I don’t know one person who watched the trial and believes Lindsay is guilty. Instead, they’re all saying - why was Patrick never investigated?!?!

Which news organizations or which influencer do you think will be the first to actually have the humility to step back and ask: 1). Were we misled by the headlines? 2). Did we get the Clancy case wrong? 3). How did we fall for this? 4). It’s like we forgot the way they lied about Covid! They could still save a bit of face if they’re the front runners to admit they accepted the DA’s story and failed to investigate. So do you think anyone will? When the truth comes out, what will they say?

New rule on here: If they charge you with a crime, asking them to prove it is rude.

It takes a truly unique legal strategy to spend 3 1/2 years prosecuting a triple homicide, only to complain to the judge that you were totally blindsided by the defense’s shocking request for actual evidence.

I can’t get over today. Reddington asked the DA, “Where is the evidence she did this?” The answer was basically: Patrick went to the store. That’s the case. A grown man left the house, bought some things, came home, and during those 37 minutes they allege Lindsay murdered three children and tried to kill herself four different ways before dropping her body temperature to 82°. They skipped investigating 11:30 to 4 because Patrick said everybody was fine when he walked out. So the cameras can just sit there. Patrick already told them when the story starts. Two adults. One of them draws the starting line, and the other one gets charged. Then they stand in court like the receipts are DNA. I don’t know how you keep a straight face through that. I really don’t.

They attacked us constantly for questioning the narrative. Tonight that question is in the headlines. Kudos to everyone who refused to stay silent. 🥂

There was a visible look of relief on Lindsay’s face today, a softness that returned to her demeanor, and even the hint of a subtle smile. To wake up from a coma to the devastating reality that your children are gone, to be told by authorities that you were the one who did it, and then to be forced into a legal strategy where you have to play the role of the insane perpetrator because no one is challenging the state's narrative is a staggering level of psychological confinement. Hearing Kevin Reddington stand at the podium today and ask the court, “Where is the evidence she did this?” completely shattered the forced script. By focusing on the lack of forensic proof, the nonexistent investigation and the absence of any admission, her defense finally refused to accept a fabricated narrative, and you could see the impact of that truth in her aura.

The DA’s whole answer to “Where is the evidence she did this?” was truly shocking. She started by saying the evidence is voluminous. Then she listed her voluminous things. Almost all of them were the errand. 1) She’s the only one in the home.
2) She sent him out.
3) The call is on her phone.
4) Video of him at the store and the restaurant.
5) He came home and found her and found the kids. Then two that weren’t about the errand. 6) They said her DNA was on the ends she had to pull. That was a lie.
Yellow ends exclude her.
Black ends weren’t interpreted.
Blue ends are a family list. 7) Then a pastor story that is not in the pastor’s notes. The first written voice is the defense psychologist on February 6. Another lie. That was the “voluminous” evidence.
His errand.
A false sentence about the bands.
Another false statement. If this is sufficient to prove someone is the murderer, we are all in danger.

I cannot stop smiling! 😁 It was fascinating to watch him pull back the curtain on the actual scene. I thought it was really interesting that he stood there and asked where the smears were on the bedroom floor. I have a lot more thoughts on everything else he brought up today, but I want to hear what stood out to all of you!

Judge Sullivan did not rule on anything today. He heard arguments on the renewed motion under Rule 25 and took it under advisement. The double-jeopardy dismissal motion and the request to inquire further into the holdout juror were postponed to November 2, along with discussion of a possible retrial date. The DA has not announced whether they will retry the case. However, the judge was pushing to set trial dates, and Reddington said the earliest he’d be available would be June. Personally, I do not think there will be another trial.

Wow. Where was that Kevin Reddington during the trial? It is very rare that attorneys argue something that wasn’t in their motion. But he did. He hit on what we’ve been talking about and it sure took the DA by surprise! I am so happy!😁

You know what’s insane? Asking the court to label your client insane for a crime they didn’t commit.

No fingerprints. Yellow exclusion. Black at 11 against 220,000. Blue hidden. 82° on the ground. No TOD. No time of crime. No opportunity window. No alibi. A defense lawyer who still runs “she did the act” after that is a man who was protecting something, but it wasn’t his client.

When the system completely abandons its constitutional duty to prove the crime, uses an incapacitated person as the scapegoat, it simultaneously transforms its failure into a highly lucrative corporate payout for a person who was never actually vetted.

Did you know the following? The weapons don’t ID her.
They ID the other adult more. There is no time of death.
No time of death means no locked window and no alibi. The other adult was in that house all afternoon.
The tech is quiet from 11:30 to 4.
That is a real window. The state seized the cameras and never used them.
They took his word and shrank the case to 37 minutes - enough time, they say, for three killings, four suicide methods, and a body temperature of 82. The lab never said she did it.
Her lawyer did. Odd, don’t you think?

Let’s summarize the actual facts of the Clancy case. THE WHO: On the yellow and black exercise bands, Lindsay is out and Patrick is in. But on the blue exercise band, they stipulated to hide who was in the middle - which is incredibly odd. Furthermore, there were zero fingerprints recovered on anything, including the knife. THE WHEN: There is no time of death. Without a time of death, there is no proof of “when”. As such, all the media noise about receipts and camera footage is completely irrelevant. Patrick's errands aren't the point - the window of opportunity is. Outside of his 37 minutes away, that window was just as open for him as it was for Lindsay. WHAT DO WE ACTUALLY HAVE? 1). Three children tragically and horrifically strangled. 2). A woman near death on the lawn. 3). A co-suspect who, for reasons nobody has explained, inexplicably became the state's narrator on night one. Over 3 1/2 years and 70+ State witnesses later, they have no more proof of “who” and “when” than they did on day one. The DA lied to you. The headlines misled you. Are you going to allow them to continue to manipulate you?

Wow… this is crazy! There was a case where the weapons matched the spouse they didn’t charge and the spouse they did charge had a lawyer who said she did it anyway.

Lindsay never admitted it. The state never forensically proved it. Yet, her own defense team is asking the court tomorrow to lock her away based on a narrative that was never proven true. That doesn’t seem like a defense that is defending Lindsay. It seems like a defense that is defending the unproven claims and false narrative.