My Thesis. Perhaps It’s Yours Too. It’s eye-opening to realize that 99% of the conversation in crypto is focused on Tier 2 and its infrastructure. Tier 1, and the infrastructure needed to connect sovereign monetary systems, is what really excites me. #XRP #XLM #XDC #QNT #CC #LINK #IOTA

Thank you @YessahBlessahCC for your rabid posting, helping spread awareness of the hypocrisy of the founders at @digitalasset and the associated risks. That's all I wanted. Attention on the facts. Let the community decide if my conclusions are rational or unfounded.

"Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword." Matthew 26:52

$0.74 XRP incoming.

This is what self-loathing does. Amazing.

I'm here to make money. But I am also a man of principle. I see the big names and hype building behind Canton and I don't want to miss out on an opportunity. But the more I dig, the worse the investment thesis becomes. You sir, sold out of a scarce commodity(#XRP) and bought into a coin of which its protocol and coin with an uncapped supply that actively fights scarcity dynamics. You sold out of a decentralized protocol for one which is centrally funded, created, developed and controlled by profit-seeking institutions. You sold out of the XRPL which prioritized the least amount of fee friction to secure the network, and bought into a network that is centered around a fee-extraction model at the consumers expense. You sold out of a network where its biggest whale holds 33 Billion XRP(33% of circulating supply) and releases them in a transparent and controlled manner, and bought into a shitcoin whose cantralized founders and investors hold 35 Billion CC(89% of circulating supply) who will sell into any volatility that the protocol doesnt suppress. I could go on... The point is, I've yet to see anyone make a case for why CC is a good investment aside from jerking off to the big names. You may make money on CC, but it won't be for any rational or principled reason. And I argue you've made a poor choice. I feel it a duty to warn my fellow #XRPcommunity members of the risks. You can evaluate the information i present and judge it on its merrit. Formulate a rebuttal if you disagree. But posting memes without a coherent rebuttal is indicative of Cognative Dissonance, low IQ and low conviction.

The man who founded $CC, and accumulated 89%(35 Billion) of the current circulating supply for his company and early investors, is actively shilling to retail with bullish posts. You are exit liquidity.

All he can do in the face of facts is ignore or dismiss. His reply is telling. “No founder coins. No investor coins. No ICO.” Yet 35 Billion CC issued PRIOR to public launch. Where is the 35 Billion #CC Kfir? As of July 2026, 100 wallets hold 89% of the circulating supply.

"We're #1!" 🤦‍♂️

Imagine buying a coin whose protocol suppresses scarcity, volatility and speculation- while early insiders earned 50%+ of today’s circulating supply, then boast “no founder or investor coins.” Meanwhile, ~90% of circulating CC sits in just 100 wallets. This is a fee-sucking network owned and operated by the commercial banking cartel and their demonstrably dishonest boot-lickers. @Moonchaser2020 let's hear your bullish spin. @sentosumosaba? @IOV_OWL? Lets talk about it.

Blatant lies from @digitalasset and @CantonNetwork founder... ⚠️ “No founder coins. No investor coins. No ICO.” Then explain this: Digital Asset itself has earned ~5.3 BILLION CC. Known early investors still disclose ~3.1 BILLION #CC in custody. Known early participants have earned ~21B of ~39B circulating CC. Much of that accumulation began BEFORE retail even had a public market for CC. And Grayscale’s June 2026 SEC filing says the top 100 wallets control ~89% of circulating supply. How much of that 89% went to Digital asset and the early banking investors? So spare us the slogan. נָחָשׁ You didn’t call them “founder coins” or “investor allocations.” You rigged the distribution from the beginning and called them "rewards".

Do you think a token which will never be scarce, which is funded, created and operated by profit-driven institutions whose entire business model is profiting from retail, created a mechanism for retail to get rich but not themselves?

This guy simultaneously exposes the Rothschild family while also assigning authority to a fake Rothschild on X. The mental gymnastics and confirmation bias is off the charts.

"Perpetual Burn" is not a thing. There is only equilibrium which the protocol always fights to maintain. Its designed to dampen volatility, discourage speculation, and bring burn/mint into balance. Because fees are denominated in USD, if the price of CC increases, CC burn decreases. The higher the value of CC, the less CC the network needs. Billions minted as rewards flood the market, push the price down, burn of CC increases. A pendulum effect can happen but it always centers on equilibrium. Celebrating the bullishness of more burning, inferring scarcity, is a fools game that these influencers love to talk about because it gets the likes. Dishonest actors. And here is the kicker... CC fees are directly tied to Global Synchronizer use, but institutions can choose to run their own private synchronizer and bypass the GS and CC fees entirely. The entire world financial system could run on Canton using private Synchronizers, and rarely if ever have to use the GS or touch CC. One last question nobody can answer, and moonchick has likely never thought about or discussed... How can anyone be sure that the price speculators have driven CC to($0.11), may not already cover the next 5 years of adoption? The investment thesis for CC is as clear as mud. And no matter how many big names pile on, investors are just left with poorly founded assumptions. Some people will make money on CC. I hope lots do. And if I miss out on gains, so be it. All other things equal, its objectively a bad move to invest in a non-scarce asset.

One thing that I've been wrong about... I always believed that the Central Bank sovereign layer would go DLT before the Commercial Bank private layer. But it appears they are both developing at the same time but the Private sector has a lot more momentum and urgency.

A blatant LIE from the Digital Asset/#Canton founder. "It's designed to appeal to long-term investors..." See all the evidence below. But the best quote is “this model disincentivizes holding Canton Coins purely for speculative reasons”. @ShaulKfir, how can it be designed to appeal to long-term investors while the protocol itself disincentivizes holding $CC purely for speculative reasons? Those two statements are at direct odds. ‐-------------- From Canton Coin - MiCA Whitepaper - “Canton Coin is not issued in exchange for investment.” - “Encourage Utility, Discourage Speculation” - “We avoid design choices that could lead to artificial scarcity or speculation bubbles.” From Digital Asset - Canton Coin: A Responsible Approach to Digital Tokens - “The Economic Model for Canton Coin is Designed to Disincentivize Price Speculation and Instead Encourage the Development of Useful Applications” - “this model disincentivizes holding Canton Coins purely for speculative reasons”

The most exciting part for me is that I truly don't know if I'm right about #XRP. Everything I do on X is an attempt to solidify my own thesis. Bitcoin, XPR, Coreum, Chainlink, and now Canton. I have challenged these communities because each of them had challenged my own thesis about XRP in some way. That mild feeling of discomfort when I encountered narratives that challenged my own; thats called Cognative Dissonance. At that point you either ignore the narrative and risk being uninformed OR you let the narrative in and put it to the test and follow the result no matter where it brings you. I believe awareness of the process and honestly with myself is the best path forward.

I've been in #XRP for 6 years. I've taken profits worth 3x my original investment. I retain most of the XRP I've purchased. I've never lost money on XRP. If you feel like you've been scammed by Ripple or XRP influencers, its probably because of one or more of the following... A) You convinced yourself of a narrative without proper evidentiary backing. B) You convinced yourself of a timeline without proper evidentiary backing. C) You failed to take profit when you had the opportunity and now live in regret. D) You unfortunately bought at a market high and refuse to take accountability for it. Whatever happened to make you feel this way, radical accountability is the only way through.

Preparations include having doughnuts, coffee, and gender-affirming care ready for all US invasion forces.