David Limbrick MP shares what he witnessed firsthand—including claims that counterprotesters tried to silence women through intimidation and sheer volume. Watch the full video here: piped.video/1pj4jiGqVi0?si=fprk… Follow @topherfield on all the socials! Find books, DVDs, tee shirts, hoodies, caps, stickers, AND the 2026 MASTERCLASS at: store.topherfield.com/collec… And as always, Think Free

As the political landscape shifts from two dominant parties to three, where voters place their 2, 3, 4, and beyond could have a major impact on the final result. This is why understanding how preferences work—and how they flow between candidates—matters more than ever. Victorian voters: know what your preferences mean before you vote. Watch the full video here: piped.video/Aw3NYr5p7ds?si=Y9Ec… Follow @topherfield on all the socials! Find books, DVDs, tee shirts, hoodies, caps, stickers, AND the 2026 MASTERCLASS at: store.topherfield.com/collec… And as always, Think Free

Was Pauline right to stand by what she called a “demonstrable historical fact”? The debate over history, race, and political correctness gets heated fast. Watch the full video here: piped.video/wgg304KibNE?si=QMmx… Follow @topherfield on all the socials! Find books, DVDs, tee shirts, hoodies, caps, stickers, AND the 2026 MASTERCLASS at: store.topherfield.com/collec… And as always, Think Free

Call me crazy... but i don't think a 'Prime Minister Wong' is out of the question... piped.video/qr7H50heluc?si=K-0j…

Making a false report to Police is a crime. Why aren't Flock, Axon, and all their fellow universal surveillance companies being held criminally liable for their thousands of false accusations? These are not 'mistakes' in the human sense, these are known systemic issues with the technology that are either unable to be fixed or these companies are choosing not to fix (probably because it would cost a lot!) So they continue to pump out false alerts and reports, wasting police time and ruining innocent lives. It's a VERY easy fix legally... hold the company criminally liable for false reports, especially ones that lead to prosecutions. They would either have to pay a LOT of criminal fines, spend the money to make sure their accusations are accurate, or stop throwing out accusations like confetti. (I'm putting aside the fact that these surveillance systems are a human rights violation for this post, just proposing an alternative approach to stopping the worst of the present abuses)

With a NSW state election approaching, the debate over firearms laws is becoming increasingly political. Advocates say public attitudes have changed—and parties are taking notice. Watch the full video here: piped.video/i1Le0mla9wg?si=R7gU… Follow @topherfield on all the socials! Find books, DVDs, tee shirts, hoodies, caps, stickers, AND the 2026 MASTERCLASS at: store.topherfield.com/collec… And as always, Think Free

One story. One controversy. One bigger agenda?  I break down why I believe these stories could be helping build the case for a One Nation ban. Watch the full video here: piped.video/wgg304KibNE?si=QMmx… Follow @topherfield on all the socials! Find books, DVDs, tee shirts, hoodies, caps, stickers, AND the 2026 MASTERCLASS at: store.topherfield.com/collec… And as always, Think Free

What happens when errors in a firearms registry trigger real-world consequences? Critics argue police could end up chasing records for firearms that were never there in the first place. Watch the full video here: piped.video/i1Le0mla9wg?si=R7gU… Follow @topherfield on all the socials! Find books, DVDs, tee shirts, hoodies, caps, stickers, AND the 2026 MASTERCLASS at: store.topherfield.com/collec… And as always, Think Free

Environmentalists confuse 'delicately balanced' with 'self correcting'. Most natural systems are NOT 'delicately balanced' meaning if we knock them off balance they run away to collapse... in contrast the truth is they have built in self-correction mechanisms that keep the system within a range. This matters because the 'delicately balanced' idea pre-supposes that ANY changes are dangerous... upsetting the 'balance'. How often do we hear so called environmental experts invoke a concept like "If it continues like this..." But that idea is nonsense when you realise that most of the time it's NOT a case of 'delicate balance', it's a case of 'self correcting'. Nature goes through boom and bust cycles. Too much food leads to too much prey leads to too many predators... then a bust happens. Of course GOOD environmentalist (and there are many, not all are out there to 'weaponise' the 'knife's-edge, delicate balance' myth, but some are...) you'll observe the self-correcting nature of that ecosystem and that it will bounce back fully as soon as conditions change again, and you'll focus your efforts into the places where there is REAL environmental harm, to the degree that the self-correcting bounds have been breached (like toxic waste in rivers) and not waste time and energy on areas where humans are having an impact, sure, and it's change the range within which nature is self-correcting, sure, but it's not any sort of 'collapse'. And YES human interference in an ecosystem will change the bounds within which that system self-corrects, I'm not suggesting humans don't have an impact, that's obviously nonsense, but most human impacts only changes the bounds within which a system self-corrects. The environmentalists who live on the land (which by the way most farmers are REAL environmentalists!) or spend a lot of TIME on the land, know this intimately... which is why you rarely see them scaremongering on TV. The ones you see scaremongering on the nightly news or putting their hand out for grants or donations? They're often the kind of 'environmentalists' who live in the city and work off spreadsheets, and their REAL job is fundraising from the public and from stupid bureaucrats handing out taxpayer grants. This is especially true if they work for a massive 'environmental charity' which needs millions in donations every year just to keep all their desk-jockey 'environmentalists' employed in their cushy concrete jungle airconditioned open-plan office. And if the world at large really grasped the degree to which this 'delicate balance' angle is a myth, and the 'self correcting' idea is reality, most of these 'environmental charities' would go broke, and most of these 'environmentalists' would have to get a real job. And that would definitely improve the environment.

Using a $90,000 Australian salary, this breakdown looks at the gap between what an employee earns, what they actually take home, and what they cost their employer. The claim? Government may be the biggest expense of all. Watch the full video here: piped.video/xx_lzrWGmzE?si=UN7r… Follow @topherfield on all the socials! Find books, DVDs, tee shirts, hoodies, caps, stickers, AND the 2026 MASTERCLASS at: store.topherfield.com/collec… And as always, Think Free

A 'VIBE SHIFT' in Victoria? Or is this just another trap? Are the 'winds of change' sweeping through Victoria already? The counter-protest to the 'Let Women Speak' rally was everything you'd expect from the intolerant left... noisy, vulgar, destructive, violent. But the media reporting? That was... unexpected. Channel 10 in particular seem to have their finger to the breeze as the winds of change gather strength, being remarkable forthright in their report about the rally, the counter protest, and who was causing the violence. I speak with David Limbrick MLC, who was there on the day, to see if we can get to the bottom of what happened on the day... and also what's going on with this 'vibe shift'? Support the Topher Project by buying me a coffee and checking out all my merch here: store.topherfield.com/

The debate over Andrew Hastie highlights a bigger question: Can we honor someone’s military service while still scrutinizing their political record? The two are not the same thing. Watch the full video here: piped.video/mUqVSppScaA?si=gQdh… Follow @topherfield on all the socials! Find books, DVDs, tee shirts, hoodies, caps, stickers, AND the 2026 MASTERCLASS at: store.topherfield.com/collec… And as always, Think Free

With Australia’s political landscape becoming more competitive, preferences can play a crucial role in determining who finishes in the top two and ultimately wins a seat. But here’s the part many voters may not know parties can recommend preferences on how-to-vote cards, but voters make their own choices.  So why do parties put so much effort into handing out those cards at polling booths? Because preferences matter. Watch the full video here: piped.video/Aw3NYr5p7ds?si=Y9Ec… Follow @topherfield on all the socials! Find books, DVDs, tee shirts, hoodies, caps, stickers, AND the 2026 MASTERCLASS at: store.topherfield.com/collec… And as always, Think Free

They can't figure out why it's not working this time... The desperation is showing and the attacks aren't working... but there's still a danger here. The power of One Nation is that they are NOT like other politicians... which means that making qualified apologies or using other classic 'political' tactics to deal with these attacks will undermine the entire brand value. These attacks will continue to FAIL, if One Nation continue to stand tall and refuse ALL apologies. But will they? Support the Topher Project by buying me a coffee and checking out my books, DVDs, and all my merch here: store.topherfield.com/

So why is he being treated as the face of the party? Watch the full video here: piped.video/wgg304KibNE?si=QMmx… Follow @topherfield on all the socials! Find books, DVDs, tee shirts, hoodies, caps, stickers, AND the 2026 MASTERCLASS at: store.topherfield.com/collec… And as always, Think Free