Question I asked about 9/11 three years ago. I realize this wasn't a scholarly consensus. But was there anyone making this argument? Was it the subject of debate? Do people make the argument now after the term has been so radically redefined?
Refresh my memory: did scholars and activists refer to 9/11 aerial attack on the one of the most densely populated places on earth — and one that actually did target innocent civilians, and on account of their nationality at that — as a "genocide," textbook case or otherwise?