To see how unusual our approach is, try to imagine another country taking it. Picture the Americans or the Chinese rushing to hand their territory to a state that had never owned it – that had, indeed, permanently renounced any claim to it – simply because a posse of Third Worldist judges had told them to.
While our civil servants continue to promote their deal,
@AndyBurnham can see how dreadful it looks. You don’t need to be a fulminating reactionary in a pith helmet to see what is wrong with betraying a poor, black, dispossessed population, and handing a pristine maritime conservation area to a country with a terrible record on biodiversity. This week, opposition has been voiced by Labour and Lib Dem MPs, by
@TheNewsAgents and by The Independent. All ask why we should pay to give territory we already own to a country that is close to China.
Burnham talks of Starmer’s deal as something he “inherited”: he, at least, gets the politics. At the same time,
@EllieReeves, his impressive Attorney General, has quietly altered the rules to water down the obligation on government ministries to follow non-binding rulings by international tribunals, making it harder for Matrix Chambers types to pursue Mauritius’s claim through our domestic courts – the prospect held up by supporters of the deal as a reason to rush.
There is an alternative. Ditch the deal and resettle the islands, allowing people of Chagossian descent to cultivate their old coconut plantations and tend their longfathers’ graves. Once the archipelago has a settled population, we can defend its right to self-determination as we do in Gibraltar or the Falkland Islands.
An opportunity is coming soon. Next month, the House of Lords will vote on the British Sovereignty Protection (Chagos Islands) Bill, proposed by the independent
@LordWeirDUP. Lord Weir, a barrister and former Stormont minister, wants to make it illegal to transfer ownership of the islands without the permission of Parliament and the diaspora Chagossian population. On democratic grounds, his case is unarguable, and my guess is that his bill will sail through the Lords, Labour peers being as unenthusiastic as anyone else about betraying Chagossians a second time.
Burnham should back it and announce that the Government will promote Chagossian resettlement of the outer atolls – something that, while not cheap, is a fraction of what Starmer was proposing to pay Mauritius.
As for Mauritius, its interest in the territory has only ever been pecuniary. Paying it to back our claim, rather than paying it to take our land, genuinely would be a worthwhile investment and an exercise of meaningful power.
Me in the Telegraph. Paywall down.
telegraph.co.uk/gift/0e9f3ba…