When I started @OstoraStudio , I wasn't trying to build an agency. I was trying to prove that a small team from Morocco 🇲🇦 could create work that stood alongside the best. Over the years, that idea became reality. We worked with creators, startups, esports organizations, and projects across the world. We built, learned, failed, adapted, and kept moving forward. But growth has a funny way of changing your perspective. At some point, the goal stops being "How far can I take this?" And becomes: "How big can we make this?" After many conversations with @axeldesigns , it became clear that Ostora and @flawlessdesignX were chasing the same thing: Building a studio that creates world-class work, attracts top talent, and becomes a home for ambitious creators. So today, we're taking the next step. Ostora is joining Flawless. Not because we reached the limit of what we could do. But because we believe we can achieve far more together than we ever could apart. This move brings together our experience, our teams, our creativity, and our ambition under one vision. For our clients, partners, and everyone who supported Ostora from day one: Thank you for being part of the journey. Every project, every recommendation, every opportunity helped us reach this moment. The mission doesn't change. We're still here to build. We're still here to create. We're just doing it on a bigger scale now. See you in the next chapter. 📷 @flawlessdesignX X @OstoraStudio
1
3
20
3,007
Blast shutting down is a sign that we built way too many L2s. We already had dozens of blockchains doing almost the same thing. Then we started building L2s on top of them. For what? Not every chain needs to exist. If you build a product, people should want to use it every day. If nobody needs it once the incentives disappear, maybe the problem isn't the incentives. Maybe the product shouldn't exist. Blast had more than $2B in TVL at its peak. Now it's shutting down because it costs more to run than it makes. And I don't think Blast will be the last one. It reminds me of the metaverse in 2022. Everyone was building for a future that hadn't arrived yet. Crypto is doing something similar with chains. We don't need 100 blockchains doing the same thing. We need a few that people actually use. The rest will eventually have to prove why they deserve to exist.
1
1
43
This is the kid running this account
this is the kid who runs this acc btw
3
65
Robinhood is doing crazy numbers with its chain right now. But I keep thinking about how much bigger the opportunity could’ve been. Remember 2021? Everyone wanted Robinhood to add SHIB. People were literally spamming “add SHIB” everywhere. Now imagine they actually did it at the peak of that cycle. Millions of retail users already on Robinhood. One of the biggest memecoins in the world suddenly available in the app. The amount of trading volume they could’ve captured is crazy to think about. And that’s what makes Robinhood Chain interesting today. They’re basically building around behavior that was already happening on their platform years ago. Makes me wonder: what other opportunity is sitting in front of Robinhood right now that we’re going to look back at in 5 years and say “how did they not do this earlier?”
3 months old btw > $1.04B in TVL > $5M app fees last 24hrs > $1.5B in DEX volume with a team clearly showing they understand and care about crypto both in terms of culture but also in terms of business potential + @vladtenev putting on a masterclass in terms of signaling
3
9
228
Morning Someone can explain what is this ? And im a winning ?
1
3
134
With every new AI update, building gets easier. Better models. Better agents. Better tools. Better everything. Which makes me think the most valuable skill to build now is distribution. If everyone can build, the people who know how to get attention, build an audience and reach the right people have the advantage. The gap isn’t getting smaller. It’s moving from building to distribution.
2
3
87
Imagine being 30 & starting over That's me , I'm Rite and i'm going to document this journey
Made with AI
3
7
201
Web2 people are laughing at NFTs. And honestly? Can you blame them?
1
1
67
Most companies use motion to make things look cool. That's not why we use it. Motion can explain how a product works, guide attention, simplify something complex, and make an idea easier to understand. Good motion isn't decoration. It's communication.
2
69
Power of knowing the right people
Working with Frank taught @axeldesigns a lot. Not just about design, but about how to approach problems, work with clients, and think through the details that actually matter. Some of the most valuable lessons don't come from tutorials. They come from working alongside people who have already done it.
6
128
Most companies explain what they built. The features. The technology. How it works. But customers aren't buying your technology. They're buying what it changes for them. Don't just explain what your product does. Explain what becomes better after someone uses it.
1
2
73
When you’re building a prooduct do it at the same level as your facade wich is your website/app
Kaito is a good reminder that building a great product isn’t enough. If the product feels 10/10 but the website feels 6/10, there’s a gap. Your product, website and brand should feel like they were built with the same level of care. Don’t let the presentation undersell the product.
1
2
95
Morning Im seeing kalshi , memecoins Btc pumping Are we back?
1
2
77
Your homepage has one job: Make people understand what you do. If visitors have to spend time figuring it out, you've already lost them. Confused visitors don't become customers. They become someone else's traffic.
1
75
Another thesis i've been preaching
AI isn't about asking it to do everything for you. It's about knowing what to give it, what to ask for, and what to do with the result. The more you understand the work, the more useful AI becomes. Don't just use AI. Learn how to work with it.
3
104
That's why you need to be goood at something before using AI
AI doesn't make everyone a great designer. It gives great designers a much more powerful tool. If you understand design, you know what to ask for, what to change, what looks wrong, and what to push further. The better you understand the craft, the more you can get out of AI. The tool isn't the advantage. Knowing how to use it is.
3
114
You don’t have a traffic problem. You have a first 4 seconds problem. You can spend thousands getting people to your website. But if they land and can’t understand what you do, they’re gone. More traffic won’t fix a website people don’t understand. Fix the first impression first.
3
89
I’m 30 . Build web3 design agency , esports and now marketing & creative work in @flawlessdesignX . Always looking to meet creative people who are building something of their own. Designers, filmmakers, marketers, founders, artists, builders. If you’re making cool things, let’s connect.
7
14
301
Another take i've been talking about Whenver we see a new version of AI the same thing keep happenning
AI made building websites easier. But there's a problem. If thousands of companies are using the same models, following the same patterns and asking for the same things… Eventually, they all start looking the same. AI can give you the foundation. It can't give you differentiation.
98
I always said this & i'll keep saying it Create value is you wanna stay in this industry
You don't keep an industry alive by teaching every newcomer how to trade. You keep it alive by creating things people actually want. Build. Create. Contribute. Give people a reason to stay beyond speculation.
1
1
3
116
I spend hours looking through startup websites. Not for inspiration. I'm looking for patterns. Why does one company instantly feel credible while another struggles to explain what it does? Once you start seeing these patterns, you can't unsee them.
1
2
93