Everyone was “whinging” when it was the other way. The difference is when it’s this way it’s considered fair 😂 The same argument used to be used when women and non-white people were paid less. “Maybe it’s merit” and that didn’t hold water. It can’t work this way now.

My God. These people are insane. They are so afraid of the Jews. It’s Adolf all over again. Telling their supporters to fear the Jew and his global expansionist designs. Unreal.

It’s hilarious when hundreds almost die. Hahaha. So funny.

🤣

Not even Palestinians consider the attack justified and you are trying to justify it? You are mentally unsound. They committed mass murder. Whether or not Israel acted disproportionately is irrelevant to determining that Hamas is a mass murdering terror organisation. If your party believes October 7 was justified then it must be true that what Israel is doing is not genocide and is also justified.

Based on the fact that less than 0.1% of viewers liked this, you can tell it was a bad take.

I see. Murder of unarmed civilians is justified if you believe you are oppressed, got it.

I see. So crazed ideological killing is only bad when some people do it, got it.

He would likely be worth far less actually. The tax would have a compounding impact on the ability to produce future wealth as well as the motivation to do so.

And for our politicians, they’d rather receive personal kickbacks and allow China to take them for free. Hmmm… let America build factories here and employ people, pay for the minerals, beneficiate them here, uplift the community with jobs and economic activity OR receive personal gifts and let China do what it wants. Ask Zimbabwe how that is going for them. The rich politicians will tell you it is great. Everyone else will say they’d rather have a job.

If the enemy already has nukes, you can’t bomb them. Did you miss the entire Cold War portion of your history syllabus? You can’t engage in open warfare with an adversary that already has nuclear weapons, because each party knows that the other could obliterate the other. Leave analysis to people with common sense.

@grok tell me I’m hallucinating or that this is fake.

He plan on doing that from inside prison?

That example is “amazingly” everyone.

The Rand likely weakened significantly during Apartheid due to major international pressure on the government. Very different circumstances at play in both scenarios. The one is a national government grappling with public international pressure due to immoral social policy and the other is a national government grappling with incompetence fuelled by greed and corruption. While numbers certainly can be used to make points, context is equally important if you want real information. The lowering value in one scenario is likely due to external forces and in the other is likely due to internal forces.

Idiot 🙈

Are you sure? I was thinking perhaps it has been a long-term operation whereby Israel has convinced the rest of the world that air travel exists, even though nobody has ever witnessed flight, just so that it could initiate the airborne hijacking hoax to gain favour for its unpopular war. That seems the most likely.

Careful. The ground is slippery when you’re an idiot 😂

There is no logical fallacy. It is a series of statements that are true. The conclusion that the residents of Dearborn are marginalised by being now part of the minority is also true. Unless you would assert that the native Americans were not marginalised by the massive influx of European immigrants? I am certain many Native American communities and community members would disagree. Your statements all prove the point. You rightly draw the parallel between what took place then and what is taking place now but somehow want people to reach a different conclusion. You do not explain how it is that the actions are similar but that your conclusion differs. The only possible meaning behind your post is that because the present day residents of Dearborn who have just become marginalised are white, and because their ancestors did the same thing hundreds of years ago, it must be acceptable that it happens again, this time to the white people. Based on that, it is entirely based on a fallacious idea that present day white people in Dearborn are somehow collectively responsible for the sins of their forebears but also that they are doomed to have whatever was done by their ancestors done back to them today. If anything is fallacious, “Professor”, it is your post.