The Supreme Court of NSW has ordered @KirralieS to pin this post to all her social media accounts. I'm pinning it to mine to highlight the Authoritarian dictates being forced on Australian women by the State. We are being ordered to lie under threat of serious and debilitating court ordered punishment and financial penalty. For calling men 'Men'. The State is trying to force us to lie. It is compelling our speech so we will adopt and spread an Official State Belief. I will not comply. PUBLISHED BY ORDER OF THE LOCAL COURT OF NSW AS VARIED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF NSW Following proceedings in the Local Court of NSW (2024/78280) the Local Court of NSW has declared that Kirralie Smith and Binary Australia contravened section 38S of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1997 (NSW) by making and publishing various social media posts between 19 January 2023 and 27 March 2023 and a newsletter dated 19 January 2023 that incited hatred towards, serious contempt for, or severe ridicule of a soccer player on the ground that she is a transgender person. Public acts that incite hatred towards, serious contempt for, or severe ridicule of, a person or group of persons on the ground that the person or group are transgender are unlawful under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW). The Local Court of NSW has ordered Kirralie Smith and Binary Australia to pay damages to the soccer player, and to remove the offending posts and to not repeat or continue the offending behaviour. theothercheek.com.au

"Bi people of both genders..." - is this shitweasel's slow crab walk away from the 3+ genders tosh down to a binary.

Sexual Conversion Therapy - using shame and social stigma in an attempt to change the sexual preferences of heterosexual women and lesbians to match homosexual male norms. You should be ashamed of yourself. My sexual discrimination begins and ends at my body, and it is none of your fucken business.

In what ways do women discriminate against bisexual men besides refusing to have sex with them? How does this bigotry manifest outside of our own bodies?

There are an alarming number of men on here who think that women who don't want to have sex with them - should have sex with them anyway.

Are you really intent on arguing for the creation of a society where everyone has the right to have sex with anyone else, and a refusal is morally wrong, except perhaps for medical reasons, such as too young or too ill? Regettably, in the course of my professional practice, I have come across men who believe this specifically in relation to women. Am I wrong to disapprove strongly of such attitudes because it demonstrates my prejudice against their preference for coercive sex? And after all, all human interactions are influenced by personal preferences, not just sexual behaviour. So if exercising sexual preferences is to be deemed wrong, why not include other preferences, indeed all other preferences? It's probably not a good idea to argue for a principle whose logical extension would have such an effect.

Once again, goalpost moving. Now it’s not a bisexual man, it’s a bisexual man who didn’t know until after he committed himself to a woman. 🙄 But yes, a wife would be entitled to know what suddenly brought on this attraction to men and she would be able to decide if that was alright with her. You keep changing the scenario to make yourself appear correct. You are not correct, dude.

That’s utterly ridiculous goalpost moving. No one is saying that here. And if you actually believe in your vows, you vowed sickness and health. You knew that life happens and people can get sick or be in an accident. You claim people are racist or phobic for their dating preferences without understanding that someone’s body is not an open discussion for society to decide who gets access. Not wanting to date someone doesn’t mean you hate their “group” or are unable to treat individuals with respect. It means you don’t want to date them. And if you, a third party not actually involved in the dating, feel the need to judge others and pontificate on the horror of their reasoning, you are the bad person here. You are the one inserting yourself into a situation solely to judge and castigate. Grow up.

I don’t use the word ‘hate’ very often but I fkn HATE that so many ahole men now feel they have the right to tell women what a woman is, tell women what feminism is, tell women who they should & shouldn’t have sex with, tell women what they shouldn’t say about their own lives.

This has been a trans tactic from the beginning. An infamous example being the StonewallUK leader who told gays and lesbians that if they refused to sleep with trans of the opposite sex, they were "sexual racists."

roast chickens are cryogenically snowmen

Sexual selection is inherently prejudicial Owen. Everyone has the right to reject anyone, anytime, for any reason. I am gratified that you seem to be grasping the reality of biological sex though in your constant posts about this, almost as if you know that bisexual = 2 sexes.

Reflecting on a day spent in the company of amazing women; but why in 2026, do we need to keep arguing that women,as a separate sex class, exist. It’s fucking crazy.

Information for trades union members who don't want their membership used to lobby against women's rights. Write to explain why as well. Further info in link in next tweet. #OptOutOfBetrayal gov.uk/government/publicatio…

I take the day off and come back to yet another way for society to tell women they are at fault for everything wrong in the world and are bigots. Apparently the latest shenanigan is we are mean and exclusionary for not having a Walmart greeter at the entrance to our vaginas? I am coming out as survey phobic.

The only thing being denied is intimacy and apparently the denial is a bridge too far for some men. These are the same men who ask women what they wear wearing after women are sexually assaulted. These are the same men who call us bigots for having intimate single sex spaces. It is 💯 about removing all boundaries to the pleasure principle for them.

It's taken opponents of the Supreme Court judgment in @ForWomenScot 18 months to realise that the only way around it is to amend the Equality Act. At this rate it'll be 2036 before they come up with anything resembling a plan for how they want the Act changed.

🚨 The Albanese Labor government’s proposed Digital Duty of Care bill would give the eSafety Commissioner unlimited powers to run fake “sock-puppet” accounts using AI to surveil and influence Australians. Full report: rebelne.ws/4yhYrS9

If I seem on edge, I am. Just over 6 weeks away from the appeal trial, at the Supreme Court of B.C., for stating that humans can’t change sex. It boggles, infuriates, and exhausts. How is this real life?

Many men see sex as something that’s done *to* a woman, not *with* a woman. So “wearing down” a woman until she relents is ok bc the goal is have sex *to* a woman. It doesn’t matter if she didn’t really feel like it or got traumatized, the goal is only the man’s pleasure.

There is also a word for coercing people into sleeping with men they aren’t attracted to.