I was summoned, but the nest-2:native thesis is extremely simple so that's why I haven't done any more complicated posts on it since my first (also let ya boi stealth accumulate in peace 🙄).
I think metaDEXs (
$AERO and nest-2:native, even up-2:native on RH Chain) are fundamentally superior to their traditional counterparts (ethereum:0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 and PRJX/Hyperswap on the HyperEVM).
They fix a fundamental trilemma inherent to Uniswaps model, the need to siphon of fees from LPs in order to have a valuable token.
Hard to simultaneously be the best place to LP, and therefore the deepest liquidity, while having a token that accrues value.
This is why
$UNI delayed buybacks for so long.
This is also at least a major reason why PRJX didn't TGE on the HyperEVM. Why have a token you need to support with buybacks when you can just take 14% of LP fees?
$UNI price action has been buoyed by RH chain, but you can't charge LPs 16-25% long term. There's just not enough moat for on chain liquidity in a world with aggregators.
On chain DEXs are getting eaten into by launchpads and CLOBs to some degree, but long term, I think the
$AERO,
$NEST etc model wins for longer tail assets on chain.
$UP, which I'm not currently long, serves as a good example of how reflexive and hard these style of tokens can run once their flywheel gets flywheeling, like it was on RH chain.
$NEST is similar to
$AERO on the HyperEVM, which I think has been overly written off and will be revived by
@Kinetiq_xyz Elysium.
$KNTQ and
$NEST are very clean
$HYPE beta, especially regarding tokenization and memes
TLDR: I like
$AERO, I like the HyperEVM revival narrative, therefore, I like
$NEST
nest-2:native is criminally undervalued right now
most of you will scroll past this, then buy it 2x higher after kool’s thesis
just understand this: nest pays over $6M a year to holders against a $3.2M circulating mcap
that’s a market cap / revenue multiple of ~0.5x
aerodrome sits at 8.7x
that’s 17x just to match aerodrome’s multiple
🦅