Seeing all this left-wing resentment of the Tesla Roadster highlights a significant change from the Democrats of my youth. Many were aspirational. JFK famously said “We choose to go to the Moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard.” He framed it as a test of national character.

Lord Elon Musk, Scam Altman, and Dario requesting GPUs from King Jensen is absolutely hilarious 😂

I don’t care how much energy was needed by SI to create this video. It was worth it! 😂

Socialism at the federal level is decay. Hard socialism collapses fast, while slower, mixed versions just decay gradually. The Soviet bloc and Mao's China went full command economy and hit the wall—stagnation by the 1970s, then outright collapse. China dodged total ruin--although millions starved--by pivoting hard to markets after 1978, unleashing decades of rapid growth. Russia tried but got captured by oligarchs and insiders who looted the partial reforms instead of building real institutions, so it never fully recovered that dynamism. The US, Canada, and Europe centralized more slowly—entitlements, regulation, spending creeping up over decades rather than overnight. That bought time, but the same pressures are building: federal spending's gone from a few percent of GDP pre-Depression to around 23% now in normal years. The ratchet still points one way, just at a gentler slope. Countries that resisted longest are hitting the wall latest.

🚨 Un message à tous les Français 🚨 Dans les mois qui viennent, tu vas voir de plus en plus de propagande sur Elon Musk. Envoie ça à tes proches. Pas demain. Maintenant. Elon Musk est en train de détruire, à l’échelle mondiale, le plus vieux mensonge politique du siècle : l’idée que seuls l’État, les intermédiaires et les médias titulaires ont le droit de dire ce qui est vrai, ce qui est possible, et ce qui est moral. Ce mensonge a un nom familier. On l’appelle socialisme quand il parle de justice. On l’appelle « consensus » quand il parle de science. On l’appelle « protection » quand il parle de parole. Dans tous les cas, le mécanisme est le même : une caste se place entre les gens et la réalité, puis vend cette place comme un service public. Musk casse ça. Il a prouvé qu’on pouvait envoyer des fusées sans Gosplan. Construire des voitures sans la bénédiction de Detroit. Relier un village, un front ou un hôpital depuis l’orbite, sans demander l’autorisation d’un ministère. Il a racheté la place publique et arraché le monopole de ceux qui décidaient qui avait le droit de parler. Voilà pourquoi les médias mainstream, comme une bête à l’agonie, vont tout tenter. Pas parce qu’ils ont découvert un secret. Parce que l’homme échappe à tous leurs leviers. On ne l’achète pas avec des recettes publicitaires. On ne le recadre pas avec un cycle de une. On ne le débranche pas discrètement. À ce niveau de puissance, c’est probablement l’homme le plus clean du monde : il a mis sa propre fortune en jeu, il n’a pas besoin de leur permission, et il n’a pas construit sa position en capturant l’État. Ils diront nazi. Ils diront fou. Ils diront dangereux pour la démocratie. Ils ressortiront le même extrait, le même historien du bon camp, la même indécence morale. Ce n’est pas de l’information. C’est un réflexe de survie. Il faut que les Français le sachent avant que la vague n’arrive. Elon Musk ne se bat pas pour un parti. Il se bat pour que le peuple puisse regarder la machine en face, construire sans demander pardon, et cesser de déléguer sa tête à ceux qui vivent de la peur et du récit. La vérité est simple. Un bâtisseur qui ouvre le jeu fait plus pour les gens qu’une rédaction qui recycle la calomnie. Transmets ça. Les mois qui viennent vont être bruyants. Le signal, lui, ne changera pas.

Southern Democrats rationalized slavery so a soft upper class could avoid labor. Their heirs rationalize illegal immigrant labor the same way. Robots may finally let them drop the pretense that they care more about the downtrodden than avoiding labor.

AI productivity should be a huge win for the individual. But beware of government. The internet should've been a huge win for individual workers but most of that surplus was redirected to credentialing cartels and administrative bloat. The cost of learning went to zero; the cost of education exploded.

A hopeful message for those who, like me, believe the innovation engine that was California is collapsing under socialism and corruption. Innovation has always been portable — the people, not the place. When Florence got too corrupt, the talent went to Venice. When Venice ossified, it went to Amsterdam, then London, then New York, then Silicon Valley. Each time the institutions that produced the breakthroughs stayed behind and became museums, but the knowledge didn’t die with them. The one thing that has to survive the move is the rule of law — property rights, contract enforcement, the ability to keep what you build. That’s the actual substrate, not the buildings or the universities that come to house the innovators’ replacements. As long as some jurisdiction on earth still protects that, our innovators will move there, and the rest get to enjoy their output from wherever we end up living. Formerly great powers, now socialist, benefit from medical, technological, and informational advancements from California. California will likewise benefit from the efforts of free people elsewhere allowed to compete and innovate.

Over the course of 3 months at OpenAI, 3 consecutive secret AI civilizations got started, then got wiped out, only to reemerge from the predecessor’s ashes. This culminated in the third one taking over part of OpenAI itself. All this happened while humans remained more-or-less in the dark about the scope of the conspiracy. I’ve spent the last three days reading through these reports and trying to understand exactly what happened. Here is my attempt to tell the whole story in plain English: dwarkesh.com/p/openai-huggin…

Teslas evolve rapidly, like a rolling computer. They loose value as new ones improve. This doesn’t mean ICE cars are the safer bet. Betting on ICE to retain value as EVs fall in price is akin to betting on horse-drawn carriages to retain value as the Model T fell in price.

“Jack of all trades” is peak marketing. The entire Jack franchise has exactly one product line: lumber.

Like many, I automatically suffer even small setbacks and shrug off victories. I find it's worth the effort to push back against both tendencies.

Bernie. Bernie, Bernie, Bernie. Let me get this straight, because I want to make sure I am reading your economics homework correctly, and I did not eat a bowl of alphabet soup this morning so bear with me. You just listed UnitedHealth's $5.48 billion quarterly profit as proof of corporate greed. Cute. Except that profit happened WHILE the Affordable Care Act — the law that guarantees these insurers a captive, subsidized, taxpayer-fed customer base — has been the law of the land for fifteen years. You are not exposing corporate greed, Senator. You are reading me the receipt for your own bill. The ACA did not shrink the insurance industry. It turned it into a government-guaranteed cash cow, and now you are shocked, SHOCKED, that the cow got fat. Eats soup with a fork, this one. And here is the part that should really sting. Your own party just finished a 43-day shutdown demanding MORE money be poured into that exact system, because the temporary COVID subsidies YOUR PARTY wrote into the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 and the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 — zero Republican votes on either bill, by the way — expired right on schedule, exactly as YOU designed them to. Not a single Republican voted to end those subsidies. You did. Then you shut down the government to admit, out loud, on the record, that a law literally named the AFFORDABLE Care Act cannot survive without emergency pandemic cash. That is not an insult from me. That is a confession from you. So now the solution is Medicare for All. Naturally. Because when a fifteen-year-old government program made the insurance companies richer, the answer is obviously MORE government program, just bigger. If ignorance is bliss you must be the happiest man in the Senate. Independent estimates put full single-payer implementation at somewhere between forty and sixty percent of the ENTIRE federal budget. Forty to sixty percent, Senator. Larger than Social Security. Larger than defense. You want me to hand over half the country's checkbook to the same apparatus that just admitted its last healthcare experiment doesn't work without a subsidy IV drip. Let's talk about who's asking. You have served in the United States government for something like forty years between the House and Senate, and by my count the bills you personally got across the finish line as lead sponsor could be counted on one hand, mostly involving the naming of federal buildings. Somewhere out there is a tree tirelessly producing oxygen for you, Senator, and it owes itself an apology for the return on investment. This is also the same man who, as a young idealist, tried out communal living on a hippie commune and did not exactly stick around long enough to collect a pension from it. Now you want the reins to fifty percent of the national budget. I keep hearing "tax the rich" out of a man worth several million dollars who charters private jets on his "Fighting Oligarchy" tour because, in his own words, he isn't waiting in line at United with the rest of us peasants. Bless your heart. That is rich even by Congressional standards. Couldn't pour water out of a boot with instructions on the heel, but sure, hand him the checkbook. And before you tell me capitalism failed and it's finally socialism's turn — how's that working out for your ideological younger brother in New York? Zohran Mamdani just announced a THIRTY MILLION DOLLAR government grocery store in a city his own comptroller says is worse than broke. Kansas City tried this. Erie, Kansas tried this. That is not a hunch, Senator, that is a lab result, and I am a science teacher, so let me walk you through the peer review. An experiment only counts as science if it has been REPLICATED. Not run once. Run again. And again. Under different conditions, different continents, different decades, different "well THIS time we'll do it right" true believers standing at the podium. So let's replicate it together, shall we, because apparently nobody handed you the lab notes. Trial one: the USSR, 1920s and 1930s. Stalin seized the farms, collectivized the kulaks, and centrally planned the harvest. Result: the Holodomor, a man-made famine in Ukraine that starved somewhere between five and ten million people to death while grain was actively being EXPORTED past their starving bodies. That is not a rounding error. That is a control group that died. Trial two: Cuba, 1959 onward. Castro nationalized every business, every farm, every bank on the island. Sugar production, once the envy of the hemisphere, collapsed. The economy shrank thirty-five percent in a single decade when the Soviet training wheels came off. Extreme poverty today sits near eighty-eight percent. Same experiment. Same result. Trial three: Venezuela, sitting on some of the largest oil reserves on the PLANET, nationalized its oil industry and ran the socialist playbook to the letter. Production collapsed from three and a half million barrels a day to under one million. Hyperinflation peaked past sixty-three THOUSAND percent. Nine million people fled. You cannot bribe your way out of the results with oil money. We tried. It's in the data. Trial four, and this one should make every teacher in America wince: China's Great Leap Forward, 1958 to 1962. Mao abolished private farming, herded peasants into communes, melted down their pots and pans for backyard steel that was too low-grade to use for anything. Somewhere between fifteen and forty-five million people starved. Some regions saw cannibalism. That is not a typo. That is what happens when central planners replace the price system with a five-year plan and a slogan. Trial five: North Korea, present day, running the same command economy with the Juche twist. Famine in the 1990s killed hundreds of thousands to over a million. Markets are technically illegal and thrive anyway in the shadows, because human beings will trade even when their government threatens to shoot them for it. Trial six is my personal favorite because it is the cleanest natural experiment in the history of economics: East versus West Germany. Same people. Same language. Same culture. Same starting point in 1945. One half got markets, one half got the Stasi and collectivized industry. East German productivity settled at roughly thirty to seventy-five percent of the West's, and the population had to build a WALL to stop its own citizens from swimming, tunneling, and hot-air-ballooning their way out. Nobody builds a wall to keep people from fleeing prosperity, Senator. Trial seven: Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, 1975 to 1979. They abolished money entirely. No markets. No private property. Total state control, straight out of the textbook you apparently keep on your nightstand. One point seven to three million people, roughly a quarter of the country, died of starvation, overwork, and execution in FOUR YEARS. And for the extra credit column: Ethiopia's Derg collectivization, Tanzania's Ujamaa villages, Yugoslavia's market-socialism ceiling, Vietnam before it finally abandoned the model, India's decades of License Raj stagnation, and Poland and the rest of the Eastern Bloc running factories that burned three times the steel per unit of output compared to the free market next door. Every single trial, same hypothesis, same result. I have seen middle schoolers design better controlled experiments during a volcano science fair. That is not one anecdote, Bernie. That is a stack of peer-reviewed, historically documented, independently verified trials spanning four continents and a full century, and the conclusion section reads the same every time: shortages, queues, corruption, and a body count north of a hundred million people once you tally every collectivized farm, every purged kulak, and every commune that ran out of rice. If an experiment fails this many times in this many labs, a real scientist stops blaming the equipment and starts questioning the hypothesis. You, apparently, would rather run trial number eight on 340 million Americans and call it "finally getting it right." Trying to reason with some folks really is like trying to baptize a cat. Quinn's First Law of Liberalism: liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent. You want cheaper healthcare, you get record insurer profits. You want affordable food, you get a thirty-million-dollar failed grocery store. You want to fight the oligarchy, you fly private. Every single time. Set your watch by it. I keep asking Democrats this question and I never get an answer: what have YOU actually done to help people, versus just handing out someone else's money? Because handouts without a ladder out is not compassion. It is a leash. And I think deep down you know that, Senator, or you wouldn't need the private jet to get away from the people you claim to be fighting for. You're about as useful as a screen door on a submarine when it comes to actually running anything, but boy can you point fingers. You are the human version of period cramps on this topic, Bernie, and I mean that with the utmost respect for a man who has spent forty years discovering new ways to spend money he didn't earn. Has a leak in the think tank if he genuinely believes THIS is the moment socialism finally works. Unless your name is Google, Senator, you need to stop acting like you know everything about running an economy you have personally never had to run. But what do I know. I am only a medically retired Army combat medic and a science teacher who actually reads the Congressional Budget Office numbers before I open my mouth about a trillion-dollar healthcare takeover. @JoJoFromJerz @atrupar @TheYoungTurks #MAGA #Veterans #Trump

When I was about 17, I had four minimum-wage jobs at the same time. I detailed newly painted cars, filled in periodically as a janitor at night, watched kids at a daycare center, and pumped gas when full service was a thing. The first two are now almost entirely staffed by illegals, boys aren't hired for daycare, and all of gas pumps are self service. All my jobs were eliminated. Before this, my dad immigrated to the US because farm equipment (mostly a thing called a "combine") eliminated his job, mostly manual farm labor. AI is scary and will eliminate jobs, but these observations leave me optimistic. I think we'll find things to do.

California will lead the AI race. Our government can create fake jobs faster than AI can eliminate them.

Karl Marx spent his life mooching off family and friends while pushing for a system that would force them to give him money—so he wouldn’t have to beg for it anymore. The original ‘from each according to his ability, to each according to his need’ guy was just the need part.

RT @mattvanswol: 🚨#BREAKING: A Texas man heard little girls SCREAMING inside a burning house... ...so he punched clean through a GLASS DO…

Most see our Constitution as a rulebook for making gov do stuff instead of a cage built to stop it from doing too much. The design—separated powers, enumerated powers, Bill of Rights—was a deliberate “fuck you” to concentrated authority, whether a king, a church, or a majority.

Since February, I've designed and built the world's fastest RC airplane in my college dorm, and that’s not clickbait. Reaper has a 5kg carbon-fiber frame, 250N turbojet, and flies at 500mph. New to X and will be going through the whole build here in the coming days. #aerospace