Co-founder of Gorilla Science (@WatchGorillaSci). "Climate: The Movie" producer. CO2 is vital plant food, but it is *not* the climate control knob.

MIT climate scientist (and former IPCC lead author) Dr. Richard Lindzen and Joe Rogan chuckle at climate hysteria in this clip. Lindzen: "Guterres at the UN says, "The next half degree and we're done for." I mean, doesn't anyone ask, a half degree? I mean, I deal with that between, you know, 9:00 AM and 10:00 AM." Joe Rogan: "It does seem crazy. It's just that kind of fear of minute change that they try to put into people. And what I think people need to understand that are casual observers of this is what you discussed earlier, how much money is involved in getting people to buy into this narrative..."
11
151
395
10,749
MIT climate scientist (and former IPCC lead author) Dr. Richard Lindzen talked to Joe Rogan about ClimateGate: Lindzen: "...somebody anonymous released the emails from a place in England, the University of East Anglia, which has a lot of people pushing climate alarm, and they were communicating with other people like Michael Mann and so on. And they were talking about blocking publication and getting rid of editors and doing this and doing that and so on." Rogan: "Wow." Lindzen: "And that was all public. And it had no impact at all." Rogan: "That sounds like that should be illegal."
1
8
15
546
This John Costella ClimateGate book is fabulous work: lavoisier.com.au/articles/gr… I am publishing an interview with Costella next week.
1
3
158
Tom Nelson retweeted
Harry Wait shined a light on one of the ways election fraudsters were allowed to operate in Wisconsin. Wisconsin’s official election website had a very flimsy setup: If a fraudster had your name and birth date, that’s all they needed to request your ballot from the official website and get it sent to their address without you knowing. If a fraudster had thousands of names and birth dates, they could request thousands of ballots. They could then dump those ballots in Wisconsin’s ballot drop boxes. Harry Wait alerted government leaders to this problem by requesting their ballots sent to his home. Then he showed them the ballots and asked them to fix the problem. Rather than being commended for helping pinpoint problems in election security, he was charged with a felony. He was convicted this year. The corporate media only covered him as an election criminal and completely ignored what he was exposing. Your beloved Fox News and Newsmax gave his story silence while their homies on the left side slanted the story into oblivion. This is how it works, friends. Harry said he’d do it again in a heartbeat to help preserve your ability to vote for the person who represents you. We need more heroes like Harry Wait. Looking forward to sharing a stage with him at the Liberty Summit in Wausau/Rothschild, Wisconsin this weekend 🫡 PS: If you want to join the independent media and help cover stories like this one, connect with me. I’m a veteran of TV news and independent news, and can’t wait to coach more independent media members: pages.freepresscourse.com/ni…
4
15
3,163
100% scam; 0% science
Monster nor’easters are growing stronger thanks to climate change. Boston is ‘fundamentally’ unprotected. trib.al/6wNnVp4
5
41
1,442
As it should be. Catastrophic anthropogenic global warming is the most massive scientific fraud in human history.
The IPCC is under intense pressures "The fossil fuel industry has “captured control of too many governments” and even the UN’s top climate science apparatus “to a shocking degree”, Gore said" theguardian.com/us-news/2026…
2
22
72
1,779
Tom Nelson Podcast #431: Cohler/Soon: “ Response to Ed Berry’s recent presentation” is now published. @cohler Jonathan Cohler, joined by Willie Soon, says he is correcting false statements Ed Berry made about their paper “Dominance of Natural Atmospheric CO2 Dynamics,” which is under review and posted online. Cohler argues Berry wrongly claimed they ignored Berry’s work, presented an identical delta-14C “proof,” and called for a carbon-cycle model; Cohler says they cited Berry prominently and used newer radiocarbon data (Hua et al. 2022) and Koutsoyiannis 2024. They distinguish residence time (~3.8 years) from radiocarbon relaxation time (~18.4 years), claim a bridge equation links them, and assert their new work mathematically refutes Bern multi-exponential/adjustment-time models. They also discuss conflicts with the CO2 Coalition over attributing CO2 rise to humans. 00:00 Why This Rebuttal 01:23 Berry Claims Overview 03:16 New Radiocarbon Data 05:19 Lie One Citation Record 07:33 Lie Two Not Identical 10:00 Lie Three No Model Needed 12:34 Why Skip Berry 2023 13:16 Residence vs Relaxation 15:57 Bridge Equation Results 17:20 Math Theorems Against Bern 18:29 Independent Checks and Implications 21:38 Host Q and IPCC Confusion 22:49 Soon on Adjustment Time Myth 24:55 Table Consensus and Bern Failure 26:25 Bomb 14C Reality Check 27:30 Why Bomb Tests Matter 28:19 Ethics And Accusations 29:27 Data Driven Challenge 31:08 CO2 Coalition Split 33:32 Math Not Debate 36:55 Ugly Email Wars 40:01 Science Over Ego 42:52 Searchers Versus Blockers 43:22 Passing The Torch 45:08 Final Thanks And Goodbye
10
21
1,908
This just in: Now carbon dioxide is allegedly making children eat donuts, or something
13
14
56
1,511
POLITICO calls it! ‘Trump’s latest climate rollback makes it all but official’ – ‘We’ve lost the culture war on climate’ – Obama advisor: ‘The left strategy on climate needs to be rethought’ climatedepot.com/2025/06/11/…
45
144
520
173,945
Two important essays were published this week on the theme that the climate movement is now a serious national security risk for the US and Europe. This one in Tablet magazine: tabletmag.com/sections/news/… is by 2 authors, one from the Hudson Inst in DC and the other a professor at the Naval Postgrad Academy in CA. They trace the links between China and the western Net Zero movement, which is partly financial, but works mostly through influence operations by which the CCP gains exemption from criticism by western green groups despite its own coal-intensive and slave labor-dependent growth strategy. This one: thegwpf.org/content/uploads/… is by Richard Dearlove, former head of MI5, explaining how China's influence ops in the UK led to deindustrialization and a precarious dependence on China; to the extent that the UK could not now reindustrialize or stabilize its electricity grid without seeking assistance from Beijing. Dearlove's paper raises the possibility that a security agency like MI5 saw a threat building but was unable to address it because of a perception that climate science forbids criticizing Net Zero and related measures. A question I think worth asking is whether western intelligence agencies have internalized the green Net Zero mindset thereby preventing them from challenging the climate alarmism so effectively weaponized by the CCP. And if they now want to start doing so, would they know how, or have the capacity to do so.
1
1
1
704
Climate emergency declaration scrapped by council bbc.com/news/articles/ckge4w…
1
2
356
Spot the climate crisis
Uninformed people think that the climate was once constant. I wonder which bit of this famous climate data series Mr Khan thinks is due to climate change?
2
14
54
2,231
Shock: That "bad weather-preventing school buses!!" thing was actually just a scam.
Less than 40% of EV school buses purchased with Biden-era EPA grants have been delivered: 'Taxpayer dollars vanished' trib.al/G3tf0sI
3
20
52
2,304
The "free energy from wind turbines!" narrative was always BS
Many of the onshore wind farms in the United Kingdom and Denmark have experienced drastic operating declines after only 10 to 15 years. This is far earlier than the 20 to 25-year operational lifespan claimed by the wind energy industry and backed by the UK Government. A major statistical analysis of historical UK and Danish datasets, led by Professor Gordon Hughes at the University of Edinburgh, revealed substantial performance decay across these early-generation fleets. Hughes concluded that turbine load factors—the actual electricity generated relative to maximum capacity—declined rapidly due to cumulative wear and tear. By year 10, the average UK onshore wind farm's output efficiency had dropped by roughly 33%. This degradation was largely driven by tangible engineering failures, including severe leading-edge blade erosion from precipitation, alongside chronic gearbox and bearing stress. As a result, many onshore turbines became acutely uneconomical after roughly 12 years due to soaring maintenance overheads and declining output. Rather than running for their full theoretical lifespan, these assets faced early economic retirement, leaving operators facing premature decommissioning costs or forced site transitions. While manufacturers maintain that a 25-year lifespan remains valid on paper, empirical data reveals a steep decline in long-term viability. To maintain output and secure ongoing financial returns, energy companies have increasingly turned to 'repowering'—dismantling prematurely aged hardware to replace them with larger, modern units long before the original turbines reach their nominal 25-year target. Source: The Performance of Wind Farms in the United Kingdom and Denmark, Professor Gordon Hughes, published by the Renewable Energy Foundation, 2012.
7
40
103
2,284
Biographer Will Wilkinson on Will Happer: "What I learned from Will's remarkable story was that one event after another shaped a man who would grow up to be a very diligent student of whatever he was working in. So this is not somebody who just casually accepts anything. His motto, as I said: "Trust and verify." He's as skeptical about his own work as he is about anyone else's work."
1
9
31
1,731
I am interviewing John Costella very soon. He is the author of this excellent ClimateGate report: lavoisier.com.au/articles/gr… @aDissentient @RossMcKitrick
3
7
26
1,798
Key excerpt:
1
2
369
Another key excerpt:
1
1
236
Tom Nelson retweeted
After destroying the NZ economy chasing Climate Change objectives, I still believe in Climate Change so convincingly that I went to Australia & bought a $6M house by the beach
194
1,222
7,985
67,003
As I review ClimateGate info in preparation for interviewing John Costella, I'm still irked.
Replying to @bfwebster
Scott Adams' lazy, wildly wrong, flippant takes on ClimateGate still irk me. @julie_kelly2
2
3
18
1,496