New rule on here: If they charge you with a crime, asking them to prove it is rude.

Sep 30, 2026 · 2:50 AM UTC

7
8
91
1,779
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @TruthAnswersAll
🙏🏼⚔️😔⚡~ All of your posts today (and earlier) have made me genuinely question, even for us longtime battle-torn Truth Warriors, who are familiar with every twisted narrative in the Global Lie Playbook-- when is enough truly enough?~ Apparently, X thinks we need to be vigilante crusaders, for nothing is off limits to them-- but on the brighter side, atleast we know a few more critical thinkers now, beyond any brainwashed political divisions/psyops~ so cheers to that? 🥂⛑️🪖💘😶‍🌫️
1
7
118
Yes! A few more critical thinkers is definitely a positive as we are becoming somewhat rare.
1
6
102
Replying to @TruthAnswersAll
I can’t believe how confused they all are after Reddington straightened it out yesterday. This judge has made a mess of things by not allowing the bifurcation forcing her to stipulate to guilty just for the situation of in case they found her guilty which they never did. The jury proceeded as if she had admitted it. This judge has screwed everything up.
2
22
Replying to @TruthAnswersAll
They don’t even need to talk to you or test the evidence. Hearsay is now the new evidence 🤷‍♀️
5
43
Replying to @TruthAnswersAll
its Candance rule right? Because asking Candance prove her claims is rude somehow, but she keep accusing people left and right without any proves
13
Replying to @TruthAnswersAll
Seems logical to....SpongeBob
2
28