A lot of you are making our point for us. The current prop firm model is broken for profitable traders. Even the top firms FTMO, FundedNext, FundingPips, 5ers - you name it, have a graveyard of denied payouts, banned accounts, and "risk reviews" that show up the moment a trader starts winning “too much”. The reason for that is a $200 demo challenge is not enough to ascertain whether or not to A-book or B-book a trader. So everyone is relegated to “sim-only environment” There's a sea of consistently profitable traders out there with nowhere to go. No firm they can actually trust to pay them. That's who FT Prime is for. And no, it's definitely not cheap. You're not buying a challenge. You're buying certainty for your skillset. You guarantee the result, we guarantee the payout. That's the trade. Now to the $4,000 everyone's mad about. It's 10x a normal challenge. It's also NOT going in our pockets. That's the cost of routing you to a real A-book model. We take zero cut. Which means we don't profit when you lose, we don't need you to fail, and we don't need to "review" your account into oblivion to stay in business. The incentive is flipped. If B-book worked so well, the biggest names in this industry wouldn't be drowning in payout complaints. But they are. Because that model only works when traders lose. And when you win too much, you become the problem. Usually by getting banned. We're not playing that game. If you're not already profitable, FT Prime isn't for you. Stay on the regular challenges. But if you've outgrown the B-book uncertainty ... and you're done wondering whether your next withdrawal is the one that gets "reviewed" away, THIS is what's been missing.
Today I'm launching something I should have built years ago. FT Prime. A-book execution. For traders who've already proven it. If you've traded prop long enough, you know the pattern. Pass the challenge. Get funded. Start pulling consistent numbers. Then the friction starts. Delays, reviews, rule interpretations that didn't exist when you signed up. Every firm in this space, major or minor, has a list a mile long of traders who got denied, stuck in review indefinitely, or banned outright the moment they became consistently profitable. Some with legitimate cause, many without. It's an industry-wide story, and enough traders have lived it that it barely needs explaining anymore. Most prop firms run a B-book. Plain English: your trades never touch real markets. They're simulated internally and act as signals the firm could copy to live accounts but most never do. They collect challenge fees and move on. The model works fine when traders lose. When traders win consistently, the economics get complicated. That tension is baked into the structure - it's not a bug. FT Prime runs a different model. We work with a regulated Liquidity Provider who takes your positions live which means real execution, real fills, real P&L. Not a demo. Not a mirror. Your orders flow to live markets exactly the way they would with any institutional broker. The LP executes them and returns your profit or loss directly. No internal book. No conflict of interest. And because your P&L flows through the LP, there are no payout denials. No risk management reviews standing between you and your money. What you made is yours. We take our share, you take yours, and there's no internal process that can change that. Every funded account has real capital behind it. That's why this costs more. We have skin in the game on every account we activate. That's the structure as it should be. We both put money on the line and split the profits, with the majority going to the trader whose skill made them possible. 95% of our revenue is profit-share. We only win when you win. Here's how it works: ▪ $500 evaluation on a $100K account - simulated at this stage only, to verify the skill is there ▪ 10% target, 3% daily drawdown, 10% max loss ▪ Pass and pay the $4K activation - this is the moment everything goes live Real capital, real execution, real markets. This isn't our profit. It's the cost of putting your trades in front of a regulated LP. ▪ 70% split default, scaling to 85% ▪ Weekly payouts This is for the trader pulling consistent five-figure months who's started noticing the friction. FT Prime is built for that stage - where your consistency is an asset, not a problem. ftprime.com
11
5
167
1,107,917
Stan FTPrime.com || FundingTraders.com retweeted
Wall Street’s earnings forecasts are exploding higher and the market is nowhere near finished (Save this). Analysts usually begin with optimistic forecasts and gradually lower them as reality catches up but this time, the exact opposite is happening. Goldman Sachs chart shows that global earnings estimates for 2026 have risen from roughly $52 per share to more than $61 per share. The 2027 estimate has increased even faster, rising from approximately $56 per share to more than $71 per share.. These increases are unusual because earnings estimates for most previous years moved sideways or lower as the year approached and the increases for 2026 and 2027 suggest that companies are earning considerably more money than analysts expected. So why this all happening? it's because of AI is one of the biggest reasons for this earnings growth. Goldman Sachs estimates that global AI investment will exceed $1 trillion in 2026, with approximately $581 billion of that spending occurring in the United States. This money is flowing into semiconductors, memory, networking equipment, cloud infrastructure, data centers, cooling systems and power equipment. The spending cycle also appears to have more room to run because Goldman Sachs expects global AI investment to increase from 0.9% of global GDP in 2026 to 1.3% in 2027 and 1.4% in 2028. The bank also estimates that hyperscaler capital spending could reach approximately $1.1 trillion in 2027, compared with Wall Street’s forecast of roughly $920 billion. This continued investment helps explain why the 2027 earnings line is rising so quickly. The growth is also beginning to spread beyond the largest American technology companies. Companies that provide chips, memory, electricity, construction, networking and cooling equipment are earning more money as the AI infrastructure buildout expands. This is important because a bull market becomes stronger when earnings growth spreads across more sectors, countries and companies. This is why I’m still comfortable staying heavily exposed to AI and infrastructure names. Earnings expectations are not rolling over, they’re still moving higher. If you want to see the positions I’m holding and the trades I’m making around this trend, check out my Milk Road Pro portfolio below. link.milkroad.com/d8cj6v
4
18
57
7,882
The biggest edge in trading isn’t a secret indicator. It’s the ability to sit on your hands when there’s no edge, cut losers without ego, and size positions so one bad day doesn’t end the account. Most traders fail psychology long before they fail strategy. Funded accounts amplify both the wins and the lessons. Stay disciplined. Scale when ready. fundingtraders.com #TradingPsychology #RiskManagement
2
5
319
$3.75 MILLION accounts value giveaway #propfirm #trading
5
2
11
516
Stan FTPrime.com || FundingTraders.com retweeted
European Net Zero achieved two things: 1. Deindustrialization in Europe due to high energy costs, many well-paid jobs lost. 2. The same products come now from Asia, but with higher emissions to build and ship. Cars, for example, cause 70% more emissions. Isn’t that genius?
208
1,450
4,681
419,625
$GOLD $GC #GOLD Daily chart - sideways low vol consolidation for over a month now.
401
#GOLD $GC - Lets see which scenario will start playing out and hop on it.
2
2
437
“‘The market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient.’ – Warren Buffett In forex & gold, patience + risk management = funded accounts. Stop chasing, start executing. At FundingTraders.com we’re funding patient traders daily with capital. Who’s trading patient today? Quote below if this hits. #TradingQuotes #GoldTrading #MarketSuccess”
1
1
1
321