My post may be long, but worth the read; US Army (Ret), Husband and Father of 4, Teacher, Really slow with DMs, and only look at people interested in postings

Medina, OH
Mike brought receipts
Replying to @BernieSanders
Bernie. Again? Already? You have never once answered me. Not one reply, not one like, nothing. And that's fine, because you don't have to. You just keep posting, and I keep getting free lesson plans. Four posts in two days, and every one of them is a gift. It's the best relationship I've ever had with a senator. You ignore me, I grade your homework. At this point I should be paying YOU. Actually, never mind, I already am. I'm a taxpayer. So let me get this straight. You posted a picture of a state dinner, drew little red boxes with net worths on the guests like it's a true crime documentary, and then quoted the Gettysburg Address. The Gettysburg Address, Bernie. "Of the people, by the people, for the people." Written by Abraham Lincoln. The FIRST Republican president. You borrowed a Republican's most famous line to attack a Republican president. That's like showing up to a potluck with somebody else's casserole and then complaining about the cooking. I'd call you a gray sprinkle on a rainbow cupcake, but that's an insult to sprinkles. Now. The actual picture. It's a state dinner. For the leader of China. The country that makes a huge chunk of our phones, our electronics, and the parts inside half the stuff in your house. Of course the people who build chips, phones, cars, and rockets are at that table. Where else would they be? You want the trade talks about computer chips to happen without the guy who MAKES the computer chips? That's like planning a surgery and not inviting the surgeon because he makes too much money. Bernie, your brain is running on energy-saving mode, and I think somebody unplugged the charger. Every state dinner has CEOs at it. Every one. What's next, a Democrat president hosting Xi Jinping at a state dinner with a tech billionaire at the table... wait. I'm being told Barack Obama already did that in September 2015, and Mark Zuckerberg was in the room. Okay, fine, what's next, a Democrat throwing a state dinner packed with Tim Cook, Sundar Pichai, Satya Nadella, AND Sam Altman... wait. I'm being told Biden's Autopen already sent those invitations out for the Modi dinner in 2023. Where were your little red boxes then, Bernie? Did the Sharpie run dry? Let's look at the people you circled, since you clearly didn't. Lisa Su. Born in Taiwan. Came here as a little kid, became an engineer, took over AMD when everybody thought it was about to go belly up, and saved it along with every job inside it. Jensen Huang. Born in Taiwan. Washed dishes and bused tables at a Denny's. Started Nvidia in a Denny's booth. A DENNY'S BOOTH, Bernie. And now he builds the chips that run half the modern world. Tim Cook. Son of a shipyard worker from a little town in Alabama. Elon Musk. Born in South Africa. Came here and built electric cars, rockets, and satellite internet for rural families the cable companies ignored for twenty years. Three of the four people you circled weren't even born in this country. They came here with nothing but brains and nerve and built something. And the fourth one's dad worked in a shipyard. You looked at that table and saw villains. I look at it and see the American Dream having dinner. I have kids in my classroom who need to hear stories exactly like those. You'd rather teach them to hate the people who made it. And those red numbers under their names? That's not cash, Bernie. Nobody at that table has $928 billion in a checking account. That's the value of their companies. Their stock. Stock that sits in the 401(k) of every nurse, plumber, and retired teacher in America. When those numbers go up, working people's retirement goes up. You are putting a big red warning label on the retirement savings of the working class. You're as sharp as a bowling ball, Senator, and about as easy to steer. Now let's talk about this "government of, by and for the billionaire class" line. Name one person in that picture who is IN the government, besides the President. Go ahead. I'll wait. Lisa Su can't pass a law. Jensen Huang can't raise your taxes. Tim Cook can't draft your kid. Elon can't throw you in jail. You know who CAN do all of those things? The government. Congress. People like you. You're a sitting United States Senator, Bernie. You ARE the government. You've been the government for thirty-five years. If the government is broken, you're one of the guys holding the wrench. And while we're talking about who the government works for, let's check your wallet. Three houses. A taxpayer salary for thirty-five years. A taxpayer pension waiting for you. $221,000 on chartered private jets in one quarter of 2025. Book royalties from writing about how nobody should have that much money. The government works just fine for YOU, Senator. It's the rest of us picking up the tab. Quinn's Law Number Seven: it's different when you're a Democrat. When Obama puts Zuckerberg at the table, it's diplomacy. When Biden's Autopen invites four tech CEOs to dinner, it's a celebration of partnership. When Trump does the exact same thing, it's "the billionaire class." Same dinner. Same guests. Different jersey. Your train of thought derailed back around 1971 and nobody ever sent a rescue crew. And I have to point out the funniest part. You're upset that capitalists had dinner with the head of the Chinese Communist Party. Bernie. You went on your HONEYMOON in the Soviet Union. Your idea of a romantic getaway was a communist country, and now you're clutching your pearls because Tim Cook shared a table with one. That's not a principle. That's a mood swing with a Senate pin on it. So let me make the same offer I always make, and change it up a little. I keep hearing Democrats cry about rich people when they're rich people. They know every loophole in the tax code because a lot of them helped write it, and then they use those loopholes on their own returns. So here it is. Before you draw one more red box around somebody else's net worth, file your taxes with the standard deduction only. No itemizing. Pay DOUBLE what the IRS says you owe. Then post a picture of THAT. I'll even draw the red box for you. Until then, you're a few clowns short of a circus, Bernie, and the tent is on fire. Here's what really gets me, though. The four people you circled have given working Americans jobs, phones, computers, chips, internet in the middle of nowhere, and paychecks for hundreds of thousands of families. You've been in Congress for thirty-five years and you've got two renamed post offices to show for it. If I made a picture of your contributions to the working class, Senator, I wouldn't need red boxes. I'd need a magnifying glass. You're like a solar-powered night light. Nice idea. Totally useless when it counts. So I'll ask the same thing I always ask. What have you actually built? Not a speech. Not a tweet. Not a picture with red boxes on it. What have you DONE for the working people you keep talking about? Because the only thing I see you building is a bigger audience for the next fundraising email. Anyway, Bernie, thanks again. Seriously. I'll see you in about three hours. I know you'll post something else stupid. You always do. But what do I know? I'm only a physics teacher who knows that net worth isn't a checking account, that the Gettysburg Address was written by a Republican, and that you can't have a trade deal about chips without the people who make the chips, which apparently puts me three lessons ahead of the senator from Vermont. @TPUSA @JoJoFromJerz @atrupar #MAGA #Trump #Veterans
1
2
145
1
3
81
mike bski retweeted
Pretty killer takedown of Chucky. It's long but worth the read. Well done sir. 👍👍👍
Replying to @SenSchumer
Senator Schumer, "The MAGA Supreme Court strikes again." I spit my coffee. Actual coffee. On my actual grading pile. I have thirty lab reports on projectile motion with a brown ring on them now, and I'm billing you for it. Because, Chuck, I have a memory. Not a great one. I'm fifty, I've been up since five, and I walk into rooms and forget why. But even I can remember back TEN DAYS. Let me read you some quotes. You tell me if they sound like a man who thinks this Court is illegitimate. February 20: "This is a win for the wallets of every American consumer." June 29, in an official press release with your name across the top: "The Supreme Court just upheld this bedrock American principle." June 30: "The Supreme Court confirmed today that those born in America are American." And September 15. Ten days ago. You could still have the leftovers in your fridge: "The Supreme Court had no choice but to make the right decision." Upheld. Confirmed. Bedrock. Had no choice. Same nine justices. Same marble building. Same black robes. The only thing that changed between September 15 and today is whether YOU got what you wanted. And then there's my favorite. Same day, September 15, on the Senate floor: "Even Trump's MAGA Supreme Court shut down his unconstitutional plan." Read that one more time. Slowly. I'll wait. I teach high school, so silence doesn't bother me. The MAGA Court... ruled against MAGA... and you praised it... while calling it MAGA. Chuck, that isn't a court. That's a Schrödinger's cat with a gavel. It's MAGA and not MAGA at the same time, and it stays that way until you open the box and check whether you won. I have four kids. When I hand out candy, I'm the greatest dad who ever lived. When I enforce bedtime, my three-year-old throws himself on the carpet and screams that I'm the worst person in the whole world. Same dad. Same house. Same rules. The only thing that changed is whether he got the candy. He's three. You've been in Congress since 1981. Longer than I have been alive! What exactly is your excuse? OK. Line by line. Get comfortable. "Thousands of American voters could be wrongly stripped from voter rolls... this election season." No. They can't. And you KNOW they can't. The National Voter Registration Act, a Democrat-passed law, signed by Bill Clinton in 1993, bars states from systematically removing voters in the 90 days before a federal election. Election Day is November 3. Count backward ninety days. That door slammed shut in early AUGUST. Seven weeks ago. Even the AP, which nobody will ever accuse of being a MAGA outlet, reported that the effect on the midterms is likely limited. Forty-five years in Congress and you either don't know about a 1993 voting law your own party passed, or you know and you posted this anyway to scare people. I honestly don't know which one is worse. The first one means the elevator doesn't go all the way to the top floor. The second one means you're scaring grandmas for clicks. "Elon Musk's DOGE-overhauled SAVE database." Oh good, Elon. It's always Elon. If your Wi-Fi went out tomorrow, it would be Elon. Chuck, the SAVE program has existed since 1987. When it started, Elon was sixteen years old and living in South Africa. And the law the Supreme Court leaned on this week? 1996. Signed by Bill Clinton. It sailed through the House 370 to 37. You know who was sitting in the House of Representatives in 1996? Representative Charles Schumer of New York. I'm not going to tell you how you voted. I'm going to let you look it up yourself. Bring a flashlight and a snack. It's a long walk back to 1996. And here's the part that made me laugh out loud in my kitchen. That SAME 1996 law made it a deportable offense for a non-citizen to vote illegally. So the tool you're screaming about exists to enforce a rule your own party's president signed. Thirty years ago. You're protesting your own homework. "Ridden with errors." This is the one place you have half a point, and I'm going to give it to you, because I'm a science teacher and we don't hide inconvenient data. Travis County, Texas checked 97 flags and found somewhere between 10 and 21 percent were actually citizens. That matters. That's a real person getting a letter they shouldn't have gotten. But a FLAG is not a PURGE, Chuck. A flag means a human being looks at it. The voter gets a notice. They show proof. And naturalized citizens have proof. It's called a naturalization certificate, and I promise you most of them keep it somewhere safer than their car title, because they EARNED it. They studied. They took the test. They raised their right hand and swore the oath. Nobody is prouder to prove they're an American than someone who had to earn it. And if something STILL goes wrong on Election Day, federal law already hands them a provisional ballot. Now let me tell you about the voters YOU never tweet about. Iowa ran SAVE and confirmed 277 non-citizens registered to vote. Thirty-five of them had ballots COUNTED in 2024. Georgia used it to block 1,634 attempted registrations in 2022. Every one of those illegal ballots canceled out a real citizen's vote. Maybe a nurse. Maybe a factory worker. Maybe a guy like me who spent twenty-three years in uniform so people could vote in the first place. Where's their press release, Chuck? Where's THEIR bedrock American principle? Oh, and one tiny detail you forgot to mention. States' use of SAVE is VOLUNTARY. New York never has to touch it. You're pulling the fire alarm over an OPTIONAL fire extinguisher sitting in someone else's building. Then there's the document in the post you quoted. Did you look at it? I did. Read the caption at the top. That is not the Supreme Court. That's the Sixth Circuit. From MY state. Ohio. Red Wine & Blue v. LaRose. Filed September 23. Different court, different case, different day. You quote-tweeted a legal document without checking which court filed it. I make my freshmen cite sources better than that, and I have freshmen who think a thesis is a type of dinosaur. Now the part that doesn't make me laugh at all. "Election-rigging agenda." "Attempts to cheat." Senator, you are the Democratic Leader of the United States Senate. Millions of people hang on your words. And some of those people are not well. When the most powerful Democrat in the Senate tells an entire country that the President is cheating and rigging an election, SOMEBODY out there hears a mission instead of a tweet. I was a combat medic in Iraq. I was a paramedic here at home. I have seen what bullets do to a human body, and I know exactly how short the road is between "they're stealing your country" and a man with a gun who thinks he's a hero. And you know it too. Because you've already done it. March 4, 2020. You stood on the steps of this same Court and said, "I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won't know what hit you." The Chief Justice of the United States had to publicly rebuke you. Two years later, a man with a gun was arrested near Justice Kavanaugh's home. You never got the whirlwind, Chuck. Somebody else almost did. What's next? The Senate Democratic Leader calls the Supreme Court a rigged MAGA institution one week after praising it on the Senate floor for its bedrock American principles... oh wait. That's today. That's this post. I keep trying to make up something too ridiculous to be true, and you keep doing it before I finish typing. Quinn's Law #2 says if you want to know what they're up to, watch what they accuse you of. You scream "cheating" at a citizenship check while 277 non-citizens sat on the rolls in Iowa alone. And Quinn's Law #26 needs no explanation at this point. Liberals love the courts right up until the gavel falls the wrong way. You didn't just prove it, Chuck. You footnoted it. With dates. So here's your quiz, Senator. Multiple choice. Pick one: A. You didn't read the order, didn't remember the NVRA, and didn't read the caption on the document you quoted. B. You read all three and couldn't understand them. C. You understood every word and decided New Yorkers are easier to lead when they're scared. But what do I know, I am only a science teacher from Ohio who read the caption on a court order before posting it, which apparently puts me one step ahead of the Senate Democratic Leader. @TPUSA @JoJoFromJerz @atrupar @TheYoungTurks #MAGA #Trump #Veterans
1
1
106
mike bski retweeted
Totally owned.
Replying to @BernieSanders
Bernie. Again? Already? You have never once answered me. Not one reply, not one like, nothing. And that's fine, because you don't have to. You just keep posting, and I keep getting free lesson plans. Four posts in two days, and every one of them is a gift. It's the best relationship I've ever had with a senator. You ignore me, I grade your homework. At this point I should be paying YOU. Actually, never mind, I already am. I'm a taxpayer. So let me get this straight. You posted a picture of a state dinner, drew little red boxes with net worths on the guests like it's a true crime documentary, and then quoted the Gettysburg Address. The Gettysburg Address, Bernie. "Of the people, by the people, for the people." Written by Abraham Lincoln. The FIRST Republican president. You borrowed a Republican's most famous line to attack a Republican president. That's like showing up to a potluck with somebody else's casserole and then complaining about the cooking. I'd call you a gray sprinkle on a rainbow cupcake, but that's an insult to sprinkles. Now. The actual picture. It's a state dinner. For the leader of China. The country that makes a huge chunk of our phones, our electronics, and the parts inside half the stuff in your house. Of course the people who build chips, phones, cars, and rockets are at that table. Where else would they be? You want the trade talks about computer chips to happen without the guy who MAKES the computer chips? That's like planning a surgery and not inviting the surgeon because he makes too much money. Bernie, your brain is running on energy-saving mode, and I think somebody unplugged the charger. Every state dinner has CEOs at it. Every one. What's next, a Democrat president hosting Xi Jinping at a state dinner with a tech billionaire at the table... wait. I'm being told Barack Obama already did that in September 2015, and Mark Zuckerberg was in the room. Okay, fine, what's next, a Democrat throwing a state dinner packed with Tim Cook, Sundar Pichai, Satya Nadella, AND Sam Altman... wait. I'm being told Biden's Autopen already sent those invitations out for the Modi dinner in 2023. Where were your little red boxes then, Bernie? Did the Sharpie run dry? Let's look at the people you circled, since you clearly didn't. Lisa Su. Born in Taiwan. Came here as a little kid, became an engineer, took over AMD when everybody thought it was about to go belly up, and saved it along with every job inside it. Jensen Huang. Born in Taiwan. Washed dishes and bused tables at a Denny's. Started Nvidia in a Denny's booth. A DENNY'S BOOTH, Bernie. And now he builds the chips that run half the modern world. Tim Cook. Son of a shipyard worker from a little town in Alabama. Elon Musk. Born in South Africa. Came here and built electric cars, rockets, and satellite internet for rural families the cable companies ignored for twenty years. Three of the four people you circled weren't even born in this country. They came here with nothing but brains and nerve and built something. And the fourth one's dad worked in a shipyard. You looked at that table and saw villains. I look at it and see the American Dream having dinner. I have kids in my classroom who need to hear stories exactly like those. You'd rather teach them to hate the people who made it. And those red numbers under their names? That's not cash, Bernie. Nobody at that table has $928 billion in a checking account. That's the value of their companies. Their stock. Stock that sits in the 401(k) of every nurse, plumber, and retired teacher in America. When those numbers go up, working people's retirement goes up. You are putting a big red warning label on the retirement savings of the working class. You're as sharp as a bowling ball, Senator, and about as easy to steer. Now let's talk about this "government of, by and for the billionaire class" line. Name one person in that picture who is IN the government, besides the President. Go ahead. I'll wait. Lisa Su can't pass a law. Jensen Huang can't raise your taxes. Tim Cook can't draft your kid. Elon can't throw you in jail. You know who CAN do all of those things? The government. Congress. People like you. You're a sitting United States Senator, Bernie. You ARE the government. You've been the government for thirty-five years. If the government is broken, you're one of the guys holding the wrench. And while we're talking about who the government works for, let's check your wallet. Three houses. A taxpayer salary for thirty-five years. A taxpayer pension waiting for you. $221,000 on chartered private jets in one quarter of 2025. Book royalties from writing about how nobody should have that much money. The government works just fine for YOU, Senator. It's the rest of us picking up the tab. Quinn's Law Number Seven: it's different when you're a Democrat. When Obama puts Zuckerberg at the table, it's diplomacy. When Biden's Autopen invites four tech CEOs to dinner, it's a celebration of partnership. When Trump does the exact same thing, it's "the billionaire class." Same dinner. Same guests. Different jersey. Your train of thought derailed back around 1971 and nobody ever sent a rescue crew. And I have to point out the funniest part. You're upset that capitalists had dinner with the head of the Chinese Communist Party. Bernie. You went on your HONEYMOON in the Soviet Union. Your idea of a romantic getaway was a communist country, and now you're clutching your pearls because Tim Cook shared a table with one. That's not a principle. That's a mood swing with a Senate pin on it. So let me make the same offer I always make, and change it up a little. I keep hearing Democrats cry about rich people when they're rich people. They know every loophole in the tax code because a lot of them helped write it, and then they use those loopholes on their own returns. So here it is. Before you draw one more red box around somebody else's net worth, file your taxes with the standard deduction only. No itemizing. Pay DOUBLE what the IRS says you owe. Then post a picture of THAT. I'll even draw the red box for you. Until then, you're a few clowns short of a circus, Bernie, and the tent is on fire. Here's what really gets me, though. The four people you circled have given working Americans jobs, phones, computers, chips, internet in the middle of nowhere, and paychecks for hundreds of thousands of families. You've been in Congress for thirty-five years and you've got two renamed post offices to show for it. If I made a picture of your contributions to the working class, Senator, I wouldn't need red boxes. I'd need a magnifying glass. You're like a solar-powered night light. Nice idea. Totally useless when it counts. So I'll ask the same thing I always ask. What have you actually built? Not a speech. Not a tweet. Not a picture with red boxes on it. What have you DONE for the working people you keep talking about? Because the only thing I see you building is a bigger audience for the next fundraising email. Anyway, Bernie, thanks again. Seriously. I'll see you in about three hours. I know you'll post something else stupid. You always do. But what do I know? I'm only a physics teacher who knows that net worth isn't a checking account, that the Gettysburg Address was written by a Republican, and that you can't have a trade deal about chips without the people who make the chips, which apparently puts me three lessons ahead of the senator from Vermont. @TPUSA @JoJoFromJerz @atrupar #MAGA #Trump #Veterans
1
1
96
mike bski retweeted
Great response to @SenSchumer and his screeching response to today’s SCOTUS ruling
Replying to @SenSchumer
Senator Schumer, "The MAGA Supreme Court strikes again." I spit my coffee. Actual coffee. On my actual grading pile. I have thirty lab reports on projectile motion with a brown ring on them now, and I'm billing you for it. Because, Chuck, I have a memory. Not a great one. I'm fifty, I've been up since five, and I walk into rooms and forget why. But even I can remember back TEN DAYS. Let me read you some quotes. You tell me if they sound like a man who thinks this Court is illegitimate. February 20: "This is a win for the wallets of every American consumer." June 29, in an official press release with your name across the top: "The Supreme Court just upheld this bedrock American principle." June 30: "The Supreme Court confirmed today that those born in America are American." And September 15. Ten days ago. You could still have the leftovers in your fridge: "The Supreme Court had no choice but to make the right decision." Upheld. Confirmed. Bedrock. Had no choice. Same nine justices. Same marble building. Same black robes. The only thing that changed between September 15 and today is whether YOU got what you wanted. And then there's my favorite. Same day, September 15, on the Senate floor: "Even Trump's MAGA Supreme Court shut down his unconstitutional plan." Read that one more time. Slowly. I'll wait. I teach high school, so silence doesn't bother me. The MAGA Court... ruled against MAGA... and you praised it... while calling it MAGA. Chuck, that isn't a court. That's a Schrödinger's cat with a gavel. It's MAGA and not MAGA at the same time, and it stays that way until you open the box and check whether you won. I have four kids. When I hand out candy, I'm the greatest dad who ever lived. When I enforce bedtime, my three-year-old throws himself on the carpet and screams that I'm the worst person in the whole world. Same dad. Same house. Same rules. The only thing that changed is whether he got the candy. He's three. You've been in Congress since 1981. Longer than I have been alive! What exactly is your excuse? OK. Line by line. Get comfortable. "Thousands of American voters could be wrongly stripped from voter rolls... this election season." No. They can't. And you KNOW they can't. The National Voter Registration Act, a Democrat-passed law, signed by Bill Clinton in 1993, bars states from systematically removing voters in the 90 days before a federal election. Election Day is November 3. Count backward ninety days. That door slammed shut in early AUGUST. Seven weeks ago. Even the AP, which nobody will ever accuse of being a MAGA outlet, reported that the effect on the midterms is likely limited. Forty-five years in Congress and you either don't know about a 1993 voting law your own party passed, or you know and you posted this anyway to scare people. I honestly don't know which one is worse. The first one means the elevator doesn't go all the way to the top floor. The second one means you're scaring grandmas for clicks. "Elon Musk's DOGE-overhauled SAVE database." Oh good, Elon. It's always Elon. If your Wi-Fi went out tomorrow, it would be Elon. Chuck, the SAVE program has existed since 1987. When it started, Elon was sixteen years old and living in South Africa. And the law the Supreme Court leaned on this week? 1996. Signed by Bill Clinton. It sailed through the House 370 to 37. You know who was sitting in the House of Representatives in 1996? Representative Charles Schumer of New York. I'm not going to tell you how you voted. I'm going to let you look it up yourself. Bring a flashlight and a snack. It's a long walk back to 1996. And here's the part that made me laugh out loud in my kitchen. That SAME 1996 law made it a deportable offense for a non-citizen to vote illegally. So the tool you're screaming about exists to enforce a rule your own party's president signed. Thirty years ago. You're protesting your own homework. "Ridden with errors." This is the one place you have half a point, and I'm going to give it to you, because I'm a science teacher and we don't hide inconvenient data. Travis County, Texas checked 97 flags and found somewhere between 10 and 21 percent were actually citizens. That matters. That's a real person getting a letter they shouldn't have gotten. But a FLAG is not a PURGE, Chuck. A flag means a human being looks at it. The voter gets a notice. They show proof. And naturalized citizens have proof. It's called a naturalization certificate, and I promise you most of them keep it somewhere safer than their car title, because they EARNED it. They studied. They took the test. They raised their right hand and swore the oath. Nobody is prouder to prove they're an American than someone who had to earn it. And if something STILL goes wrong on Election Day, federal law already hands them a provisional ballot. Now let me tell you about the voters YOU never tweet about. Iowa ran SAVE and confirmed 277 non-citizens registered to vote. Thirty-five of them had ballots COUNTED in 2024. Georgia used it to block 1,634 attempted registrations in 2022. Every one of those illegal ballots canceled out a real citizen's vote. Maybe a nurse. Maybe a factory worker. Maybe a guy like me who spent twenty-three years in uniform so people could vote in the first place. Where's their press release, Chuck? Where's THEIR bedrock American principle? Oh, and one tiny detail you forgot to mention. States' use of SAVE is VOLUNTARY. New York never has to touch it. You're pulling the fire alarm over an OPTIONAL fire extinguisher sitting in someone else's building. Then there's the document in the post you quoted. Did you look at it? I did. Read the caption at the top. That is not the Supreme Court. That's the Sixth Circuit. From MY state. Ohio. Red Wine & Blue v. LaRose. Filed September 23. Different court, different case, different day. You quote-tweeted a legal document without checking which court filed it. I make my freshmen cite sources better than that, and I have freshmen who think a thesis is a type of dinosaur. Now the part that doesn't make me laugh at all. "Election-rigging agenda." "Attempts to cheat." Senator, you are the Democratic Leader of the United States Senate. Millions of people hang on your words. And some of those people are not well. When the most powerful Democrat in the Senate tells an entire country that the President is cheating and rigging an election, SOMEBODY out there hears a mission instead of a tweet. I was a combat medic in Iraq. I was a paramedic here at home. I have seen what bullets do to a human body, and I know exactly how short the road is between "they're stealing your country" and a man with a gun who thinks he's a hero. And you know it too. Because you've already done it. March 4, 2020. You stood on the steps of this same Court and said, "I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won't know what hit you." The Chief Justice of the United States had to publicly rebuke you. Two years later, a man with a gun was arrested near Justice Kavanaugh's home. You never got the whirlwind, Chuck. Somebody else almost did. What's next? The Senate Democratic Leader calls the Supreme Court a rigged MAGA institution one week after praising it on the Senate floor for its bedrock American principles... oh wait. That's today. That's this post. I keep trying to make up something too ridiculous to be true, and you keep doing it before I finish typing. Quinn's Law #2 says if you want to know what they're up to, watch what they accuse you of. You scream "cheating" at a citizenship check while 277 non-citizens sat on the rolls in Iowa alone. And Quinn's Law #26 needs no explanation at this point. Liberals love the courts right up until the gavel falls the wrong way. You didn't just prove it, Chuck. You footnoted it. With dates. So here's your quiz, Senator. Multiple choice. Pick one: A. You didn't read the order, didn't remember the NVRA, and didn't read the caption on the document you quoted. B. You read all three and couldn't understand them. C. You understood every word and decided New Yorkers are easier to lead when they're scared. But what do I know, I am only a science teacher from Ohio who read the caption on a court order before posting it, which apparently puts me one step ahead of the Senate Democratic Leader. @TPUSA @JoJoFromJerz @atrupar @TheYoungTurks #MAGA #Trump #Veterans
2
4
105
mike bski retweeted
Replying to @C_3C_3
Bernie take downs by Mike. Pure enjoyment.
Today's lesson, class: look at who Bernie circled. Lisa Su, born in Taiwan. Jensen Huang, born in Taiwan, washed dishes at Denny's, started Nvidia in a Denny's booth. Elon Musk, born in South Africa. Tim Cook, son of a shipyard worker from Alabama. Three out of four weren't even born here. Bernie saw villains. I see the American Dream having dinner. Pop quiz: what has Bernie built in 35 years? Hint: two post offices got new names. Full lesson below. Show your work in the comments. @JoJoFromJerz @TPUSA #MAGA #Trump #Veterans
2
10
426
mike bski retweeted
Replying to @BernieSanders
@BernieSanders Did you forget on purpose that the former potus Obama did the same?
Bernie is outraged that tech CEOs were at a state dinner. What's next, a Democrat president hosting Xi at a state dinner with a tech billionaire at the table... wait. Obama did that in 2015. Zuckerberg was there. Okay, what's next, a Democrat throwing a state dinner with Tim Cook, Sundar Pichai, Satya Nadella, AND Sam Altman... wait. Biden's Autopen sent those invitations for the Modi dinner in 2023. Where were the red boxes then, Bernie? Receipts below. @TPUSA @atrupar #Trump #Veterans #MAGA
1
1
133
mike bski retweeted
Replying to @CynicalPublius
This is a must read
Replying to @SenSchumer
Senator Schumer, "The MAGA Supreme Court strikes again." I spit my coffee. Actual coffee. On my actual grading pile. I have thirty lab reports on projectile motion with a brown ring on them now, and I'm billing you for it. Because, Chuck, I have a memory. Not a great one. I'm fifty, I've been up since five, and I walk into rooms and forget why. But even I can remember back TEN DAYS. Let me read you some quotes. You tell me if they sound like a man who thinks this Court is illegitimate. February 20: "This is a win for the wallets of every American consumer." June 29, in an official press release with your name across the top: "The Supreme Court just upheld this bedrock American principle." June 30: "The Supreme Court confirmed today that those born in America are American." And September 15. Ten days ago. You could still have the leftovers in your fridge: "The Supreme Court had no choice but to make the right decision." Upheld. Confirmed. Bedrock. Had no choice. Same nine justices. Same marble building. Same black robes. The only thing that changed between September 15 and today is whether YOU got what you wanted. And then there's my favorite. Same day, September 15, on the Senate floor: "Even Trump's MAGA Supreme Court shut down his unconstitutional plan." Read that one more time. Slowly. I'll wait. I teach high school, so silence doesn't bother me. The MAGA Court... ruled against MAGA... and you praised it... while calling it MAGA. Chuck, that isn't a court. That's a Schrödinger's cat with a gavel. It's MAGA and not MAGA at the same time, and it stays that way until you open the box and check whether you won. I have four kids. When I hand out candy, I'm the greatest dad who ever lived. When I enforce bedtime, my three-year-old throws himself on the carpet and screams that I'm the worst person in the whole world. Same dad. Same house. Same rules. The only thing that changed is whether he got the candy. He's three. You've been in Congress since 1981. Longer than I have been alive! What exactly is your excuse? OK. Line by line. Get comfortable. "Thousands of American voters could be wrongly stripped from voter rolls... this election season." No. They can't. And you KNOW they can't. The National Voter Registration Act, a Democrat-passed law, signed by Bill Clinton in 1993, bars states from systematically removing voters in the 90 days before a federal election. Election Day is November 3. Count backward ninety days. That door slammed shut in early AUGUST. Seven weeks ago. Even the AP, which nobody will ever accuse of being a MAGA outlet, reported that the effect on the midterms is likely limited. Forty-five years in Congress and you either don't know about a 1993 voting law your own party passed, or you know and you posted this anyway to scare people. I honestly don't know which one is worse. The first one means the elevator doesn't go all the way to the top floor. The second one means you're scaring grandmas for clicks. "Elon Musk's DOGE-overhauled SAVE database." Oh good, Elon. It's always Elon. If your Wi-Fi went out tomorrow, it would be Elon. Chuck, the SAVE program has existed since 1987. When it started, Elon was sixteen years old and living in South Africa. And the law the Supreme Court leaned on this week? 1996. Signed by Bill Clinton. It sailed through the House 370 to 37. You know who was sitting in the House of Representatives in 1996? Representative Charles Schumer of New York. I'm not going to tell you how you voted. I'm going to let you look it up yourself. Bring a flashlight and a snack. It's a long walk back to 1996. And here's the part that made me laugh out loud in my kitchen. That SAME 1996 law made it a deportable offense for a non-citizen to vote illegally. So the tool you're screaming about exists to enforce a rule your own party's president signed. Thirty years ago. You're protesting your own homework. "Ridden with errors." This is the one place you have half a point, and I'm going to give it to you, because I'm a science teacher and we don't hide inconvenient data. Travis County, Texas checked 97 flags and found somewhere between 10 and 21 percent were actually citizens. That matters. That's a real person getting a letter they shouldn't have gotten. But a FLAG is not a PURGE, Chuck. A flag means a human being looks at it. The voter gets a notice. They show proof. And naturalized citizens have proof. It's called a naturalization certificate, and I promise you most of them keep it somewhere safer than their car title, because they EARNED it. They studied. They took the test. They raised their right hand and swore the oath. Nobody is prouder to prove they're an American than someone who had to earn it. And if something STILL goes wrong on Election Day, federal law already hands them a provisional ballot. Now let me tell you about the voters YOU never tweet about. Iowa ran SAVE and confirmed 277 non-citizens registered to vote. Thirty-five of them had ballots COUNTED in 2024. Georgia used it to block 1,634 attempted registrations in 2022. Every one of those illegal ballots canceled out a real citizen's vote. Maybe a nurse. Maybe a factory worker. Maybe a guy like me who spent twenty-three years in uniform so people could vote in the first place. Where's their press release, Chuck? Where's THEIR bedrock American principle? Oh, and one tiny detail you forgot to mention. States' use of SAVE is VOLUNTARY. New York never has to touch it. You're pulling the fire alarm over an OPTIONAL fire extinguisher sitting in someone else's building. Then there's the document in the post you quoted. Did you look at it? I did. Read the caption at the top. That is not the Supreme Court. That's the Sixth Circuit. From MY state. Ohio. Red Wine & Blue v. LaRose. Filed September 23. Different court, different case, different day. You quote-tweeted a legal document without checking which court filed it. I make my freshmen cite sources better than that, and I have freshmen who think a thesis is a type of dinosaur. Now the part that doesn't make me laugh at all. "Election-rigging agenda." "Attempts to cheat." Senator, you are the Democratic Leader of the United States Senate. Millions of people hang on your words. And some of those people are not well. When the most powerful Democrat in the Senate tells an entire country that the President is cheating and rigging an election, SOMEBODY out there hears a mission instead of a tweet. I was a combat medic in Iraq. I was a paramedic here at home. I have seen what bullets do to a human body, and I know exactly how short the road is between "they're stealing your country" and a man with a gun who thinks he's a hero. And you know it too. Because you've already done it. March 4, 2020. You stood on the steps of this same Court and said, "I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won't know what hit you." The Chief Justice of the United States had to publicly rebuke you. Two years later, a man with a gun was arrested near Justice Kavanaugh's home. You never got the whirlwind, Chuck. Somebody else almost did. What's next? The Senate Democratic Leader calls the Supreme Court a rigged MAGA institution one week after praising it on the Senate floor for its bedrock American principles... oh wait. That's today. That's this post. I keep trying to make up something too ridiculous to be true, and you keep doing it before I finish typing. Quinn's Law #2 says if you want to know what they're up to, watch what they accuse you of. You scream "cheating" at a citizenship check while 277 non-citizens sat on the rolls in Iowa alone. And Quinn's Law #26 needs no explanation at this point. Liberals love the courts right up until the gavel falls the wrong way. You didn't just prove it, Chuck. You footnoted it. With dates. So here's your quiz, Senator. Multiple choice. Pick one: A. You didn't read the order, didn't remember the NVRA, and didn't read the caption on the document you quoted. B. You read all three and couldn't understand them. C. You understood every word and decided New Yorkers are easier to lead when they're scared. But what do I know, I am only a science teacher from Ohio who read the caption on a court order before posting it, which apparently puts me one step ahead of the Senate Democratic Leader. @TPUSA @JoJoFromJerz @atrupar @TheYoungTurks #MAGA #Trump #Veterans
3
8
465
Replying to @SenSchumer
Senator Schumer, "The MAGA Supreme Court strikes again." I spit my coffee. Actual coffee. On my actual grading pile. I have thirty lab reports on projectile motion with a brown ring on them now, and I'm billing you for it. Because, Chuck, I have a memory. Not a great one. I'm fifty, I've been up since five, and I walk into rooms and forget why. But even I can remember back TEN DAYS. Let me read you some quotes. You tell me if they sound like a man who thinks this Court is illegitimate. February 20: "This is a win for the wallets of every American consumer." June 29, in an official press release with your name across the top: "The Supreme Court just upheld this bedrock American principle." June 30: "The Supreme Court confirmed today that those born in America are American." And September 15. Ten days ago. You could still have the leftovers in your fridge: "The Supreme Court had no choice but to make the right decision." Upheld. Confirmed. Bedrock. Had no choice. Same nine justices. Same marble building. Same black robes. The only thing that changed between September 15 and today is whether YOU got what you wanted. And then there's my favorite. Same day, September 15, on the Senate floor: "Even Trump's MAGA Supreme Court shut down his unconstitutional plan." Read that one more time. Slowly. I'll wait. I teach high school, so silence doesn't bother me. The MAGA Court... ruled against MAGA... and you praised it... while calling it MAGA. Chuck, that isn't a court. That's a Schrödinger's cat with a gavel. It's MAGA and not MAGA at the same time, and it stays that way until you open the box and check whether you won. I have four kids. When I hand out candy, I'm the greatest dad who ever lived. When I enforce bedtime, my three-year-old throws himself on the carpet and screams that I'm the worst person in the whole world. Same dad. Same house. Same rules. The only thing that changed is whether he got the candy. He's three. You've been in Congress since 1981. Longer than I have been alive! What exactly is your excuse? OK. Line by line. Get comfortable. "Thousands of American voters could be wrongly stripped from voter rolls... this election season." No. They can't. And you KNOW they can't. The National Voter Registration Act, a Democrat-passed law, signed by Bill Clinton in 1993, bars states from systematically removing voters in the 90 days before a federal election. Election Day is November 3. Count backward ninety days. That door slammed shut in early AUGUST. Seven weeks ago. Even the AP, which nobody will ever accuse of being a MAGA outlet, reported that the effect on the midterms is likely limited. Forty-five years in Congress and you either don't know about a 1993 voting law your own party passed, or you know and you posted this anyway to scare people. I honestly don't know which one is worse. The first one means the elevator doesn't go all the way to the top floor. The second one means you're scaring grandmas for clicks. "Elon Musk's DOGE-overhauled SAVE database." Oh good, Elon. It's always Elon. If your Wi-Fi went out tomorrow, it would be Elon. Chuck, the SAVE program has existed since 1987. When it started, Elon was sixteen years old and living in South Africa. And the law the Supreme Court leaned on this week? 1996. Signed by Bill Clinton. It sailed through the House 370 to 37. You know who was sitting in the House of Representatives in 1996? Representative Charles Schumer of New York. I'm not going to tell you how you voted. I'm going to let you look it up yourself. Bring a flashlight and a snack. It's a long walk back to 1996. And here's the part that made me laugh out loud in my kitchen. That SAME 1996 law made it a deportable offense for a non-citizen to vote illegally. So the tool you're screaming about exists to enforce a rule your own party's president signed. Thirty years ago. You're protesting your own homework. "Ridden with errors." This is the one place you have half a point, and I'm going to give it to you, because I'm a science teacher and we don't hide inconvenient data. Travis County, Texas checked 97 flags and found somewhere between 10 and 21 percent were actually citizens. That matters. That's a real person getting a letter they shouldn't have gotten. But a FLAG is not a PURGE, Chuck. A flag means a human being looks at it. The voter gets a notice. They show proof. And naturalized citizens have proof. It's called a naturalization certificate, and I promise you most of them keep it somewhere safer than their car title, because they EARNED it. They studied. They took the test. They raised their right hand and swore the oath. Nobody is prouder to prove they're an American than someone who had to earn it. And if something STILL goes wrong on Election Day, federal law already hands them a provisional ballot. Now let me tell you about the voters YOU never tweet about. Iowa ran SAVE and confirmed 277 non-citizens registered to vote. Thirty-five of them had ballots COUNTED in 2024. Georgia used it to block 1,634 attempted registrations in 2022. Every one of those illegal ballots canceled out a real citizen's vote. Maybe a nurse. Maybe a factory worker. Maybe a guy like me who spent twenty-three years in uniform so people could vote in the first place. Where's their press release, Chuck? Where's THEIR bedrock American principle? Oh, and one tiny detail you forgot to mention. States' use of SAVE is VOLUNTARY. New York never has to touch it. You're pulling the fire alarm over an OPTIONAL fire extinguisher sitting in someone else's building. Then there's the document in the post you quoted. Did you look at it? I did. Read the caption at the top. That is not the Supreme Court. That's the Sixth Circuit. From MY state. Ohio. Red Wine & Blue v. LaRose. Filed September 23. Different court, different case, different day. You quote-tweeted a legal document without checking which court filed it. I make my freshmen cite sources better than that, and I have freshmen who think a thesis is a type of dinosaur. Now the part that doesn't make me laugh at all. "Election-rigging agenda." "Attempts to cheat." Senator, you are the Democratic Leader of the United States Senate. Millions of people hang on your words. And some of those people are not well. When the most powerful Democrat in the Senate tells an entire country that the President is cheating and rigging an election, SOMEBODY out there hears a mission instead of a tweet. I was a combat medic in Iraq. I was a paramedic here at home. I have seen what bullets do to a human body, and I know exactly how short the road is between "they're stealing your country" and a man with a gun who thinks he's a hero. And you know it too. Because you've already done it. March 4, 2020. You stood on the steps of this same Court and said, "I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won't know what hit you." The Chief Justice of the United States had to publicly rebuke you. Two years later, a man with a gun was arrested near Justice Kavanaugh's home. You never got the whirlwind, Chuck. Somebody else almost did. What's next? The Senate Democratic Leader calls the Supreme Court a rigged MAGA institution one week after praising it on the Senate floor for its bedrock American principles... oh wait. That's today. That's this post. I keep trying to make up something too ridiculous to be true, and you keep doing it before I finish typing. Quinn's Law #2 says if you want to know what they're up to, watch what they accuse you of. You scream "cheating" at a citizenship check while 277 non-citizens sat on the rolls in Iowa alone. And Quinn's Law #26 needs no explanation at this point. Liberals love the courts right up until the gavel falls the wrong way. You didn't just prove it, Chuck. You footnoted it. With dates. So here's your quiz, Senator. Multiple choice. Pick one: A. You didn't read the order, didn't remember the NVRA, and didn't read the caption on the document you quoted. B. You read all three and couldn't understand them. C. You understood every word and decided New Yorkers are easier to lead when they're scared. But what do I know, I am only a science teacher from Ohio who read the caption on a court order before posting it, which apparently puts me one step ahead of the Senate Democratic Leader. @TPUSA @JoJoFromJerz @atrupar @TheYoungTurks #MAGA #Trump #Veterans
1
1
106
mike bski retweeted
Replying to @SenSchumer
@SenSchumer is a worthless steaming pile of excrement 💩:
Replying to @SenSchumer
Senator Schumer, "The MAGA Supreme Court strikes again." I spit my coffee. Actual coffee. On my actual grading pile. I have thirty lab reports on projectile motion with a brown ring on them now, and I'm billing you for it. Because, Chuck, I have a memory. Not a great one. I'm fifty, I've been up since five, and I walk into rooms and forget why. But even I can remember back TEN DAYS. Let me read you some quotes. You tell me if they sound like a man who thinks this Court is illegitimate. February 20: "This is a win for the wallets of every American consumer." June 29, in an official press release with your name across the top: "The Supreme Court just upheld this bedrock American principle." June 30: "The Supreme Court confirmed today that those born in America are American." And September 15. Ten days ago. You could still have the leftovers in your fridge: "The Supreme Court had no choice but to make the right decision." Upheld. Confirmed. Bedrock. Had no choice. Same nine justices. Same marble building. Same black robes. The only thing that changed between September 15 and today is whether YOU got what you wanted. And then there's my favorite. Same day, September 15, on the Senate floor: "Even Trump's MAGA Supreme Court shut down his unconstitutional plan." Read that one more time. Slowly. I'll wait. I teach high school, so silence doesn't bother me. The MAGA Court... ruled against MAGA... and you praised it... while calling it MAGA. Chuck, that isn't a court. That's a Schrödinger's cat with a gavel. It's MAGA and not MAGA at the same time, and it stays that way until you open the box and check whether you won. I have four kids. When I hand out candy, I'm the greatest dad who ever lived. When I enforce bedtime, my three-year-old throws himself on the carpet and screams that I'm the worst person in the whole world. Same dad. Same house. Same rules. The only thing that changed is whether he got the candy. He's three. You've been in Congress since 1981. Longer than I have been alive! What exactly is your excuse? OK. Line by line. Get comfortable. "Thousands of American voters could be wrongly stripped from voter rolls... this election season." No. They can't. And you KNOW they can't. The National Voter Registration Act, a Democrat-passed law, signed by Bill Clinton in 1993, bars states from systematically removing voters in the 90 days before a federal election. Election Day is November 3. Count backward ninety days. That door slammed shut in early AUGUST. Seven weeks ago. Even the AP, which nobody will ever accuse of being a MAGA outlet, reported that the effect on the midterms is likely limited. Forty-five years in Congress and you either don't know about a 1993 voting law your own party passed, or you know and you posted this anyway to scare people. I honestly don't know which one is worse. The first one means the elevator doesn't go all the way to the top floor. The second one means you're scaring grandmas for clicks. "Elon Musk's DOGE-overhauled SAVE database." Oh good, Elon. It's always Elon. If your Wi-Fi went out tomorrow, it would be Elon. Chuck, the SAVE program has existed since 1987. When it started, Elon was sixteen years old and living in South Africa. And the law the Supreme Court leaned on this week? 1996. Signed by Bill Clinton. It sailed through the House 370 to 37. You know who was sitting in the House of Representatives in 1996? Representative Charles Schumer of New York. I'm not going to tell you how you voted. I'm going to let you look it up yourself. Bring a flashlight and a snack. It's a long walk back to 1996. And here's the part that made me laugh out loud in my kitchen. That SAME 1996 law made it a deportable offense for a non-citizen to vote illegally. So the tool you're screaming about exists to enforce a rule your own party's president signed. Thirty years ago. You're protesting your own homework. "Ridden with errors." This is the one place you have half a point, and I'm going to give it to you, because I'm a science teacher and we don't hide inconvenient data. Travis County, Texas checked 97 flags and found somewhere between 10 and 21 percent were actually citizens. That matters. That's a real person getting a letter they shouldn't have gotten. But a FLAG is not a PURGE, Chuck. A flag means a human being looks at it. The voter gets a notice. They show proof. And naturalized citizens have proof. It's called a naturalization certificate, and I promise you most of them keep it somewhere safer than their car title, because they EARNED it. They studied. They took the test. They raised their right hand and swore the oath. Nobody is prouder to prove they're an American than someone who had to earn it. And if something STILL goes wrong on Election Day, federal law already hands them a provisional ballot. Now let me tell you about the voters YOU never tweet about. Iowa ran SAVE and confirmed 277 non-citizens registered to vote. Thirty-five of them had ballots COUNTED in 2024. Georgia used it to block 1,634 attempted registrations in 2022. Every one of those illegal ballots canceled out a real citizen's vote. Maybe a nurse. Maybe a factory worker. Maybe a guy like me who spent twenty-three years in uniform so people could vote in the first place. Where's their press release, Chuck? Where's THEIR bedrock American principle? Oh, and one tiny detail you forgot to mention. States' use of SAVE is VOLUNTARY. New York never has to touch it. You're pulling the fire alarm over an OPTIONAL fire extinguisher sitting in someone else's building. Then there's the document in the post you quoted. Did you look at it? I did. Read the caption at the top. That is not the Supreme Court. That's the Sixth Circuit. From MY state. Ohio. Red Wine & Blue v. LaRose. Filed September 23. Different court, different case, different day. You quote-tweeted a legal document without checking which court filed it. I make my freshmen cite sources better than that, and I have freshmen who think a thesis is a type of dinosaur. Now the part that doesn't make me laugh at all. "Election-rigging agenda." "Attempts to cheat." Senator, you are the Democratic Leader of the United States Senate. Millions of people hang on your words. And some of those people are not well. When the most powerful Democrat in the Senate tells an entire country that the President is cheating and rigging an election, SOMEBODY out there hears a mission instead of a tweet. I was a combat medic in Iraq. I was a paramedic here at home. I have seen what bullets do to a human body, and I know exactly how short the road is between "they're stealing your country" and a man with a gun who thinks he's a hero. And you know it too. Because you've already done it. March 4, 2020. You stood on the steps of this same Court and said, "I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won't know what hit you." The Chief Justice of the United States had to publicly rebuke you. Two years later, a man with a gun was arrested near Justice Kavanaugh's home. You never got the whirlwind, Chuck. Somebody else almost did. What's next? The Senate Democratic Leader calls the Supreme Court a rigged MAGA institution one week after praising it on the Senate floor for its bedrock American principles... oh wait. That's today. That's this post. I keep trying to make up something too ridiculous to be true, and you keep doing it before I finish typing. Quinn's Law #2 says if you want to know what they're up to, watch what they accuse you of. You scream "cheating" at a citizenship check while 277 non-citizens sat on the rolls in Iowa alone. And Quinn's Law #26 needs no explanation at this point. Liberals love the courts right up until the gavel falls the wrong way. You didn't just prove it, Chuck. You footnoted it. With dates. So here's your quiz, Senator. Multiple choice. Pick one: A. You didn't read the order, didn't remember the NVRA, and didn't read the caption on the document you quoted. B. You read all three and couldn't understand them. C. You understood every word and decided New Yorkers are easier to lead when they're scared. But what do I know, I am only a science teacher from Ohio who read the caption on a court order before posting it, which apparently puts me one step ahead of the Senate Democratic Leader. @TPUSA @JoJoFromJerz @atrupar @TheYoungTurks #MAGA #Trump #Veterans
1
1
106
mike bski retweeted
Facts, Actually
Replying to @RepLaMonica
Representative McIver, "Doing my job." I read that three times. Nope. Still says it. Let me walk through this slowly, like I would with a sophomore whose dog ate the lab report. On May 9, 2025, you went to Delaney Hall. So did Rep. Watson Coleman. So did Rep. Menendez. Same facility. Same day. Same "job." They toured. They left. Nobody charged them with a thing. If the crime were oversight, all THREE of you would be in the indictment. That is not rocket science. That is counting to three. The grand jury (June 10, 2025, 18 U.S.C. § 111(a)) is not talking about the tour. It is talking about the scrum outside the gate when officers moved to arrest Mayor Baraka. A forearm into an HSI agent. Grabbing him. Both forearms into an ICE officer. Those are the allegations. You pleaded not guilty, and you get the presumption of innocence. Good. Remember that feeling, because we are coming back to it. Now the Speech or Debate Clause. Article I, Section 6. It protects what you SAY in Congress. It does not cover your elbows. On August 26, 2026, the Third Circuit looked at Counts 1 and 2 and called the alleged contact "unambiguously non-legislative." Two federal courts. Same answer. At some point the wheel is spinning but the hamster checked out a while ago. And "17 years"? Come on. That is every maximum stacked end to end, with zero reported officer injuries. Anyone who is not a few fries short of a Happy Meal knows that is the scariest number you can build, not the likely one. Quinn's Law #4 in the wild: liberalism only works when people are scared into believing they need it. Bold. Wrong, but bold. Here is the part that makes me want to bang my head on a lab table. You are a member of CONGRESS. You WRITE immigration law. The Immigration and Nationality Act came out of your building. The executive enforces it (Article II, "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed"). You have a drafting office and a voting card, and you are complaining on X like the elevator never made it to the top floor. Next thing you know, a lawmaker will decide the fastest way to change a law is to physically block the officers enforcing it... wait. Somebody just handed me the indictment. Quinn's Law #23: liberals love the law, right up until they don't agree with it. Your party has decided the people enforcing the law are villains and the people obstructing it are heroes. That is how you become the party of crime without passing a single bill. You're not the brightest bulb in the chandelier if you think nobody notices. And "merciless." That one got me. I was a combat medic and a civilian paramedic. I have stood next to cops on the worst nights of other people's lives. They have kids. Mortgages. When a sitting member of Congress calls them merciless, some guy who is a couple sandwiches short of a picnic decides he's the hero of the movie. And then somebody like me gets called to the scene. Turn it down. That is ALSO your job. One more thing, and I mean this part sincerely. You are an expectant mother. Congratulations. You have a whole lot more to think about right now than talking points and party politics. You are also a representative, and your district takes its cues from you. Is this what you want them to learn? That getting physical with public servants at a gate is just "doing my job"? Oh, wait. Never mind. That only counts when the public servant is a cop. If somebody put a forearm into an expectant mother who happens to be a congresswoman, it would lead every network for a month. I forgot how the rules work. And the irony, which is thick as a brick: you're getting a grand jury, appeals, a rehearing petition, deadline extensions. That's due process. The same system of courts and hearings you call "merciless" when it applies to somebody else. Told you we'd come back to it. Honest question: what have you done for NJ-10 lately that did not involve a camera and a gate? But what do I know, I am only someone who actually read the indictment AND the Third Circuit opinion instead of the fundraising email. @TPUSA #MAGA #Trump @JoJoFromJerz @atrupar @TheYoungTurks
1
1
142
mike bski retweeted
🤚 🗣️ “Party script”
So you do not want AI companies to regulate themselves... you want CONGRESS to do it. What... Blink. Blink. The brain is an amazing organ, @ewarren. It starts working the moment you are born and does not stop until you get elected to Congress. If you added up the IQ of the entire Congress, I think you might break 100. On a good day. With a curve. Let us review the expert panel you want in charge of artificial intelligence. In 2018, a senator asked Mark Zuckerberg how Facebook makes money if the service is free. "Senator, we run ads." In 2023, a congressman asked the TikTok CEO whether the app connects to your home Wi-Fi. These are the people who are going to "investigate independently" the most complex technology on Earth. The elevator in that building does not reach the top floor. I am not sure it has left the basement. And "guardrails that prioritize safety over corporate profits"? From the same government whose TSA failed 67 of 70 covert weapons tests, whose VA hid veterans on secret wait lists, whose Pentagon has never passed an audit, and whose HHS lost track of tens of thousands of migrant children. Congress has not passed all twelve spending bills on time since 1997. It cannot finish its own homework, and you want it grading the valedictorian's. Quinn's Tenth Law: the failure is never the idea, it is that there was not enough of it. Government flops at everything it touches, so the answer is to hand it the newest, most powerful thing we have. Sharp as a marble. Now, Senator, since we are talking about "independent investigations" and people who police their own claims... you are the last person in Washington who should lecture anyone about self-reporting. You listed yourself as Native American on your 1986 Texas bar registration card and in law school faculty directories, based on family stories. Then in 2018 you proudly released a DNA analysis. It found you are overwhelmingly European, with one distant Native American ancestor roughly six to ten generations back. That works out to somewhere between about 1/64 and 1/1,024, with the analysis leaning toward about 1/256. The average white American carries about 0.18 percent Native American ancestry. You might be more Native than your mailman. You might not. It is a coin flip. And here is my favorite part. Most people of European descent carry roughly 1 to 2 percent Neanderthal DNA. So by your own standard, Senator, you had a stronger claim to check the Cavewoman box on that bar card. The Cherokee Nation called the DNA stunt inappropriate and wrong. You ended up apologizing to them. That is how self-regulation went for YOU. Also, you did legal consulting work for corporations, including Travelers Insurance, and got paid well for it. You are worth millions. And you still stand at a podium shouting "Tax the Rich." Before I hear another word about corporate profits, lead by example. Send the IRS DOUBLE what you legally owe, standard deduction only, no itemizing, and publish the returns. Then we might start to hear your message. So which is it, Senator? Pick one: You have not read how any of this technology works and you are just reading the party script. You read it and did not understand it. You understood it perfectly and just want another federal agency to run. What is next, Congress sets up a new federal bureau to regulate AI and staffs it with people who still print their emails... wait, I am being told that is literally your proposal. But what do I know, I am only a science teacher who understands the technology better than the committee that wants to regulate it. @TPUSA @JoJoFromJerz @atrupar @TheYoungTurks #MAGA #Veterans #Trump
1
1
180
mike bski retweeted
Replying to @SenSanders
Bernie is outraged that tech CEOs were at a state dinner. What's next, a Democrat president hosting Xi at a state dinner with a tech billionaire at the table... wait. Obama did that in 2015. Zuckerberg was there. Okay, what's next, a Democrat throwing a state dinner with Tim Cook, Sundar Pichai, Satya Nadella, AND Sam Altman... wait. Biden's Autopen sent those invitations for the Modi dinner in 2023. Where were the red boxes then, Bernie? Receipts below. @TPUSA @atrupar #Trump #Veterans #MAGA
1
2
130
mike bski retweeted
I mean….
Replying to @RepLaMonica
Representative McIver, "Doing my job." I read that three times. Nope. Still says it. Let me walk through this slowly, like I would with a sophomore whose dog ate the lab report. On May 9, 2025, you went to Delaney Hall. So did Rep. Watson Coleman. So did Rep. Menendez. Same facility. Same day. Same "job." They toured. They left. Nobody charged them with a thing. If the crime were oversight, all THREE of you would be in the indictment. That is not rocket science. That is counting to three. The grand jury (June 10, 2025, 18 U.S.C. § 111(a)) is not talking about the tour. It is talking about the scrum outside the gate when officers moved to arrest Mayor Baraka. A forearm into an HSI agent. Grabbing him. Both forearms into an ICE officer. Those are the allegations. You pleaded not guilty, and you get the presumption of innocence. Good. Remember that feeling, because we are coming back to it. Now the Speech or Debate Clause. Article I, Section 6. It protects what you SAY in Congress. It does not cover your elbows. On August 26, 2026, the Third Circuit looked at Counts 1 and 2 and called the alleged contact "unambiguously non-legislative." Two federal courts. Same answer. At some point the wheel is spinning but the hamster checked out a while ago. And "17 years"? Come on. That is every maximum stacked end to end, with zero reported officer injuries. Anyone who is not a few fries short of a Happy Meal knows that is the scariest number you can build, not the likely one. Quinn's Law #4 in the wild: liberalism only works when people are scared into believing they need it. Bold. Wrong, but bold. Here is the part that makes me want to bang my head on a lab table. You are a member of CONGRESS. You WRITE immigration law. The Immigration and Nationality Act came out of your building. The executive enforces it (Article II, "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed"). You have a drafting office and a voting card, and you are complaining on X like the elevator never made it to the top floor. Next thing you know, a lawmaker will decide the fastest way to change a law is to physically block the officers enforcing it... wait. Somebody just handed me the indictment. Quinn's Law #23: liberals love the law, right up until they don't agree with it. Your party has decided the people enforcing the law are villains and the people obstructing it are heroes. That is how you become the party of crime without passing a single bill. You're not the brightest bulb in the chandelier if you think nobody notices. And "merciless." That one got me. I was a combat medic and a civilian paramedic. I have stood next to cops on the worst nights of other people's lives. They have kids. Mortgages. When a sitting member of Congress calls them merciless, some guy who is a couple sandwiches short of a picnic decides he's the hero of the movie. And then somebody like me gets called to the scene. Turn it down. That is ALSO your job. One more thing, and I mean this part sincerely. You are an expectant mother. Congratulations. You have a whole lot more to think about right now than talking points and party politics. You are also a representative, and your district takes its cues from you. Is this what you want them to learn? That getting physical with public servants at a gate is just "doing my job"? Oh, wait. Never mind. That only counts when the public servant is a cop. If somebody put a forearm into an expectant mother who happens to be a congresswoman, it would lead every network for a month. I forgot how the rules work. And the irony, which is thick as a brick: you're getting a grand jury, appeals, a rehearing petition, deadline extensions. That's due process. The same system of courts and hearings you call "merciless" when it applies to somebody else. Told you we'd come back to it. Honest question: what have you done for NJ-10 lately that did not involve a camera and a gate? But what do I know, I am only someone who actually read the indictment AND the Third Circuit opinion instead of the fundraising email. @TPUSA #MAGA #Trump @JoJoFromJerz @atrupar @TheYoungTurks
1
2
141
mike bski retweeted
Yes!
Replying to @BernieSanders
Oh, Bernie. Bernie, Bernie, Bernie. I read this post twice. The first time I laughed. The second time I actually got a little angry, because I sat there and counted, and I realized you just handed the whole country a list of ten people who have done more for the working class than you have in thirty-five years, and you did it on purpose, thinking it made THEM look bad. Let me walk you through your own list, since clearly nobody on your staff did. Elon Musk. Born in South Africa. Jensen Huang. Born in Taiwan, washed dishes and bused tables at a Denny's, and then started Nvidia in a booth at a Denny's. I love that. I genuinely love that story. Lisa Su, also born in Taiwan, took over AMD in 2014 when everybody was writing its obituary and brought it back from the dead. Satya Nadella, born in India. Sundar Pichai, grew up in a two-room apartment in Chennai. Tim Cook, a shipyard worker's kid from a little town in Alabama. Michael Dell, a college kid with about a thousand bucks and a dorm room. Half of them weren't even born here. They came to this country with a brain and a dream and they BUILT something. I teach kids every single day who need to hear stories exactly like that. Kids from homes where nobody has ever owned a business. And you want to hold these people up as villains? Senator, you are not the sharpest crayon in the box, and I say that as someone who has personally watched a sophomore eat a crayon. Also, while we're here. "Got richer" is not a paycheck. Nobody backed a Brinks truck up to Elon's house with 658 billion dollars in it. That is the stock price of a company going up. You know who else owns that stock? Every pipefitter, nurse, and retired teacher with a 401(k) or a pension fund. When those numbers go up, THEIR retirement goes up. You are standing on a soapbox, furious, that working people's retirement accounts grew. The lights are on, Bernie. Nobody's home. I'm not sure anybody has been home since disco. Now. You want to talk about who has actually done something for working people? Fine. Let's do it. I'm going to take attendance. Musk gave us tens of thousands of American factory jobs at Tesla, in California and Texas and Nevada. And Starlink, which finally gave internet to rural families the cable companies laughed at for twenty years. When Hurricane Helene wiped out those mountain towns in North Carolina and the phones were dead, Starlink showed up. Where were you? Michael and Susan Dell put up 6.25 BILLION dollars of their own money, their own, to seed Trump Accounts for about 25 million American kids. And here's the part that made me set my coffee down. Those accounts exist because of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The one YOU voted against. So a billionaire, the kind of guy you call an oligarch, is funding a savings account for working-class kids that you tried to stop from ever existing. I had to read that twice too. Jensen Huang built the chips that run the AI you're suddenly so worried about, and his company's stock turned a lot of regular engineers and technicians into the first people in their families to ever have real money. Bezos. Over a million American jobs, no degree needed, health insurance on day one, the same plan the executives have. Four billion dollars to get groceries delivered into rural food deserts, and yes, they take SNAP and EBT. Zuckerberg lets a grandmother in Ohio see her grandkids in Texas on video for free. Lisa Su saved an American company and every job in it. Sam Altman put a free AI tutor on every phone in America. Tim Cook made the phone. Nadella's software runs the front office of basically every school I've ever worked in. And Pichai gave the world free search, free maps, free email, and YouTube. Oh, and every single one of those paychecks has the employer half of Social Security and Medicare paid on it. That's the money that pays for the programs you give speeches about. They fill the bucket, Bernie. You stand next to the bucket with a bullhorn. Okay. Your turn. Thirty-five years in Congress. Thirty-five years. The bills you wrote that actually became law? Two post offices got new names, and veterans got a cost-of-living adjustment. That's it. That's the list. I have kids who've done more with a group project and a glue stick. Two post offices. I want that on your headstone. "He named two post offices. And he was very upset." And what did it cost us? A taxpayer salary for thirty-five years. A taxpayer pension waiting for you. Three houses. Two hundred and twenty-one thousand dollars on private jets in ONE quarter of 2025. Plus a pile of book money from writing about how nobody should have a pile of money. What's next, Bernie? Getting rich selling books about how getting rich is evil... wait. I'm being told you already did that. See, the people on your list got rich by giving working people something they WANTED. People handed over their money on purpose, with a smile, and got a phone or a package or a paycheck back. You got comfortable by taking working people's money through the tax code and handing back nothing they asked for. That's not a trade. That's a vacuum hose with a campaign sticker on it. And honestly? Nothing would've been better. Because every time you "helped," we paid for it. Let me pull out your report card. You're not going to like it. Obamacare. You voted YES. The government's own HHS numbers showed average individual-market premiums in the HealthCare.gov states more than DOUBLED from 2013 to 2017. People had insurance with deductibles so high they couldn't afford to actually use it. "If you like your plan, you can keep it." Remember that one? Millions of people remember it. They couldn't keep it. Quinn's First Law of Liberalism says liberalism always produces the exact opposite of what it promises, and the proof is right there in the name. The Affordable Care Act made care unaffordable. I couldn't write a better joke if I tried, and believe me, I've tried. The American Rescue Plan in 2021. You were Budget Committee chairman. You pushed 1.9 trillion dollars through on a party-line vote while economists in your OWN party, Larry Summers for one, were waving their arms screaming this would light inflation on fire. By June 2022 inflation hit 9.1 percent. Forty-year high. I remember standing in the grocery store with my wife, doing math on a cart full of food for four kids, putting stuff back. That was your rescue, Bernie. Inflation is the meanest tax there is because it hits the waitress and the welder first and never has your name on the bill. Then the Inflation Reduction Act in 2022. You voted YES. It did not reduce inflation. Not even a little. It did extend the temporary COVID Obamacare subsidies through the end of 2025, with an expiration date DEMOCRATS picked. Zero Republicans voted for it. Zero. So when premiums jumped this year and your party lost its mind about "Republicans raising your health care costs," I just sat there shaking my head. You built the cliff. You picked the date. Then you pointed at the other guy when people fell off it. You couldn't pour water out of a boot if the instructions were printed on the heel. The 2017 Trump tax cuts. You voted NO. The Tax Policy Center found about 91 percent of middle-income households got a tax cut that first year. Nine out of ten regular families kept more of their own money, and you voted no on every one of them. The One Big Beautiful Bill in 2025. NO again. No tax on tips. No tax on overtime. A bigger child tax credit. Tax rates for working families that would've gone UP otherwise. Those Trump Accounts Michael Dell just dropped billions into. You called it the most dangerous bill in modern history. Go tell that to a waitress in Burlington who gets to keep her tips now. Actually, don't. She's busy working. And your 17 dollar minimum wage. Bernie, I TEACH these kids. Sixteen, seventeen years old, no diploma yet, nothing on the resume, just trying to get that first job. Force a business to pay a kid with zero experience more than he can produce and the answer isn't a raise. The answer is "no." You're not raising their wage. You're locking the front door and hanging a nice little sign on it about fairness. Some of my students are going to sit on the wrong side of that door because of people like you, and that is the part that honestly makes me mad. Oh, and the 1994 crime bill. You voted for that too, then spent years apologizing when your own base decided it wrecked working-class neighborhoods. Even your fans think you blew that one. So here's the final tally, and I'm grading generously. Your ten "oligarchs": jobs, paychecks, phones, chips, internet, software, day-one health insurance, groceries in food deserts, and a six-billion-dollar head start for 25 million kids. You: premiums that doubled, a forty-year inflation high, an Obamacare cliff your own party dated, a NO on tax cuts for nine out of ten middle-class families, a NO on no tax on tips, and two renamed post offices. They made our lives cheaper and easier. You made them more expensive and then sent a fundraising email about it. The wheel's spinning, but the hamster clocked out a long time ago. Quinn's Law Number Nine says that to a liberal, intentions matter more than outcomes. Your whole post proves it. Your INTENTION is that AI should "improve life for all humanity." Their OUTCOME is a kid in my district pulling up a free AI tutor on a phone Tim Cook built, over a network Elon launched, on a chip Jensen designed. One of you did the homework. The other one wrote a note to the teacher about how homework is unfair. And I have to say it. Just YESTERDAY you were pushing a bill to ban superintelligence and shut the AI labs down. Today AI has to serve all of humanity. Which is it, Bernie? Pick a lane. You're swerving more than a raccoon in headlights. You know what the government version of AI would look like? I'll tell you. It'd launch like HealthCare.gov and crash in an hour. It'd need a continuing resolution every ninety days. It'd cost three times the estimate. And every question you asked it would get the same answer: "Your call is important to us. Please hold for the next available billionaire to blame." Also, everybody gets a free robot butler on Tuesdays, and the robot companies just eat the cost. It's not a radical idea. It's just common sense. Now, the Xi dinner. You're SHOCKED that a president sat down with China's leader and brought American tech CEOs along. Shocked! What's next, a Democrat president throwing Xi a White House state dinner with Mark Zuckerberg in the room... wait, I'm hearing Obama already did that. September 2015. Same week Xi was in Seattle meeting the heads of Apple, Amazon, and Microsoft. Not a peep out of you. And forgive me, but a man who went on his HONEYMOON to the Soviet Union does not get to clutch his pearls because some capitalists ate dinner with a communist. That's not a principle, Bernie. That's a mood. Quinn's Law Number Twenty-Five: liberals are great at giving away other people's money. Never their own. Michael Dell wrote his check himself. You wrote a tweet asking somebody else to write one. Which brings me back to my standing offer, because I make it every single time and nobody ever takes me up on it. I keep hearing rich Democrats scream "tax the rich" when they ARE the rich. They know every loophole. Some of them wrote the loopholes, and then used them on their own tax returns. So here it is. File with the standard deduction. No itemizing. Pay DOUBLE what the IRS says you owe. Post the return. Do that, and I'll listen to you lecture about billionaires. Until then you're just a fopdoodle with a jet budget, one sandwich short of a picnic and two houses past hypocrisy. Look. Ten people on your list feed the working class. You feed OFF the working class, and then you send us the invoice. I've got four kids, a teacher's paycheck, and a grocery bill that still hasn't recovered from your "rescue." So with all the respect I can find, Senator, and I'm really digging here... please stop helping. We cannot afford it. But what do I know? I'm only a physics teacher who knows the difference between net worth and a paycheck, which apparently puts me about thirty-five years ahead of a sitting United States Senator. @TPUSA @JoJoFromJerz @atrupar #MAGA #Trump
1
2
153
mike bski retweeted
🎯
Replying to @SenSchumer
Senator Schumer, "The MAGA Supreme Court strikes again." I spit my coffee. Actual coffee. On my actual grading pile. I have thirty lab reports on projectile motion with a brown ring on them now, and I'm billing you for it. Because, Chuck, I have a memory. Not a great one. I'm fifty, I've been up since five, and I walk into rooms and forget why. But even I can remember back TEN DAYS. Let me read you some quotes. You tell me if they sound like a man who thinks this Court is illegitimate. February 20: "This is a win for the wallets of every American consumer." June 29, in an official press release with your name across the top: "The Supreme Court just upheld this bedrock American principle." June 30: "The Supreme Court confirmed today that those born in America are American." And September 15. Ten days ago. You could still have the leftovers in your fridge: "The Supreme Court had no choice but to make the right decision." Upheld. Confirmed. Bedrock. Had no choice. Same nine justices. Same marble building. Same black robes. The only thing that changed between September 15 and today is whether YOU got what you wanted. And then there's my favorite. Same day, September 15, on the Senate floor: "Even Trump's MAGA Supreme Court shut down his unconstitutional plan." Read that one more time. Slowly. I'll wait. I teach high school, so silence doesn't bother me. The MAGA Court... ruled against MAGA... and you praised it... while calling it MAGA. Chuck, that isn't a court. That's a Schrödinger's cat with a gavel. It's MAGA and not MAGA at the same time, and it stays that way until you open the box and check whether you won. I have four kids. When I hand out candy, I'm the greatest dad who ever lived. When I enforce bedtime, my three-year-old throws himself on the carpet and screams that I'm the worst person in the whole world. Same dad. Same house. Same rules. The only thing that changed is whether he got the candy. He's three. You've been in Congress since 1981. Longer than I have been alive! What exactly is your excuse? OK. Line by line. Get comfortable. "Thousands of American voters could be wrongly stripped from voter rolls... this election season." No. They can't. And you KNOW they can't. The National Voter Registration Act, a Democrat-passed law, signed by Bill Clinton in 1993, bars states from systematically removing voters in the 90 days before a federal election. Election Day is November 3. Count backward ninety days. That door slammed shut in early AUGUST. Seven weeks ago. Even the AP, which nobody will ever accuse of being a MAGA outlet, reported that the effect on the midterms is likely limited. Forty-five years in Congress and you either don't know about a 1993 voting law your own party passed, or you know and you posted this anyway to scare people. I honestly don't know which one is worse. The first one means the elevator doesn't go all the way to the top floor. The second one means you're scaring grandmas for clicks. "Elon Musk's DOGE-overhauled SAVE database." Oh good, Elon. It's always Elon. If your Wi-Fi went out tomorrow, it would be Elon. Chuck, the SAVE program has existed since 1987. When it started, Elon was sixteen years old and living in South Africa. And the law the Supreme Court leaned on this week? 1996. Signed by Bill Clinton. It sailed through the House 370 to 37. You know who was sitting in the House of Representatives in 1996? Representative Charles Schumer of New York. I'm not going to tell you how you voted. I'm going to let you look it up yourself. Bring a flashlight and a snack. It's a long walk back to 1996. And here's the part that made me laugh out loud in my kitchen. That SAME 1996 law made it a deportable offense for a non-citizen to vote illegally. So the tool you're screaming about exists to enforce a rule your own party's president signed. Thirty years ago. You're protesting your own homework. "Ridden with errors." This is the one place you have half a point, and I'm going to give it to you, because I'm a science teacher and we don't hide inconvenient data. Travis County, Texas checked 97 flags and found somewhere between 10 and 21 percent were actually citizens. That matters. That's a real person getting a letter they shouldn't have gotten. But a FLAG is not a PURGE, Chuck. A flag means a human being looks at it. The voter gets a notice. They show proof. And naturalized citizens have proof. It's called a naturalization certificate, and I promise you most of them keep it somewhere safer than their car title, because they EARNED it. They studied. They took the test. They raised their right hand and swore the oath. Nobody is prouder to prove they're an American than someone who had to earn it. And if something STILL goes wrong on Election Day, federal law already hands them a provisional ballot. Now let me tell you about the voters YOU never tweet about. Iowa ran SAVE and confirmed 277 non-citizens registered to vote. Thirty-five of them had ballots COUNTED in 2024. Georgia used it to block 1,634 attempted registrations in 2022. Every one of those illegal ballots canceled out a real citizen's vote. Maybe a nurse. Maybe a factory worker. Maybe a guy like me who spent twenty-three years in uniform so people could vote in the first place. Where's their press release, Chuck? Where's THEIR bedrock American principle? Oh, and one tiny detail you forgot to mention. States' use of SAVE is VOLUNTARY. New York never has to touch it. You're pulling the fire alarm over an OPTIONAL fire extinguisher sitting in someone else's building. Then there's the document in the post you quoted. Did you look at it? I did. Read the caption at the top. That is not the Supreme Court. That's the Sixth Circuit. From MY state. Ohio. Red Wine & Blue v. LaRose. Filed September 23. Different court, different case, different day. You quote-tweeted a legal document without checking which court filed it. I make my freshmen cite sources better than that, and I have freshmen who think a thesis is a type of dinosaur. Now the part that doesn't make me laugh at all. "Election-rigging agenda." "Attempts to cheat." Senator, you are the Democratic Leader of the United States Senate. Millions of people hang on your words. And some of those people are not well. When the most powerful Democrat in the Senate tells an entire country that the President is cheating and rigging an election, SOMEBODY out there hears a mission instead of a tweet. I was a combat medic in Iraq. I was a paramedic here at home. I have seen what bullets do to a human body, and I know exactly how short the road is between "they're stealing your country" and a man with a gun who thinks he's a hero. And you know it too. Because you've already done it. March 4, 2020. You stood on the steps of this same Court and said, "I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won't know what hit you." The Chief Justice of the United States had to publicly rebuke you. Two years later, a man with a gun was arrested near Justice Kavanaugh's home. You never got the whirlwind, Chuck. Somebody else almost did. What's next? The Senate Democratic Leader calls the Supreme Court a rigged MAGA institution one week after praising it on the Senate floor for its bedrock American principles... oh wait. That's today. That's this post. I keep trying to make up something too ridiculous to be true, and you keep doing it before I finish typing. Quinn's Law #2 says if you want to know what they're up to, watch what they accuse you of. You scream "cheating" at a citizenship check while 277 non-citizens sat on the rolls in Iowa alone. And Quinn's Law #26 needs no explanation at this point. Liberals love the courts right up until the gavel falls the wrong way. You didn't just prove it, Chuck. You footnoted it. With dates. So here's your quiz, Senator. Multiple choice. Pick one: A. You didn't read the order, didn't remember the NVRA, and didn't read the caption on the document you quoted. B. You read all three and couldn't understand them. C. You understood every word and decided New Yorkers are easier to lead when they're scared. But what do I know, I am only a science teacher from Ohio who read the caption on a court order before posting it, which apparently puts me one step ahead of the Senate Democratic Leader. @TPUSA @JoJoFromJerz @atrupar @TheYoungTurks #MAGA #Trump #Veterans
1
1
137
mike bski retweeted
Democrats, they just love the illegal voter over an American Citizen voter. It’s like without those pesky voters, they’re afraid they won’t be able to win.
1
11
201
Again! 🫵👍🔥🔥🔥🙏
Replying to @BernieSanders
Bernie. Again? Already? You have never once answered me. Not one reply, not one like, nothing. And that's fine, because you don't have to. You just keep posting, and I keep getting free lesson plans. Four posts in two days, and every one of them is a gift. It's the best relationship I've ever had with a senator. You ignore me, I grade your homework. At this point I should be paying YOU. Actually, never mind, I already am. I'm a taxpayer. So let me get this straight. You posted a picture of a state dinner, drew little red boxes with net worths on the guests like it's a true crime documentary, and then quoted the Gettysburg Address. The Gettysburg Address, Bernie. "Of the people, by the people, for the people." Written by Abraham Lincoln. The FIRST Republican president. You borrowed a Republican's most famous line to attack a Republican president. That's like showing up to a potluck with somebody else's casserole and then complaining about the cooking. I'd call you a gray sprinkle on a rainbow cupcake, but that's an insult to sprinkles. Now. The actual picture. It's a state dinner. For the leader of China. The country that makes a huge chunk of our phones, our electronics, and the parts inside half the stuff in your house. Of course the people who build chips, phones, cars, and rockets are at that table. Where else would they be? You want the trade talks about computer chips to happen without the guy who MAKES the computer chips? That's like planning a surgery and not inviting the surgeon because he makes too much money. Bernie, your brain is running on energy-saving mode, and I think somebody unplugged the charger. Every state dinner has CEOs at it. Every one. What's next, a Democrat president hosting Xi Jinping at a state dinner with a tech billionaire at the table... wait. I'm being told Barack Obama already did that in September 2015, and Mark Zuckerberg was in the room. Okay, fine, what's next, a Democrat throwing a state dinner packed with Tim Cook, Sundar Pichai, Satya Nadella, AND Sam Altman... wait. I'm being told Biden's Autopen already sent those invitations out for the Modi dinner in 2023. Where were your little red boxes then, Bernie? Did the Sharpie run dry? Let's look at the people you circled, since you clearly didn't. Lisa Su. Born in Taiwan. Came here as a little kid, became an engineer, took over AMD when everybody thought it was about to go belly up, and saved it along with every job inside it. Jensen Huang. Born in Taiwan. Washed dishes and bused tables at a Denny's. Started Nvidia in a Denny's booth. A DENNY'S BOOTH, Bernie. And now he builds the chips that run half the modern world. Tim Cook. Son of a shipyard worker from a little town in Alabama. Elon Musk. Born in South Africa. Came here and built electric cars, rockets, and satellite internet for rural families the cable companies ignored for twenty years. Three of the four people you circled weren't even born in this country. They came here with nothing but brains and nerve and built something. And the fourth one's dad worked in a shipyard. You looked at that table and saw villains. I look at it and see the American Dream having dinner. I have kids in my classroom who need to hear stories exactly like those. You'd rather teach them to hate the people who made it. And those red numbers under their names? That's not cash, Bernie. Nobody at that table has $928 billion in a checking account. That's the value of their companies. Their stock. Stock that sits in the 401(k) of every nurse, plumber, and retired teacher in America. When those numbers go up, working people's retirement goes up. You are putting a big red warning label on the retirement savings of the working class. You're as sharp as a bowling ball, Senator, and about as easy to steer. Now let's talk about this "government of, by and for the billionaire class" line. Name one person in that picture who is IN the government, besides the President. Go ahead. I'll wait. Lisa Su can't pass a law. Jensen Huang can't raise your taxes. Tim Cook can't draft your kid. Elon can't throw you in jail. You know who CAN do all of those things? The government. Congress. People like you. You're a sitting United States Senator, Bernie. You ARE the government. You've been the government for thirty-five years. If the government is broken, you're one of the guys holding the wrench. And while we're talking about who the government works for, let's check your wallet. Three houses. A taxpayer salary for thirty-five years. A taxpayer pension waiting for you. $221,000 on chartered private jets in one quarter of 2025. Book royalties from writing about how nobody should have that much money. The government works just fine for YOU, Senator. It's the rest of us picking up the tab. Quinn's Law Number Seven: it's different when you're a Democrat. When Obama puts Zuckerberg at the table, it's diplomacy. When Biden's Autopen invites four tech CEOs to dinner, it's a celebration of partnership. When Trump does the exact same thing, it's "the billionaire class." Same dinner. Same guests. Different jersey. Your train of thought derailed back around 1971 and nobody ever sent a rescue crew. And I have to point out the funniest part. You're upset that capitalists had dinner with the head of the Chinese Communist Party. Bernie. You went on your HONEYMOON in the Soviet Union. Your idea of a romantic getaway was a communist country, and now you're clutching your pearls because Tim Cook shared a table with one. That's not a principle. That's a mood swing with a Senate pin on it. So let me make the same offer I always make, and change it up a little. I keep hearing Democrats cry about rich people when they're rich people. They know every loophole in the tax code because a lot of them helped write it, and then they use those loopholes on their own returns. So here it is. Before you draw one more red box around somebody else's net worth, file your taxes with the standard deduction only. No itemizing. Pay DOUBLE what the IRS says you owe. Then post a picture of THAT. I'll even draw the red box for you. Until then, you're a few clowns short of a circus, Bernie, and the tent is on fire. Here's what really gets me, though. The four people you circled have given working Americans jobs, phones, computers, chips, internet in the middle of nowhere, and paychecks for hundreds of thousands of families. You've been in Congress for thirty-five years and you've got two renamed post offices to show for it. If I made a picture of your contributions to the working class, Senator, I wouldn't need red boxes. I'd need a magnifying glass. You're like a solar-powered night light. Nice idea. Totally useless when it counts. So I'll ask the same thing I always ask. What have you actually built? Not a speech. Not a tweet. Not a picture with red boxes on it. What have you DONE for the working people you keep talking about? Because the only thing I see you building is a bigger audience for the next fundraising email. Anyway, Bernie, thanks again. Seriously. I'll see you in about three hours. I know you'll post something else stupid. You always do. But what do I know? I'm only a physics teacher who knows that net worth isn't a checking account, that the Gettysburg Address was written by a Republican, and that you can't have a trade deal about chips without the people who make the chips, which apparently puts me three lessons ahead of the senator from Vermont. @TPUSA @JoJoFromJerz @atrupar #MAGA #Trump #Veterans
1
2
216
mike bski retweeted
This is The way you Tell A Politician How his career is summed up Bravo Bravo Bravo 👏👏👏👏
Replying to @BernieSanders
Bernie. Buddy. Before anything else, I have to say thank you. I mean it. Three posts in two days. THREE. Some teachers spend their whole weekend hunting for examples of bad logic to show their students. Not me. I just open your page and hit refresh. You are the most dependable supplier of classroom material I have ever had, and I've had a lot of freshmen. So from the bottom of my heart, Senator, thank you. You're the fruitcake that keeps showing up every Christmas whether anybody asked for it or not. Okay. Now. "Get big money out of politics." I read that out loud and had to sit down. Bernie, you ARE big money in politics. You raised over 200 million dollars for your 2016 run. Then you did it AGAIN in 2020. Your campaign dropped $221,000 on chartered private jets in ONE quarter of 2025, on a tour literally called "Fighting Oligarchy." So let me make sure I've got this straight. You took donor money... bought jet fuel with it... flew to a rally... and told the crowd that money has too much influence in politics. Senator, if hypocrisy burned like jet fuel, you'd never have to pay for a flight again. It's like a frog calling somebody ugly. "But Mike, it was SMALL donors!" Okay. Great. Good for you. Honestly. But think about what you just proved. If a guy from Vermont with the warmth of a DMV waiting room can raise 200 million bucks from regular working people, then regular working people already have a voice. And they use it. The "rigged system" you keep crying about is the exact system that turned you into a celebrity. You're sawing off the branch you're sitting on and then yelling at gravity. That's not a policy position. That's weapons-grade stupid, and I apologize to weapons. And notice how you said "megadonors from BOTH parties"... and then only named one. Cute. Let me help you with the other half. I've got a red pen and nowhere to be. Kamala Harris raised about 1.5 BILLION dollars in roughly fifteen weeks in 2024. Billion. With a B. Hollywood fundraisers, celebrity concerts, Wall Street checks, the whole circus. And she LOST. So much for money buying elections, Bernie. Turns out people don't care how many billionaires show up to your fundraiser when they're standing in the grocery store putting eggs back on the shelf. Then there's Michael Bloomberg. He spent about a BILLION dollars of his own money in the 2020 Democratic primary. You were IN that race. You were standing on the same debate stage. And what did a billion dollars buy him? American Samoa. That's it. The most expensive souvenir in the history of mankind. The poor man couldn't blow out a candle, and he still outspent the entire field. What's next, a Democratic billionaire trying to buy the whole nomination with his own checkbook... wait. I'm being told Bloomberg already did that. Right next to you. Where was THIS tweet back then, Bernie? George Soros put more than 125 million dollars into his Democracy PAC in a single donation back in 2021. Reid Hoffman. Tom Steyer. I could keep going until the bell rings. And the unions! Don't forget the unions. Citizens United freed them up to spend too, and they've been pouring hundreds of millions into Democratic campaigns ever since. Funny how that never makes it into your posts. Your mind is like a steel trap, Senator. Rusted shut. But only on the left side. That's Quinn's Law Number Seven, alive and well: it's different when you're a Democrat. When Trump's side spends money, it's "buying the election." When Bloomberg lights a billion dollars on fire, when Soros writes nine-figure checks, when Harris burns through a billion and a half in fifteen weeks, that's "democracy." Same money. Same ads. Different jersey. Your brain is a browser with 47 tabs open and not a single one of them loading. Now let's talk about Citizens United, because I'm fairly sure you've never read it. That's okay. Most people haven't. Pull up a chair. Class is in session. Citizens United was a small nonprofit. In 2008 they made a documentary that criticized Hillary Clinton. The federal government told them they could NOT air it close to the election. That's the whole case. The government tried to ban a MOVIE because it said mean things about a politician. And here's the part that made my jaw drop the first time I read it. During oral argument, the government's own lawyer admitted that under that law, the government could ban a BOOK if it said the wrong thing about a candidate close to an election. A book, Bernie. A BOOK. You've written a few of those. The Supreme Court said absolutely not, and pointed at the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech." So when you shout "End Citizens United," what you're really saying is: let the government ban movies and books that criticize politicians. Politicians like YOU. That's not getting money out of politics. That's getting criticism out of politics, and guess who'd get to decide who talks? I'm glad to see you're not letting education get in the way of your ignorance. As a medic, I took an oath to protect people. As a soldier, I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution, and that includes the First Amendment. I did not raise my right hand so a senator could decide which movies Americans are allowed to watch in October. That part actually makes me angry. Oh, and a little civics for the road. A senator can't "end" a Supreme Court decision with a tweet. That takes the Court reversing itself, or a constitutional amendment, which needs two-thirds of Congress and three-quarters of the states. You've been in Congress since the first Bush was president, and you still think laws happen by hashtag. Democrats have been promising to "end Citizens United" since Moby Dick was a minnow. They've had full control of Washington twice since that ruling came down. And they did... nothing. Zip. You're about as useful as a screen door on a submarine, Senator. There's a leak in the think tank and the water's up to your knees. And here's the kicker. Campaign finance "reform" is the whole reason super PACs exist. Every time Congress capped what a person could give straight to a candidate, the money didn't vanish. It just walked around the building and came in through a side door. Outside groups. PACs. Super PACs. The harder you squeeze, the darker the money gets, because money that used to go straight to a candidate with his name on it now goes to some group called "Americans for Puppies and Sunshine" that nobody can trace. Quinn's Law Number One: liberalism always delivers the exact opposite of what it promises. You wanted less shady money. You built a shady money factory. You're more confused than a chameleon in a bag of Skittles. Now let's get to your big genius fix. "Public funding of elections." Bernie. Public funding means MY money. My tax dollars. Out of my teacher's paycheck. Paying for campaign ads for politicians I can't stand. I already pay your salary. I already pay your pension. I already pay your staff. And now you want me to buy your commercials too? That's not getting money out of politics. That's making it MANDATORY. It's a campaign donation with a gun to my head. You're as useful as a battery-powered battery charger. And we already TRIED this. Remember that little checkbox on your tax return for presidential campaigns? Do you know who blew that system up? A Democrat. What's next, a Democratic nominee turning down public funding in the general election because he could rake in way more from big donors... wait. I'm hearing Barack Obama already did that in 2008. First major-party nominee to walk away from it since the system started. He raised about three quarters of a BILLION dollars instead. And you cheered him the whole way. So fine, let me propose my own plan, since taxpayer money is apparently the cure for everything. Every single American gets their own free campaign. Free yard signs. Free TV ads. Free robocalls at dinner time. The TV stations just eat the cost. Plus free campaign pizza on Fridays. This is not a radical thing, Bernie. It's just common sense. Honestly, arguing with you about this is like trying to baptize a cat. Everybody ends up wet and bleeding, and nobody gets saved. I'll get a little personal now. I keep watching Democrats scream about rich people in politics while BEING the rich people in politics. You own three houses. Nancy Pelosi's household is worth over two hundred million dollars. Your party is stuffed with millionaires who know every loophole in the tax code, because a lot of them wrote it, and then they turned around and used those loopholes on their own returns. So my offer still stands, and it never expires. Before you lecture ANYBODY about billionaires, file with the standard deduction. No itemizing. Pay DOUBLE what the IRS says you owe. Post the return online. Then come talk to me about greed. Until then, some hogs have all four feet and their snout in the trough, and you're squealing about the other pig. So let's grade today's post, shall we? You complained about big money after raising over 400 million dollars across two campaigns and flying private on donor cash. You said "both parties" and then only named one. You forgot Bloomberg, Soros, the unions, and a billion-and-a-half-dollar Harris campaign that lost anyway. You want to overturn a case that stopped the government from banning a MOVIE. And your big solution is to force taxpayers to pay for politicians they can't stand. That's not a platform, Bernie. That's a 12-piece bucket of stupid with a side of hypocrisy and a large sweet tea. Grade: F. Please see me after class. You smile about as often as a total solar eclipse, Senator, and you're almost always wrong, but never, ever in doubt. I'll give you consistency. It's just not the good kind. You've got delusions of adequacy and you're depriving some little village in Vermont of its idiot. Honestly, you're impossible to underestimate. Every time I think you've hit rock bottom, you show up with a shovel. I picture your last two brain cells arguing over who has to go to work today. And after thirty-five years in Congress, with two renamed post offices to show for it, I still want to know one thing. What have you actually done for the working people you talk about in every single post? Not handouts. Not tweets. Not speeches. What have you BUILT? Because from where I'm sitting, the only thing you've ever truly campaigned for... is the next campaign. Anyway. Thanks again for the material, Bernie. Seriously. See you tomorrow. I know you'll have something. You always do. But what do I know? I'm only a physics teacher and a retired Army medic who actually read the Citizens United decision and the First Amendment, which is two more documents than the senator from Vermont, and a whole lot less money than his last campaign. @TPUSA @JoJoFromJerz @atrupar #MAGA #Trump #Veterans
1
2
231