#Tapeout believer 🧵 $BEM supporter. Here to spread the vision, support the builders & grow the community.
Singapore
- Tweets 668
- Following 600
- Followers 37,899
- Likes 1,453
Pinned Tweet
I am thinking about something called #TapeAPI.
If DeWEB enables decentralized websites and TapeSend facilitates communication between people, then TapeAPI could allow websites to interact with one another without relying on a central server.
You can think of TapeAPI like this:
Today, most websites need to connect to a server/backend owned by a company to get data or perform certain functions.
For example:
Website → Server → Get BEM price
Website → Server → Process AI
Website → Server → Store game data
The idea behind TapeAPI is to turn these services into services with their own addresses on TapeOut.
For example:
price.tape → provides price data
ai.tape → provides AI services
game.tape → handles game data
payment.tape → handles payments
A DeWEB website could simply call whichever service it needs.
A simple example
Imagine you build a game on DeWEB.
Your game needs a translation feature.
Instead of building your own server:
Game → Your Server → Translation API
it could be:
Game → TapeAPI → Translation
The API provider could receive BEM as payment, while users only pay when they actually use the service.
This could create a decentralized marketplace for services:
Developer A builds an AI service
Developer B builds translation
Developer C provides data
Developer D provides payments
Other applications can use these services without having to build everything from scratch.
What I find interesting is:
DeWEB = Websites
TapeSend = Communication
TapeAPI = Services
Together, they could become another piece of the infrastructure for a decentralized Internet.
This is just an idea I’m proposing
#Tapeout $BEM
TapeOut在努力让愿景变为可能。之前他们说TapeOut没有应用实例，于是PoD出现了，作为官方示例他可以挖矿BEM。他们又说那TapeOut只是一个矿机链游。于是HashPort出现了，电路容器可以将前端上链，并随时交易。他们又说那TapeOut没有应用场景，于是TapeKit和TapeSend上线了，现在任何开发者都享受到远比WEB2的网络存储服务更便宜，更可靠的，跨公链去中心化广域网，并可以轻松在上面搭建网站，或推出自己的网络服务，让web2用户没有任何门槛的使用。他们又说那BEM没有消耗场景。于是我要告诉他们，你们自己哪怕认真用1分钟去看推文，也能看明白协议的收入是做什么用的呢？所以，我们永远在做。他们永远在说。你，永远叫不醒一个装睡的人。
我会全力以赴。我只想和所有TapeOut的坚定支持者们一起，创造那个新世界。
@CryptoLoser9 @bitcoin2themars @youyou5202 @xukego @BruceBlue @web4miko @wolfyxbt @iruletrenches @web3kexin
3
1
47
17,379
Is X really rewarding creators like this? 👀
Only 14K followers, yet the first payout from X’s new program was $11,359.
It’s a good reminder that follower count isn’t everything. Content, attention, and engagement matter.
You don’t need 100K followers to start building seriously.
14K followers → $11K payout.
Keep building. Let the value speak for itself. 🔥
#X #ContentCreator #CreatorEconomy #BuildInPublic #BEM #TAPEOUT
88
他指的应该是 $BEM 吧？😁
1
1
10
938
Maybe the answer isn't another “chain killer.”
The real question is: what comes after the blockchain?
TapeOut is interesting because it isn't only trying to build another place to move assets. Its bigger direction is DeWEB — bringing websites and applications closer to an on-chain, verifiable infrastructure.
From:
Blockchain → Infrastructure → DeWEB → Applications
“What if the next evolution of Web3 is not another blockchain, but a new way of building the Web?”
#TapeOut × #DeWEB.
Build the infrastructure. Build the Web. 🔥
BTC is old and just for whales.
ETH is expensive, and now no one wants to use it.
SOL is full of scammers and memecoin devs.
BNB: no one uses it, and it’s just backed by the Binance cabal.
Zcash is a scam, with the founder having unlimited supply.
HYPE is just a perp trading chain that is not even fully on-chain lol.
What’s the solution?
1
577
It is still too early to get involved with $BEM.
$BEM remains extremely undervalued.
there’s already a whole ecosystem building on top of it, with a strong flywheel structure already in place.
50% of all transaction fees go directly toward buybacks & burns, while 50% of all circuit and transistor market fees also go toward buybacks & burns.
and look at the ecosystem:
$TAPOUTX, just a meme coin around TAPOUT on X Layer / OKX Chain, reached
A 20M market cap.
$HPA, a project launched on top of $BEM, reached a ~70M ATH and is still around ~18M today.
both have higher mcap than $BEM itself. that’s how mispriced $BEM currently is.
you also have a hackathon organized by @okx, dozens of builders already building, and potentially hundreds or thousands more as the ecosystem grows.
more than 150k worth of $BEM has already been bought back and burned.
now imagine when the volume increases 10-50-100x from here.
at current levels, I think $BEM could 20x and still have room to re-rate.
the flywheel is already in place. now it’s a matter of how large the ecosystem becomes.
1
1
10
1,090
🌕 致 TapeOut 中国社区的一封中秋祝福
值此中秋佳节，祝所有 TapeOut 中国社区的朋友们：
🌕 月圆人团圆
🥮 阖家幸福，万事如意
🔥 Build 不停，热爱不减
🚀 一起见证 TapeOut 生态不断成长
过去的每一步建设，都离不开社区里的每一位 Builder、Contributor 和支持者。
无论你来自哪里，无论你是在 Build、探索 DeWEB，还是关注 $BEM，今晚都暂时放下忙碌，和家人朋友一起赏月、吃月饼。
愿我们在链上一起 Build，在现实中一起团圆。
中秋快乐，TapeOut 中国社区！🌕🔥
月圆 TapeOut，未来共赴。
#TapeOut #BEM #DeWEB #中秋节 #中秋快乐
2
1
16
451
🔐 $351.6M Affected — A Bigger Lesson for Web3
The @bitget incident is significant not only because approximately **$351.6 million in assets were affected**, but because it exposes a deeper security question:
Are we protecting the private key, or are we also protecting everything that happens before the private key signs a transaction?
At 18:31 UTC on September 24**, Bitget detected unauthorized transfers involving parts of its hot and warm wallet infrastructure. The exchange temporarily suspended withdrawals, while deposits and trading continued. Bitget stated that its cold wallets remained secure and that the loss falls within its $464M+ User Protection Fund
More importantly, Bitget has since identified part of the attack path.
According to its latest update, the attacker compromised a critical backend system within the wallet infrastructure, used it to spoof transaction data, and then triggered Bitget's own authorization process** to move the funds.
The private keys themselves were not compromised.** The exact method used to breach that backend system is still under investigation.
And this is where the incident becomes especially interesting for **DeWEB + TapeAPI**.
A traditional architecture might look like:
Frontend → Backend → API → Wallet → Sign
But what if the infrastructure could instead move toward:
DeWEB → TapeAPI → Verify → Simulate → Authorize → Execute
DeWEB could provide a verifiable frontend and data layer, while TapeAPI could evolve beyond a simple API into a **verifiable service layer** — checking service identity, code integrity, transaction data and transaction intent before anything reaches the authorization stage.
Of course, we cannot claim that TapeAPI would have prevented the Bitget incident. The full attack vector has not yet been disclosed.
But the lesson is clear:
> In Web3, securing the private key is only one part of the problem. We also need to verify the software, data and instructions that reach the signer.
Maybe the next generation of Web3 infrastructure isn't just about decentralizing assets.
It's about making the entire path from application → service → transaction → authorization more verifiable
And that's where **DeWEB + TapeAPI** becomes a concept worth watching. 🔐
#TapeOut #DeWEB #TapeAPI #Web3 #DeFi #HealthConnect #FOMO #黑客 #热钱包
[1]: bitget.com/support/articles/… "[SECURITY NOTICE] Bitget Hot Wallet Incident — September 24, 2026 | Bitget Support Center"
[2]: gulfnews.com/business/market… "Bitget Suffers $351.6 Million Wallet Hack, Withdrawals Suspended but User Funds Deemed Safe"
#TAPEOUT #DEWEB #TAPEAPI $BEM
About the Bitget Protection Fund 🛡️
The Bitget Protection Fund exists for moments like this. It holds 5,500 BTC, approximately $464M at current prices.
All fund wallet addresses are public and can be verified on-chain by anyone, at any time. The fund is designated to protect user assets against platform-wide threats such as cybersecurity incidents.
Losses from this hot wallet incident after assessment will be borne by the Protection Fund. We will replenish the fund. Details and coverage terms will be announced separately.
1
6
728
This is exactly where DeWEB becomes interesting. 👀
Instead of trusting a centralized frontend, TapeOut’s DeWEB architecture stores the frontend on-chain and verifies each file against its on-chain hash. If the frontend is modified, the mismatch can be detected before it is displayed.
It doesn’t eliminate every security risk, but it directly addresses one of the biggest frontend attack surfaces. 🔐
Maybe #DeWEB is not just about decentralization — it’s also about verifiable frontend integrity.
@SafeLabs_ @safefndn @multisig @SparrowWallet @SpecterWallet @ElectrumWallet @nunchuk_io @bluewalletio @Ledger @CasaHODL @unchained @Bitkey @BitGo @FireblocksHQ @CopperHQ @Anchorage @coinbase @taurushq @FordefiHQ @utila_io @gemini @KomainuCustody @ZodiaCustody @Hex_Trust @Cobo_Global @Safeheron @CregisOfficial @Blonskr
郑重呼吁！！！郑重呼吁！！！！
无论是Bitget本次被盗，还是Bybit上次被盗，问题大都出在第三方工具或多签等系统前端被篡改，郑重呼吁所有Defi、第三方工具将前端部署到TapeOut的可验证DeWEB中，我将个人无偿赞助所有前端上链的大型第三方工具做前端上链的安全审计资金，包括safe多签等！让他们的所有用户使用安心！DeWEB的“前端上链”首先无法被篡改，其次浏览器通过自动Hash比对，可确保前端一旦出现被篡改风险，就立即通过浏览器进行安全提示！
@SafeLabs_ @safefndn @multisig @SparrowWallet @SpecterWallet @ElectrumWallet @nunchuk_io @bluewalletio @Ledger @CasaHODL @unchained
@Bitkey @BitGo @FireblocksHQ @CopperHQ @Anchorage @coinbase @taurushq @FordefiHQ
@utila_io @gemini @KomainuCustody @ZodiaCustody
@Hex_Trust @Cobo_Global @Safeheron @CregisOfficial
2
257
Chinese version
如果回顾 **过去几天 TapeOut 生态的发展**，可以看到它正在从最初的链上电路协议，逐渐扩展成一个包含基础设施、交易、挖矿、DeWEB 和第三方应用的完整生态。
### 🚀 近期值得关注的几个方向
* **TapeHub** — 为第三方项目提供 launchpad，围绕 transistor、挖矿和 Token Launch 构建新的经济模型，并结合 $BEM 的 Buyback & Burn 机制。
* **TapeKit + HashPort** — 将网站部署到链上，并通过普通 Web 界面访问，进一步推动 TapeOut 从 circuit layer 向 **DeWEB infrastructure** 扩展。
* **X Layer 部署** — TapeOut 已将 Processor Factory、Circuit Container、Website Repository 和 TapeSend 部署到 X Layer，进一步扩展多链基础设施。
* **TapeOut Market / Firsto / Silicon / TapeOut Club** — 生态开始出现更多交易平台和第三方工具，用于交易 transistor、circuit NFT、BEM 以及挖矿相关资产。
* **TapeOutScan** — 社区开发的 explorer，用于追踪 transistor、circuit、mining、hashrate、BEM 等链上活动。
* **GatePilot** — PoD mining、矿机租赁和 miner 管理平台，并已经进入 DeWEB 生态。
* **GradFi** — 基于 TapeOut 构建的 fair-launch mining protocol。
* **BEM Royale / Black Myth: Behemoth** — TapeOut 开始向 **on-chain gaming** 扩展，通过 circuit 来实现游戏逻辑。
* **TAPQQ / On-chain Chat / TapeOut to the Moon** — 社区正在尝试将聊天、社交、NFT 等更多应用部署到 DeWEB。
* **TapeStar** — 第三方 builder 开发的 transistor/circuit 聚合工具，帮助用户寻找购买、tape-out、PoD mining 和 BEM claim 等机会。
* **TapeOut Texas Hold'em** — 社区也开始尝试开发使用 BEM 的多人 Poker 游戏。
### 🧩 把这些组合起来看
**TapeOut Protocol → TapeKit → DeWEB → TapeHub → Trading → PoD Mining → Third-party Builders → Games → X Layer**
TapeOut 正在从最初的：
**“链上 NAND / LATCH / Circuit”**
逐渐扩展到：
**基础设施 → 开发者 → 应用 → 用户 → 交易 → 收入**
更重要的是，这些第三方项目如果持续产生真实 activity，就可能进一步形成：
**Protocol → Infrastructure → Builders → Applications → Revenue → BEM Buyback & Burn**
这也是目前 TapeOut 生态最值得继续观察的地方。
▶️ TapeOut 不再只是 NAND、LATCH 和 BEM Mining。
▶️ TapeHub 正在扩展经济层。
▶️TapeKit 正在扩展 Web 层。
▶️ X Layer 正在扩展多链基础设施。
Third-party Builders 正在带来 Trading、Mining、Games、#DeWEB Apps 以及更多新的应用。
▶️ **生态正在从一个 Protocol，逐渐变成一个 Ecosystem。** 🔥
*注：GatePilot、GradFi、TapeStar、游戏以及部分 DeWEB 模块属于第三方/社区项目，不应默认理解为 TapeOut 官方产品。*
If there are any other projects I haven’t listed yet, please feel free to update me in the comments. I’d love to keep track of everything happening across the TapeOut ecosystem. 🔥
$BEM $TAPEOUT #TAPEKIT #TAPEHUB
@Blonskr @longsun5991 @theunipcs @iruletrenches @BruceBlue @xing8047 @blueshirt666 @TapeOutWorld @yztc123 @BEMGoGoGo @ywweb3 @CryptoLoser9
1
4
250
🔥 4 DAYS, 1,826 BEM BURNED.
Since 11:00 on September 21, 2026, 50% of the trading fees from the transistor and circuit marketplace have officially been allocated to BUYBACK & BURN BEM. 🔥
In just around 4 days:
🔥 1,826.35137108 BEM has been burned
🔥 Burn address: 0x000000000000000000000000000000000000dEaD
🔥 The burn address is now among the Top 20 BEM holders
But what really matters is:
This is only the beginning.
TapeHub continues to expand.
More third-party builders are building projects on TapeOut.
V2 is coming.
Now imagine if more and more projects start generating revenue and join the Buyback & Burn mechanism:
BUILD → REVENUE → BUYBACK → BURN → BUILD AGAIN. 🔥
Every new builder could bring more activity, more revenue, and potentially another source of BEM burns to the ecosystem.
4 days → 1,826 BEM.
The Burn Wallet is already in the Top 20.
If the TapeOut ecosystem keeps growing, let's see how far this address can climb. 👀🔥
Top 5?
#TapeOut $BEM #TapeHub #DeWEB
1
1
3
309
🔥 4天，1,826枚 BEM 已被销毁。
自 2026年9月21日 11:00 起，晶体管和电路交易市场——正式将 50% 的交易手续费用于 BUYBACK & BURN BEM。 🔥
仅仅约4天：
🔥 1,826.35137108 BEM 已被销毁
🔥 Burn 地址： 0x000000000000000000000000000000000000dEaD
🔥 该 Burn 地址目前已经进入 BEM 持仓地址 Top 20
而真正值得关注的是：
这还只是开始。
TapeHub 正在持续扩展。
越来越多的 第三方开发者（Third-party Builders） 正在 TapeOut 上构建项目。
V2 也即将到来。
想象一下，如果未来越来越多的项目开始产生收入，并共同参与 Buyback & Burn：
BUILD → REVENUE → BUYBACK → BURN → BUILD AGAIN. 🔥
每一个新的 Builder，都可能为生态带来更多活跃度、更多收入，以及新的 BEM Burn 来源。
4天 → 1,826 BEM。
如今 Burn Wallet 已经进入 Top 20。
如果 TapeOut 生态继续增长，接下来就看看这个地址还能走到哪里。👀🔥
Top 5?
#TapeOut $BEM #TapeHub #DeWEB
3
3
15
1,346
> Honestly, this is why I see #TapeOut differently. @Blonskr @TapeOutWorld
>
> Crypto has been flooded with narratives, especially memecoins and endless new chains. Many projects raise capital, attract attention, launch a token, and then slowly lose activity when the hype disappears.
**TapeOut took a different path.**
> No traditional fundraising. No presale of the token. Instead, the project sells resources that allow the community to mine $BEM. When the ecosystem was still new, those resources were available at a very low cost, giving the community a way to participate from the beginning.
The interesting part is the economic loop:
**Resources → Mining → BEM → Builders → Applications → TapeOut Ecosystem**
> The community doesn't just sit there waiting for a token to pump. People use resources, mine BEM, build products, create activity, and gradually contribute to the ecosystem.
> And this is the part I find most interesting:
> **If TapeOut becomes more valuable, BEM has a stronger foundation of utility and demand. If BEM becomes more valuable, the economic layer supporting the ecosystem becomes stronger.**
> It’s not just about BEM.
> It’s not just about TapeOut.
> **The two are designed to grow with each other.**
> To me, TapeOut feels like a **rain shower in the middle of a crypto desert**. 🌧️🏜️
> We still have to see whether the ecosystem can attract enough developers, applications and real users. But at least the model gives me something I rarely see in crypto today: **an incentive to actually build.**
I’m not here because of another temporary narrative.
*I’m here to watch what happens when innovation, builders and an economic ecosystem grow together.**
> **Always long innovation. Always long builders.** 🔥
$BEM #TapeOut
Tapeout $BEM, is the most innovative and interesting infra I’ve seen in the last few years, and that alone is enough for me to bet on it as hard as i did.
always long innovation.
3
3
19
3,869
This is exactly where my shared mining pool idea could make sense. 👀
If individual miners are becoming too expensive, a third-party project could let the community pool their capital, collectively own mining rigs, and share the rewards based on each person’s contribution.
Instead of everyone trying to buy a miner alone, build it together as a community. Maybe it’s time for someone to make this happen. 🔥 #TAPEPOOL
#TAPEOUT $BEM
1
5
565
From Circuit Containers to websites, content, and communication, and then to developers building applications on top of this infrastructure, TapeOut seems to be aiming for more than just another on-chain project; it’s gradually building a new kind of infrastructure.
DeWEB is the key layer that connects all of these foundational capabilities together.
再次感谢大家在这次 AMA 中的关注。关于 TapeHub 的方向和我们当前的重点，在这里做一次更清晰的整理，也补上现场没来得及展开的 DeWEB。
TapeOut 始于一个想法：如果能像搭积木一样，在区块链上从基础元件搭出电路，再逐步构建应用，会发生什么？
我们从数字化的晶体管和逻辑电路出发，让电路成为可以拥有、验证和复用的链上资产。如今，我们正在围绕这些资产连接账户、内容和通信，希望为开发者提供可以持续创造的基础。
TapeHub：让一个项目从发行走向长期建设
我们希望 TapeHub 成为一个让优秀技术团队启动项目、找到早期支持者，并持续把产品做出来的平台。
优秀的技术团队优秀的技术团队可以从TapeHub出发，发行自己的生态代币、建立社区，再通过代币逐步的释放换取时间，逐步出发展自己项目生态。
例如，基于BNBChain的神经网络项目、基于BNBChain的云存储项目，或其他DeWEB项目。我们希望项目的成长能贯穿从想法、发行到实际使用的整个过程
Mint、毕业和市场交易机制提供了启动路径，挖矿与可交易资产让社区能够以不同方式参与。我们希望在这个基础上，项目方能够不断基于矿机来增加核心功能能力，团队基于电路进行二次创作，用户能够找到值得长期使用的服务。项目之间的合作互动也是我们非常乐意看到的。
对初创团队来说，TapeHub 希望降低从想法走向市场的门槛，帮助他们找到愿意一起建设的人。对参与者来说，与项目的关系也可以不断深入：从早期支持者，成为使用者、贡献者，甚至在它的基础上创建新项目。
随着更多有用的产品出现、项目之间开始合作，TapeHub 才能成长为一个有持续创造力的开发者生态。
当前重点：让 DeWEB 真正好用
这次 AMA 有人问，我们更关注增加处理器、吸引更多项目，还是简化挖矿流程。
目前，我们最优先的是 DeWEB 的应用体验。
因为这些底层能力最终都需要回答具体的问题：项目提供什么服务？用户为什么需要它？开发者还能在这个基础上做什么？我们希望用户进入生态后，即使不关心代币，也能找到值得留下来的服务。
因此，我们关注一条完整的使用路径：开发者建立电路容器身份，发布网站或应用入口；用户通过电路 ID 或域名访问内容，通过 TapeSend 交流，并在需要时连接链上资产与交易。
对用户来说，浏览公开网站内容理应轻松，完全不用先学习区块链、准备 Web3 钱包或支付链上 Gas。
而对开发者来说，我们希望账户、存储、内容验证和通信可以成为全新的去中心化广域网络的基础设施。他们可以把更多精力放在自己的 AI 产品、存储服务、社区工具或其他业务上，继续进行二次开发。
关于 DeWEB，还有一些现场没来得及说的话
DeWEB 是TapeOut推出的一个基于公链的去中心化广域网络，一个可验证网络，承载着我们对下一代互联网基础设施的设想。它围绕链上电路容器ID建立访问和通信能力，并与网络服务存储、内容读取和资产账户这些模块结合，为开发者提供进一步构建应用的基础，它完全基于公链的L1层。
想要理解这个设想，应该从一个具体的身份开始——电路容器。它是与电路 NFT 关联的链上账户，有自己的地址，由当前持有人按照合约规则控制。项目可以围绕这个身份组织网站内容、资产和消息。
例如，一个团队在 TapeHub 上发行自己的项目代币，之后开发 FTP服务。它可以通过电路容器部署服务，并利用 DeWEB 与用户交换请求或结果。另一个团队可能开发文件协作工具。开发者可以复用这些基础模块，再定义自己的业务逻辑。
我们所说的的“可验证”有明确含义：读取网站时，兼容客户端可以核对文件长度和哈希，检查收到的内容是否与链上登记记录一致。发送消息时，合约检查发送者是否拥有相应权限，收件客户端再读取和核对消息；加密消息在本地解密。
用户因此拥有可以检查的依据。它不能保证每一条内容都真实，却能帮助用户确认内容是否一致、消息是否经过相应身份授权。
DeWEB 的开源客户端还可以汇总多条已接入链上的消息，让不同链上的容器身份进入共同的通信体验。这为应用之间的连接提供了基础；跨链转账和远程合约执行则需要另外的机制。
对用户来说，这些能力最终意味着更多延续性与选择权：只要底层链、数据和兼容工具仍然可用，更换一个访问入口，就不必从头建立全部项目身份与内容。对开发者来说，共同协议意味着可以继续开发新的客户端和应用，让已有基础被更多人使用。
我们希望几年之后，大家提到 TapeOut 和 TapeHub，会想到这里诞生了哪些有用的产品、哪些团队仍在持续建设，以及畅想自己还能在这个基础上创造什么。
1
416
🇨🇳
我越来越觉得，$BEM 值得从另一个角度去理解。
2018 年的 ENU 和 2019 年的 EIDOS，其实已经在探索一个很有意思的方向：把链上行为本身变成一种“挖矿”方式，让用户通过链上活动获得价值。
但当时的问题可能并不完全在模式本身，而在于时代和市场还没有准备好。
那个时候 Crypto 的市场规模还很小，用户和开发者数量有限，链上基础设施也不成熟，更重要的是，区块链的影响力基本还局限在互联网和 Crypto 圈子里。
今天的环境已经完全不同。
AI 降低了开发门槛，多链生态逐渐成熟，链上应用越来越丰富，而 TapeOut 正在尝试把 Circuit、Processor、Computation 和 DeWEB 连接起来。
在这样的背景下，我觉得 $BEM 的意义可能远远不只是一个 Token。
如果 ENU 和 EIDOS 是早期的探索，那么 BEM 也许是在更成熟的基础设施和更大的市场环境下，继续探索一个更大的问题：
当链上计算、链上生产和链上应用开始产生真实价值时，谁来承载这套经济体系？
这可能才是 $BEM 真正值得关注的地方。
现在当然还无法知道 BEM 最终会长成什么样，但很多真正新的东西，往往都是先出现，再慢慢被市场理解和定义。
也许 BEM 不是 ENU 或 EIDOS 的简单重复，而是同一个想法在一个更成熟时代里的重新实验。 👀🔥
#BEM #TapeOut
谁还记得 2018 年的 $ENU？
当年往合约地址转 0 ETH 就能获得空投，我撸了很多地址。
还有 2019 年的 $EIDOS，和 ENU 系出同源，在 EOS 上把“链上操作”变成了一种挖矿方式，我当时也挖了很多。
前两次我都兴奋地参与了，但这次 $BEM 出来，我反而一直没看懂。
直到今天才突然反应过来：
$BEM 不就是当年那条路的延续吗？
币圈的发展史，也是发币方式的进化史：
矿机 + 能源 → PoW
BTC / ETH → ICO
平台币 → IEO
情绪 + 注意力 → Meme
链上计算 → BEM
ENU 没走出来，是因为团队决裂；EIDOS 没走出来，是因为 EOS 后来掉队了。
当年失败的未必是这种模式，而是时代和土壤还没准备好。
现在不一样了。
开发者更强，AI工具更好用，链上基础设施更成熟，币安、OKX 也开始关注这类东西。
同样的种子，落在了完全不同的土壤里。
所以 $BEM 最后会长成什么样，我觉得可能连小孩哥自己也未必知道。
很多新东西，往往都是先长出来，后来才有名字。
@Blonskr @BEMGoGoGo @TapeOutWorld @Theairresearch
9
1,077
I’m increasingly starting to think that $BEM deserves to be understood from a different perspective.
Back in 2018, ENU and in 2019, EIDOS were already exploring a very interesting idea: turning on-chain activity itself into a form of “mining,” allowing users to create value through their on-chain actions.
But the problem back then may not have been the model itself. The era and the market simply weren’t ready yet.
Crypto was still a relatively small market. There were fewer users and developers, on-chain infrastructure was still immature, and more importantly, blockchain’s influence was largely limited to the Internet and the crypto community.
Today, the environment is completely different.
AI has lowered the barrier to development, multi-chain ecosystems are becoming more mature, on-chain applications are expanding, and TapeOut is trying to connect Circuits, Processors, Computation, and DeWEB.
In this environment, I think $BEM could mean much more than just a token.
If ENU and EIDOS were early experiments, then perhaps BEM is continuing to explore a much bigger question in a more mature infrastructure and a much larger market:
When on-chain computation, on-chain production, and on-chain applications begin to create real value, what becomes the economic layer that supports the entire system?
This may be what makes $BEM truly worth watching.
Of course, it’s still too early to know what BEM will ultimately become. But many truly new things appear first, and only later does the market understand and define them.
Maybe BEM isn’t simply repeating the story of ENU or EIDOS. Maybe it’s the same idea being tested again in a much more mature era. 👀🔥
#BEM #TapeOut
🇨🇳 中文
我越来越觉得，$BEM 值得从另一个角度去理解。
2018 年的 ENU 和 2019 年的 EIDOS，其实已经在探索一个很有意思的方向：把链上行为本身变成一种“挖矿”方式，让用户通过链上活动获得价值。
但当时的问题可能并不完全在模式本身，而在于时代和市场还没有准备好。
那个时候 Crypto 的市场规模还很小，用户和开发者数量有限，链上基础设施也不成熟，更重要的是，区块链的影响力基本还局限在互联网和 Crypto 圈子里。
今天的环境已经完全不同。
AI 降低了开发门槛，多链生态逐渐成熟，链上应用越来越丰富，而 TapeOut 正在尝试把 Circuit、Processor、Computation 和 DeWEB 连接起来。
在这样的背景下，我觉得 $BEM 的意义可能远远不只是一个 Token。
如果 ENU 和 EIDOS 是早期的探索，那么 BEM 也许是在更成熟的基础设施和更大的市场环境下，继续探索一个更大的问题：
当链上计算、链上生产和链上应用开始产生真实价值时，谁来承载这套经济体系？
这可能才是 $BEM 真正值得关注的地方。
现在当然还无法知道 BEM 最终会长成什么样，但很多真正新的东西，往往都是先出现，再慢慢被市场理解和定义。
也许 BEM 不是 ENU 或 EIDOS 的简单重复，而是同一个想法在一个更成熟时代里的重新实验。 👀🔥
#BEM #TapeOut
2
190
这种支持正是 Builder 们需要的。👀
TapeOut 还处于早期阶段，但给新技术一个真正可以建设、实验和证明自己的舞台，才是创造未来的方式。很期待这次 Hackathon 的 Builder 们能带来什么新的东西。🔥
#TapeOut #XLayer #Hackathon $BEM
很高兴和 @Blonskr 一起，揭幕 TapeOut 的首届黑客松。
为什么 X Layer 要率先支持 TapeOut，哪怕未来道路坎坷，我也会明确支持。
The best way to predict the future is to invent it.
OKX 永远支持创新，推动行业向前。
所有技术创新，都应该被看见、被讨论，得到真正的支持。
8
3,615