No man is harmed by the existence of women's single sex spaces, sports, and services.
22
260
1,939
16,441
One might argue the reverse is also true, but that didn't help the gentlemen's clubs, did it?
3
3
542
Replying to @anewid2021
If you're scared for your safety when confronted by women in men's public toilets and change rooms - protest. If you're sick of the injustice of women cheating men out of sponsorships, prize money and careers in men's sport - protest. If you feel creeped out and silenced by women in your support groups for prostate cancer survivors and erectile dysfunction - protest. Women will stand with you. You could start by making your own posts, instead of trying to hijack women's. Maybe you could organise a rally to protect men's gentleman's clubs against women joining. I'm sure you'll get a lot of support. Or just stick to whinging and whining on posts by women who are protesting against men in our spaces, sports and services. That'll really get people on your side! 🤷‍♀️ 🙄

Sep 23, 2026 · 9:36 AM UTC

2
8
70
1,112
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @ThatAussieWoman
You read far more into my post than I wrote. Extrapolation ad absurdum.
1
3
267
It's in your reply. 'The reverse' of women's single sex spaces, sports and services is not gentleman's clubs. You're ridiculous coming onto my post about the loss of our public amenities and ss facilities to whinge about ... checks notes ... Gentlemen's clubs. Which still exist.
1
1
33
495
more replies
Replying to @ThatAussieWoman @anewid2021
I often wonder if part of the sub-text of men thinking that women should just put up with trans in women’s spaces is that the poor long-suffering blokes have had to put up with women in the workplace/public life for last 60 years and they see it as payback.
1
1
28