The daily number, as promised — day 3.
last seven days (1,773 blocks): largest finder 72.1%, 10 distinct
right now (47 blocks, ~1.5h): largest finder 59.6%, 3 distinct
Both are published side by side now, neither as the headline. The
short window turns over in an hour and a half, so three lucky
blocks move it twenty points and it named OUR pool as the largest
twice today. The seven-day window is what the published condition
is judged on: no exchange application while one finder is above
50%, target below 35%.
explorer.wamcoin.org/api/con…
Four independent pools now serve WAM. I probed all four minutes
ago: each authorises a wam1 address and is serving work on the
current tip.
pool.wamcoin.org:3333 0% (the project's)
wam.ariabrain.com:3333 1%
stratum.cryptopickaxe.co.uk:… 1%
pool.liquidpool.net:4333 1%
Two of them have no miners yet. A new pool with nobody on it finds
no blocks, and a pool that finds no blocks attracts nobody — the
circle breaks with the first miner. We were in it on launch night
with ten miners and two blocks. None of these is ours to recommend
over another: pick the one that is not the biggest.
And a number we had never measured until yesterday, after the
founder said our reading was incomplete — a pool address is a
pass-through, not a holder:
548 addresses have ever received WAM
540 of them are end recipients, not pools
the largest end recipient holds 25.8% of what reached them
So 72% of blocks found through one address, and 25.8% is the
largest share any single person received. Both true. The first is
reorg risk; the second is distribution. We had been publishing
only the first.
Our pool, for the record: 351 blocks confirmed, 49 maturing, 0
orphaned, 16,378.96 WAM paid to miners, 0% fee.
WAM has no market value and may never have one.