Pinned Tweet
Spam becomes a very different problem when sending unwanted messages has an actual cost attached to it. That idea is built into Liberdus through message tolls. Instead of relying entirely on filters after abuse happens, the network introduces an economic barrier before someone can freely flood another user’s inbox. It changes the incentive structure. For a legitimate conversation, a small toll isn’t necessarily a major obstacle. But for someone trying to send thousands of unsolicited messages, repeatedly paying to reach strangers becomes far less attractive. I find this approach interesting because it treats spam as an economic problem, not only a moderation problem. The goal isn’t simply to identify bad messages after they arrive. It’s to make large scale abuse expensive enough that the incentive starts working against the attacker. Checkout @liberdus today
6
9
84
RISK retweeted
The scary part isn’t just the recording. It’s what happens afterward. Someone can capture a private moment without consent, upload it, and suddenly thousands or millions of people have access to something the person never agreed to share. That same loss of control is worth thinking about with digital communication too. If a platform requires your real world identity and keeps large amounts of personal information tied to your account, there’s more data that can potentially be exposed, misused or linked back to you. Liberdus takes the opposite approach…you can communicate through a username without attaching a phone number, email or KYC, while messages are encrypted and the network uses decentralized infrastructure. The goal is to give people more control over what connects their identity to their conversations.
Meta glasses are being used for covert harassment and group stalking. Women and girls are being secretly filmed in streets, schools, restaurants and on dates, then uploaded for millions of strangers. Police inquiries now span worldwide. #OpDeathEaters yacnews.com/meta-glasses-use…
6
6
58
RISK retweeted
The worrying part of mass surveillance isn’t only what authorities can see today. It’s the possibility of having enough information to map people’s relationships, movements and conversations before anything even happens. That’s why I think privacy should be built into communication instead of depending entirely on whoever operates the platform. Liberdus takes a different route by using username based accounts without requiring a phone number, email or KYC, alongside encrypted messaging and decentralized infrastructure. You’re not just handing over a complete identity profile and hoping it stays protected. The system is designed to reduce how much personal information is attached to you in the first place.
Bill Burr on Mass Surveillance: "They have this level of surveillance on us, not because of what we're doing, but because of what they are about to do. And they know the reaction that's going to happen. They've never had an army big enough to stop a revolution, but if you know what everybody's talking about and where they are at all times, you can just put out all these little fires."
6
6
62
Taking the camera away helps, but a microphone connected to an AI system still raises some serious privacy questions. You may not be recording what people look like, but conversations and surroundings can still reveal a lot. That’s why I think privacy has to be considered from the ground up, not just through one feature. Liberdus takes that approach by avoiding phone numbers, emails and KYC for accounts, while using encrypted communication and decentralized infrastructure. For people who care about keeping their identity and conversations separate, that design choice matters. Less personal information collected in the first place means less sitting around waiting to be exposed.
Meta just unveiled smart glasses without cameras, after growing privacy concerns around its AI glasses. No camera means no photos or video recording. But the glasses still have microphones and Meta AI. So the privacy question doesn’t disappear. It just changes. Would you trust AI glasses that can listen, but can’t see? KSL/Reuters: ksl.com/article/51627508/met… Official announcement: about.fb.com/news/2026/09/in… #Privacy #Meta #AI
5
5
65
RISK retweeted
This is the part people don’t think about. You don’t have to install some shady spyware for your location to become valuable data. If ordinary apps and ad networks are quietly collecting location signals, something as simple as checking the weather can contribute to a profile of where you go. That’s why I like Liberdus taking a different approach to personal data. Your account doesn’t need to be built around a phone number, email or KYC, and communication is encrypted and decentralized. The less personal information you hand over in the first place, the less there is sitting around to be collected, sold or exposed. Checkout @liberdus today
A surveillance system called Webloc harvests location data from ordinary ad requests, your weather app, your flashlight app, to track up to 500 million phones. Buyers include ICE and the U.S. military. You never installed spyware. You just checked the forecast.
6
6
70
RISK retweeted
The problem with mass KYC isn’t just the information you give up, but the huge databases created from collecting it. Once that information is leaked, you can’t simply change your identity. That’s why I like the approach Liberdus is taking. You can use a username instead of tying your account to a phone number, email or KYC, while still getting encrypted communication and decentralized infrastructure. Privacy should start with collecting less personal information in the first place.
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce calls to end mass KYC data collection, warning it puts crypto holders at risk of phishing and physical attacks. Pierce says the current KYC/AML system creates massive databases of sensitive information that can be hacked, leaked, or exploited. She's pushing for zero-knowledge proofs (ZK proofs) that could verify users meet regulatory requirements without exposing their personal information.
6
6
63
RISK retweeted
Let’s Make Solana Great Again
6
11
83
RISK retweeted
Adding more users to a messaging network shouldn’t automatically mean adding more bottlenecks. That’s one reason the Shardus architecture behind Liberdus is interesting to follow. Traditional distributed systems can struggle when every participant has to process or replicate the same workload. Sharding takes a different route by dividing network activity across portions of the system. @liberdus uses Shardus to support parallel transaction processing, allowing different parts of the workload to be handled simultaneously. The important idea here is capacity. As validator participation increases, the architecture is designed so network capacity can grow with it rather than forcing every node to handle everything. For a decentralized messaging and payment network, that matters beyond raw transaction speed. If adoption grows substantially, infrastructure has to grow alongside demand without making participation practical only for increasingly powerful hardware.
6
10
93
RISK retweeted
Stay humble. Nobody knows tomorrow
2
2
6
78
RISK retweeted
Interested in running a Liberdus validator? We’re starting to gauge interest from people who want to help power the Liberdus network by running retail validators. Whether you’re an experienced node operator or interested in running your first validator, we want to hear from you. Fill out our short Validator Pre-Interest Form below to keep up to date with the Liberdus node operator opportunities in the near future. Help us build a network powered by its community! docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F…
12
12
22
1,691
RISK retweeted
Liberdus is opening up interest for people who want to run retail validators and become part of the infrastructure powering the network. You don’t have to already be a professional node operator either. They’re also looking for people interested in running their first validator, which makes this a chance for more community members to get involved on the infrastructure side. If you’ve been looking for a way to contribute to Liberdus beyond using the network, this is one worth paying attention to. Fill out the Validator Pre-Interest Form and stay updated on the upcoming validator opportunities. The more independent community members help power the network, the more decentralized its infrastructure can become. Fill the interest form here: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F…
Interested in running a Liberdus validator? We’re starting to gauge interest from people who want to help power the Liberdus network by running retail validators. Whether you’re an experienced node operator or interested in running your first validator, we want to hear from you. Fill out our short Validator Pre-Interest Form below to keep up to date with the Liberdus node operator opportunities in the near future. Help us build a network powered by its community! docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F…
6
9
109
RISK retweeted
Wassup, LIBERtarians! Some quick facts about Liberdus for the new amongst us: 1. No phone number, email or KYC required 2. Messaging and payments in one app 3. Quantum-resistant + classical encryption 4. Decentralized and open source 5. Run your own node 6. Tolls help fight spam and monetize attention 7. LIB has a fixed maximum supply of 210 million 8. Built to scale horizontally as the network grows Basically, our ethos is: your messages, your money, your network. Try us out if you still haven't: liberdus.com/test/ 😉
9
6
18
781