Professor in Biological Sciences @unccharlotte Group leader, Charlotte Group for Proteostasis Research Interested in the role of Hsp70 PTMs (Chaperone Code)
If you’re letting AI do a review of a manuscript for you, just know that (A) it’s super obvious to anyone reading it, (B) it’s dishonest - as you’re explicitly instructed not to do so, and (C) it’s careless - because you’re uploading someone’s confidential material to an AI app.
Today in @NatureBiotech we report OptiPrime, a mechanism-based machine learning model for predicting prime editing (PE) efficiencies and suggesting pegRNAs to achieve a user-specified edit. OptiPrime incorporates biochemical knowledge about PE into its mathematical structure, enabling training on ~300,000 PE efficiencies collected using 40 experimental conditions in multiple labs, and outcome predictions of PE variants such as twin prime editing not used in its training. OptiPrime enabled the rapid identification of efficient PE strategies across a variety of applications in vitro and in vivo, and could outperform months or years of manual experimental optimization.
Try out OptiPrime here: optipri.me
PDF: drive.google.com/file/d/13JZ…
1/15
UNC Charlotte ranks No. 17 in the nation and No. 1 in NC on SmartAsset’s 2026 list of America’s Best Value Public Universities. The ranking reflects what matters most: affordability, graduation and strong career outcomes.
smartasset.com/data-studies/…
We are looking for motivated postdocs to join our lab starting Spring 2027 to study the Hsp70 Chaperone Code and Proteostasis, see here for more details:
trumanlab.org/open-positions
We are recruiting! If you are passionate about technology development, protein engineering, computational design, directed evolution, chemical biology - please reach out!
(The setting is pretty nice too…)
We are looking for talented graduate students to join our group for Fall 2026 studying the role and regulation of Hsp70 PTMs! If you are interested please check out trumanlab.org
Trilled and humbled to received the 2025 Outstanding Faculty Research Award by Department of Biological Sciences at UNC Charlotte. Thankful to my mentors, collaborators, current/former lab members, friends and family. @EMGSUS @ASBMB @unccharlotte
How well do you think you understand chaperones? In our recent @MolSystBiol paper, @fried_lab's Divya Yadav shows that obligate chaperone clients in cells are totally different from the proteins that "need" chaperones during in vitro refolding.
embopress.org/doi/full/10.10…
Great to see this work by our team, lead by PhD student Thomas Walker.
We found that the heat shock protein HSPB5 is a powerful chaperone that prevents TDP-43 fibrillation AND maintains TDP-43 condensate fluidity even more than its sibling HSPB1.
What if proteins that can’t refold in vitro fold perfectly fine inside cells?
Our new News & Views article in Molecular Systems Biology, written with Dr. @TrumanLab , explores this interesting insight from Yadav et al. (2025).
For decades, chaperone-client relationships have been defined using fundamental in vitro refolding assays, where proteins are unfolded by heat or denaturants and refolded with chaperones. But what happens inside a living cell is far more complex. Using proteome-wide LiP-MS, the authors show that in vivo chaperone requirements don’t necessarily match what refolding assays suggest. Many proteins that fail to refold after denaturation can still fold successfully during co-translational synthesis without the chaperones once thought essential.
In our commentary, we discuss how this challenges long-standing assumptions about “chaperone dependence” and highlight the role of the “chaperone code” (post-translational modifications on chaperones) that fine-tunes chaperone functions in the cell.
As someone fascinated by how molecular chaperones and their modifications orchestrate proteostasis, I find these findings a powerful reminder of how dynamic folding is within living cells.