‼️San Francisco is worth fighting for‼️

It’s likely that > 100,000 drug tourists have taken advantage of SF’s “free everything” program administered by NGOs How many registered to vote? How many drifted away? How many ballots were delivered to NGO buildings? Next: your taxes go ⬆️ We have NO ELECTION SECURITY 🤬

For the record, the proposed amendment to the RTM transit measure would’ve been: 1. MORE revenue than the current 2. More politically accepted by voters 3. A progressive tax on corporations, not a regressive tax on working people (Wiener’s version) So why did Scott Wiener and Jesse Arreguin reject it? Because their corporate donors threw a tantrum. kqed.org/news/12044945/propo…

The permanent closure of the Great Highway didn't make commuters disappear. It pushed people onto Sunset Blvd, 19th Ave, and many residential streets. Traffic spills over, and D7 neighbors are feeling it too, too many trips stuck bumper to bumper. Routes change depending on congestion. What was once predictable has become unpredictable, increasing risks closer to where we live and raise our families. Working families still need to get to work, school, medical appointments, and home. Yet when neighbors share these experiences, they face gaslighting, shaming, and attempts to silence them. "Cars are bad." "Car-brained freaks." "War on cars." Where is the respect for commuters whose transportation needs differ from yours? Cars are tools. People need reliable transportation. With Muni service cuts immediately after the permanent closure, what practical choices do busy workers and families have? Not everyone can bike, and transit doesn't meet every trip's needs. A war on cars hurts people. SF must improve Muni services, provide transportation options, and stop punishing commuters. Support the compromise: weekday access for everyone, with recreation prioritized on weekends and holidays. That's a fair share. SF can compromise. Vote YES on G. greathighwayforeveryone.com/

💀 For context, that is Scott Wiener who is running for Nancy Pelosi's seat in SF. He wrote the bill SB 63 that is behind measure RTM. It was written with zero accountability as a $17 billion blank check to pad the profits of his donors by making your life more expensive.

While @Nextdoor suspended neighbors for commenting "YES on G," it allowed "No" posts like these to stay up. 👇 Neighbors deserve the full picture, not a selective endorsement list that makes working families disappear. This post names only three groups supporting YES on G. It leaves out UNITE HERE Local 2, the hotel and restaurant workers' union, which explicitly endorsed the Great Highway compromise. It also leaves out moderate group like ConnectedSF and the SF Taxpayers Association's published support. That is a significant omission when asking voters to judge who stands behind each side. The Chinese American Democratic Club (CADC) @sf_cadc is the engine supporting YES on G. So do people whose names appear in the official ballot booklet: Supervisor Alan Wong @alankennywong, former Supervisor Sandra Fewer, retired Judge Quentin Kopp, retired SFPD Commander Richard Corriea, and Brian Kragh of the Richmond District Democratic Club. Read printed pages 110 and 112-118. You will find working parents, small business owners, retirees, disability advocates and longtime residents speaking for themselves, including Patricia Arack, Shawna McGrew and myself, Selena Chu, a Sunset resident and working mom. Our voices count even when someone's endorsement summary leaves us out. And if we are comparing political influence, let's compare the money. The SF Ethics Commission's figures, updated October 5, show: 👉 NO on G: approximately $1.59 million. 👉 YES on G: approximately $101,158. That is almost 16 times as much funding for No!!! Its disclosed contributions include $750,000 from Jeremy Stoppelman, $250,000 from Laura Yakovenko and $75,000 from Emmett Shear. Those 3 contributions alone total $1.075 million, more than 10 times the entire YES campaign's reported funding. Meanwhile, approximately 88% of YES on G's reported funding comes from San Francisco addresses. Its largest disclosed contribution is $9,900, and it has received $8,492 in contributions under $100. That is a very different funding picture from the enormous checks backing No. 🤔 Then there is @Nextdoor. More than ten neighbors have told me, which I shared on X, that their accounts were suspended after leaving "YES on G" comments, with "spam" given as the explanation. Meanwhile, I continue seeing posts promoting No on G on Nextdoor... What specific conduct violated the rules? Are the same standards being applied to both sides? A political viewpoint should never be treated as spam simply because neighbors spoke up in support of it. This Nextdoor post calls one side "broad" while leaving out YES on G's union support, community advocates, and working families, giving neighbors a biased, one-sided picture. And telling neighbors their vote "says a lot" about them is a strategic attempt to label voters and frame a YES on G vote as proof of a particular party affiliation. This strategy for attacking the opposition just never gets old in San Francisco. You know what? YES on G is a compromise that promotes inclusion and fair sharing. It's common sense for all people to support sharing instead of refusing to share and keep everyone denied from public roadway access in San Francisco. People deserve to discuss commuting, school, medical appointments and access without having their character judged or their voices removed. Nextdoor, do better! I am voting YES on G for the compromise: weekday access for everyone, including commuters and working-class families, while prioritizing recreation on weekends and holidays. Share the facts. Share the space. Let neighbors speak. Funding records: campaign.sfethics.org/electi…

It’s interesting that Scott goes against the methods of funding transit that are known to work well in city’s where transit is thriving. “Top-performing global systems aggressively minimize their reliance on broad general population taxes through alternative self-sustaining mechanisms.” “Systems like Tokyo's private-public rail lines or Hong Kong's MTR run profitable commercial operations via real estate development and retail management, meaning the system practically pays for itself rather than draining public tax coffers.” Scott must have done zero research before drafting this bill. Or he did, and his goal is to raise the cost of living for everyone. Even half of SF that doesn’t have a BART line running through.

According to Garry Tan, wealth taxes on grandma and the middle class are good but wealth taxes on the wealthy are bad. Make it make sense!

RTM stand for “Regressive Tax Manipulation”. I’m voting NO. Of course it was written by Scott Wiener. He’s skilled… at increasing the cost of living in CA.

Another thing Scott Wiener will never do. Scott supports sexual assault from politicians.

We closed Market Street We built ridiculous 60’ sidewalks We make sure EVERY store caters to drug addicts👇🏽 Outcomes are INTENTIONAL 👇🏽👇🏽 @DanielLurie and @sfbos do nothing 😰

Be kind to our East side neighbors. Yes on G. Reopen the high way.

SCOTT WIENER SUCKS SO MUCH

Be kind to your neighbors: vote YES on G!

Nextdoor is suspending accounts for commenting "YES on G." Its explanation? "Spam." More than 10 SF residents I know have described the same experience since last Thursday. They didn't create posts telling anyone how to vote. They simply said "YES on G" in comments and received account suspension notices. Last year, during the Recall Engardio campaign, I saw ordinary D4 neighbors flagged, removed, and silenced while posts supporting Joel Engardio and his agenda remained. Joel's campaign manager, Josh, even faked his address to pretend he was a D4 resident so he could influence the district. 🫠 Total control. This year, seeing both YES and NO discussions on @Nextdoor gave neighbors some hope that different views would finally be respected. But we were too optimistic again. Someone at Nextdoor was just waiting for the right moment. Now, suspensions are happening just as ballots arrive. The timing is interesting. Even a temporary suspension takes away a neighbor's voice during a critical part of the election. Especially for the SF neighbors impacted by the permanent closure of the Great Highway. "No" already had tons of money, why are they doing this retaliation again? Is Nextdoor treating "NO on G" comments as spam, too? Neighbors deserve an answer. When moderators can silence one side, their power deserves scrutiny. Nextdoor must explain these suspensions, provide a transparent appeal process, and apply the same standards to everyone, including the "No, absolutely no sharing." "Spam" should not become an excuse to silence political disagreement. Please stay strong everyone. 🙏 Vote YES on G. The compromise is a fair share.

What happens in my sauna stays in my sauna.

Tech wealth has lots of culture. It's just the worst culture that has ever existed.

Closing the GH to weekday working ppl who drive should NEVER have been voted on by the entire city. It's deeply un fair. - We the People don't have real representation anymore. The billionaire oligarchs & their Yimby minions own the entire political structure in SF now. $ rules.

No registered sex offender left behind.

Bill Gates is such a perfect case for why we need to tax these billionaires to where they're just millionaires. Richest man in the world who tried to use it to exert power over everything. Epstein sidekick. Accomplished less than if his taxes paid for schools and healthcare.

What radicalized me? ✅ life-long Dem ✅ volunteered for Obama 🚨 beaten and robbed by drug addicts in San Francisco 🚨 helped a junkie convulsing in the gutter 🚨 found a corpse 🚨 this _____ 👇🏽