"THE ROTHSCHILDS WERE SABBATEAN FRANKISTS"
@ProfessorJiang_ @NickJFuentes
jews were expelled from various places 602 times before the rise of the Sabbatean jews in 1665, and then they were expelled 77 more times before the Frankist jews arose in 1755. If the "Sabbatean-Frankists" are the problem, how do you account for those 679 prior expulsions?
And if you say "tHe KhAzAriAns!", then how do you account for the 181 jewish expulsions before the alleged (and discredited) Khazarian conversion ca. AD 800?
The fact is, there have been hundreds, maybe thousands of jewish movements throughout history—some more prominent than others—and one constant is that they tend to be subversive & antagonistic to their gentile neighbors & host countries. The Sabbatean and Frankist movements fit comfortably within this milieu.
In our time we've had to deal with anarchism, globalism, Bolshevism, the jewish Bund, zionism, modern Leftism (a la Batya Ungar-Sargon), feminism, "Epstein-ism", the "Open Society", Kahanism, ANTIFA, Chabad, Reform judaism, etc, and many more. We needn't list them all.
The attempts to isolate problematic jewish behavior to 2 particular jewish movements in the 17th & 18th centuries—and then to recontextualize them as not jewish & outside of world jewry—is ignorant & wrong and therefore subversive.
Whether the Rothschilds were SFs is beside the point & doesn't even matter anyway. They identify as jews. They act as part of the jewish collective on behalf of jewish interests. World jewry accepts them as jews.
As Nick said here: They are ethnic jews practicing the jewish religion.