In Britain, noting that Sharia contradicts human rights or expressing solidarity with Jews and October 7 victims gets you reported to anti-terror police. Open calls for jihad and Sharia get a pass.
John was referred to Prevent for stating that Sharia law is incompatible with human rights. A British mother who publicly stood with Jews and the October 7 victims was also targeted by anti-terror officers.
Both cases follow the same pattern: criticism of Islamic doctrine or basic solidarity with the victims of Islamic terrorism is treated as the greater threat.
Meanwhile, pro-Hamas marches, chants for jihad, and public demands for Sharia law continue with minimal interference. The same institutions that act against a mother mourning murdered Israelis or a man pointing out legal incompatibility show far less urgency toward those who openly reject British law and call for its replacement.
This is not oversight. It is inversion. Wake up Britain! Freedom of speech must be protected!
âNo this is about you â because you may be at risk of manipulation.â
Risk of manipulation by Israel...
Qatar/Al-Jazeera, Hamas, and the Muslim Brotherhood manipulate and brainwash Western streets, campuses, media, and politicians, but it's her door the police knock on, concerned she's being 'manipulated' by Israel.