שקרי. כלומר, להיסק הלוגי המוצע פה אין באמת תוקף.
אם הכל שקרים אז כנראה שלא הודלף שום דבר שמצדיק חקירת שב"כ. אם יש הצדקה לחקירת שב"כ, אז אולי לא מדובר בשקרים...
1
3
39
1,867
אין אף אחד חוץ ממני שזוכר את זה? יש מישהו שיכול לעזור לי למצוא את הקליפ?
יש עוד מישהו חוץ ממני שזוכר את השידור בטלוויזיה בליל ה־11 בספטמבר עם מוחמד בכרי ושלמה בן עמי?
7
1,727
If you are in the small minority of deviants who like the look of my face and the sound of my voice, here are some recent recorded appearances of mine. First, on the podcast of @havivrettiggur, talking about eight decades of elections in Israel: piped.video/watch?v=6liCokBl…
16
22
161
13,094
Third, here's a short clip of me on @AlArabiya_Eng talking about the UK sanctions: piped.video/watch?v=Z9n7EPFn… You'll have to sit through more than seven minutes of this before you can hear my opinion of Ed Miliband.
1
2
19
2,259
Somewhere out there there are a few more clips, including audio. I'll post them if I can find them (and if there's anything new or worthwhile in them).
1
1
8
483
Shany Mor שני מור شني مور retweeted
But when you can render the Hebrew acronym for it as an almost-homograph for Nazi, the temptation is overwhelming. Desperately wanting to see the Jews as Nazis is the seductive temptation of the entire "criticism of Israel" obsession, with "Naza" only the latest iteration.
4
28
311
7,137
Shany Mor שני מור شني مور retweeted
Replying to @DrewPavlou
1
7
26
1,015
Question I asked about 9/11 three years ago. I realize this wasn't a scholarly consensus. But was there anyone making this argument? Was it the subject of debate? Do people make the argument now after the term has been so radically redefined?
Refresh my memory: did scholars and activists refer to 9/11 aerial attack on the one of the most densely populated places on earth — and one that actually did target innocent civilians, and on account of their nationality at that — as a "genocide," textbook case or otherwise?
5
11
53
5,315
"Collateral damage" is a weird angle to focus on if you genuinely believe there is a genocide, because the very conceptualization of it and calculation of it indicates definitively that there is no genocide.
37
223
1,666
58,979
Calculating the collateral damage of a proposed military action isn't some bloodthirsty ritual, it is a requirement of the laws of armed combat (proportionality), something civilized armies do, but terrorists and genocidaires do not.
4
50
381
7,299
The thirst for war confessional artifacts in the post-Christian inquisition never extends to the home armies of the post-Christian west. And it certainly never extends to Israel's enemies.
Replying to @ShMMor
I think about this whenever I encounter some new exhibit or documentary with the "testimonies" of Israelis who fought in this war or that. Do the Arabs who fight Israel also have testimonies, tortured memories, moral dilemmas? If yes, why the lack of interest? If no, why not?
2
20
156
7,381