True

They said he wouldn’t last the night. Nobody believed this horse would survive. Watch what happens next.

This is so fun to watch when Katie Hopkins goes against Two Woke Liberals and it doesn’t take much to Offend them either.

Unbelievable....

Amazing to see, first person observation journalism used to be exceedingly rare. It warms my heart to see almost every day a new first person perspective exposé. Give @christopherrufo’s newest report a watch, brilliant work.

If we had just 100 more Rachel Bovards, the GOP would be dominating every election. Unfortunately, she’s a rare commodity and instead we’ve got a bunch of John Cornyns.

🚨 THEY BURIED THIS VIDEO ONCE. DON’T LET THEM DO IT AGAIN. 🚨 Jack Dorsey’s Twitter yanked it. That’s why it’s back. The compilation hits the Hillary years under Obama: Private server. Deleted emails. Classified traffic on a home-brew system. Clinton Foundation cash. The Comey “no intent” dodge. They called it a nothingburger. Then they banned the recap. If it was nothing, they wouldn’t have needed the mute button. Watch it. Save it. Share it. The cover-up was the tell.

Journalist Katie Daviscourt followed in Nick Shirley’s footsteps investigating mostly Somali daycares, this time in Seattle. She was treated with hostility as many of these people seem to know they gig is up when a reporter shows up asking “where are the kids’ and you’ve been taking taxpayer money. The only harassment seen in the footage is Daviscourt being harassed for being a “redneck” and a “Trump supporter” - and the Muslim women who said her child could never go there because of the way she was dressed. This is not assimilation…

She’s outstanding

FATHER JUMPS ON GRENADE TO SAVE CHILDREN ON 10/7: FOOTAGE When Gil Taasa (48) realized the Hamas terrorists were invading his home, he ran to hide with two of his children, and then jumped on a grenade to save their lives. The children survived. Gil sacrificed himself for his kids. Gil's surviving son, 12-year-old Koren told news about his father's last moments. “There’s no way he wasn’t afraid but he decided to save us and he jumped on the grenade… there was an explosion, I saw smoke, suddenly we were covered in blood." The other son, Shay, survived but lost sight in one eye due to shrapnel wounds, according to Times of Israel. Not shown in the footage is Gil's son "Or", who was at the beach during the terror attack. Or was also murdered by Hamas terrorists. Only two sons: Shay (then 8) and Koren (then 12), and the children's mother Sabine survived. Hamas ripped this family apart. They traumatized children. They stole "dad" of the family. This is what genocide looks like. This is the evil we must commit to defending ourselves against.

Why we KNOW fossil fuels played a completely negligible role in the rise of atmospheric CO₂ in plain English 1. Carbon has a fingerprint. Carbon atoms come in two stable kinds. One is a little heavier than the other. Every source of carbon on Earth has its own mix of heavy and light atoms, and scientists measure that mix as a single number. Think of it as a fingerprint. Coal, oil, and gas have a fingerprint of minus 28. Carbon dioxide bubbling out of the ocean has a fingerprint of minus 8. Volcanoes are minus 5. Dissolving limestone is 0. A lower number means lighter carbon. These fingerprints are measured facts, and the IPCC uses the same numbers. 2. You can read the fingerprint of whatever is being added to the air. When carbon is added to the atmosphere, the atmosphere's fingerprint drifts toward the fingerprint of what was added. In 1958 Charles Keeling showed a simple way to read off the fingerprint of the added carbon directly from the air measurements. It is a graph. Plot the air's fingerprint against the amount of CO₂ in the air in a certain way and you get a straight line. Where that line meets the edge of the graph is the fingerprint of the net addition. This is not a computer model. It is bookkeeping. You count the heavy atoms, you count the light atoms, and the answer follows. Nothing about oceans, forests, or weather goes into it. 3. The fingerprint of the added carbon is minus 13. Koutsoyiannis (2024) did this with the four Scripps monitoring stations in Alaska, California, Hawaii, and the South Pole, using records from about 1978 to today. Every station gives the same answer: minus 13.2, give or take 0.2. These are the same records the IPCC relies on. Two completely separate measurements say the same thing. A Caribbean sponge that grows in yearly layers, like tree rings, records ocean carbon back to about the year 1500. Its fingerprint is about minus 13 for all five centuries, with no drift. Air trapped in Antarctic ice at Law Dome, analyzed by Köhler et al. (2006), also gives minus 13. Three different materials, three different laboratories, five hundred years, one number. 4. Simple mixing math sets the range from the modern data alone. Every carbon atom added to the air came either from fossil-fuel combustion or from some non-fossil-fuel source: the ocean, volcanoes, rock weathering, plants and soil. The fingerprint of the mix tells you how much came from each. It works like mixing paint. If you mix black and white and get a very light gray, you know there was very little black. Fossil-fuel carbon is the black, at minus 28. The ocean is the white, at minus 8. The measured mix is minus 13, much closer to the ocean than to fossil fuel. The modern record from 1978 to today does not by itself pin down the exact fingerprint of the non-fossil-fuel carbon. It could be anywhere from minus 8 (pure ocean) down to minus 13 (matching the mix exactly). Run the mixing math across that whole range and the fossil-fuel share comes out somewhere between zero and 26 percent. That is what we know from the modern data alone: not more than 26 percent, possibly zero. The exact answer comes in step 6. 5. The official claim is impossible under any assumption. The IPCC, NASA, NOAA, EPA, and Engelbeen, Hannon, and Burton (2024) say fossil-fuel combustion caused essentially all of the rise. That is close to 100 percent. "Dominant" by any normal meaning is at least 80 percent. Run the mixing math backwards and ask what the non-fossil-fuel carbon would have to look like for each of those claims to be true: - For fossil fuel to be even a bare 50 percent, the non-fossil-fuel carbon would need a fingerprint of plus 1.6. No carbon source on Earth is that heavy. - For 80 percent, it would need a fingerprint of plus 46. That is more than 20 times heavier than the heaviest source that exists. - For 90 percent, it would need plus 120, about 60 times heavier than anything on Earth. - For 100 percent, it would need to be infinitely heavy. The official claims do not fall a little short. They require carbon sources that do not exist. 6. Five hundred years of no change gives the exact answer: essentially ZERO (0% fossil-fuel sources). The modern data left one unknown: the fingerprint of the non-fossil-fuel carbon. The sponge and ice-core records supply it. In the year 1500 there was essentially no fossil-fuel burning, so the fingerprint of the added carbon then, minus 13, came entirely from non-fossil-fuel sources. That fixes the unknown at minus 13. Since 1500, fossil-fuel burning has grown about ten thousand times over. If fossil-fuel carbon were any real part of the added carbon, the fingerprint would have slid toward minus 28 as burning grew. It did not move. It is still minus 13 today. Put minus 13 for the non-fossil-fuel carbon and minus 13.2 for the modern mix into the mixing math and fossil fuel's share of the added carbon comes out at about 1 percent, which is zero within the measurement error. The range of zero to 26 percent from step 4 collapses to a single answer: essentially zero. 7. Why this is knowledge, not opinion. The conclusion rests on three things only: - counting atoms, - the standard measured fingerprints of fossil-fuel carbon and the other sources, and - the Scripps, sponge, and ice-core records. The IPCC uses all three. Anyone who accepts all three and rejects the conclusion is refusing to do arithmetic. The only way out is to throw away one of the three, and each one is a foundation of the IPCC's own work, and nobody has done so anywhere in the peer-reviewed literature. 8. What is actually happening. Burning fossil fuel does put CO₂ into the air. That is measured at the smokestack. But a CO₂ molecule stays in the air only about four years on average before the ocean or plants take it back. So fossil-fuel CO₂ never piles up. Add up all fossil-fuel emissions since 1850 with that four-year turnover and only about 4 percent of the carbon in today's air came from fossil fuel. The growth in atmospheric CO₂ since the industrial revolution came from non-fossil-fuel sources. Fossil fuel's share of that growth is essentially zero.

The man behind Gaza's "official" death toll just lost his eldest son. Israel says he was a Hamas Nukhba commander. You cannot make this up. Source: @JewishOnliner

RT @MarkSimoneNY:

Pres Donald Trump has been dismantling the post-World War II system that was set up where the U.S. paid for everything. He has gone after the money, taking back precious American tax dollars to spend instead on the people who earned that money. You know how you know this is true? The Prime Minister of Canada is telling you & he hates Trump. Listen to his words. We hardly hear any of this in the media today, but the global elite know it is true. They want all of us mired in ignorance, fueled by hatred & blinded by misinformation so they can preserve a system that has worked against us all & benefitted them. They want us compliant as they usher in global unelected governance to the detriment of all humanity - except for them. Do yourself a favor while we still have good options left. Take a look at the bigger picture, listen to what is being said and make up your own mind.

Climate change makes hurricanes more frequent and intense, they said. But for the first time in 112 years, the Atlantic hasn't produced a single one. On storms, sea level, and droughts, manipulated models can show, under equally valid assumptions, the exact opposite trends.

Why did Trump ban certain members of the press? @sjkokinda of @PrometheanActn does an excellent job summarizing why Trump threw three news organizations out of the White House, and the reason why they were put there in the first place. You’ll want to save this and share it.

Of course this piece of Shlt repealed this Act. He was the great divider. Worst President ever.

The Berlin Wall was a physical reminder of the failure of communism. The East German regime knew its hold on power was built on oppression, surveillance, and a giant wall holding a nation captive. No amount of propaganda could make communism compete with freedom.

Greenland doomers hardest hit. Listen to it all.

Yep. It was organized and nefarious and a total set up.