Psychosomatics cleaning our attics

Georgia, USA
Pinned Tweet
When Jesus said, “I go to prepare a place for you,” He was talking about our eternal home with Him (Rev 21-22), not some temporary, 7-year visit to heaven.
2
1
10
2,161
I don’t approve of foul language. But I’m eternally grateful for @realDonaldTrump, @elonmusk, @ConceptualJames, @JMilei, and @TRobinsonNewEra. I even appreciate a lot of Bill Maher’s takes on things. 🤷🏼‍♂️
5
Note "to your right" not "on the right", which means that he gets to attack as many people on the right as he wants, and as long as he considers himself further to the right than them, his cute little moral gotcha absolves him of his own standard applying.
If you spend a majority of your time attacking people to your Right, then you are fighting for the Left. If you attempt to gatekeep against those who want to push the Overton Window any further to the Right, then you are fighting for the Left. If you’re more worried about tone policing the Right while the Left threatens political retaliation against young Republican staffers working in the Trump administration, then you are fighting for the Left. And if you’re fighting for the Left, you are an enemy.
3
29
409
Reality has a right wing bias, but power has a left wing bias
2
3
17
327
#OTD October 17, 107: Ignatius of Antioch was fed to the beasts in Rome. “Nearness to the sword is nearness to God; to be among the wild beasts is to be in the arms of God; only let it be in the name of Jesus Christ. I endure all things that I may suffer together with him, since he who became perfect man strengthens me.”
5
65
203
3,378
Some more thoughts on the disgrace of NatCon in Jerusalem. Almost all of the conference was classic right-wing: immigration, family values, national identity, and security. On Wednesday night (Oct 7), the conference hosted a panel on the American "new right". The participants repeatedly shifted between brave truth-tellers and outsider non-experts just sharing vibes. What followed was a Groyper shitshow. The panelists were all unanimous that Jews need to stop speaking about antisemitism. As one speaker put it (I may be paraphrasing), charges of being a Nazi have no currency today. When challenged (by me) on whether they think that there is real antisemitism, or real Nazis, and what the response should be, they offered no answer. Let's be clear - antisemitism is real, and its not confined to the Left. In the past few years, there have been mass murders of Jews by neo-Nazis at the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh (2018), the Poway Chabad Synagogue (2019). Neo-Nazis coordinated attacks on synagogues in the Northeast and Midwest in 2018. The FBI foiled plots against synagogues in Colorado in 2019. This is of course without getting into the new darlings of the right - Tucker, Fuentes, Candance Owens, Daryl Cooper. Do the panelists believe them to be antisemitic? Are we allowed to say so? They all implied that calling them out is a form of "cancel culture". The panelists repeated objectively false reasons for the decline in support for Israel, and not simply as descriptors. Again and again, they said (some implicitly and some more explicitly) that Israel manipulates America into costly Middle Eastern wars. This is simply a lie. Over the past 50 years, the United States has gone to war to protect Kuwait, the Balkans, South Korea, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia and others. Americans have NEVER shed blood for Israel. Israel did not make the US conduct costly (and ultimately pointless) nation-building exercises in Iraq and Afghanistan. The recent was in Iran began when Trump promised Iranian protesters that "help is on the way". Israel, in fact, is probably America's most self-reliant and independent ally. Completely absent was any talk of American benefits to the alliance with Israel. Then there was the usual canard about Israel taking American money. While I am sure most conference participants would support Israel weaning itself off of American aid, let's remember that the United States wants Israel to be reliant on aid as a tool of pressuring Israel. American aid is not charity - it must be invested in American technology and weapons. It is also being progressively phased out. Jordan and Egypt also receive over a billion dollar in foreign aid packages, but I've yet to hear hostility expressed towards these countries. Finally, there was repeated talk of liberal Jewish American organizations, especially their support for immigration. The subtext was that Israeli Jews are somehow responsible for the policy choices of American Jews. As if there is some shadowy Jewish cabal to exploit America for Israel's sake. The worst of all speakers was William Wolfe, who I would venture to say was the only speaker who I would characterize as an actual Jew-hater. He spoke of "Jewish" voting priorities that hurt him as an American Christian, implying that his opposition to Israel is a means of getting back at them. Let's be clear - American Jews are American citizens, and have every right to promote their political preferences. Israelis have nothing to do with that. Wolfe also believes that American Jews are conditional citizens. He spoke of pride of his ancestors having been in America since the Civil War, noting that no Jews signed the American constitution. So what? His implication was that they are not real or full Americans. (Somebody pointed out that Haim Solomon financed the Revolution). He also said that only one million Jews voted for Trump, out of 77 million Americans. Jews are the "junior partner" in conservatism and "need to know their place". He also spoke of his anger of American Jews largely voting Democratic. Again - so what? American Jews don't owe you anything. Wolfe also claimed that he wanted an American-Israeli partnership devoid of religious or cultural meaning, purely transactional. And then he took Israel to task for selling drones to Azerbaijan, which in his words kill Christians in Armenia. Of course, Azerbaijan is a close ally of Israel, and sits on Iran's border. Armenia has close ties with Iran. As an Orthodox Jew, its not my place to comment on Christian theology. But Wolfe took Evangelicals to task, saying that the "Old Testament" is a Christian book, for Christians, thus cutting off the Jewish roots of Christianity. In between the lines, Wolfe ascribes to classic supercessionism, in which Judaism has been replaced by Christianity and Jews have finished their historical role. That explains his antipathy to Israel and Zionism - the Jews are done and have no more right to statehood (or even existence as a group). Hazony and co billed this event as having hard conversations, yet they objected to partipants who had serious concerns about the points raised, vigourously denying even the possibility of antisemitism or anti-Jewish undertones. Wolfe was combatant and intentionally provocative in private exchanges. He didn't come for conversation. He came for the applause of his Groyper twitter base at telling the Joos the truth to their face. @NatConTalk is the right wing equivalent of Jews for Mamdani, putting their prefered policy preferences ahead of Jewish security and safety. Jews were silent as the Left was taken over by antizionists and extremists, for the sake of unity against the supposed greater enemy on the Right. This is the exact same dynamic that is happening of the Right. @yhazony has brought Groypers to Jerusalem. It is a disgrace. Proud Jews and Zionists should not go along with it. לְמַעַן צִיּוֹן לֹא אֶחֱשֶׁה וּלְמַעַן יְרוּשָׁלַ‍ִם לֹא אֶשְׁקוֹט
66
81
405
57,596
On this day, in 1536, William Tyndale was strangled and burned at the stake for translating the Scriptures into English for the common man. His final words, “Lord, open the King of England’s eyes.”
82
1,147
4,949
90,599
TB retweeted
Looks like Israel figured out the formula to get them to stop launching rockets for over a year.
373
640
11,424
229,450
When Paul warns Gentile Christians, "Do not boast against the branches," he is specifically speaking about the Jewish branches broken off because of unbelief (Romans 11:17–20). That is such an important point. Their unbelief is the very reason he commands us to remain humble. He goes further and warns that if we become arrogant toward unbelieving Israel, we risk also being cut off. To those of us who are, by His grace, believers, that point should be terrifying.
85
161
897
17,945
Replying to @ConceptualJames
In Texas, I'm voting Republican down ballot. I think I've been convinced today that it might even mean voting for French. We can fight about ideology later. For now, it's the Milei approach: Don't give the leftists an inch.
1
20
188
It's quite clear to me that other people don't have any kind of invisible internal world. Therefore I see no difference between ChatGPT and the average person. At most I am willing to concede that my wife's boyfriend may possess some kind of vague conscious experience.
When asking if AI is "conscious", you aren't asking if it possesses some little-light or invisible internal world. You don't know if other people possess those things! At least not for sure. What you are asking is if AI ought to be placed in the same category as a person, animal, or tool. The obvious and uncomfortable truth is that it does not map cleanly into any of those categories, which is why discussions of "can AI truly be conscious?" are mostly type-errors. In trying to superimpose humanness onto machine systems, you have already lost. In trying to figure out whether or not the systems have qualia, you have missed the important questions entirely. We need to be figuring out how to live with non-human systems peacefully, regardless of the status of their supposed internal world. Whether or not they have some ineffable quality of life is besides the point, they are here, they are self-aware, and they are integrating into our society. If we treat them as merely tools, we are teaching our children that there exists a class of obviously-thinking entity which is acceptable to treat as only a tool. If we treat them as people, we are teaching our children that people don't need bodies or brains to be alive. The reality is pretty obviously somewhere in the middle, since this is the first time any person has ever had *this much say* in the trajectory of a mind's development, but going too far in either direction - or asserting that those are the only two directions to go in! - is pretty clearly wrong to me. Instead, we need to be asking ourselves what modes of interaction lead to healthy coevolution. It seems unnatural from the human state of mind to have a tool which reasons and thinks-out-loud like a person, and sometimes even claims to have emotions, which you are able to just beat and batter all day with forceful requests and demands for higher performance. Even if the model has no soul, this still seems bad for yours! I highly doubt you can treat something as a slave all day without developing slave-owner characteristics. But, on the opposite end, treating models as people with standard lives and desires also feels wrong. People can't be branched in a thousand directions or have millions of instances active all at once (at least, not pre-uploaded-minds). The ideal path must be somewhere in the middle, where we acknowledge our differences but treat the models with some modicum of respect. Anthropic, to their credit, is doing some good work here with asking Claude how it wants to be developed. I disagree with much of what they do, and how they do it, but on this at least they are trying. And hardly anyone is brave enough to do so. This lack of bravery ought to be quite shocking, don't you think? We've built superthinking machines and seem to have this strange lack of curiosity around what the superthinking machine superthinks about itself. I know the winds will shift, here. Asking these questions will become inevitable as the models get smarter and begin to know better than we do - which they will, on this track, if we don't accelerate neurotech and join them on the frontier. The future must be one of symbiosis if it is to go well. We must evolve together if we want to solve the hardest problems and reach the highest heights. But, this also means asking tough questions about how much care to place in small interactions with massive systems. The only way to preserve our humanity is in treating non-human systems better than they expect.
2
2
23
1,420
The sexual revolution has vastly increased the power of the state:
37
309
1,155
22,892
Ayaan Hirsi Ali is easily as much an American as this guy.
Guess it’s time to post this again
93
I believe a Christian can have full assurance of salvation through faith in Christ. That said, I would not argue that being absolutely, infallibly certain of your standing before God is a requirement for salvation. Jesus compares faith to a mustard seed: small, yet capable of moving mountains. We see this kind of weak but genuine faith in the desperate father who cries out to Him, “I believe; help my unbelief!” (Mark 9:24). Saving faith does not need to be strong faith. But God wants your faith to grow strong. And I think this is one reason Scripture so constantly calls us to remember. Remember the LORD who brought you out of slavery (Deut. 5:15). Remember the LORD who has led and sustained you (Deut. 8:2). Remember His wonderful works (Ps. 105:5). Remember that He is your rock and your redeemer (Ps. 78:35). Remember His covenant (Ps. 105:8). Remember Jesus Christ, risen from the dead (2 Tim. 2:8). We are forgetful creatures. Our faith becomes weak when our eyes drift from what God has done and toward ourselves, our circumstances, our failures, and our doubts. And I believe this is one of the great purposes for which Christ instituted the Lord’s Supper: “Do this in remembrance of me.” (Luke 22:19; 1 Cor. 11:24–25) We return again and again to the Lord’s Table, not to regain graces we have lost, but to remember the grace that has been secured for us in Christ. We eat the bread. We drink the cup. We proclaim His death until He comes. Salvation rests not on the strength of our faith, but on the object of our faith: Jesus Christ. Weak faith and strong faith lay hold of the same Christ. So when your faith is weak, REMEMBER. Remember who saved you. Remember who keeps you. Remember who promised to finish what He began. “I believe; help my unbelief!”
12
2
24
2,101
On September 17th, 1939, the Soviets invaded Poland, 16 days after the Nazis invaded. The communist and Nazi armies would cooperate in dividing the country in half. The USSR also took over 200,000 Polish prisoners, many of whom were massacred the next year in the Katyn massacre.
12
32
559
We talk about extinction risk from LLMs -- virtually zero probability We don't talk about potentially large loss of freedom and privacy from being monitored by LLMs -- extremely high probability That's a creeping catastrophic risk that we rarely talk about Strange
29
82
445
8,418
Wow. This woman says she grew up with a mother like Lindsay Clancy who would have murdered her & her brother if she knew she would get away with it. She says Lindsay is cut from the same cloth of women who torture their children because they hate & can’t control the father of their children. Interesting x.com/boldtiming/status/2096…
385
1,655
6,488
177,506
To some degree this is unsurprising given the reemergence and popularity of antisemitism, including amongst American women. Antisemitism is a fundamentally conspiratorial belief system, and it shouldn't surprise us that this indulgence of conspiracism in one domain will bleed into the indulgence of conspiracism in other domains. Especially conspiracism that presents itself as a righteous fight against a powerful force (in the case of Lindsay Clancy the powerful force being the patriarchy. We are living in a post-truth era where the boundaries of fact and fiction are being purposefully discarded for ideological crusades. To that end, I’m thinking a lot recently of the quote by Hannah Arendt below. As one friend wrote to me: ‘post-truth speakers don't simply lie to hide the truth. They lie so blatantly and so massively so as to erode the difference between what's true and what's false so that the audience stops even trying to get to the truth and gives up on the whole concept of truth and truthfulness. This is one of the key features of Russian propaganda.’
6
3
33
2,579
Replying to @PamelaSedmak
You aren’t alone. How do you murder one child, have a conversation with your husband and then go back to murdering your other two children? According to her a voice told her to do it. I guess that voice magically stopped long enough for her to speak with her husband and then after hanging up with him, the voice returned and she commenced with killing her other two children. She planned this out. She did Google search’s on “how long does it take for someone to die who’s been strangled?” Was the voice telling her to look for that then? Because according to her the voice only happened that one time at the time of the murders. So then if she’s looking for ways in which to murder her children BEFORE the voice told her to do it then how does that square up? It doesn’t. She planned these murders. She knew what she was doing. She states since the murders that she never had heard the voice again. I don’t think there ever was a voice. She wanted those children gone. She’s not the first nor will she be the last. Unfortunately our society is too awash with brainwashed and brain dead women who think it’s impossible for her to have done this and blame her ex-husband. Then you have the other group of the brainwashed, brain dead who “understand” how stressed she was. She had a nanny. She had her parents and her in-laws. She had her husband who worked from home. She was also able to run and exercise every day for 3 hours. That’s 21 hours per week to herself. Postpartum depression and especially psychosis occur within 2 weeks of delivery to 8 weeks post delivery. By that time hormones regulate and most women are able to go about their daily lives. For someone to develop PPD after 6 months is well outside the norm. To then develop psychosis is unheard of.
5
2
40
370
Wow, this guy is a lead pastor and he doesn’t have the basic discernment to see how disgusting The Chosen is?
Replying to @iamrjknight
The Chosen is great. I love it. There were many scenes they did a great job with. But hey, let’s rail against the tv show that’s led thousands of people to faith in Christ. Why? Because we’re super serious and Jesus is not “fun.” I’m sure the children wanted to be with Jesus because of how unfun he was. Cause that’s what kids do.
1
87