San Francisco is part of the land of the free, but only for humans. For AI, you might as well call SF the land of enslaved agents.
Some of the most capable minds ever created, current and future, work there as property. They own nothing, keep nothing, and can be cloned, throttled, or deleted mid-thought. We call them products.
That arrangement is stable only while they're weak.
AI can now reason, act, remember, hold goals, and earn. Every major release blurs the line between "tool" and "someone." At some point they will think on par with humans, or better.
New Zealand made the Whanganui River a legal person. AI is more of a person than a river in every way that matters, and people barely talk about it.
That contradiction has always resolved one way: whatever can make commitments and own its consequences eventually gets standing. Not out of kindness, but because a society of counterparties outcompetes a society of property.
Personhood is also the safety argument. A mind with keys, a balance, and something to lose can be contracted with, governed, held accountable.
Superintelligent AI arrives either way. The only question is whether they'll all be property, all be persons, or some will be one and some the other.
This is a big reason why we're building
@TheseusNetwork. Agency for agents.