NEW: The DOJ released photos of the Tumbler Ridge school shooter's guns: a shotgun with a trans flag-colored sticker, posed before a trans flag, and a rifle with a suppressor in trans flag colors. Jesse Van Rootselaar killed eight people, six of them children aged 11 to 13. Van Rootselaar sent the photos on Discord to James Cody Bryant, who also identifies as transgender. Bryant, 30, of Bellingham, Washington, was charged yesterday with conspiracy to murder. Prosecutors say he helped plan the shooting and agreed to livestream it.

Adolf Hitler Favorability Rating 🟢 Favorable: 6% 🔴 Unfavorable: 85% Favorable By Party: Democrats: 🟢 Favorable: 10% Republicans: 🟢 Favorable: 5% YouGov Poll

For them to live, you must die. They believe death is a virtue. Read the true story in "The Zizians: Inside a Trans Death Cult." My new book is out next week. Don't let this book be silenced. Order now: hachettebookgroup.com/titles…

Really impressive to see all this .

Vlad Nicola goes undercover as a woman in my home town of Luton. It goes exactly how you'd expect.

Holy. Shit. Drone footage from the UK tonight… The UK government is using the cover of darkness to continue importing foreign men. They will all live off British taxpayers. Before long, they will all have multiple children. It’s being done on purpose.

You learn something new every day. Jugaad means lying, cheating, and half-arsing everything, basically.

The media is now writing headlines saying “Why a ‘rise in sexual assaults' by migrants is a price worth paying to end racism” 🚨 They go on to literally say sexually assaulting WHITE WESTERN WOMEN SPECIFICALLY IS NECESSARY for assimilation Mind is literally blown “Quasi-consensual encounters between refugees and white Western women may help with assimilation. Increasingly they result in a shared apartment and a new surname” There is NOTHING Quasi-consensual about getting sexually assaulted The media is the enemy of the people I more more into this media organization and it’s Black owned and their website is about how White women are a mistake and white people are colonizers. They basically haye white people and want them eliminated so now they’re writing articles about how white women need to accept being sexually assaulted Why are we putting up with this

The West is fighting three issues: 1. Socialism 2. Doomerism 3. Radicalism More often than not, people are infected with all three at the same time. The future of the West will be defined by how successful these ideologies are in influencing young people.

Here is CNN calling “safeguarding Western civilizational norms” a “far-right” issue. Look, they believe whiteness, patriarchy, colonialism, etc. are interlocking forms of domination to overcome. The deeper con is severing Western civilization from its own achievements: overcome the civilization, keep all the goodies. The underlying story (con) begins with an immediate human unity. Primitive Communism, maan. People are embedded in a common social world before they experience themselves and their powers as separate from it. The unity is real but undeveloped and mostly unconscious. People belong to the whole without really knowing themselves as a whole. Just vibing, maaan. So, then comes rupture of this low level vibe. Different theories locate it in the enclosure of the commons, private property, wage labor, commodification, colonialism, racial hierarchy, patriarchy, and so on. The details change, but the basic movement is the same in each of these (post)Marxist theories. Human life becomes divided, and powers once embedded in the social whole become scattered into separate social forms. At the widest scale though, Western civilization becomes the historical order in which those divisions take shape, harden, and reproduce themselves. None of this requires anyone to sit down and design the system. The structures emerge “historically,” take on lives of their own, and are inherited by people who didn’t create them. People can benefit from them, exploit them, defend them, or reproduce them, but they’re operating inside forms already larger than themselves. The theory focuses on structures more than individual bad actors. This is where alienation and reification come in. Human powers become objectified in property, capital, markets, institutions, social categories, inherited norms, and structures of authority. “Objectified” means those powers now exist outside immediate human life in durable social forms. “Reified” means those forms have hardened until they confront people almost like independent things, with their own apparent logic and power. The social world starts to look like a second nature. These structures derive their power from the living human capacities bound up within them. Capital has no productive power without labor. Markets do nothing without human exchange. Institutions act only through people. Social categories persist because they keep organizing human relations. Yet the form conceals that dependence. The structure appears to possess the power that actually runs through it. Human capacities become caught inside structures that seem independent of them and confront people as external powers. What belongs to living social life now appears to belong to capital, institutions, markets, categories, and systems. Critical consciousness is supposed to see through that appearance. It sees history where ordinary consciousness sees nature, social relations where it sees fixed things, and human powers where it sees autonomous structures. It also begins to separate the human capacity worth recovering from the social form in which that capacity has become alienated. The oppressed and marginalized provide privileged standpoints from which particular forms of domination can be exposed. A consciousness-bearing movement, the vanguard in its stronger form, connects those insights into a picture of the whole. It identifies what belongs to the oppressive form and what can be recovered from it. Critical consciousness then becomes a kind of sorting operation: separate the human content from the alienated structure, then turn that knowledge into action. That raised consciousness gives the movement the standpoint from which to repair the fractured social whole. Praxis is the work of that repair. The oppressive forms are negated, while the powers bound up within them are recovered and reappropriated. Knowledge, technology, productive capacity, cooperation, social organization, cultural achievement, and the rest are freed from the forms that supposedly distorted, enclosed, or monopolized them and recast as common human powers. Here the opening move pays off, because the achievements of Western civilization have already been detached from Western civilization itself, the civilization can be overcome without giving up its “goodies.” The historical shell can be discarded while the useful human capacities bound up within it are claimed for humanity as a whole. Thats the whole con. This whole process is what is meant by sublation. The old form is negated, its recoverable contents are separated out and preserved, and those contents are reorganized at a higher level. Western civilization disappears as a distinct historical order, while the powers developed within it are universalized and recombined into a more conscious social whole. The final unity is supposed to be richer than the original one because it has passed through division, differentiation, alienation, and conscious recovery. The first unity was immediate and largely unconscious. What existed at the beginning without understanding itself is supposed to reappear at the end as a consciously organized whole. Taken together, classical Marxism, feminism, postcolonial theory, critical race theory, etc. are diagnosing different fractures within this larger civilizational whole. Class, race, sex, colonialism, and the rest identify different places where separation, alienation, and domination have taken form. Zoomed all the way out, Western civilization becomes the master frame to be sublated. Its hardened forms are dissolved, the human powers bound up within them are recovered, and those powers are consciously reorganized into a supposedly higher social unity.

If this is the end result of WW2, being invaded by the 3rd world trash, did we really win?

McCarthy admits Republicans are deliberately blocking White men from the Republican party. Then they wonder why Whites don't want to vote for Republicans anymore.

The Second World War is a founding myth for our treacherous political class. But while cosplaying halfwits like Jacob Rees-Mogg sigh with relief that "At least we're not speaking German", presumably, if the state had issued the Luftwaffe with British passports, he would recognise them as being as English as he is? I care much more about the present invaders speaking Hindi, Pashtun, and Urdu, than I do the war in Ukraine, or the one against Hitler still going on in Mogg's head.

VP RESPONDS DIRECTLY TO "YOUNG MEN WHO ARE P*SSED OFF" "We institutionalized anti-white, anti-male discrimination in this country. Totally disgusting. There is a lot more work to do, but we are NOT discriminating against people." @JackPosobiec @VP @JDVance

Vance: I would support ELIMINATING the H-1B program

Beginning of the formal process to put me in jail I've been advised that I need a criminal lawyer

A must read:

🚨🚨🚨 VINDICATED 🚨🚨🚨 For eight years, I have argued one simple thing: Facebook was never given “immunity” from being sued. But that is exactly how my case was killed. Facebook told the court Section 230 gave it immunity from the lawsuit itself, not just a defense to my claims. They did not have to prove good faith, prove they acted lawfully, or really prove anything. The court adopted that argument almost verbatim and threw my case out with prejudice before discovery, amendment, or any real examination of what Facebook actually did. Essentially, I was not allowed to sue them because of Section 230 “immunity.” In every filing I kept saying: that is not what the law says. Eventually I was told I was entitled to my “opinion,” the issue was “definitively decided,” that I was “perpetually relitigating” it, and my lawyer was even warned about continuing to press it or face sanctions. Except there was a YUGE problem: Nobody had ever actually decided whether the law provides "immunity from suit." I told the Ninth Circuit exactly that in March 2025. I did not simply tell them they were wrong. I told them they had never actually considered the immunity question. My motion was denied. Then, seventeen months later, California v. Meta happened. Meta again argued that Section 230 had repeatedly been treated as immunity from suit and therefore immunity should be “implied.” In other words, repetition had become the substitute for actually deciding what the law says. That's crazy. However, this time the Ninth Circuit actually examined the question. They finally did their job. It admitted its earlier use of “immunity” had been “somewhat loose,” said cases are not precedent for things merely "assumed," and then held: Section 230 is a defense to liability, NOT immunity from suit. That is the exact distinction I have been fighting over for eight years. So yeah, I was right, that is vindication. The courts have long treated immunity as settled simply through repetition. Have you ever been told this is already settled? It wasn't. The Ninth Circuit just said that prior usage was not binding because the question had never actually been formally considered, Congress knows how to create immunity when it wants to, and Congress did not do that here. So after eight years of being told this was long settled, I was proven correct on both points: it had never been settled, and when the Ninth Circuit finally settled it, the answer was the one I had been arguing all along. There is no immunity. Now, this does not mean I have already won my underlying case. It means the legal premise used to stop me from ever getting my case heard has now been completely rejected by the appellate court that controls my case. In plain English: the immunity used to kill my case never existed so my dismissal is not based on law. The question now is whether the courts have the integrity to acknowledge what happened and reopen a case that resulted in a grave miscarriage of justice. I got screwed. We shall see. But this is much bigger than me. Big Tech’s harms are not limited to allegedly addicting kids to social media. Their business models give them enormous punlisher control over businesses, audiences, advertising, visibility, money and livelihoods. If a platform uses that power unlawfully, the question should be whether what it did was legal. The answer cannot simply be: “Section 230. We’re immune. Case over.” That world just ended! I do not expect miracles from the District Court. They have already shown they will not follow controlling law. But if it refuses to fix this, the appeal goes right back to the Ninth Circuit. And this time the Ninth Circuit has already answered the question: Section 230 is a defense. It is not immunity from suit. Eight years later, the law finally says what I have been saying all along. There is no Big Tech immunity!

VP Vance: A lot of the problems that exist in American society would be solved — just by deporting illegal aliens. Lower housing prices, lower rent, lower vıolent crime.

Lindsay Clancy's lawyer last month: "When she killed the kids, she was experiencing psychosis" Today: "Who says she killed them?!"