🚨 BREAKING : $META is rumored to be in partnership with $ICP. Is Facebook, Whatsapp, Instagram migrating to $ICP fully onchain ?

The fact I never did 4 years in the military with zero deployments and then received full disability for a bad back that I dont have will forever bother me damn.... Literally every vet I know lmao

What if the blockchain was the cloud? Internet Computer explained in under 3 minutes. 👇 $ICP

Hey @Grok, yes/no BEFORE Michael Jackson’s first child-abuse case even came up, was the accuser’s father SECRETLY RECORDED planning with a lawyer and child psychiatrist he hired to destroy Jackson’s career AND get as much money as possible? Were all three Jewish?

Jack Butcher is great at calling his projects art, making a boatload of cash, abandoning it, and doing it again. The launch mechanic is interesting, the art is whatever (if it wasn't Jack Butcher you wouldn't like it) merging we've seen before. In 6 months he'll do it again

This is the time in the cycle where rotators get REKT... Don't lose conviction in your bags and chase pumps! 🫡🔥📈

Wait until people realize multidex is both hype and and near put together and its just one app on the $ICP looool

Do the non $ICP believers realise that nearly half of the ICP total supply is staked for longer than 12 months? It literally cannot be sold this cycle. There is in effect, roughly 340m ICP available. Once canisters start burning more ICP than staking rewards, it's also deflationary. The supply shock is coming, and it's going to hit like a rocket. Open interest had ICP valued at $18 last month, that is, for many their first target. Most want to see $35, some want to see it reach its 3 figure potential. ICP holders are maxis, they know what they hold. Everyone fading now is going to fade at $10, $20 $30 and so on. Read the room.

This is too important to disappear under a long investigation, so here is the short version for everyone who did not want to read the full thing. For 5 days, I recorded almost every Solana token launch I could capture. The system collected 145,228 launches, roughly 29,000 new tokens per day. Then I stopped looking at the tokens and started following the wallets behind them. The first thing that stood out was concentration. Just 10 addresses created 8,895 tokens in 7 days. The largest created 1,621, roughly 1 launch every 6 minutes, around the clock. These are normal keypair wallets, not Pumpfun service addresses. One of them repeatedly creates a token and then sells its own token within seconds or minutes. The economics explain why this is possible. A launch requires roughly 0.0089 SOL of rent-funded account creation, around $1 at the observed price. Much of that rent can later be reclaimed when accounts are closed. In other words, producing another token is effectively close to free. Once the cost of manufacturing the asset approaches zero, the scarce resource is no longer capital. It is attention. Then it gets more interesting: I followed the funding layer behind one creator and found another wallet that had funded 22,258 token accounts, repeatedly with the exact same 0.00148844 SOL amount. In one transaction, it distributed the same token in the exact same quantity to 11 different wallets. It shows something important: holder counts can be manufactured mechanically and cheaply. The wallet had spent about 33 SOL just funding the accounts behind those distributions. I followed one of those recipient wallets further. Its recent activity consisted of DFlow swaps between roughly 0.0551 and 0.0567 SOL, repeating every few minutes with almost no variation. Based on the observed cadence, that single wallet would generate roughly 17 SOL of trading volume per day. Extrapolated across the 11 wallets from that distribution transaction, the observed rate would be around 190 SOL per day. That second figure is an estimate, not a measured daily total, but the transaction pattern itself is directly visible on-chain. So the structure I found looks like this: -Layer 1 creates the asset. -Layer 2 can manufacture the holder count. -Layer 3 can manufacture activity and volume. Those are 3 of the main signals retail traders routinely use to decide whether something looks alive, distributed and actively traded. And this is not just 1 wallet cluster. I checked 6 of the top 10 creator wallets. They were funded from different sources, including Binance, Bybit, OKX and unrelated wallets, with wallet ages ranging from 10 days to more than 1 year. I could not establish a common operator between them. That actually makes the finding more interesting: this appears less like 1 operation and more like a repeatable business model that multiple independent operators have discovered. One of those creator wallets was also receiving Axiom Rewards, meaning the generated trading activity can potentially create an additional revenue stream through trading-terminal incentives. The metadata has the same factory-like fingerprints. In the portion I had processed, usepaid-app appeared on 569 different tokens, elonmusk was claimed as the X handle by 73, and individual image files were reused across more than 50 tokens. Only 13.8% of the relevant metadata had been processed at that point, so those are minimum counts, not estimates. The trading results: Across hundreds of thousands of measured entry points, only 8.0% were profitable after 30 seconds, 8.7% after 60 seconds and 12.8% after 120 seconds. Average returns were negative at every one of those horizons. A realistic bonding-curve round trip cost about 2.47% through fees, spread and impact before the trader had even made a directional mistake. My ultra-fast test entered within 12 seconds of launch and exited within 30 seconds across 1,771 different tokens. It still averaged -2.41% per trade, with only 108 winners. The underlying directional edge was about +0.06%. The friction was about 40 times larger. There was even a trap inside my own data. The 5-minute survivors showed a positive average return, but only 16.5% of the original observations still had a measurable exit price at that point. The apparently bullish result was survivor bias. Most of the sample had already disappeared from the calculation. The chain already shows that tokens can be produced at industrial scale for almost nothing, holder counts can be engineered, trading activity can be automated, metadata can be recycled, and the average retail trader entering these launches is fighting brutal execution costs and terrible base rates.

$ICP soon. Things are happening.

internet-computer:native Would a $30 ICP retire you? If not, then you’re not ready for the bull run. Golden cross imminent. 10x incoming.

$SN80 is weaponizing the decentralized agility flywheel to scale Physical AI at a fraction of the cost. Crowdsourced compute, open-source compounding, and pure asymmetric growth upside. The asymmetric play on the future of VLA models is hiding in plain sight. $TAO @openroboto

$SN80 is weaponizing the decentralized agility flywheel to scale Physical AI at a fraction of the cost. Crowdsourced compute, open-source compounding, and pure asymmetric growth upside. The asymmetric play on the future of VLA models is hiding in plain sight. 🦾$TAO @openroboto

$tao to 10k easy

All the "I sold my $tao" or " $tao is shitcoin" fud has me so bullish lol

Can everyone on CT just stay quiet until we are back at ATH?

Gaethje KOs Arman.

We have every other cat over $1m.. $Hype smashing ATH Hype Cat $HCAT figJo35WcGVdj76aEcEKmTuwd8w6TjX4C9QajUw7WRJ Idk why they thought they could send 'Hyper' cat? This is the name

Hold doggo, earn $NEAR $Nearinu Ht31P6kwiq7X1fEHMDTk9uuRTveuJ1koz4gXKXwQYUEx