GAS LIGHTING??
As you all know, the State Supreme Court struck down the initiative to preserve energy choice and natural gas.
WA Democrats should do the honorable thing next session and repeal HB 1589 from 2024 (the natural gas ban) to respect the will of the people. Even if a hand selected majority of the State Supreme Court wouldn’t.
Just to refresh your memory on what this bill did…
HB 1589 was a gift to PSE. It gave them a series of complicated benefits like accelerated depreciation and the ability to combine their natural gas and electric utilities under the UTC. In plain English: PSE gets to recover its money faster and spread costs across more customers, while ratepayers (that’s you) get stuck with the bill. Some PSE customers are already paying 30% more.
Meanwhile, the law puts PSE on a path toward phasing down natural gas, including something literally called “geographically targeted electrification” where PSE must transition portions of its natural gas customers to electricity.
And somebody has to pay for all of this!
BIAW estimated it could cost the average homeowner around $50,000 to convert from natural gas to electric, while natural gas bills could rise roughly 62% as customers leave the system. For many homeowners, that’s nearly $1,000 more per year!
We’re talking about roughly 800,000 PSE households potentially affected by this transition.
And it’s not just homeowners. Natural gas serves roughly 200,000 businesses and institutions across Washington, including manufacturers, hospitals, hotels and restaurants. For many commercial facilities, conversion costs can easily reach six figures or more. When businesses pay more for equipment and energy, those costs don’t magically disappear, they eventually show up in the prices the rest of us pay.
Then there’s an even bigger problem… where is all this new electricity supposed to come from?
If you look at PSE’s own forecasts for available power and future demand, we’re approaching a serious power shortfall. I was frankly shocked when I saw it.
So we’re simultaneously facing an electricity shortage while state policy is pushing hundreds of thousands of natural gas customers toward using MORE electricity. Make that make sense.
If HB 1589 isn’t repealed, natural gas users are cooked (no pun intended) and I never want to hear another lecture about “affordability” or “no kings.”
The initiative did more than stop this bill, it added in future protections for other natural gas users, and put the brakes on a very activist building code council. Those protections are gone now, and you could be next.
As for the Supreme Court, the majority said I-2066 violated the Constitution because it “log rolled” multiple subjects together. That’s flimsy as hell in my opinion. I agree with the dissent, if this initiative was unconstitutional log rolling, you could make the same argument about a whole lot of laws passed by the Legislature.
It also makes me wonder whether the Court will apply that same precedent when it considers the challenge to the state’s income tax law, which is also accused of log rolling multiple subjects together.
I won’t hold my breath.
Regardless, voters will have another opportunity to make their voices heard for energy choice in November by voting Republican.