Nerd/Techie Fighting A.I & $BTC FUD | $BTC ≠ Crypto | A.I. Super-User | Member: @TNorth | Contributor: @Roxom // @BitcoinForCorps | Data-Driven Analysis

This was a fantastic conversation with @chasepalmieri We talked about the @Strategy daily dividend announcement, $STRC buybacks, $SATA and market forces impacting price in both:
Was @Strategy Outsmarted? Daily Dividends & The Only Moat In Digital Credit Watch @_Adrian of @TNorth on RE:Bitcoin youtube 👇 $MSTR $STRC @Strive $ASST $SATA
2
5
72
6,688
DAILY DIVIDENDS ON DECK: A look at Strategy Digital Credit @Strategy preferred offerings are sitting at ~$4.70B of Trading Volume across $STRC, $STRD, $STRF and $STRK over the last 6 weeks. As of 09-18-2026, preferred trading activity has recovered, with a notable reduction in concentration around $STRC: EoW 08-14: ~$637.1M traded on ~6.89M shares [-25.0%] EoW 08-21: ~$796.0M traded on ~8.62M shares [+24.9%] EoW 08-28: ~$925.0M traded on ~9.77M shares [+16.2%] EoW 09-04: ~$889.7M traded on ~9.34M shares [-3.8%] EoW 09-11: ~$551.2M traded on ~5.71M shares [-38.0%] EoW 09-18: ~$899.2M traded on ~9.47M shares [+63.1%] Note: “EoW” - [End of Week] “WoW” - [Week Over Week] In the 9-16 pref market read, the main observations were 1] Reduced activity, 2] A return toward the summer lull, and 3] increasing concentration in $STRC. This week changes the read on the first two and reverses the direction of the third, although it does not yet resolve the question of sustained (organic) demand. Total preferred dollar volume increased [63.1%], while share volume increased [65.6%]. If we adjust for having a week with five full trading sessions versus four (due to Labor Day), average daily dollar volume still rose [30.5%] and share volume [32.5%] with all four preferreds participating in that increase. Against EoW September 4, total activity has largely returned to its pre-holiday levels, with dollar volume [1.1%] higher and share volume [1.4%] higher; a recovery from the preceding week’s contraction. A notable shift is the composition of activity, with $STRC trading ~$764.3M and its share of total preferred dollar volume falling from [90.9%] to [85.0%]. Unlike the previous week, $STRC concentration declined while its turnover actually increased. Even after adjusting for trading sessions, compared to 9-11, the combined totals for $STRD | $STRF | $STRK rose from ~$49.9M to ~$134.8M, and their average daily dollar volume increased [116.1%]. Trading activity is now more spread outside $STRC, although it still accounts for roughly $85 of every $100 traded across the Strategy Digital Credit Complex. Buybacks and Liquidity Over the September 14–20 period, Strategy spent $174.0M repurchasing 1,771,238 STRC shares with an implied average purchase price of *~$98.24. With a total of ~$764.3M traded on ~7.78M shares, buybacks represented [22.76%] of $STRC dollar volume | [22.75%] of share volume. Both participation rates declined from approximately [27.79%] in the preceding reporting period. To take a fair look at this, we should separate the weekly total from the daily pace; repurchase spend increased [24.9%], but there were five trading sessions versus four. Average spend per trading session was effectively flat at $34.825M for EoW 9-11 versus $34.80M for EoW 9-18. Meanwhile, the average daily volume for $STRC increased [22.0%] showing that turnover recovered while Strategy's average repurchase pace was essentially unchanged. Across the nine disclosed buyback periods, Strategy has now repurchased ~11.73M $STRC shares for approx. $1.125B, at an implied average cost of ~$95.87. Over the matched 7-20-26 to 9-18-26 trading window, $STRC recorded ~$5.87B traded on ~61.89M shares with repurchases representing [19.17%] of total dollar volume and [18.96%] of share volume. [As of 9-20-26, Strategy has $875.1M remaining under their Digital Credit Securities Repurchase Program.] On 9-18-26, $STRC closed at $98.51, [1.49%] below the $100 par level compared with $98.64 on Friday 9-11. More trading activity has not led to the offering trading at par (yet). Strategy’s preferred market is showing increased turnover, and the common stock has shown strong recovery in engagement, a meaningful improvement from last week's read; but there is not yet evidence of persistent demand across the entire capital stack. With the potential move to daily dividends that was announced today (9-25-26) {subject to shareholder approval} it will be interesting to see how the market responds and “front runs” the potential shift, if at all.
1
1
29
2,562
Daily Dividends are coming to $STRK | $STRF | $STRD | $STRC Many wanted them, well here they are:
Strategy is proposing daily dividends on $STRF, $STRC, $STRK, and $STRD, accruing every calendar day, including weekends and holidays, and paid the next business day, with economics unchanged. The proposed changes aim to support price stability, liquidity, and demand.
11
6
226
9,560
I think much of the conversation around $STRC | $SATA and dividend rate(s) is missing a critical point: Proximity to Bitcoin and the respective issuers is central to understanding why $STRC (and $SATA) carry the highest stated dividend rates among the five Digital Credit offerings. The rate is not simply SOFR plus a spread. Strategy’s own guidance says they review trading levels, market yields, credit spreads, $BTC price and volatility, USD Reserve coverage, capital market conditions, and capital structure together. The dividend rate(s) compensate holders, in part, for risk in the capital structure that flows from $BTC and the respective issuer. The path of $STRC moving that rate from 9% at launch to 12% (as of September 2026), in my view, reflects that risk premium being discovered in real time. In the case of $SATA, I view the higher dividend rate as partly reflecting a different issuer risk profile: a smaller issuer with a smaller $BTC balance sheet. The key is the coverage that $BTC provides relative to the issuer’s obligations, alongside its liquidity. The rate (and frequency) are product features; I see the higher rate as compensation for the additional risk holders are taking. An offering with a 12% stated dividend rate does not necessarily attract the same investor cohort as a bank-issued preferred like JPM-PC or WFC-PL. These Bitcoin-derivative perpetual preferreds naturally appeal to a different cohort; one native to (and familiar with) $BTC risk, yield-seeking, and, in some cases, leverage. Which, ironically, is what @PhongLe pointed to as a contributing factor in $STRC volatility: they did not expect that amount of leverage to build up. The product isn’t broken; it’s finding market | cohort fit driven by the TAM of its investor base as it scales alongside the $BTC on the balance sheet, not by dividend frequency or rate alone. Over the same 215 sessions through September 18, both offerings closed in the $95–$99.99 band most days, with $STRC spending more time at or above $95 than $SATA did: 78.1% versus 69.8%. $STRC also spent more time below $90 [14.4% versus 5.1%], and that detail matters. This is consistent with the product finding the market cohort willing to hold a BTC-deriviative | BTC-linked pref. I don’t read it as evidence of a failed offering.
15
2
56
6,166
$STRC | $SATA: Performance since inception
1
1
8
891
Bitcoin, the fondle, the diddle and the waddle… At the time of this chart, Bitcoin was about $740 above its May high of $82,818. However, a weekly close below that level on Sunday, September 27 (just in time for Monday's Bitcoin Treasuries Conference) might “invalidate” that breakout. $BTC briefly surged to ~$87.4K on September 23, the same day the 10-year Treasury yield rose 15 basis points, from 4.96% to 5.11%. I thought $BTC’s $87K fondle would lead to a $90K diddle. Instead, it might do what it always does: kick us in the balls and leave everyone walking with a waddle.
5
1
38
2,998
Looking forward to NYC and seeing many of the great minds in the space in person again. I'll be speaking on "Strategy's 10-Year Strategy" and sharing my thoughts on the future of $BTC | $MSTR.
BREAKING: The FULL agenda for the #Bitcoin Treasuries Conference is now live and locked in. ⚡️ Over 50 speakers ⚡️ Over 20 talks and panels ⚡️ Over 1,000,000 BTC on the balance sheet Sept. 28. New York City. 8am ET 🔥
3
2
45
5,842
I agree with some of the framing from @TimmerFidelity here, but to be fair, A.I. can be (is) a secular revolution and still be subject to financing cycles. The focus on valuation and capital absorption echoes earlier points that I and others have made; the companies funding this build-out are very profitable. Another point I want to raise is that vendor financing isn’t new, so the continued talk of “circular deals” doesn't prove this is a “bubble.” The real question is whether or not cash flows continue to sustain | justify the investment, and the scale of market activity is enormous: the 13-stock basket of A.I. equities I track recorded ~$121T in cumulative dollar trading volume from Jan. 2023 through Sept. 22, 2026. Which brings me to my next point: The risks I’m watching are 1] funding demands outrunning cash generation, 2] credit tightening, or 3] a market correction that unwinds leveraged positions. $121T invites significant leverage | derivative positioning; while a sharp correction doesn't invalidate the secular investment thesis or mean a bubble has popped, it would spook the market and send capital running to the exits. That said, I expect continued capital-markets access to bridge potential funding gaps in 1], and broader economic incentives to help mitigate 2]. That leaves 3] as my personal “wild card”: a sentiment shift leading to a positioning unwind that moves faster than the “fundamentals”.
As disturbing as the near-perfect price analog is between the semis today and the internet stocks 26 years ago (see below), the critical difference is that earnings were non-existent in 1999 and 2000 while they are booming today. So, at forward P/E of 20x, there is no valuation bubble as far as I can see. If the AI theme unravels at some point, my guess is that it will be because investors are choking on the firehose of capital raises as opposed to being deceived by earnings that don’t materialize.
1
2,100
Bull Market Confirmed? I don't know about that. But, is $BTC going to diddle $90K? - Yep, me thinks so.
Bull market: confirmed. Bitcoin closed above its 365-day moving average for the first time since March 2023 — the line that has called every bull market since 2019. Next resistance: $88K–$90K.
3
3
46
4,868
$BTC touched $87K and soon it'll fondle $90K (consensually of course).
25
3
201
5,763
$BTC | $MSTR: @Strategy is sitting at ~$94.46B in Trading Volume over the last 6 weeks. As of 09-18-2026, $MSTR is showing renewed engagement following the potential “cool-off” we discussed last week: EoW 08-14: ~$7.30B Traded on ~76.2M Shares [-9.1%] EoW 08-21: ~$19.48B Traded on ~180.1M Shares [+166.7%] EoW 08-28: ~$21.25B Traded on ~165.7M Shares [+9.1%] EoW 09-04: ~$17.92B Traded on ~133.8M Shares [-15.6%] EoW 09-11: ~$9.57B Traded on ~71.3M Shares [-46.6%] EoW 09-18: ~$18.94B Traded on ~137.3M Shares [+98.0%] Note: “EoW” - [End of Week] “WoW” - [Week Over Week] In last week's post, using the trading data from the week ending 9-11 as context; I noted that the market could be moving from a re-acceleration period into a justification period, where the market was testing whether August’s renewed engagement could hold. We now have a legitimate response to that question. After a shortened week due to Labor Day,  total dollar volume increased [98.0%] WoW, while share volume increased [92.7% WoW. Average daily dollar volume rose [58.4%] to ~$3.79B, while daily share volume rose [54.2%] to ~27.47M shares; a notable increase in the number of shares changing hands as opposed to higher prices simply lifting nominal dollar volume. If we compare these totals against the week ending 9-4-26 (the last full trading week) dollar volume was [5.7%] higher and share volume was [2.7%] higher. Trading activity has recovered beyond its pre-holiday level, but is below EoW August 28 by [10.9%] in dollar terms and [17.1%] in share terms. The trading activity was also somewhat concentrated last week: Friday 9-18 accounted for ~$8.15B traded on ~54.7M shares, representing [43.0%] of weekly dollar volume and [39.8%] of share volume. While this is entirely speculation, it's possible that the concentration we saw could be due to the fact that Friday was a Quadruple Witching options-expiration date with expiration related positioning exerting its effects. Additionally, because the market leverages Strategy to forward-price expectations on Bitcoin, the weekend surge we saw in Bitcoins price (rising from the Friday 9-18 close of around $80,875 to a Sunday close around $86,397) provides highly relevant context. The correlation between Bitcoin price and $MSTR price is well known, with recent interest in Strategy noticeably driven by Bitcoin's upward momentum. Should Bitcoin maintain this trend, the market could rapidly transition from a phase of justification into one of sustained acceleration and amplification.
1
27
2,977
You all know I'll never lie to you: 90K $BTC is in play.
5
7
169
3,151
When $BTC ⬆️ and $MSTR ⬆️ $STRC ⬆️ back to par. Bigger footprint, lower vol, slower to move. Leverage takes it down on an elevator, Capital Structure takes it back up with the stairs.
3
5
111
3,040
I've got a folder that's filled with screenshots of Bearish | FUD-ish takes on $MSTR that I can't wait to start sharing with you all.
47
12
592
9,402
Technical Analysis: $BTC Numba Go Up, Bears Are Cooked
7
3
78
2,518
$BTC | $MSTR | $STRC: Summary of Activities [1] Bought 1,771,238 shares of $STRC for $174M [2] Bought 950 $BTC for $75.7M [3] Used $57.4M of USD Reserve for Dividends | Debt [4] $875.1M left under the Digital Credit Securities Repurchase Program.
Strategy has acquired 950 $BTC and repurchased $174M of $STRC. As of 9/20/26, we hold 846,000 BTC and $6.09B of USD Assets. $MSTR strategy.com/press/strategy-…
1
5
66
4,185
$BTC: Oh hi there...
7
7
152
3,466
$MSTR: Hello and Good Morning to everyone, it's Dotday. The hallowed, and respected, Sunday tradition is back. @Strategy had ~$18.94B last week; an increase of 98% WoW. More than enough to buy a little more $BTC.
A little more orange.
4
11
350
13,499
6 Months later. The Iran War is still going and likely will last into 2027. If it goes into 2027, don't be shocked if it still has no real resolution into 2028. Oil prices won't be coming down any time soon.
5
1
27
2,644
I usually fade weekend price action on $BTC (low volume, etc) BUT there's a real push to get the corn through the $82K level. If that happens...
Looks like $BTC is doing a thing...
21
6
206
14,522